Why is my 383 ls6 not making power?
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: canberra ACT
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is my 383 ls6 not making power?
I have just built a 383 using a lunati stroker kit with 6cc pistons matched to CNC ported CBM 64 cc 243 heads with 1.8 rockers gives it approx 10.8 compression it has a vcm 13 cam which is a 238 242 603 112 spec cam. It has a edelbrock single plane high rise manifold and a 850cfm dominator carbie with a dry sump so why am I only making 420 rwhp? I have checked the cam timing and it is setup dot to dot. And it runs a edelbrock timing module that is fully programable. It also has a crank driven dry sump.
When I do a compression test all cylinders have 160 psi.
It should make a lot more power why isn't it?
When I do a compression test all cylinders have 160 psi.
It should make a lot more power why isn't it?
Last edited by boschvette; 04-29-2014 at 08:01 AM.
#2
Drifting
I have just built a 383 using a lunati stroker kit with 6cc pistons matched to CNC ported CBM 64 cc 243 heads with 1.8 rockers gives it approx 10.8 compression it has a vcm 13 cam which is a 238 242 603 112 spec cam. It has a edelbrock single plane high rise manifold and a 850cfm dominator carbie with a dry sump so why am I only making 420 rwhp? I have checked the cam timing and it is setup dot to dot. And it runs a edelbrock timing module that is fully programable. It also has a crank driven dry sump.
When I do a compression test all cylinders have 160 psi.
It should make a lot more power why isn't it?
When I do a compression test all cylinders have 160 psi.
It should make a lot more power why isn't it?
Something is amiss, Could the cam have a wiped lobe or something? Geometry with the 1.8 rockers wrong? We use the MSD 6012 box. On the track, our motor with the smaller cam outperforms the big cam version. The torque comes in much earlier. My 346 LS6 with ASA type cam and CNC heads makes more than 420 at the wheels.
#3
I know you said you checked the cam timing at the sprocket and it was dot-to-dot, but have you actually 'checked' it to verify with a degree wheel and dial indicator? That'd be my first step if you haven't already, there's no guarantee that the dots are correct.
Also, how's the carb tuning and ignition timing curve look? Either one of those could easily hurt your peak power.
Also, how's the carb tuning and ignition timing curve look? Either one of those could easily hurt your peak power.
#6
Advanced
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: canberra ACT
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not sure why 1.8 rockers would make about 80 rwhp difference.
No I haven't put longer valves in but I had these heads on the car before I rebuilt the bottom end and they are untouched and worked perfectly
No I haven't put longer valves in but I had these heads on the car before I rebuilt the bottom end and they are untouched and worked perfectly
#7
I don't know that it'd cause 80hp loss, but running them with stock valves and PR's can cause longevity issues because the geometry is probably wrong. When we were building OHC Ford 2300's, bad valvetrain geometry would cause motors to almost immediately spit followers, which made it a critical part of the build. An LS1 valvetrain will hide a lot more geometry sins in the short-term but will still be hurt by them in the long run, especially in a race application.
Ultimately, I think it's important in your case to verify cam timing and lift at the valve with a degree wheel and dial indicator and take it from there
Ultimately, I think it's important in your case to verify cam timing and lift at the valve with a degree wheel and dial indicator and take it from there
#9
Advanced
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: canberra ACT
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I have found the problem. It has massive crank case pressure because the dry sump pump isn't pumping fast enough to cause a vacumn and all the breathers were blocked off.i will re plumb the lines through my catch cans and bang it back on the dyno and then post the results. It had that much crank case pressure when we took it to the track for its first run it blew the rocker cover gasket out.
#10
Melting Slicks
I think I have found the problem. It has massive crank case pressure because the dry sump pump isn't pumping fast enough to cause a vacumn and all the breathers were blocked off.i will re plumb the lines through my catch cans and bang it back on the dyno and then post the results. It had that much crank case pressure when we took it to the track for its first run it blew the rocker cover gasket out.
Vacuum pump maybe. But the dry sump?
#12
Glad to hear you found the problem, eager to hear the real numbers
Many dry sump engines have so much scavenging versus the oil they pump back in, that they'll actually pull a vacuum in the engine, just like a PCV system that uses engine vacuum on the crankcase. Because they function this way, you can generally 'seal' the engine and just vent the dry sump tank, ensuring that any oil vapor is contained in the oil system, rather than spraying in the engine bay or pulling into the intake.
Pulling a vacuum on the crankcase is good for a number of reasons, but at a minimum it needs to be ventilated to evacuate pressure that builds from normal combustion and engine operation. If that pressure build rate is higher than the dry sump can overcome on an airtight engine, it will build pressure in the crankcase, which in his case is blowing gaskets and using up horsepower by adding another force for the pistons to overcome
Pulling a vacuum on the crankcase is good for a number of reasons, but at a minimum it needs to be ventilated to evacuate pressure that builds from normal combustion and engine operation. If that pressure build rate is higher than the dry sump can overcome on an airtight engine, it will build pressure in the crankcase, which in his case is blowing gaskets and using up horsepower by adding another force for the pistons to overcome
Last edited by LateBreak; 05-02-2014 at 09:39 AM.