C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

AO Smith vs St Louis bodies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2002, 05:11 AM
  #21  
Split Sixty Three
Instructor
 
Split Sixty Three's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2002
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (nolandadams@d-web.com)

Noland,

Welcome to the Forum,..we're all lucky to have a definitive knowledgeable resource like you on board,.I just recently purchased a copy of Volume 2 63-67 Guide To Technical Restoration,.Paid $80 + and probably contributed a little to your retirement fund,...:-) but I must say it has been worth every penny in helping me put my '63 back together. I will among with many others look forward to hearing more from you here on the CF, C1 & C2 'Vettes Tom
Save The Wave!!! :chevy
Split Sixty Three is offline  
Old 04-20-2002, 05:25 AM
  #22  
Chuck Gongloff
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Chuck Gongloff's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Beverly Hills/Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 10,733
Received 561 Likes on 349 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (Split Sixty Three)

Welcome Noland. Great to have you here. Shame on anyone who owns a 53-67 Corvette and does not own either your 53-62 or 63-67 book. Both are truly the "bibles" for their respective generation of Corvette. Chuck
Chuck Gongloff is offline  
Old 04-20-2002, 01:12 PM
  #23  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,856 Likes on 1,099 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (Chuck Gongloff)

Hi, Noland - welcome aboard! After three C1 and three C2 body-off restorations, I have both of your Restoration books (kinda dog-eared by now), and all five volumes of your "American Legends" series too - great stuff!

JohnZ (John Hinckley)
'57 270
JohnZ is offline  
Old 04-21-2002, 12:47 AM
  #24  
jimgessner
Safety Car
 
jimgessner's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Bandera Texas
Posts: 4,148
Received 638 Likes on 382 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (JohnZ)

Noland, it's all your fault ! Zora made these silly cars and you have historically showed us all how it was done.

Remember Oakland and San Mateo in 76and 80? Boy a lot of knowledge since those days. Have fun with this forum. A great bunch of people. And I learn something new every time I visit.
Jim
jimgessner is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 11:38 AM
  #25  
Tim Gilmore
Racer
 
Tim Gilmore's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 400
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (jimgessner)

I have owned three 67 big blocks and all are St. Louis bodies. The stripe was the issue in 67 and I have always understood that only very early 67 big blocks could be A.O. Smith cars. Noland came to look at a car I had for sale when I lived in Sacramento. Signed my book in my garage. I am back in Austin, TX now.
Tim Gilmore is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 12:44 PM
  #26  
L71rat
Racer
 
L71rat's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2001
Location: toronto ont
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (Tim Gilmore)

What do you tell the guy with a '67 #s match big block from AO Smith?
L71rat is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 01:20 PM
  #27  
Dave's '67
Advanced
 
Dave's '67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Tulsa Okla.
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (L71rat)

L71,It would have to be a very low serial numbered car to be consistant with what we know today. My S-Bodied 427 is Ser. NO. 23XX...Mid Oct production.

Dave
Dave's '67 is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 03:46 PM
  #28  
Tim Gilmore
Racer
 
Tim Gilmore's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 400
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (Dave's '67)

I think the A.O. Smith big block would have to stand on its own integrity. I would hope that it has some paperwork or a good owner history. I would prefer an unrestored car and I would look real hard at the stamp. Judging of the car would help. In a judging seminar at Galveston last year this topic came up while we were looking at an original 67 big block. Not very many people are aware of the fact that St. Louis was the only source for big block bodies in 67.
Tim Gilmore is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 03:49 PM
  #29  
Tim Gilmore
Racer
 
Tim Gilmore's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2001
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 400
Received 24 Likes on 17 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (Tim Gilmore)

My 1967 number 2096 is a St. Louis car.
Tim Gilmore is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 11:16 PM
  #30  
nolandadams@d-web.com
Intermediate
 
nolandadams@d-web.com's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (L71rat)

If I had the opportunity to examine a 1967 big block with an AO Smith body I would approach it with an open mind. Of course if it's an early '67 (up to serial number 1,100 or so) it could have either body.
After the agreement was reached to apply the hood stripe at St. Louis, we would expect to see all '67s with 427s with "S" bodies. But- lets imagine a possibility- while checking the inventory of body panels at the AO Smith body assembly plant, there is enough material to assemble 3 or 4 427 front ends. This requires not only the hood, but the correct inner fender panels with provisions for mounting the hood support. The 327's hood support was on the right, the 437's hood support was on the left side.
The first thing was that AO Smith would probably do is to contact the engineers at the St Louis assembly plant. SInce AO Smith did not have the hood stripe masks, could St. Louis install the hood stripe?
Answer: Yes. We'll get back to you with the body type, exterior/interior colors and the options. Remember, such an option as power windows affects the center console, wiring harness, and doors and door panels.
Next, the details are finalized, the AO Smith 427 body is built and painted and shipped to St. Louis, where the hood stripe is installed.
After this AO Smith 427 body was successfully completed, the detailed instructions for the next body were sent to AO Smith. And the 427 body assembly process continued until all the parts were used up.
Now, all this is conjecture on my part, but it's based on the way the assembly plant procedures unfold as Corvettes were built.
So, if I were to examine a 1967 427 with an AO Smith body, I would check it out carefully and throughly. It is possible that it is an original car as presented.
-Noland Adams
nolandadams@d-web.com is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 11:21 PM
  #31  
67HEAVEN
Le Mans Master
 
67HEAVEN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,245
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (nolandadams@d-web.com)

The 327's hood support was on the right, the 437's hood support was on the left side.
Noland, I've often wondered why big blocks got the driver's side hood support...small blocks the passenger side.
67HEAVEN is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 11:33 PM
  #32  
jimgessner
Safety Car
 
jimgessner's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Bandera Texas
Posts: 4,148
Received 638 Likes on 382 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (67HEAVEN)

I think it had to do with the wide 427 brass radiator. There was no room on the passanger side underhood area for the hood support with the big radiator of the big block. Sound right Noland??
Jim
jimgessner is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 11:37 PM
  #33  
wombvette
Le Mans Master
 
wombvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: New Hill NC
Posts: 8,918
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts

Default Re: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies (67HEAVEN)

Noland, I agree with your assesment, except the fact that the innerfenders are different. Yes the hood support is on the other side, but for 66 and 67 the innerfender panels are the same as the SB except that the mounting bracket is moved to the other side. There are provisions for the support on both innerfenders. It would be very easy to move the bracket.
wombvette is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 03:23 PM
  #34  
Tom McMahon
Instructor
 
Tom McMahon's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 197
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 67HEAVEN
My early '67 L-71....St. Louis body.
Hi,
What is the VIN of your Corvette. Last six characters is sufficient.
My 1967 Corvette built 09/09/1966 is VIN 194677S100560.
This Corvette is St Louis built body.
Only documented 1967 Dow Smith big block body is VIN 365.
Tom McMahon is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 03:30 PM
  #35  
Mossy66
Drifting
 
Mossy66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Villa Illinois
Posts: 1,542
Received 92 Likes on 73 Posts
St. Jude Donor '14

Default

Originally Posted by Tom McMahon
Hi,
What is the VIN of your Corvette. Last six characters is sufficient.
My 1967 Corvette built 09/09/1966 is VIN 194677S100560.
This Corvette is St Louis built body.
Only documented 1967 Dow Smith big block body is VIN 365.
that thread was from 14 years ago.


Gerry
Mossy66 is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 03:42 PM
  #36  
SBR
Safety Car
 
SBR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2001
Location: Barrington IL
Posts: 4,289
Received 676 Likes on 382 Posts

Default

This has to be a record.
SBR is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 03:44 PM
  #37  
Tom McMahon
Instructor
 
Tom McMahon's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 197
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 67HEAVEN
My early '67 L-71....St. Louis body.
Time flies when you are having fun.
Can't remember your VIN?
My Corvette will be fifty years old on this Friday.
My Corvette was built with RPON11 OFF ROAD SERVICE ACCESS.
Tom McMahon is offline  

Get notified of new replies

To AO Smith vs St Louis bodies

Old 09-07-2016, 04:02 PM
  #38  
Tom McMahon
Instructor
 
Tom McMahon's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Posts: 197
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SBR
This has to be a record.

My 1967 Corvette Rally Red Convertible was ordered through Curhan Chevrolet Randolph Massachusetts in July of 1966 by me and my father.
The Corvette was a GM class A discount Corvette and Corvette was delivered to the dealership before announcement day 09/29/1966.
All I could do is look at Corvette in rear garage at dealership until 09/29/1966.
Originally wanted side dual exhaust (N14) but dealer said I couldn't get inspection sticker in Massachusetts. However dealer did buy into (N11) off road service exhaust)
I have the original bill of sale and protect 0 plate after all of these years.
My Corvette is St Louis built body.
Dow Smith wasn't allowed to build big block 1967 Corvette's because they messed up the hood stripe. Again, my Corvette body was built by St Louis. When looking at the hood stripe on this brand new car, you could see Rally Red paint through the black stripe (What a joke)
Dealer repainted stripe under new car warranty.
Tom McMahon is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 05:16 PM
  #39  
Loren Smith
Drifting
 
Loren Smith's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,755
Received 91 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

If only Noland would have stayed on the forum, it looks like no posts since 2002. Imagine the wealth of information we could have received. "sigh"
Loren Smith is offline  
Old 09-07-2016, 07:39 PM
  #40  
DansYellow66
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
DansYellow66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 15,746
Received 2,617 Likes on 1,949 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SBR
This has to be a record.
Well - 67Heaven posted last Feb which was his first and last post since 2012. So maybe he still drops in once in a great while and will answer.
DansYellow66 is offline  


Quick Reply: AO Smith vs St Louis bodies



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 PM.