Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C5 - Front Upper Adjustable A-Arm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2009, 03:29 PM
  #1  
gtpvette
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
gtpvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Key Largo Florida
Posts: 2,044
Received 73 Likes on 55 Posts

Default C5 - Front Upper Adjustable A-Arm

I'm wondering if anyone has seen an adjustable front upper a-arm for a C5 suspension? I'm looking for a bit more camber and caster.

Thanks
Old 01-29-2009, 03:42 PM
  #2  
0Randy@DRM
Former Vendor
 
Randy@DRM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Burlington NC
Posts: 9,615
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gtpvette
I'm wondering if anyone has seen an adjustable front upper a-arm for a C5 suspension? I'm looking for a bit more camber and caster.

Thanks
You should be able to get a lot of camber and castor out of the stock setup. Or get some camber plates from hardbar.

Randy
Old 01-29-2009, 04:03 PM
  #3  
spazegun2213
Burning Brakes
 
spazegun2213's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Randy@DRM
You should be able to get a lot of camber and castor out of the stock setup. Or get some camber plates from hardbar.

Randy
the hardbar plates are nice. I have the pfadt units and love them!!! My alignment shop says its super easy to setup my car with their kit, and the settings never change!!!
Old 01-29-2009, 04:38 PM
  #4  
gtpvette
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
gtpvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Key Largo Florida
Posts: 2,044
Received 73 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

Randy,,
Does the hardbar setup allow for more adjustment + or - than the stock setup?

Thanks
Old 01-29-2009, 05:22 PM
  #5  
0Randy@DRM
Former Vendor
 
Randy@DRM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Burlington NC
Posts: 9,615
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gtpvette
Randy,,
Does the hardbar setup allow for more adjustment + or - than the stock setup?

Thanks
You can find him here. I think they increase the range, but not 100 percent sure.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/memb...-ghoffman.html
Old 01-29-2009, 06:02 PM
  #6  
mgarfias
Drifting
 
mgarfias's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: scio or
Posts: 1,555
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

They do a little bit. But not the ideal way to do things.

What I did was buy Gary's kit, and get it setup to push the lower out as far as it will go. Then goto the top arm, and (with the addition of a stud kit I put together before anyone else was making them) shim it out to get the camber and caster correct.

This has the side affect of widening the front track, which is never a bad thing.

The next step I need to do with this, is put spherical bearings in the upper arms, and mount the arm to a plate that attaches to the frame. Then shim the frame out to get the adjustment I want. Using a spherical bearing in the arm here, means I mount the plates on the arm flat to the chassis. The stock setup requires that the front arm mount be shimmed at an angle to avoid binding the poly bushing I have in there.

The effect would be similar to how Lou's GT2 is setup: http://picasaweb.google.com/rfn026/L...63873439686962
Old 01-29-2009, 06:25 PM
  #7  
ghoffman
Le Mans Master
 
ghoffman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Bedford NH
Posts: 5,708
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default

We are working on what you are seeking. Considering the past history when I post Solidworks previews, I will post it when I have it ready for sale. Call me if you want to hear what we are working on.

Thanks,
Gary
603-682-8073
Old 01-29-2009, 09:12 PM
  #8  
davidfarmer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
davidfarmer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: CONCORD NC
Posts: 12,006
Received 712 Likes on 493 Posts

Default

using camber plates and removing any shims at the top should give you plenty of camber....I've seen over 3 degrees.

Lou's setups looks interesting and expensive however....give Riley a call in Mooresville.
Old 01-29-2009, 10:05 PM
  #9  
meldog21
Drifting
 
meldog21's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Milpitas CA
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by davidfarmer
using camber plates and removing any shims at the top should give you plenty of camber....I've seen over 3 degrees.

....
I agree. I got over -3.5 with camber plates. I had to use a **** load of shims to get it where I wanted it.

Dog
Old 01-29-2009, 10:07 PM
  #10  
wallyman424
Melting Slicks
 
wallyman424's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i actually find that running -90 degrees of camber works great.

the sidewall is a lot stickier than you would think.





Old 01-30-2009, 07:34 AM
  #11  
gtpvette
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
gtpvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Key Largo Florida
Posts: 2,044
Received 73 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

Thanks for the thoughts guys. I'll give Gary a call today.

I guess I should of mentioned that is not a C5 chassis.



Thanks
Fred
Old 01-30-2009, 08:17 AM
  #12  
gtpvette
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
gtpvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Key Largo Florida
Posts: 2,044
Received 73 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mgarfias
They do a little bit. But not the ideal way to do things.

What I did was buy Gary's kit, and get it setup to push the lower out as far as it will go. Then goto the top arm, and (with the addition of a stud kit I put together before anyone else was making them) shim it out to get the camber and caster correct.

This has the side affect of widening the front track, which is never a bad thing.

The next step I need to do with this, is put spherical bearings in the upper arms, and mount the arm to a plate that attaches to the frame. Then shim the frame out to get the adjustment I want. Using a spherical bearing in the arm here, means I mount the plates on the arm flat to the chassis. The stock setup requires that the front arm mount be shimmed at an angle to avoid binding the poly bushing I have in there.

The effect would be similar to how Lou's GT2 is setup: http://picasaweb.google.com/rfn026/L...63873439686962



Do you have a picture of this you might share???

Thanks
Fred
Old 01-30-2009, 11:00 AM
  #13  
davidfarmer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
davidfarmer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 1999
Location: CONCORD NC
Posts: 12,006
Received 712 Likes on 493 Posts

Default

what chassis is that, and why did the mount the upper arms that way???? Regardless, since it is a custom chassis, I would just move the mounts. The photo is too dark to see how involved it would be.
Old 01-30-2009, 11:40 AM
  #14  
gtpvette
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
gtpvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Key Largo Florida
Posts: 2,044
Received 73 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

It's a factory five GTM. I've considered moving the mounts,,,, and may end up doing it if nothing else pans out.

Thanks
Old 01-30-2009, 01:04 PM
  #15  
BrianCunningham
Team Owner
 
BrianCunningham's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Posts: 30,607
Received 239 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gtpvette
I guess I should of mentioned that is not a C5 chassis.
Yes, yes that would have helped.
Old 01-30-2009, 03:36 PM
  #16  
mgarfias
Drifting
 
mgarfias's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: scio or
Posts: 1,555
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gtpvette
Do you have a picture of this you might share???

Thanks
Fred
Pictures of which? My current setup? That looks identical to stock except for the shims/studs. Probably a ton of other pix of that available here (I can dig some up if you really need to see).

The system I'm describing is visible in that pic of Lou's GT2 car (just imagine it with stock arms/uprights and none of the pretty carbon).
Old 01-30-2009, 04:09 PM
  #17  
gtpvette
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
gtpvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Key Largo Florida
Posts: 2,044
Received 73 Likes on 55 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mgarfias
Pictures of which? My current setup? That looks identical to stock except for the shims/studs. Probably a ton of other pix of that available here (I can dig some up if you really need to see).

The system I'm describing is visible in that pic of Lou's GT2 car (just imagine it with stock arms/uprights and none of the pretty carbon).

I'm afraid my brain editied out the 'next step' portion of your origional note wen I was reading it. Sorry. I did speak to Gary today,,,, things sound promising.

Thanks guys

Get notified of new replies

To C5 - Front Upper Adjustable A-Arm




Quick Reply: C5 - Front Upper Adjustable A-Arm



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 PM.