C7 General Discussion General C7 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

I hope the C7Z isn't turdboed

Old 09-07-2013, 05:03 AM
  #1  
LEE427
V10LEE
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
LEE427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Central Coast Cali
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default I hope the C7Z isn't turdboed

Seeing a couple of rumors about the next Z turboed sucks.Man I hope they keep it naturally aspirated..
Old 09-07-2013, 05:16 AM
  #2  
jkcam6017
Burning Brakes
 
jkcam6017's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,106
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you think is the downside to the new generation of turbo motors?
Old 09-07-2013, 05:40 AM
  #3  
Supermassive
Melting Slicks
 
Supermassive's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2013
Location: Argyle, Texas
Posts: 2,257
Received 793 Likes on 307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LEE427
Seeing a couple of rumors about the next Z turboed sucks.Man I hope they keep it naturally aspirated..
You can only get so much power from an N/A motor before it becomes impractical to make due to reliability and cost of parts. Forced Induction is safer, cheaper, and more practical than sticking with the old "no replacement for displacement" argument.

Originally Posted by jkcam6017
What do you think is the downside to the new generation of turbo motors?
Weight and heat are the big issues with turbo systems. I personally think a twin turbo setup on the LT1 platform will be the best route...especially since they can still run displacement on demand with a turbo, whereas a supercharger would likely cause issues.

Some upsides to turbo systems is that you can mount the turbo's low in the chassis, so the added weight is closer to or below the car's center of gravity. There are also some turbo systems that are rear mounted on front engine cars...although they tend to have quite noticeable lag so the best mounting location is right by the exhaust ports on the head for reduced lag.

Current turbo cars have little to no noticeable lag so the old wives tales of monster lag are just that. There are also ceramic coatings that should be used on the hot side housings that reduce radiant heat to help manage underhood heat, and like my current turbo setup in my FR-S you can use thermal blankets made of kevlar and other insulators to further reduce that heat.

Of course there is the complexity of a turbo system that can be a drawback, but it's actually a pretty simple to understand system once you get your hands into one.
Old 09-07-2013, 05:59 AM
  #4  
gthal
Safety Car
 
gthal's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,937
Received 1,170 Likes on 486 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jkcam6017
What do you think is the downside to the new generation of turbo motors?
Heat and lag. For daily driving, turbos are great. If someone tracks their cars, heat becomes a battle and lag exists. Turbo lag is hugely reduced but it is still there compared to a well sorted NA engine.

That doesn't mean a turbo is bad. I personally don't like them. A supercharger is a better option IMO if a NA engine can't get it done alone.
Old 09-07-2013, 07:17 AM
  #5  
JerriVette
Race Director
 
JerriVette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Bergen county NJ
Posts: 15,819
Received 3,946 Likes on 2,176 Posts

Default

The light boost on a gen 5 v8 will along with packaging advantages have supercharged 6.2 liter engines being the order of the day for higher performance level production corvettes..


Probably have production not in Wixom but rather Bowling Green as discussed in the latest video of Mark Reuss and the motor trend round table discussion video (WOT)..

I'm sure the c7 z06 will be insanely fast and track worthy beyond most drivers capabilities.....

I wouldn't worry about heat or weight ....

This is not some "tuner" package....this is GM engineering and they don't mess around and do anything except deliver excellence in execution...

GM engineering is insane with their level of perfection in implementation of high performance...

The cost of materials will go up exponentially for sure ..but if you want to play....you have to pay....

I don't see me dropping the extra 30 grand or almost double over the standard z51 stingray but I will enjoy the testing etc...and for those who do buy them......they will have the best of the best ..
Old 09-07-2013, 07:20 AM
  #6  
1Sikstik
Burning Brakes
 
1Sikstik's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 846
Received 249 Likes on 124 Posts
2023 C7 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C6 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified

Default

No turbo, it will be supercharged with awd!
Old 09-07-2013, 08:14 AM
  #7  
VRYALT3R3D
Drifting
 
VRYALT3R3D's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,695
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

Originally Posted by jkcam6017
What do you think is the downside to the new generation of turbo motors?
Heatsoak
Old 09-07-2013, 08:56 AM
  #8  
7thgeneration
Burning Brakes
 
7thgeneration's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,226
Received 80 Likes on 46 Posts

Default

Turbos suck. They never last and will need to be replaced. Needless expense and complexity in my opinion. I also prefer a NA engine myself and would not buy a turbo.
Old 09-07-2013, 09:19 AM
  #9  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

I have owned a few turbo cars over the past 30 years, and until about 18 months ago I too was not a really big fan of them for a performance car. But I bought a 2012 BMW 550 with 400 hp/450 lb ft of torque from a twin turbo V8. I also recently drove a friends 2014 Audi S8. They will change your thinking about turbo lag. I still have a love of strong N/A engines as in the Z06 I had. But I would have no problem with a twin turbo Corvette if the engine is as well sorted as the Germans have them. I think the new Cadillac CTS turbo will be a good indicator of GM's turbo capabilities.
Old 09-07-2013, 09:24 AM
  #10  
Glenmcp
Melting Slicks

Support Corvetteforum!
 
Glenmcp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2013
Location: Central Gulf Coast Florida
Posts: 2,483
Received 574 Likes on 328 Posts

Default

Turbos seem to have more problems than superchargers.
Old 09-07-2013, 01:19 PM
  #11  
JustinStrife
Team Owner
 
JustinStrife's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 27,567
Received 96 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

I'll take turbos anyday over superchargers. Especially over pd blowers.
Old 09-07-2013, 02:13 PM
  #12  
ChucksZ06
Drifting
 
ChucksZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,356
Received 55 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

No turbo, it will be supercharged with awd!
And it will weigh 3900 lbs, get crappy mileage and finally beat the Nissan around a racetrack.
Old 09-07-2013, 02:24 PM
  #13  
C7pimp
Drifting
 
C7pimp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,747
Received 768 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

We already know a forced induction corvette is coming. It's completely guaranteed. Whether it's a Z06 type engine or a ZR1 level engine is yet to be seen but we already know for 100% fact that we will see a blown application.
Old 09-07-2013, 02:39 PM
  #14  
c7luvr
Racer
 
c7luvr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2013
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChucksZ06
And it will weigh 3900 lbs, get crappy mileage and finally beat the Nissan around a racetrack.
Doesn't the Z07 currently hold a faster lap time than the GTR at Laguna Seca?
Old 09-07-2013, 03:56 PM
  #15  
Never-Enough
Le Mans Master
 
Never-Enough's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Chester County PA
Posts: 7,579
Received 82 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

I would LOVE to see a turbo on it.
Old 09-07-2013, 03:59 PM
  #16  
jschindler
Team Owner
 
jschindler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 26,715
Received 341 Likes on 166 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Glenmcp
Turbos seem to have more problems than superchargers.
Examples?
Old 09-07-2013, 04:58 PM
  #17  
C7pimp
Drifting
 
C7pimp's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,747
Received 768 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VRYALT3R3D
Heatsoak
Because superchargers never have that problem.

Get notified of new replies

To I hope the C7Z isn't turdboed

Old 09-07-2013, 05:07 PM
  #18  
tuxnharley
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
tuxnharley's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 13,953
Received 1,937 Likes on 1,183 Posts

Default

Hmm, let's see.............

- ZR1 was S/C
- Keel's CAD pictures (which proved to be accurate on everything else) showed a S/C set up

So, C7 hipo version, whatever its called......................?
Old 09-07-2013, 05:11 PM
  #19  
LEE427
V10LEE
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
LEE427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Central Coast Cali
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gthal
Heat and lag. For daily driving, turbos are great. If someone tracks their cars, heat becomes a battle and lag exists. Turbo lag is hugely reduced but it is still there compared to a well sorted NA engine.

.
Yes I do a lot of track days and love NA power only..
Old 09-07-2013, 05:15 PM
  #20  
Stingray23
Le Mans Master
 
Stingray23's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 8,580
Received 595 Likes on 220 Posts

Default

I want NA too.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: I hope the C7Z isn't turdboed



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.