Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why run 17/17?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2008, 01:34 AM
  #1  
ericstanley
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ericstanley's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Lutz FL
Posts: 926
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts

Default Why run 17/17?

I've seen a few track set-ups (mostly a/x) that were 17/17 instead of 18/17 or even 18/18.

Besides the possible weight reduction, what other benefit is there?
Old 05-07-2008, 01:58 AM
  #2  
dbratten
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
dbratten's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Turlock CA
Posts: 1,745
Received 35 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ericstanley
I've seen a few track set-ups (mostly a/x) that were 17/17 instead of 18/17 or even 18/18.

Besides the possible weight reduction, what other benefit is there?
Availability of tires -- especially nearly new used ones -- at a great cost.

I get Kumho 710 315's and 335's from other racers anywhere from $60-125 each. They're on 17x11" ZR1-GS copies that were also cheap at $130 each delivered from Tomz.

--Dan
Old 05-07-2008, 02:22 AM
  #3  
ericstanley
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ericstanley's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Lutz FL
Posts: 926
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

So it's not a performance thing, it's a cost thing?

That makes sense... something I'm not entirely used to on CF...
Old 05-07-2008, 06:30 AM
  #4  
Lancer033
Le Mans Master
 
Lancer033's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2002
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

wheels need to be just big enough to fit over the brakes, so if you don't need 18" rotors you don't need 18" wheels - extra weight

tires are cheaper and if you can afford to lose a few tenths, buy scrubs and save a whole lot more. my last set cost $300 shipped.
Old 05-07-2008, 07:52 AM
  #5  
davidfarmer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
davidfarmer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: CONCORD NC
Posts: 12,005
Received 712 Likes on 493 Posts

Default

I agree with above, BUT when the C5 started racing in T1 in 98-99-2000, the only tires available were 17". I think so many sets of wheels/tires flooded the market, that it just became the norm. I personally run 18" wheels/tires now, and there are plenty of scrubs available (ALL pro series have been running 18's for nearly a decade).

18" rims likely do increase the moment-of-inertia slightly, but I don't honestly consider it a performance issue one way or the other.
Old 05-07-2008, 08:08 AM
  #6  
John Shiels
Team Owner
 
John Shiels's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 1999
Location: Buy USA products! Check the label! Employ Americans
Posts: 50,808
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

17 may make your finale gearing slightly lower because of small diameter but 18's work best.
Old 05-07-2008, 09:13 AM
  #7  
yakisoba
Drifting
 
yakisoba's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,375
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Weight wasa consideration to me. Also, I was thinking of doing T-1 when I bought wheels, and at the time, those guys were running 17x10 in front and 17x11 in back, generally on racing wheels. Well, the GS wheels are about that (9.5" wide in front, rather than 10") so are pretty close. I figured, if those folks were happy with it, it would be OK for me. The T-1 guys ran either 315 tires all round or 295mm front, 315 rear. I ended up on the latter combination, because it feels better and doesn't warp the sidewalls on my slightly smaller front rims.

That said, NASA rules for TTA dictate that I run a certain size of tire (305mm) in Toyo RA-1 in order to stay within the limits of the class and my car. Those come most commonly in 18", so I got a set of 18s. They also work fine, though I note different braking response and some other minor differences. They have the added bonus that I can swap any wheel to any corner.

The other configuration is to run 17x11 wheels on all four corners. This also allows you to swap to any corner, and allows 315mm tires on all four corners, which is very grippy. I'd think about that configuration for autocross and road courses where I needed massive front grip.
Old 05-07-2008, 09:43 AM
  #8  
ltborg
Drifting
 
ltborg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: San Angelo TX
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

+1 for cheaper/more available tires and wheels

ive heard some people say that the 17s are a little more forgiving with the slightly larger sidewall.

some of the advice i got from several people when i was looking at what tires/wheels to get was that with modern tires, the differences are pretty small between the two sizes so unless you are an excellent driver looking for the last tenth or two, its probably a wash. i could be wrong on this and havent done any real testing but thats what i got from the majority of the drivers i asked.
Old 05-07-2008, 10:14 AM
  #9  
Diesel68
Instructor
 
Diesel68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Posts: 151
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have used 18 and 17 for the rear, and I found better traction with 17. It doesn't hurt that prices for 17 are also generally lower.
Old 05-07-2008, 01:31 PM
  #10  
throwit
Drifting
 
throwit's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I agree that 17s are less $$ tires...but I would not go out and invest in a set of 17" wheels (if you dont have them already). Their may be a slight weight savings in the wheel weight (assuming you bought lightweight 17s), but I would think that the larger sidewall tire would negate that.

17s cost just as much as 18" wheels, and do not provide the clearance needed for bigger calipers if/when you decide to do it. Also, a larger sidewall tire (i.e. 35 aspect), while great for rear traction, does not turn as quickly or as crisp as a smaller sidewall tire does (i.e. 30 aspect), and therefore is not an ideal size for up front.

With tires/wheels/brakes only getting bigger I would go with 18s all around, as a safe bet.

FWIW - Popp used to run the 17 rear/18 front combo (which may infact be the ideal setup), but has since switched to 18s all around.
Old 05-07-2008, 02:29 PM
  #11  
ericstanley
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
ericstanley's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Lutz FL
Posts: 926
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I don't intend to change anytime soon. I was mostly curious as to why others do it.

Thanks for the info. It all makes sense.

Eric
Old 05-07-2008, 03:27 PM
  #12  
John Shiels
Team Owner
 
John Shiels's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 1999
Location: Buy USA products! Check the label! Employ Americans
Posts: 50,808
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

big 18" tires are easier to drive than say my 275 315 x 17's. Little faster but the 17's leave me on edge all the time when pushed hard so it is way more nerve racking keeping things straight..

Get notified of new replies

To Why run 17/17?




Quick Reply: Why run 17/17?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 PM.