C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Looking for Info on Kent Moore FI Calibration Kit.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2008, 11:40 AM
  #1  
10.5Vette
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
10.5Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Dorr MI
Posts: 1,034
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default Looking for Info on Kent Moore FI Calibration Kit.

I have a Kent Moore Fuel Injection Calibration Instrument (J7090) that I got in a swap about with other Vette stuff about 20 years ago. I have the orginal instructions and the box, although the box is not mint. It appears to be a complete kit judging by the instructions, but I'm not entirely sure.
At this point I don't figure to own a early FI car anymore, out of my price range with kids in college. So I may sell if if there is a market for it. If there is, where would a good place to sell it be? Are they useful? Is there any demand for them? A friend of mine who has a 57 Chevy says he's seen them go for $1000 at swap meets, but again, that may've been something different.
Any help/info you guys could give me would be helpful.
Old 07-25-2008, 12:26 PM
  #2  
YesA59
Pro
 
YesA59's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Mill Valley CA
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I think nice units go for $600 and up on ebay, although I have not followed any sales for a couple of years. I believe that shipping the mercury is a problem, however. Finding a local buyer is a good answer for that problem. Other than the shipping issue, ebay is probably the way to go.

Are the units still useful??

Some of the FI rebuilders can best weigh in on that. I don't think the units are much good in the hands of a novice, however.

Russ

Last edited by YesA59; 07-26-2008 at 01:27 PM.
Old 07-25-2008, 12:45 PM
  #3  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

I'll take it for a reasonable price. I think your friend is over-estimating the value of it.

Yesa59 is in the ballpark. I had one. Mis-placed it so I want another. I know at least one FI restorer who prefers his own homade guage set-up.

Shoot me a PM with a firm price.

Last edited by MikeM; 07-25-2008 at 12:47 PM.
Old 07-25-2008, 01:54 PM
  #4  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,530 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by YesA59
I think nice units for $600 and up on ebay, although...

Are the units still useful??

Some of the FI rebuilders can best weigh in on that. I don't think the units are much good in the hands of a novice, however.

Russ
In my opinion, Russ is in the right ballpark on price.

Are the units useful? I absolutely depend on mine to calibrate the FI units that cross my bench. I wouldn't be without it:



Jim
Old 07-25-2008, 08:50 PM
  #5  
10.5Vette
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
10.5Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Dorr MI
Posts: 1,034
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Thanks for the info guys. I've had it for about 20 years now and never really even looked at it. It looks as if everything is there, but I'm going to double check, and look at all the fittings, etc. sometime this week. MikeM when I get a price in mind I'll send you a PM. I just want to check everything first.
Old 07-25-2008, 10:28 PM
  #6  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

I bought mine about 30yrs ago when they were still available from Kent-Moore (about $200). It now sits on top of my Delco cabinet collecting dust (I took it down and blew off the dust for these pictures). I made the case for it soon after I got it.




The little compartment on the lower left contains extra oil, mercury, clamps, hoses, fittings, etc, that are used for various settings.




Old 07-26-2008, 12:25 PM
  #7  
Injected Stingray
Burning Brakes
 
Injected Stingray's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Posts: 797
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by YesA59
I think nice units for $600 and up on ebay, although I have not followed any sales for a couple of years. I believe that shipping the mercury is a problem, however. Finding a local buyer is a good answer for that problem. Other than the shipping issue, ebay is probable the way to go.

Are the units still useful??

Some of the FI rebuilders can best weigh in on that. I don't think the units are much good in the hands of a novice, however.

Russ
My manometer was purchased on eBay. It took me about 2years of bidding on them to find one under $600 Most of the complete units went for $750 to $1000. There hard to find and very sought after. You will have no problem getting $600 to $700.

Here is one for sale but it appears to be missing the fuel pressure attachment that Jerry B. noted.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/_Auto...3756.m14.l1318

Good luck with the sale. Chris
Old 07-26-2008, 01:25 PM
  #8  
YesA59
Pro
 
YesA59's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Mill Valley CA
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

This is a fascinating thread. We have three really good FI guys - Jerry, Jim and Tom - commenting. While Jerry and Jim use the Kent Moore unit, Jerry's comment about the GM specs being overly rich takes us back to the question raised by the original poster:

Are the Kent Moore units useful (to the average bloke)? Here is how I read the answers:

Tom doesn't use his beautifully boxed KM unit to calibrate FI units.

Reading Jerry and Jim's comments together, Jerry and Jim believe that the KM unit is useful, but you need to know the right specs. And you may not be able to rely entirely on GM specs (and what happens if your engine is not completely stock?). Once you figure out the right specs, however, the KM unit works fine.

As an average bloke...I don't see any need to buy a KM unit. I trust I could use the unit properly and set the engine to whatever GM spec that I wanted to apply. But to me the result would likely be random - I have no faith whatsoever that the spec I used would be appropriate for my particular setup (my engine is not completely stock, the spec could be overly rich as Jerry suggests, etc).

Thus, the KM units strike me as either a toy to play with but not rely on, or something that should just be left to the experts.

Jerry - do you think the GM specs were overly rich originally? Or did the specs become overly rich as things have changed over the years (gas formulations, etc)?

Russ

Last edited by YesA59; 07-26-2008 at 05:03 PM.
Old 07-26-2008, 04:42 PM
  #9  
wmf62
Race Director
 
wmf62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes on 621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

i have never used one in the 45 years i've had FI'd corvettes; right or wrong, i've always used the 'lean it out until it surges, and richen it back up until the surge stops' method.

but with today's technology, i would think that you could do a much better job by using a wideband O2 sensor to set your A/F ratio.
Bill
Old 07-26-2008, 08:38 PM
  #10  
10.5Vette
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
10.5Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Dorr MI
Posts: 1,034
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I checked mine out and it does seem to be missing the fuel pressure adapter fitting and one of the long hoses. Being a machinist and knowing machinists I could probaly make one up if anyone has a pic or dimensions on one.
Old 07-26-2008, 08:54 PM
  #11  
wmf62
Race Director
 
wmf62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes on 621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

Originally Posted by jerrybramlett
That would work great if you used very high quality ($$) equipment, a perfectly clean Oxygen sensor, a completely leak-tight exhaust system, and a chassis dynometer (so you could get readings under load).

I had a sales rep set up a modern tailpipe sniffer that was relatively inexpensive (just under $1,000) for a demonstration on one of my FI test cars. The readings he obtained were meaningless. He said I needed to seal weld all my exhaust pipe joints and buy a more expensive analyzer system. I declined.
Jerry
i understand,,,

Bill
Old 07-28-2008, 10:06 AM
  #12  
Joel 67
Melting Slicks
 
Joel 67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: NE Illinois IL
Posts: 2,910
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 59VetteFI
I checked mine out and it does seem to be missing the fuel pressure adapter fitting and one of the long hoses. Being a machinist and knowing machinists I could probaly make one up if anyone has a pic or dimensions on one.
Maybe Jerry or someone can help us out here. I'd certainly be interested in buying one if they were available, as I plan on building my own makeshift manometer using the commonly available parts.
Old 03-29-2015, 05:35 PM
  #13  
ohiovet
Melting Slicks
 
ohiovet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Middletown Ohio
Posts: 2,892
Received 167 Likes on 130 Posts
2016 C1 of Year Finalist
Default

If you plan on building a setup using a manometer you will need both a mercury manometer and a water manometer. The water one is much more accurate and sensitive then the mercury one.

Yes the USPS will not ship mercury but if you must do it put the bottle (usually plastic) inside a few zip lock bags, pad well and don't admit it is in there.
Old 03-29-2015, 06:04 PM
  #14  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by ohiovet
if you plan on building a setup using a manometer you will need both a mercury manometer and a water manometer. The water one is much more accurate and sensitive then the mercury one.

Yes the usps will not ship mercury but if you must do it put the bottle (usually plastic) inside a few zip lock bags, pad well and don't admit it is in there.
Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Admit to nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 03-29-2015, 08:23 PM
  #15  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,530 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by ohiovet
. The water one is much more accurate and sensitive then the mercury one.
More sensitive, yes, but accuracy isn't the reason the water manometer was part of the calibration tool. The water manometer was required to detect and measure the venturi signal which is extremely weak. The manometer needs to resolve changes in venturi vacuum as slight as ~.02 inches of water.

The mercury manometer included in the calibration tool was used to measure fuel pressure and resolves changes on the order of 0.1 PSI. It would have been worthless measuring the faint venturi vacuum signal.

For reference, 1 PSI is equivalent to almost 28 inches of water.

The old Kent-Moore manometers can not be counted on to calibrate an FI unit nearly as well as a modern wide-band O2 gauge. Anyone who is serious about accurate calibration needs stop sitting on their wallet and buy modern equipment.

Jim
Old 03-30-2015, 02:08 PM
  #16  
wmf62
Race Director
 
wmf62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes on 621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

Originally Posted by jim lockwood
More sensitive, yes, but accuracy isn't the reason the water manometer was part of the calibration tool. The water manometer was required to detect and measure the venturi signal which is extremely weak. The manometer needs to resolve changes in venturi vacuum as slight as ~.02 inches of water.

The mercury manometer included in the calibration tool was used to measure fuel pressure and resolves changes on the order of 0.1 PSI. It would have been worthless measuring the faint venturi vacuum signal.

For reference, 1 PSI is equivalent to almost 28 inches of water.

The old Kent-Moore manometers can not be counted on to calibrate an FI unit nearly as well as a modern wide-band O2 gauge. Anyone who is serious about accurate calibration needs stop sitting on their wallet and buy modern equipment.

Jim
I said that years ago, but Jerry took issue with it...
Bill
Old 03-30-2015, 02:14 PM
  #17  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

If the Kent-Moore tool doesn't tell you anything else, it would at least measure the venture signal and the fuel pressure. Might come in handy troubleshooting.

Last edited by MikeM; 03-30-2015 at 02:26 PM.
Old 03-30-2015, 10:36 PM
  #18  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,613
Received 6,530 Likes on 3,004 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
If the Kent-Moore tool doesn't tell you anything else, it would at least measure the venture signal and the fuel pressure.
A problem with the venturi signal as measured on the KM tool is that the engine isn't under a load and the range of measurement is pretty limited. For instance, the .5" water signal can occur at engine speeds as low as 1800 RPM.. The full range of the venturi signal can easily reach 64" water which greatly exceeds the 1" full scale range of the KM manometer.

I routinely log the venturi signal as I drive at normal hiway speeds. As entertaining as it is to review the captured data plots, I've actually found little practical use for the information.


Last edited by jim lockwood; 03-31-2015 at 09:32 AM.
Old 03-31-2015, 09:29 AM
  #19  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jerrybramlett

While experimenting with the manometer to find this fix, I learned that the typical fuel pressure at the nozzle during an 800 rpm idle is .25 - .3 psi, and this equates to about a 13.5 to 14:1 air/fuel ratio.

Anyway... a long, pointless story to admit I learned something using a manometer.
Well, I learned something. Thanks.

Get notified of new replies

To Looking for Info on Kent Moore FI Calibration Kit.




Quick Reply: Looking for Info on Kent Moore FI Calibration Kit.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.