Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C7 track times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2014, 03:25 PM
  #1  
928nomore
Racer
Thread Starter
 
928nomore's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Pittsburgh pa
Posts: 361
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts

Default C7 track times

I am real interested in a c7 now but cannot determine if its actually as fast as my current stock 07 Z06. (w/ track tires/carbotechs)

Would love the new car but would hate to be much slower on the track.
Some current personal bests for me are:

Mid Ohio w/ kink 1:36
Watkins Glen 2:08
VIR 2:06

I am moderately experienced driver so my hopes are that some of you hot shoes are seeing better times in a C7 Please let me know
Old 05-23-2014, 07:49 PM
  #2  
blkbrd69
Drifting
 
blkbrd69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 1,686
Received 71 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

From what I have seen so far they are a few seconds slower in equivalent trim.

Hard to get over its down on power, heavier, and doesn't have the same amount of tire as a C6Z.

The driving aids help but we are back to that physics thing.

But it is easier to drive closer to its limit, so faster for some.
Old 05-23-2014, 11:21 PM
  #3  
turbo8765
Racer
 
turbo8765's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Posts: 381
Received 50 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

According to fastestlaps.com the C7 is faster than a Z06 w/Z07 package at VIR (assume this is Grand based on the times) by 1.7 sec. Impressive given how important power is at VIR.

The MTI C7 set a TT2 record of 1:12.7 at Roebling which is basically plaid.

There isn't a lot of data just yet but so far it looks like the C7 is FAST on track.

What tire on your Z06 for 2:06@ VIR full?
Old 05-26-2014, 12:22 PM
  #4  
928nomore
Racer
Thread Starter
 
928nomore's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Pittsburgh pa
Posts: 361
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I was running Michelin slicks but they were pretty far gone.
Old 05-27-2014, 09:44 AM
  #5  
racerns
Melting Slicks
 
racerns's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Smithfield VA
Posts: 2,627
Received 118 Likes on 67 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by turbo8765
According to fastestlaps.com the C7 is faster than a Z06 w/Z07 package at VIR (assume this is Grand based on the times) by 1.7 sec. Impressive given how important power is at VIR.
You have to be careful when using fastestlaps for lap time comparison, it is a great tool but you have to look at where the times came from for an accurate comparison. The C7 time was from a GM test session with Mero driving and the Z06/Z07 time was from the C&D lightning lap. Mero was a much quicker in the ZR1 (by +4sec) than C&D was for their lightning lap time.
Old 05-27-2014, 10:28 AM
  #6  
turbo8765
Racer
 
turbo8765's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Posts: 381
Received 50 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by racerns
You have to be careful when using fastestlaps for lap time comparison, it is a great tool but you have to look at where the times came from for an accurate comparison. The C7 time was from a GM test session with Mero driving and the Z06/Z07 time was from the C&D lightning lap. Mero was a much quicker in the ZR1 (by +4sec) than C&D was for their lightning lap time.
Right, I hesitate to reference fastestlaps.com given the variability you noted in addition to some outright errors (F10 M5)…. I did reference it, however, because I just haven't seen many numbers to compare.

However, I'm still impressed that JM stock on stock PSSs is 1.7sec faster than the lightning lap driver on PSCs in the Z06 w Z07. It's likely the C7 is competitive with the Z06.
Old 05-27-2014, 10:29 AM
  #7  
RedLS1GTO
Race Director

 
RedLS1GTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2003
Location: Color my life with the chaos of trouble.
Posts: 12,742
Received 42 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by racerns
You have to be careful when using fastestlaps for lap time comparison, it is a great tool but you have to look at where the times came from for an accurate comparison.


Unless you have essentially the same driver with the same track conditions, same comfort level in car, etc there is no telling what you are actually looking at.

Look at lap times of people here at the same tracks in what are very close to the same cars for proof of that. If you look at endurance racing, even some of the best in the world in the exact same car at the same track on the same day can be quite different in their times.
Old 05-27-2014, 10:35 AM
  #8  
turbo8765
Racer
 
turbo8765's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Posts: 381
Received 50 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedLS1GTO


Unless you have essentially the same driver with the same track conditions, same comfort level in car, etc there is no telling what you are actually looking at.

Look at lap times of people here at the same tracks in what are very close to the same cars for proof of that. If you look at endurance racing, even some of the best in the world in the exact same car at the same track on the same day can be quite different in their times.
True, but not quite as bad as you make it sound. The variability among experienced amateurs who drive as testers for major publications and the super fast amateurs (JM) is far less than the variability among DE drivers.

Numbers from an unknown DE driver are useless. Numbers from experienced journals are a viable reference point.

In any case, the TT2 record of 1:12.7 at RRR indicates the C7 has immense track potential.
Old 05-27-2014, 11:21 AM
  #9  
racerns
Melting Slicks
 
racerns's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Smithfield VA
Posts: 2,627
Received 118 Likes on 67 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by turbo8765
However, I'm still impressed that JM stock on stock PSSs is 1.7sec faster than the lightning lap driver on PSCs in the Z06 w Z07. It's likely the C7 is competitive with the Z06.
One thing to note was that was the time for the Z06 Carbon in 2011 so it was running on the PS2s not the PSCs. Fastestlaps just groups the Carbon with the Z07 package for performance purposes since they are pretty much the same.

You also may want to check out the MT Laguna Seca times for both cars since they at least use the same driver, though not on the same day. The Z06/Z07 (PSCs) was almost 4 sec faster than the C7 Z51. The C7 was faster than the '06 Z06 but that car was driven by Max Angelelli, not Pobst like the others.

As for the TT2 record, that is a very fast time but it will be hard to find a comparison for a C6 Z06 since they have to be detuned to run in TT2.

Last edited by racerns; 05-27-2014 at 01:43 PM.
Old 05-28-2014, 08:46 AM
  #10  
car 99
Advanced
 
car 99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default c7 vs 07 Zo6

The C7 is a stock Z51 M7 with new Hoosiers and a professional race driver. The 07 Zo6 is equipped with Pfadt headers and featherlites, cold air intake, LS7 internals are stock. Tires are used Pirellis - 18 all the way around and the driver is a 70 year old amateur still having fun.

Old 05-28-2014, 09:38 AM
  #11  
turbo8765
Racer
 
turbo8765's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Posts: 381
Received 50 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Awesome video, thanks for posting!

Just out of curiosity, who was the pro in the C7?

It looks like there is snow on the ground! What were the ambient temps?

The hoosiers may have hurt more than they helped if it was too cold. Were they A6s or R6s? What size?

Also, what size tires on your Z? WHP on your Z? Do you know how much your Z weighs full of fuel but no driver?

Last edited by turbo8765; 05-28-2014 at 09:38 AM. Reason: spelling
Old 05-28-2014, 08:57 PM
  #12  
car 99
Advanced
 
car 99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default info

Originally Posted by turbo8765
Awesome video, thanks for posting!

Just out of curiosity, who was the pro in the C7?

It looks like there is snow on the ground! What were the ambient temps?

The hoosiers may have hurt more than they helped if it was too cold. Were they A6s or R6s? What size?

Also, what size tires on your Z? WHP on your Z? Do you know how much your Z weighs full of fuel but no driver?
The c7 tires are r6 I don't know the size. The z06 tires are 315/675-18 HP is 495 adjusted for 5k feet, weight is about 3300#,
Old 05-28-2014, 08:59 PM
  #13  
car 99
Advanced
 
car 99's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default info

Originally Posted by car 99
The c7 tires are r6 I don't know the size. The z06 tires are 315/675-18 HP is 495 adjusted for 5k feet, weight is about 3300#,
Out side temp was 45 F.
Old 05-28-2014, 09:01 PM
  #14  
turbo8765
Racer
 
turbo8765's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2014
Posts: 381
Received 50 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Nice driving
Old 05-28-2014, 09:43 PM
  #15  
NHZ06
3rd Gear
 
NHZ06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 928nomore
I am real interested in a c7 now but cannot determine if its actually as fast as my current stock 07 Z06. (w/ track tires/carbotechs)

Would love the new car but would hate to be much slower on the track.
Some current personal bests for me are:

Mid Ohio w/ kink 1:36
Watkins Glen 2:08
VIR 2:06

I am moderately experienced driver so my hopes are that some of you hot shoes are seeing better times in a C7 Please let me know
I traded my 2009 Z06 for a 2014 Z51, after 5 years of changing tires and brake pads I am very pleased to get better track times with a stock car. The brakes are great, much more surface area (1 piece) and looking great after 2 track days at NHMS, I did have to upgrade brake fluid. New tires are holding track better than the R888's I was running. NHMS is a very technical track, Watkins Glenn next, can't wait. I could not be happier with the change.

Get notified of new replies

To C7 track times




Quick Reply: C7 track times



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.