C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Cam Question, Help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2008, 08:19 PM
  #1  
happa
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
happa's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Simpsonville SC
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Cam Question, Help

Im helping my dad restore a 63 Fulie and a 62. We are rebuilding both motors and one has a 097 cam and a the other has a 30/30 cam. I had heard about the new oils do not have zinc in them.? My question is for these both solid lifter cams do I need an additive to support there need? Ive heard I do and dont, so I need your knowledge! Thanks everyone!
Old 02-19-2008, 08:41 PM
  #2  
66427-450
Safety Car
 
66427-450's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Southwest MI
Posts: 3,771
Received 436 Likes on 317 Posts

Default

I’d recommend a search the active forum, and the archives......you'll find a ton of info on this topic.

But odds are, you'll end up with a CI-4 oil, or it's successor, CJ-4....... the older CI-4 is a little richer in wear additives (however the current spec CJ-4 is more than adequate for your application).

I went with Rotella 15-40.

Also, if you’re rebuilding, I’d recommend the Isky solids with the small hole in the face (supplies oil right where you need it, at the lobe/lifter contact point).
Old 02-19-2008, 11:06 PM
  #3  
happa
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
happa's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Simpsonville SC
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thank You! I'll do some searching.
Old 02-20-2008, 11:22 AM
  #4  
KyleDallas
Drifting
 
KyleDallas's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Oil discussions have been heavy in C1/C2.... the changing oil formulas
and their effects have weighed upon the minds of many of the
solid lifter owners here.

One avenue I've been exploring lately is using AeroShell Aviation oil.
Unfortunately I don't have the Zinc levels of AeroShell yet... but
I have been able to find several at length discussions on the
difficulty having the formula for Std. Piston driven Aircraft changed.... the
major difficulty in getting a new formula for Std. Engine Aviation Oil is
the Military... they won't come off their "Mil Spec" .... evidently
the Armed Forces use enough of Std. Av Oil to squash any suggestion
of change.... and the Oil Companies are keeping MilSpec and Civi Spec
the same.

This is GOOD if AeroShell has enough Zinc... it would mean a good,
long lasting source of oil suitable for flat tappet solid lifter motors
has been found....

Another plus for Aeroshell is that it is cheap..... less than a
quart of Automotive Synthetic last time I checked....
Lycoming Aviation engines are fairly VW-esque in their design... so
I think it's certainly probable that the Zinc content of AeroShell will
be amiable with solid lifter Corvette engines.

If someone here already has the zinc specs of AeroShell I'd love to
see them posted here.
Old 02-21-2008, 02:12 PM
  #5  
Dick Whittington
Racer
 
Dick Whittington's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Wilkesboro NC
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Mil Spec what?? I have some older volumes of Lubication and they have the mil spec's in them.
Old 02-21-2008, 02:35 PM
  #6  
Scott Marzahl
Le Mans Master
 
Scott Marzahl's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Seattle Area WA
Posts: 5,911
Received 194 Likes on 149 Posts

Default

It meets MIL-L-22851D which has been superseded by SAE J-1899 which covers Ashless (detergent) aviaton oil.

Just use 15W-40 "I" or "J" or one of the "high mileage" motor oils that have plenty of zinc in them.

Aeroshell Plus is Aeroshell oil with the Lycoming LW-16702 oil additive. Lycoming '76 series engines (engines such as the O-320H2AD) require LW-16702 per an Airworthiness Directive (AD) to prevent camshaft lobe galling. By offering the additive as part of the oil it simplifies AD compliance and assures that the oil receives the additive.

LW-16702 is classified as an "EP" (extreme pressure) that is a surface reactant that chemically combines with Fe forming phosphides or phosphates. This protective film is a few molecules deep, that is swept away by shearing friction, and renewed thereafter. Thus LW-16702 is, in a sense, actually corroding the metal surfaces, however slowly.

Here is the MSDS for 16702, as stated above it is a mixture of Phosphates, no zinc.

http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/style...16702-MSDS.Pdf

Because the reacted metal surface has low shear strength, the sliding friction is markedly reduced, and the tendency to severe adhesion is reduced or even eliminated.

The combination of a higher surface energy of the freshly worn surfaces, local high temperatures, possible catalytic effects and any other activation processes makes the action of LW-16702 specific, taking place preferentially at the wear points (surface irregularities) where it is most needed.

Last edited by Scott Marzahl; 02-21-2008 at 03:12 PM.

Get notified of new replies

To Cam Question, Help




Quick Reply: Cam Question, Help



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 PM.