Car and Driver Test C7 vs 911
#1
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Car and Driver Test C7 vs 911
Has anybody read this test yet?
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...le-of-contents
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...le-of-contents
#2
Supposedly the Corvette won by a few points.
#3
Race Director
Cool thanks!
#5
Le Mans Master
"Not everyone can drive a pre-stability-control 911 to its limit, and that is the whole point. The 911 wants to teach us something about ourselves every time we drive it. That's the "why.""
I never understand statements like this. So they want a car that is hard to drive at the limits? Masochism is still alive.
Michael
I never understand statements like this. So they want a car that is hard to drive at the limits? Masochism is still alive.
Michael
#6
"Not everyone can drive a pre-stability-control 911 to its limit, and that is the whole point. The 911 wants to teach us something about ourselves every time we drive it. That's the "why.""
I never understand statements like this. So they want a car that is hard to drive at the limits? Masochism is still alive.
Michael
I never understand statements like this. So they want a car that is hard to drive at the limits? Masochism is still alive.
Michael
#7
Banned Scam/Spammer
Nice to know that current technology can significantly improve something that is inherently dysfunctional when used aggressively. A turd can be polished in the 21st century.
#8
Burning Brakes
Well I downloaded the .pdf and read it - very interesting. The whole issue is devoted to the 911's 50th anniversary, but the Corvette pooped in the punch bowl. They tested a clapped out, pre-production Stingray with worn tires, but it was still faster than the brand new, full-zoot 911S with PDK by 2.1 seconds at Willow Springs. It was not even close on the track.
The Stingray won the comparo by 5 points, (although 20 were for price). The 911S was not really superior anywhere on the objective measures - it only scored points on the subjective parameters, but one subjective opinion that will really hurt Porsche fans is steering feel - the Stingray was rated as BETTER. Who would have predicted that ??
Altogether the Stingray is every bit as good as the Porsche on the road, and much better on the track. I don't think Chevy could have asked for any better reviews for this car - it really puts the Corvette in a new league.
The Stingray won the comparo by 5 points, (although 20 were for price). The 911S was not really superior anywhere on the objective measures - it only scored points on the subjective parameters, but one subjective opinion that will really hurt Porsche fans is steering feel - the Stingray was rated as BETTER. Who would have predicted that ??
Altogether the Stingray is every bit as good as the Porsche on the road, and much better on the track. I don't think Chevy could have asked for any better reviews for this car - it really puts the Corvette in a new league.
#9
STINGRAY vs. 911 CARRERA S
Corvette: 7 speed stick
911 S: 7 speed PDK
Corvette vs. 911 S:
0-60: 4.0 vs. 4.0
0-100: 9.2 vs. 9.3
0-150: 23.2 vs. 22.8
1/4 mile: 12.5 @ 116 vs. 12.4 @ 116
Braking 70-0: 142 vs. 147
Overall Points: 207 vs. 202
1.6 mile Streets of Willow track: The Corvette is 2.1 seconds quicker than the 911 S. That is a massive difference.
In the "as tested price" category, the Corvette received 20 points (max), while the Porsche received 1. In the "rear seat space" category, the Corvette received zero (obviously), and the Porsche received 5 (max).
If you take those two categories out, the score is 187 vs. 196. However, and I quote directly from the article, "before you start howling that the Corvette won solely on price, notice that in the stuff that matters to sports car buyers, chassis and powertrain, the Porsche holds a single point lead. Is such a minute edge worth $50,000? $80,000? The Corvette does not win on Dollars. It wins on sense".
911 S: 7 speed PDK
Corvette vs. 911 S:
0-60: 4.0 vs. 4.0
0-100: 9.2 vs. 9.3
0-150: 23.2 vs. 22.8
1/4 mile: 12.5 @ 116 vs. 12.4 @ 116
Braking 70-0: 142 vs. 147
Overall Points: 207 vs. 202
1.6 mile Streets of Willow track: The Corvette is 2.1 seconds quicker than the 911 S. That is a massive difference.
In the "as tested price" category, the Corvette received 20 points (max), while the Porsche received 1. In the "rear seat space" category, the Corvette received zero (obviously), and the Porsche received 5 (max).
If you take those two categories out, the score is 187 vs. 196. However, and I quote directly from the article, "before you start howling that the Corvette won solely on price, notice that in the stuff that matters to sports car buyers, chassis and powertrain, the Porsche holds a single point lead. Is such a minute edge worth $50,000? $80,000? The Corvette does not win on Dollars. It wins on sense".
Last edited by MKDFW; 10-07-2013 at 10:33 PM.
#11
Team Owner
Corvette: 7 speed stick
911 S: 7 speed PDK
Corvette vs. 911 S:
0-60: 4.0 vs. 4.0
0-100: 9.2 vs. 9.3
0-150: 23.2 vs. 22.8
1/4 mile: 12.5 @ 116 vs. 12.4 @ 116
Braking 70-0: 142 vs. 147
Overall Points: 207 vs. 202
1.6 mile Streets of Willow track: The Corvette is 2.1 seconds quicker than the 911 S. That is a massive difference.
In the "as tested price" category, the Corvette received 20 points (max), while the Porsche received 1. In the "rear seat space" category, the Corvette received zero (obviously), and the Porsche received 5 (max).
If you take those two categories out, the score is 187 vs. 196. However, and I quote directly from the article, "before you start howling that the Corvette won solely on price, notice that in the stuff that matters to sports car buyers, chassis and powertrain, the Porsche holds a single point lead. Is such a minute edge worth $50,000? $80,000? The Corvette does not win on Dollars. It wins on sense".
911 S: 7 speed PDK
Corvette vs. 911 S:
0-60: 4.0 vs. 4.0
0-100: 9.2 vs. 9.3
0-150: 23.2 vs. 22.8
1/4 mile: 12.5 @ 116 vs. 12.4 @ 116
Braking 70-0: 142 vs. 147
Overall Points: 207 vs. 202
1.6 mile Streets of Willow track: The Corvette is 2.1 seconds quicker than the 911 S. That is a massive difference.
In the "as tested price" category, the Corvette received 20 points (max), while the Porsche received 1. In the "rear seat space" category, the Corvette received zero (obviously), and the Porsche received 5 (max).
If you take those two categories out, the score is 187 vs. 196. However, and I quote directly from the article, "before you start howling that the Corvette won solely on price, notice that in the stuff that matters to sports car buyers, chassis and powertrain, the Porsche holds a single point lead. Is such a minute edge worth $50,000? $80,000? The Corvette does not win on Dollars. It wins on sense".
#12
Another mid 12 second 1/4 mile time. This is LS3 territory. Someone posted a 12.4 116 earlier today. Why aren't they faster? No disrespect intended, I genuinely want to know. The LT1 shows big hp and tq gains on the dyno. Higher curb weight + green engine + M7?
#14
The curb weight quoted is 3460 LBS vs. 3297 for the 911 S.
#15
Safety Car
Member Since: Feb 2002
Location: GA (some days)
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#16
Melting Slicks
I don't think they would have gotten all this positive media attention if the car would have had an 11 second quarter mile and a 3.5 second 0-60 time......but come up short to its competitors on road courses....
#18
Team Owner
I agree those help in the 0-xxx runs. But I expected more trap speed and better 0-100 on the Corvette. I think they got a slow run on the C7. The 911 numbers are pretty consistent with most other test on the car. I don't buy that the C7 is that slow except in very poor conditions. A LS3 is quite a bit faster than their times in trap speed and 0-100.
#19
Yes I realize there is more to a great sports car then 1/4 mile times, I am just curious about why recent tests don't even show it meeting GM's stated times.
#20
Le Mans Master
I agree those help in the 0-xxx runs. But I expected more trap speed and better 0-100 on the Corvette. I think they got a slow run on the C7. The 911 numbers are pretty consistent with most other test on the car. I don't buy that the C7 is that slow except in very poor conditions. A LS3 is quite a bit faster than their times in trap speed and 0-100.