Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C5 Z06 in SCCA SSR class (autox) - Hoosier A7 sizing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2015, 07:24 AM
  #1  
Gary K
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Gary K's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 830
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default C5 Z06 in SCCA SSR class (autox) - Hoosier A7 sizing

I'm ready to pull the trigger and order up some A7's for my C5Z. SSR class, so running stock wheels. I was going to go with the 295/315 sizing but I ran across some discussion regarding the A6's and it sounds like stuffing 315/335 tires on is actually faster. If I'm spending the money on A7's, might as well go all in and spend a bit more on bigger tires.

Should I expect the bigger sizing in the A7 flavor to be faster like the bigger A6's were?

Does anybody know if the A7 sizing will allow the bigger tires to fit like the A6's did?

Anything I need to do when stuffing the bigger tires on? I have an alternate set of Fikse wheel in stock sizes with 1/4" less offset (still legal)...would those be better to use with the bigger tires? Or keep the tires tucked in with the stock wheels?

Thanks for any help!
Old 06-05-2015, 09:15 AM
  #2  
69autoXr
Melting Slicks
 
69autoXr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 3,243
Received 209 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

Not sure if it's actually faster or not, but the fastest C5Z at Nats last year was on the bigger combo, and after talking with a multi-time National Champ who is familiar with these cars and local to me, I decided to go for the big combo when I bought new A7's this year. They are mounted on stock wheels and are ready to go. According to Hoosier, the A7's >245 sizes are the same physical dimensions as the A6 (the smaller sizes had new molds and are a bit bigger A7 vs. A6). The C6 GS/Z06's are all running 315's on their 9.5 fronts, and in my mind you need as much front tire as you can get in autocross so I viewed this as an advantage for them. It would be nice if us C5Z guys could +1 our front wheel diameter to be able to get rid of the goofy looking big sidewall of the 315-17, but that's just an aesthetics thing in my mind.

To prepare, I test fitted the big combo A6's on my car and have ran a few events with them last fall and this spring. In the rear you'll probably need to use a small spacer to keep the tire from rubbing the inner fender, I tested with 1/8" and it was adequate, and I also have 5mm spacers in case I need a little bit more. I don't use any spacers in front. If there is any rubbing front or rear at this point I haven't noticed it.

All that said, there have been plenty of fast guys running the 295/315 combo. I don't expect that the bigger tires are going to transform me from back-marker to front-runner, but I did want to maximize my opportunity when I bought new tires.
Old 06-05-2015, 09:47 AM
  #3  
brenb
Instructor
 
brenb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

To my eye the 295/315 A6 vs A7 are the same width.

Keep in mind that going with the larger sizes will negate some of the C5 advantage of being more narrow than the C6 as they stick out a bit past the body (on OE wheels.)
Old 06-05-2015, 10:32 AM
  #4  
fatbillybob
Melting Slicks
 
fatbillybob's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,264
Received 204 Likes on 160 Posts

Default

Wow! those are some pretty big sizes on narrow stock wheels. I have run 7 sets of A7's for road racing. In T1 we ran 315 and in T2 295. IMO the tire needs to be supported by the wheel. So if you got a 315 puckered up on 10.5" wheel you got the same rubber on the ground as the 295. In fact you might even compromise the sidewall support and could have negative effects. I would be very surprised you could even get a 335 on a 9.5" C6 wheel. I mount my own tires. But if you guys are doing it with success I obviously have no clue of what I am talking about.
Old 06-05-2015, 11:31 AM
  #5  
brenb
Instructor
 
brenb's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by fatbillybob
Wow! those are some pretty big sizes on narrow stock wheels.
Welcome to national level autox.
Old 06-05-2015, 12:23 PM
  #6  
69autoXr
Melting Slicks
 
69autoXr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 3,243
Received 209 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fatbillybob
Wow! those are some pretty big sizes on narrow stock wheels. I have run 7 sets of A7's for road racing. In T1 we ran 315 and in T2 295. IMO the tire needs to be supported by the wheel. So if you got a 315 puckered up on 10.5" wheel you got the same rubber on the ground as the 295. In fact you might even compromise the sidewall support and could have negative effects. I would be very surprised you could even get a 335 on a 9.5" C6 wheel. I mount my own tires. But if you guys are doing it with success I obviously have no clue of what I am talking about.
To clarify, it's 315 on the front 17x9.5, and 335 on the rear 18x10.5. I also mount my own tires.
Old 06-05-2015, 12:24 PM
  #7  
froggy47
Race Director
 
froggy47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 10,851
Received 194 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

I don't think you can do 1/4 " rim offset PLUS a spacer. In SSR. Just sayin.



On my SSP I run 335 on 12" and they stick out a lot. Stiff springs keep them off my stock fender, but with oem springs I would plan on some tire to fender contact FWIW.

Last edited by froggy47; 06-05-2015 at 12:26 PM.
Old 06-05-2015, 12:31 PM
  #8  
Solofast
Melting Slicks
 
Solofast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Indy IN
Posts: 3,003
Received 85 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fatbillybob
Wow! those are some pretty big sizes on narrow stock wheels. I have run 7 sets of A7's for road racing. In T1 we ran 315 and in T2 295. IMO the tire needs to be supported by the wheel. So if you got a 315 puckered up on 10.5" wheel you got the same rubber on the ground as the 295. In fact you might even compromise the sidewall support and could have negative effects. I would be very surprised you could even get a 335 on a 9.5" C6 wheel. I mount my own tires. But if you guys are doing it with success I obviously have no clue of what I am talking about.
A few years ago the hot setup in A stock was Solstice on what looked to be relatively tall 285 HoHo's.. That car had (IIRC and I could be wrong) something like a 8 inch wide rim.. It was pretty silly looking and by all rights it should have been a disaster, but it really worked and those cars that were running that setup were flat hooked up. They were blowing by cars that had more "normal" setups.

After that I'm not surprised that some strange things actually work. It depends on the tire, the sidewall height and stiffness, the suspension, the surface, the driver, the phase of the moon that the tires were made under... Somebody tried it and it worked and when they kicked butt doing it, everybody else jumped on the bandwagon...

Go figure...
Old 06-05-2015, 12:51 PM
  #9  
69autoXr
Melting Slicks
 
69autoXr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 3,243
Received 209 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by froggy47
I don't think you can do 1/4 " rim offset PLUS a spacer. In SSR. Just sayin.

Correct, you're allowed 1/4" total offset variation, between spacers and wheel dimensions. My comments and experience are all regarding stock wheels. The OP's wheels with the 1/4" allowance built in are out of my realm.
Old 06-05-2015, 12:57 PM
  #10  
dhowdy
Racer
 
dhowdy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Solofast
A few years ago the hot setup in A stock was Solstice on what looked to be relatively tall 285 HoHo's.. That car had (IIRC and I could be wrong) something like a 8 inch wide rim..
285s on 8s, yup.
Old 06-05-2015, 02:24 PM
  #11  
talon95
Pro
 
talon95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 69autoXr
Correct, you're allowed 1/4" total offset variation, between spacers and wheel dimensions. My comments and experience are all regarding stock wheels. The OP's wheels with the 1/4" allowance built in are out of my realm.
Actually it's 7mm now I think. They changed it since almost everything uses mm now.
Old 06-05-2015, 10:15 PM
  #12  
talon95
Pro
 
talon95's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

And I think the real benefit (if any) of running the 315/335 combo is resistance to overheating. It's easy to overheat the A6 (and probably A7) on a longer autox course, so the bigger tire helps by just being a bigger heat sink. Possibly helps durability/wear also. They've got to be less responsive in transitions though.
Old 06-06-2015, 12:22 AM
  #13  
froggy47
Race Director
 
froggy47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 10,851
Received 194 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by talon95
And I think the real benefit (if any) of running the 315/335 combo is resistance to overheating. It's easy to overheat the A6 (and probably A7) on a longer autox course, so the bigger tire helps by just being a bigger heat sink. Possibly helps durability/wear also. They've got to be less responsive in transitions though.
I will put my 2 cents in here, I an sure talon95 won't mind, but yeah you also might have trouble (me) getting the tires warm.

Haven't used water yet this year.

Old 06-06-2015, 06:42 AM
  #14  
Gary K
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Gary K's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 830
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thanks for the input everyone. I was also thinking the larger sizes might just resist overheating better while also being a little harder to get heat in them in cooler weather. I'm kind of leaning towards the smaller 295/315 combo now.
Old 06-08-2015, 08:40 AM
  #15  
69autoXr
Melting Slicks
 
69autoXr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 3,243
Received 209 Likes on 159 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by talon95
Actually it's 7mm now I think. They changed it since almost everything uses mm now.
No, it's still 1/4" in the rulebook for SSR. Not sure why the update didn't carry over.

Had a great weekend in Toledo running on my 315/335 A6's. Got to run with Sam Strano all weekend. Though I'm a good ways behind him my car felt the best it ever has, very confidence inspiring on a fast, big speed carrying course. Sam and I talked about the bigger tire setup and he described it as being less "edgy" which I can definitely agree with, it certainly felt more forgiving and driveable. I don't even notice any real numbness in transitions, the car basically did whatever I asked it to do.
Old 06-09-2015, 08:43 PM
  #16  
strano@stranoparts.com
Supporting Vendor
 
strano@stranoparts.com's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Brookville PA
Posts: 1,072
Received 231 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by brenb
Welcome to national level autox.
And it works.
Old 06-09-2015, 08:48 PM
  #17  
strano@stranoparts.com
Supporting Vendor
 
strano@stranoparts.com's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Brookville PA
Posts: 1,072
Received 231 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

The wheel offset thing. the SEB kind of picks and chooses what rules they apply to SSR vs Street. Wheel offset of 7mm? No, but we have to abide by the stupid tire production date rules. More ignorance.

Anyway, regarding the 295/315 vs. 315/335. Basically it's been said but I'll make sure I say it too. Both are fast, I ran the same times on a C5Z with both tires on the same day, same course, 15 minutes apart. The bigger ones are less crisp and have a more tolerant slip angle window in which to work. Mind you slip angle also wears tires quicker, as does squeezing them more which crowns them and A6's like to wear the centers already. And you do make the car wider, particularly in the front, which may or may not matter. Pick your poison.

Really depends on what you like best. Would recommend folks try both if possible. If you base a lot of cones already, wider isn't better.

And Chris had also changed front bars too, which was some of the help, but the bigger tires do certainly offer a touch more wiggle room for mistakes.

Get notified of new replies

To C5 Z06 in SCCA SSR class (autox) - Hoosier A7 sizing




Quick Reply: C5 Z06 in SCCA SSR class (autox) - Hoosier A7 sizing



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 PM.