Correct cam for '64 365HP
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: May 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Correct cam for '64 365HP
Can you numbers experts tell me what was the correct cam for a '64 365HP. Is the part #3849346? And was this referred to as the Duntov 30-30? Thanks
#2
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
The 3849346 cam is correct for the 365 hp 327 engine and is generally referred to as the 30-30 cam.
The 3736097 released in 1957 for the 283 SHP engine up through the1963 SHP engine is generally called the "Duntov" cam. This same cam was released in 1956 for the 245 hp 265 engine under a different part number (I can't recall the number) and that's when the name "Duntov" was applied to it.
#3
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes
on
1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist
This cam was also used in the 375hp/327s(FI) for 64-65, as well as the 67-69 302 Z/28 engines.
There are a few aftermarket cam grinders who are making repos of this profile.
Tom Parsons
#4
Drifting
Predator 30-30 on E-bay
Here's one on E-bay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-SB-CHEVY-30-...3A1%7C294%3A50
Someone on this Forum mentioned the Predator 30-30 cam a while back and said he was very happy with it. I bought one myself a few weeks back for a 1965 365SHP I'm building for my 65 Vert.
If you do a search, I'm sure you'll find the thread.
#5
30-30 cam
Go to your home page and type in CompCams
When you get to Comp cams home page type in 30-30
First one is Hydraulic ---
Second one down is solid lifters.
Look and see if these cams match the original spec.
When you get to Comp cams home page type in 30-30
First one is Hydraulic ---
Second one down is solid lifters.
Look and see if these cams match the original spec.
#6
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
Here's one on E-bay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-SB-CHEVY-30-...3A1%7C294%3A50
Someone on this Forum mentioned the Predator 30-30 cam a while back and said he was very happy with it. I bought one myself a few weeks back for a 1965 365SHP I'm building for my 65 Vert.
If you do a search, I'm sure you'll find the thread.
http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-SB-CHEVY-30-...3A1%7C294%3A50
Someone on this Forum mentioned the Predator 30-30 cam a while back and said he was very happy with it. I bought one myself a few weeks back for a 1965 365SHP I'm building for my 65 Vert.
If you do a search, I'm sure you'll find the thread.
I think that was AaronZ28.
I believe the Predator is a cheater version of the 30-30. I'd go with the stock profile from Federal-Mogul/Speed Pro and expect no problems with it.
#7
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
The Federal-Mogul/Speed-Pro "30-30" blueprint cam is #CS-118R (cam only), or #KC-118R (kit, cam and lifters). Use stock valve springs (GM #3911068 or Federal-Mogul #VS-677).
#8
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Lake Minnetonka, Mn
Posts: 5,072
Received 1,728 Likes
on
810 Posts
2018 C1 of Year Finalist
If memory serves, the 265 cid hi-po cam was referred to as the "078" and was a different grind than the "098" cam.
I always liked the "098" better than the 30-30. It gave great mid range torque where the 30-30 really had to be spooled up to work.
I always liked the "098" better than the 30-30. It gave great mid range torque where the 30-30 really had to be spooled up to work.
#9
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
There were two solid lifter Corvette camshafts in '56. One was the 225 hp cam which was the same as the '55 195 hp camshaft. The other was the 245 hp camshaft which was the same as the 097 camshaft released in '57 except for a flat machined on the rear cam journal to oil the top end through the rear cam bearing.
#10
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: New Milford CT
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is there a "better" modern replacement cam for the Dutov 098? Better meaning equal or better torque and Hp and area under the curve etc.? ( for a bone stock 283/270hp)
#11
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Lake Minnetonka, Mn
Posts: 5,072
Received 1,728 Likes
on
810 Posts
2018 C1 of Year Finalist
If you don't mind a hydraulic, the 327/350 L79 cam is a great cam although I don't know the grind difference between it and the 098.
The L79 has 221 duration/447 lift/112 centerline
The 30-30 has 254 duration/484 lift/114 centerline.
Perhaps someone can chime in on the 098 grind characteristics. I believe the duration is about the same as the L79 but the L79 has more lift.
The L79 has 221 duration/447 lift/112 centerline
The 30-30 has 254 duration/484 lift/114 centerline.
Perhaps someone can chime in on the 098 grind characteristics. I believe the duration is about the same as the L79 but the L79 has more lift.
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
I don't know much about aftermarket but I do know as long as you stick with a Chevy grind, you can run it tens of thosands of miles with no problems. The 097 cam is hard to beat for a street cam. Probably any low end power improvement would come at the expense of valve train wear/tear.
Your intake, exhaust and valve gear need to be designed as a system. Chevy did the homework for you, why not go with it?
#13
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: New Milford CT
Posts: 2,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About the Duntov 097 cam, I know lots of people run it a like it a lot. But Chevy didn't get it right on everything the first time. Like dual point distributors that were replaced by single point vacuum advance distributors by 1964. Or 2x4 carbs that were replaced by large single four bbls later on. and so on. Honestly I think the O97 cam was designed more for circle track racing than drag racing and street performance.
So that all makes me think that there may be a modern cam with less duration and overlap, but with more aggressive lobes, and with a little more lift that will yield the same top end 270hp but still maintain the 300 ft lb of torque down low instead of losing 15 ft.lbs. like the 097 does. I guess I am hoping someone else has been there and done that, and has found the perfect cam for a nostalgia street car.
So that all makes me think that there may be a modern cam with less duration and overlap, but with more aggressive lobes, and with a little more lift that will yield the same top end 270hp but still maintain the 300 ft lb of torque down low instead of losing 15 ft.lbs. like the 097 does. I guess I am hoping someone else has been there and done that, and has found the perfect cam for a nostalgia street car.
#14
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
I am far from a cam expert but what you're asking for has little to do with "modern" and everything to do with wear and tear on the valve train. You can't have it both ways with a flat tappet cam but a roller cam will help.
If you're just interested in where the power comes on, there's probably plenty of cams that will do what you want.