Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

same pad compound front and rear or one step down in the rear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2008, 08:25 PM
  #1  
Z06Fix
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Z06Fix's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: TN
Posts: 1,374
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default same pad compound front and rear or one step down in the rear

I know this has been talked about before, but I can't seem to find any good threads about it. I'm needing to order track pads here in a couple of weeks. Right now I'm running Carbotech AX6's for autox and street driving. I love the pads. Great initial bite and seem to hold up well for my needs. I run them on the front and rear. Now I'm looking at running the XP10's for track use. The question is should I run them on the front and rear? Or run the XP10's on the front and XP8's on the back. I know alot of guys are running the 8's all the way around and love the setup. I wanting a touch more bite than they offer. I look at the threads about the Wilwoods and most are running the H's on front and rear. Why do most run a step down in the back when running Carbos?

Thanks guys.

Eric
Old 05-16-2008, 12:09 AM
  #2  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,096
Received 8,929 Likes on 5,333 Posts

Default

I have done that with PFC and Wilwood pads. I ran 01s in front and 99s in the rear. After a going through a few sets of these I started using 01s front and rear and really didn't notice any difference. This was on an 03Z. I do know that when I went to Wilwoods that I could reduce the chances of the rear rotors cracking through by using H pads in the front and E pads in the rear. However, I did notice a difference in braking when I ran this combo Vs H's front and rear. When you go to the Wilwood web page you can see there is a drastic difference in the capabilities of the two pads. There may not be that much difference between 01 and 99 pads. Same may be true for the two Carbotech pads you mentioned.

Bill
Old 05-16-2008, 02:33 AM
  #3  
Last C5
Safety Car
 
Last C5's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver Washington
Posts: 3,904
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

I've been running the Carbotech 10s in front and 8s in the rear for quite a while now and it seems to be a good combination.
Old 05-16-2008, 05:17 PM
  #4  
986_C6
Drifting
 
986_C6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Roseville CA
Posts: 1,741
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Old 05-16-2008, 05:41 PM
  #5  
Aardwolf
Race Director
 
Aardwolf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 12,487
Received 372 Likes on 308 Posts

Default

As far as I know, many run a lesser pad in the rear to prevent the rear locking up before the front. How do people dial in their bias for different situations with an adjustable bias? Perhaps in the wet the same pads front and rear would be poor, skidding the rear a lot. I have planned to try the same pads all around and have not had the chance to as of yet, to see how the car would do.
Old 05-16-2008, 05:45 PM
  #6  
cj68
Pro
 
cj68's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Reston VA
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

FWIW, I was told (by a local instructor who is a forum member) that it decreases the rear end "squirming" under hard braking where you are coming off of a long straight at high speeds. I run XP10s in the front and 8s in the rear and it has gotten rid of the squirming that I would get with stock C5 Z06 pads.

cj
Old 05-16-2008, 09:31 PM
  #7  
davidfarmer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
davidfarmer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: CONCORD NC
Posts: 12,006
Received 712 Likes on 493 Posts

Default

you would usually do this due to heat ranges. Back in 2002 &2003, I ran Hawk HT14's in the front, and HT12's in the rear. Not because the 14's had more bite, but they were capable of working at 1400deg F, which is the kind of rotor temps we were seeing. In the rear however, we only saw (guessing) 800deg. It was just a matter of running the pads in their appropriate heat ranges.

In their heat ranges, most pads are capable of more or less the same amount of torque, ie enough to lock the tires. Street pads are grippy at ambient temp and up a few hundred degrees, track pads are horrible at low temp (usually), but are amazing at high temp.
Old 05-16-2008, 09:48 PM
  #8  
Aardwolf
Race Director
 
Aardwolf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 12,487
Received 372 Likes on 308 Posts

Default

I thought about that with working pad temp. I am thinking of using PFC 97 in the rear, it's one of the few race pads I've seen listed for the C4 rear. Both the 97 and the 01 are listed on the PFC homepage as 167° min. temp, it can't take much to get that low of a temp going.
Old 05-17-2008, 12:20 AM
  #9  
fatbillybob
Melting Slicks
 
fatbillybob's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,267
Received 205 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cj68
FWIW, I was told (by a local instructor who is a forum member) that it decreases the rear end "squirming" under hard braking where you are coming off of a long straight at high speeds. I run XP10s in the front and 8s in the rear and it has gotten rid of the squirming that I would get with stock C5 Z06 pads.

cj

I have exactly this problem now on stock pads. This is worth a try. What I don't understand is that our cars in comp mode even have ABS active. ABS is a giant automatic proportioning valve. So in effect you are altering the front rear brake bias by pad switch but because of the ABS you should not need to alter the bias because the ABS will ensure proper non-skid grip. So my question is how does this pad alteration work since ABS is still doing its thing?
Old 05-17-2008, 12:23 AM
  #10  
fatbillybob
Melting Slicks
 
fatbillybob's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,267
Received 205 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by davidfarmer
you would usually do this due to heat ranges. Back in 2002 &2003, I ran Hawk HT14's in the front, and HT12's in the rear. Not because the 14's had more bite, but they were capable of working at 1400deg F, which is the kind of rotor temps we were seeing. In the rear however, we only saw (guessing) 800deg. It was just a matter of running the pads in their appropriate heat ranges.

In their heat ranges, most pads are capable of more or less the same amount of torque, ie enough to lock the tires. Street pads are grippy at ambient temp and up a few hundred degrees, track pads are horrible at low temp (usually), but are amazing at high temp.
So maybe if you did not know which pads to use from forum member rec you could use tempilac paint to determine rotor temps and chose pads that way to be in the optimum heat range. Or is there more to pad selection than that?
Old 05-17-2008, 11:44 AM
  #11  
Aardwolf
Race Director
 
Aardwolf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 12,487
Received 372 Likes on 308 Posts

Default

As far as I know the ABS doesn't do proportioning, that on my year car is done by the spring in the M/C. I put the DRM spring in to have more rear bias. Having a higher torque rear pad seems to change the bias in that you have more stopping power in the rear.

There is less heat generated in the rear because less braking is done there but also on my year car there is less airflow so they would run hotter. The pads that I have looked at as in my above post show 167° min. temp. That is really very little heat, IMO they would be warmed up to temp way before the tires are.

If your rear tires are skidding before the fronts I would change the rear to a lesser torque pad. This is because the front does it better, with weight transfer onto the tires.

I'm always interested in learning more and am curious how bias is adjusted by the driver when an adjustable bias system is used. When is more rear bias used or not used?
Old 05-17-2008, 12:36 PM
  #12  
mgarfias
Drifting
 
mgarfias's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: scio or
Posts: 1,555
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Aardwolf
As far as I know the ABS doesn't do proportioning, that on my year car is done by the spring in the M/C. I put the DRM spring in to have more rear bias. Having a higher torque rear pad seems to change the bias in that you have more stopping power in the rear.
THe Z06es use the ABS system to dynamically alter the proportioning.
Old 05-17-2008, 01:41 PM
  #13  
Aardwolf
Race Director
 
Aardwolf's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: WI
Posts: 12,487
Received 372 Likes on 308 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mgarfias
THe Z06es use the ABS system to dynamically alter the proportioning.
Sweet! It's like traction control for the brakes? Can it do per wheel or just per axle? Makes me want a Z06 all the more.
Old 05-17-2008, 01:54 PM
  #14  
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
 
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 1999
Location: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Posts: 40,096
Received 8,929 Likes on 5,333 Posts

Default

In 2001 all C5s received Dynamic Rear Proportioning as part of an overall ABS system upgrade. That is why there isn't a brake bias spring for them. Here is the description of how it works together with the ABS to control rear brake pressure and yes it appears from the description of the ABS system and DRP that it can control pressure to individual rear wheels.

Antilock Brake System
When wheel slip is detected during a brake application, the ABS enters antilock mode. During antilock braking, hydraulic pressure in the individual wheel circuits is controlled to prevent any wheel from slipping. A separate hydraulic line and specific solenoid valves are provided for each wheel. The ABS can decrease, hold, or increase hydraulic pressure to each wheel brake. The ABS cannot, however, increase hydraulic pressure above the amount which is transmitted by the master cylinder during braking.

Dynamic Rear Proportioning (DRP)
The dynamic rear proportioning (DRP) is a control system that replaces the hydraulic proportioning function of the mechanical proportioning valve in the base brake system. The DRP control system is part of the operation software in the EBCM. The DRP uses active control with existing ABS in order to regulate the vehicle's rear brake pressure.

Bill

Last edited by Bill Dearborn; 05-17-2008 at 02:01 PM.
Old 05-17-2008, 04:00 PM
  #15  
fatbillybob
Melting Slicks
 
fatbillybob's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,267
Received 205 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bill Dearborn
In 2001 all C5s received Dynamic Rear Proportioning as part of an overall ABS system upgrade. That is why there isn't a brake bias spring for them. Here is the description of how it works together with the ABS to control rear brake pressure and yes it appears from the description of the ABS system and DRP that it can control pressure to individual rear wheels.
Bill
Yes and this would imply that using different front vs rear pads would not be needed. Yet Cj68 proved that it helpped in his C5Z. I still don't know why unless it has to do with what Dave said about temperatures. Perhaps while the ABS will work regardless of pad...the ABS will work better with more ultimate grip if the pads are temperature matched to the conditions they need. And maybe what Cj and I feel as "loose" is actually the ABS trying to modulate braking too early and inefficently.
Old 05-20-2008, 02:36 PM
  #16  
bgx12
Advanced
 
bgx12's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Belmont, NC
Posts: 72
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am running next week with XP 12 in the front and Xp 10 in the rear. Is that too much brake?
Old 05-20-2008, 04:06 PM
  #17  
tmak26b
Burning Brakes
 
tmak26b's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bgx12
I am running next week with XP 12 in the front and Xp 10 in the rear. Is that too much brake?
I hope you have some good rubber. I used 10/10 with street tires, I had to be very careful so I dont get into the ABS. I still think the C6 has too much front bias, I am looking to get more brakes in the rear. A check with a infrared gauge showing 5x the temperature in the front vs the rear.

Get notified of new replies

To same pad compound front and rear or one step down in the rear

Old 05-20-2008, 05:12 PM
  #18  
beerkat
Pro
Support Corvetteforum!
 
beerkat's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Aardwolf
... I have planned to try the same pads all around and have not had the chance to as of yet, to see how the car would do.
Next time I change my pads I will be running Carbotech's XP10 front and rear so I will be you some feed back after NCM/VIR
Old 05-21-2008, 12:59 AM
  #19  
Solo2GS
Burning Brakes
 
Solo2GS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Littleton CO
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

Originally Posted by bgx12
I am running next week with XP 12 in the front and Xp 10 in the rear. Is that too much brake?
I have run that setup for years with race rubber. Great combination!

I even leave them on for the occassional street driving I do in the car between events. No problems...
Old 05-21-2008, 10:09 AM
  #20  
Bill Hetzel
Pro
 
Bill Hetzel's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Reno Nv
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Aardwolf
I'm always interested in learning more and am curious how bias is adjusted by the driver when an adjustable bias system is used. When is more rear bias used or not used?
Most everything I race has dual mastercylinders with adj. bias.
The MC pushrods are connected to a bias bar at the pedals. Inside the bar is a spherical bearing that has a threaded rod thru the center. The rod is connected to each MC pushrod with a clevis and has a cable attached that can spin the rod from a **** on the dash. This moves the spherical bearing left or right to adjust the bias.
The initial setup is to make both MC pushrods the same length (they'te adhustable for lenght), then measure and center the location of the spherical bearing inside the bar.
Initial bias is setup on jack stands by depressing the pedal until the fronts just lock up. This usually takes 2 people to do. The guy rotating the tires should be rotating the tire as the pedal gets depressed until he feels them just lock up. Then he moves to the rear and should be able to just barely rotate the rears with quite a bit of force used.
You then should check the other front and rear to make sure that all calipers are exerting the same force.
Note: If the pads aren't bedded in, this might not work as well as it should. But if you're racing, there should be a couple of sets of bedded pads in the trailer anyway.
After setting the bias in the shop, hit the track, get the brakes and tires warmed up and do a couple of threshold braking runs to see how the bias is working and adjust if necessary. It helps to have someone watch the f & r wheels while doing this.
Do it this way and the driver very seldom needs to adjust the bias in the race, usually only when something startes to go wrong.
If it starts to rain, we usually dial in more rear to keep the front tires from locking up.


Quick Reply: same pad compound front and rear or one step down in the rear



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 PM.