C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

3703524 block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2010, 04:02 PM
  #1  
scopeli
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
scopeli's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2010
Location: crown point in
Posts: 1,128
Received 67 Likes on 58 Posts

Default 3703524 block

i was looking at the date code on a 3703524 block and the date code on the right bellhousing flange is J 1 6. the number on the pad has been removed. is it possible for a 524 block to have a date code that ends in a 6?
Old 12-17-2010, 04:09 AM
  #2  
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 10,733
Received 561 Likes on 349 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by scopeli
i was looking at the date code on a 3703524 block and the date code on the right bellhousing flange is J 1 6. the number on the pad has been removed. is it possible for a 524 block to have a date code that ends in a 6?
To the best of my knowledge, the 524 block was used in 55 Corvettes only. It was a 265 CI block.

Changed in 56 to the 991 block for the Corvette, still 265 CI.

BUT, I do believe that Chevy passenger cars used the 265 CI block up to and including 1957.

Chuck
Old 12-17-2010, 09:52 AM
  #3  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,612
Received 6,528 Likes on 3,003 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Gongloff

Changed in 56 to the 991 block for the Corvette, still 265 CI.

BUT, I do believe that Chevy passenger cars used the 265 CI block up to and including 1957.

Chuck
Chuck, passenger cars also got the 991 block in '56. Who's to say, though, that the transition from the 524 to the 991 happened right at model changeover?

Jim
Old 12-17-2010, 11:11 AM
  #4  
scopeli
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
scopeli's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2010
Location: crown point in
Posts: 1,128
Received 67 Likes on 58 Posts

Default

the J 1 6 date code would probably have put this motor into the 57 model year. i would assume this date code was a factory error.
Old 12-18-2010, 06:13 AM
  #5  
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 10,733
Received 561 Likes on 349 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jim lockwood
Chuck, passenger cars also got the 991 block in '56. Who's to say, though, that the transition from the 524 to the 991 happened right at model changeover?

Jim

You would have thought I'd know that, since I have a 56 Chevy, BUT, my 56 is an old war horse hot rod. Began life as a 6 cylinder 3 on the tree. NOT much original left on the old girl.

I do know that they also carried the 265 CI block into 57. Did they also use the 991 block? The date on this block would indicate usage in a 57 vehicle.

Chuck
Old 12-18-2010, 09:31 AM
  #6  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,612
Received 6,528 Likes on 3,003 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Gongloff

I do know that they also carried the 265 CI block into 57. Did they also use the 991 block? The date on this block would indicate usage in a 57 vehicle.

'57 265s were a real odd duck. They were made from the same 548 block that was also built out as a 283. The difference between the two was the bore. If you ordered a base V8 and a manual transmission, you got a 2BBL 265. If you ordered a base V8 and any automatic, you got a 2BBL 283.

Early in the model year, or so the rumour goes, the 265s were painted yellow or green to visually distinguish them. Late in the model year, the 265s were Chevy orange.

This is an August '57 265.... never rebuilt, never re-painted:



Jim

Last edited by jim lockwood; 12-18-2010 at 09:35 AM.
Old 12-18-2010, 12:00 PM
  #7  
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 10,733
Received 561 Likes on 349 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jim lockwood

'57 265s were a real odd duck. They were made from the same 548 block that was also built out as a 283.

The difference between the two was the bore. If you ordered a base V8 and a manual transmission, you got a 2BBL 265. If you ordered a base V8 and any automatic, you got a 2BBL 283.

Early in the model year, or so the rumour goes, the 265s were painted yellow or green to visually distinguish them. Late in the model year, the 265s were Chevy orange.

This is an August '57 265.... never rebuilt, never re-painted:


Jim
So, reading your response, Jim, I gather that the 265 CI used in 57 WAS a 524 casting?

If so, that 'splains the 57 usage date on this particular block.

Chuck
Old 12-18-2010, 07:14 PM
  #8  
jim lockwood
Race Director
 
jim lockwood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,612
Received 6,528 Likes on 3,003 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Gongloff
So, reading your response, Jim, I gather that the 265 CI used in 57 WAS a 524 casting?
No. Both the '57 265 and the '57 283 were made from 548 blocks.

I've never seen 524 blocks in any application after MY55.

Jim
Old 12-19-2010, 06:55 AM
  #9  
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 10,733
Received 561 Likes on 349 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Chuck Gongloff
So, reading your response, Jim, I gather that the 265 CI used in 57 WAS a 524 casting?

If so, that 'splains the 57 usage date on this particular block.

Chuck
Originally Posted by jim lockwood
No. Both the '57 265 and the '57 283 were made from 548 blocks.

I've never seen 524 blocks in any application after MY55.

Jim

Sorry, Jim. NOW I understand. I misread your post....reading too fast.

Didn't "catch" that you said 548 block. I was still thinkin' 524.

Chuck
Old 12-19-2010, 08:49 AM
  #10  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

I play in the classic chevy arena a lot, and I have seen this before. This is most likely a service rerplacement block. The front pad most likely never had a number, as would also be indicative of service replacement blocks.
55 and 56 blocks were unique, and not considered interchangable with other blocks.

I have seen both 524 and 991 blocks dated well after the usage model year. A friend currently has a 991 block dated 1961 in his garage.

The 57 265 engines (548 block, 3.75 bore) were painted chartruse (kind of bright yellow green). I don't know this for sure, but I seem to recall that these engines were painted this color through most of the model year. Easy to tell them apart on the line.
Old 12-19-2010, 06:43 PM
  #11  
scopeli
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
scopeli's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2010
Location: crown point in
Posts: 1,128
Received 67 Likes on 58 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by emccomas
I play in the classic chevy arena a lot, and I have seen this before. This is most likely a service rerplacement block. The front pad most likely never had a number, as would also be indicative of service replacement blocks.
55 and 56 blocks were unique, and not considered interchangable with other blocks.

I have seen both 524 and 991 blocks dated well after the usage model year. A friend currently has a 991 block dated 1961 in his garage.

The 57 265 engines (548 block, 3.75 bore) were painted chartruse (kind of bright yellow green). I don't know this for sure, but I seem to recall that these engines were painted this color through most of the model year. Easy to tell them apart on the line.
thanks for the explanation. for a while i thought someone could have tampered with the casting numbers!
Old 11-24-2011, 09:14 PM
  #12  
jengen
1st Gear
 
jengen's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 524 block code

I own a 265 CI V8 with the block code 3703524. I got it with a 54 vette project car. It has a transmission which is probably a 3 speed but I'm not sure. Also have the original transmission from the 54 vette which is a 2 speed power glide with linkage and shifter. Can anyone tell me what these things are worth.

Get notified of new replies

To 3703524 block




Quick Reply: 3703524 block



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 PM.