C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Quadrajet 17054929, questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2014, 06:57 PM
  #1  
jet-tech
Pro
Thread Starter
 
jet-tech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 626
Received 121 Likes on 83 Posts

Default Quadrajet 17054929, questions

I have a Rochester Q-jet on my 1966 327, A.I.R. Powerglide Vette. The carb p/n is 17054929 and date code 2781. From my recon it's manufactured between 1974 and 77. I not sure what the CFM is, maybe 750. It smells like fuel after shutdown and sometimes hard to restart after engine is warmed up. Is this Carb worth rebuilding or should it be replaced with eddy 600 CFM carb or other aftermarket carb? Any info on this Q-jet would be appreciated.
Old 03-22-2014, 07:28 PM
  #2  
Stan's Customs
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Stan's Customs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,021
Received 88 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Call SMI and speak with Sean...he's a legendary carb man from all kinds of Hot Rod and other magazine articles that knows these carbs as well or better than anyone in the country....and is reasonable.

http://www.smicarburetor.com/

Stan...
Old 03-22-2014, 08:15 PM
  #3  
Plasticman
Race Director

 
Plasticman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Beverly Hills (Pine Ridge) Florida
Posts: 10,152
Received 525 Likes on 374 Posts

Default

Just about all carbs smell like fuel after shutdown due to the "gasoline" we have today (far cry from the gas we had back when carbs were in vogue).

Note that a Q-jet uses a spread bore bore pattern, so unless you are wanting to change over to a square bore pattern intake manifold, your choices are limited. Don't even think of using an adapter.

If your carb is from the mid 70's (and it most likely is, since I have a slew of Q-jet numbers, and that # is later than my 60-70's list), it is not optimum either. Not the worst, but could be better.

Plasticman

Last edited by Plasticman; 03-23-2014 at 08:39 AM.
Old 03-23-2014, 03:24 AM
  #4  
jet-tech
Pro
Thread Starter
 
jet-tech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 626
Received 121 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

I just did a members check on my intake manifold and heads. Manifold is not original #3927184 from 1969 300-350 HP. Heads mercilessly are original. Any info of the performance on this manifold vs a new Edlebrock performer?

One note, the A.I.R. system had been removed before I bought the car. And the PG is next to go.
Old 03-23-2014, 05:32 AM
  #5  
Stan's Customs
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Stan's Customs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,021
Received 88 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

The manifold change by itself is not enough to matter for daily driving. Just have SMI build your carb and enjoy the car. CALL Sean..he'll tell you what you need to know..and he builds them all...Holleys , Q-Jets ..you name it!

There's no good stopping place when you start upgrading....heads, intake, cam, gears, headers ...and while your at it might as well etc. etc....

If you plan on doing more.. better plan it all from the start ...so you won't have to do some things twice.

FYI..I have a Q-jet from SMI for my '61 restomod...I considered everything, F.I. systems, single carbs, two fours, everything...

...but I was in the garage business many years and the Q-jet has always been my carburetor of choice over all others. They are great for for driveability...reasonable gas mileage ....and I love the way they sound from a tromp...and I've built hundreds of them. It would have been foolish for me to do anything else...

There are many good choices...but a Q-jet will perform very well ...when properly done.

Good luck...Stan
Old 03-23-2014, 10:18 AM
  #6  
landshark 454
Pro
 
landshark 454's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Clermont Florida
Posts: 599
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

If the car runs well other than the smell and the hot start issue, there is probably nothing wrong with the carburetor. As mentioned already, the problem is today's fuel. It is made to be used in a sealed system, with the fuel under pressure at the injectors. They have added things to work under these conditions, but it causes the fuel to vapor off at lower temperatures, which causes flooding and vapor lock after a hot soak. Besides installing a thermal insulating spacer or plate under the carb, there is little you can do about it, other than running racing or aviation fuel, which, because they may contain lead, and have not been taxed for road use, are illegal to run on the street. Or you can install an electronic injection unit. ( The factory mechanical injection has even more problems with this fuel than the carb cars.)

So it boils down to; live with it, or get a newer car.
Old 03-23-2014, 10:49 AM
  #7  
Stan's Customs
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Stan's Customs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,021
Received 88 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Sorry Shark...but it really could just be the carb too...

Quadrajets are bad about leaking down via a plug in the base of the carburetor. Which causes causes the smell and hard starting after it leaks down...

It's an easy fix...

If you want to be sure before you spend any $$...talk to SMI as mentioned.

Happy trails...Stan
Old 03-23-2014, 10:53 AM
  #8  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

I ran a Rochester Q-jet on my 350ci Pontiac for decades in the 70s - prob same era carb as you have. The pre-emission versions are nice carbs and worth rebuilding and I'd take one all day long over an Edelbrock. Note Plasticman's comments about the spread bore though if you're considering a swap anyway.
Old 03-23-2014, 11:33 AM
  #9  
Stan's Customs
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Stan's Customs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,021
Received 88 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Frank and Plasticman are right...and why I mentioned having a plan before you do anything.

If you plan on a Holley and a square bore later...better get a square bore intake and carb now.
Old 03-23-2014, 11:48 AM
  #10  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Quadra-Jets have always been bad about the floats absorbing gas and getting heavy. That can stop the float from shutting off completely and cause the gas smell and hot restart problems.

From memory (which seems to fail too often) any Quadra-Jet that has the part number starting with a "1", or 8 digit part number is a later, smog era carb and not the best choice to use.
Old 03-23-2014, 12:00 PM
  #11  
jet-tech
Pro
Thread Starter
 
jet-tech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 626
Received 121 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Thanks for all the advice. leaning towards replacing the intake manifold and carb with Edelbrock performer combo. I know fitment with stock looking air cleaner is going to be a challenge.
Old 03-23-2014, 02:10 PM
  #12  
Stan's Customs
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Stan's Customs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,021
Received 88 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Ahh well, go figure.....the Edlebrock fit all package doesn't touch a carburetor from SMI of any kind. Just like there is a difference between silk and burlap....lol.

If you want some "real" information once again talk to Sean...save your self some misinformation headaches...and $$$...

His stuff will be jetted for your application.

Just sayin'...Stan

Last edited by Stan's Customs; 03-23-2014 at 02:20 PM.
Old 03-23-2014, 02:24 PM
  #13  
jet-tech
Pro
Thread Starter
 
jet-tech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 626
Received 121 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stan's Customs
Ahh well, go figure.....the Edlebrock fit all package doesn't touch a carburetor from SMI of any kind. Just like there is a difference between silk and burlap....lol.

If you want some "real" information once again talk to Sean...save your self some misinformation headaches...and $$$...

His stuff will be jetted for your application.

Just sayin'...Stan
Thanks Stan, I will call Sean before before I make up my mind.
Old 03-23-2014, 02:45 PM
  #14  
Stan's Customs
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Stan's Customs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,021
Received 88 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

Old 03-23-2014, 06:26 PM
  #15  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Just don't ever install the Q-jet "hot idle compensator" in backwards. I did it once and the car shut off once it warmed up. Duh !
Old 03-23-2014, 10:10 PM
  #16  
jet-tech
Pro
Thread Starter
 
jet-tech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2013
Location: Grapevine TX
Posts: 626
Received 121 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Does anyone know the CFM of Q-jet p/n 17054929? Built in mid 1970's
Old 03-23-2014, 11:05 PM
  #17  
Vetterodder
Safety Car
 
Vetterodder's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Fountain Hills AZ
Posts: 3,625
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

According to what I found on Google, it's from a `74 pickup. Most likely 750 cfm rated. Keep in mind that it's unlikely to achieve full airflow (750) until about 9k rpm on a 327. Even though the secondaries never fully open in real life (on a 327), they are still good carbs. IMO, better than an Edelbrock.

Get notified of new replies

To Quadrajet 17054929, questions

Old 03-24-2014, 08:48 AM
  #18  
Stan's Customs
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Stan's Customs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,021
Received 88 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

CFM is not as much a factor on QJ's as other carbs. It is what it needs to be, because of the vacuum secondaries, small front venturis and metering system. They come stock from the factory on 305's to 454's .

Whatever they came on they are all pretty close in cfm. (750/800) .
Old 03-24-2014, 10:09 AM
  #19  
PAmotorman
Melting Slicks
 
PAmotorman's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 0
Received 150 Likes on 131 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jet-tech
I have a Rochester Q-jet on my 1966 327, A.I.R. Powerglide Vette. The carb p/n is 17054929 and date code 2781. From my recon it's manufactured between 1974 and 77. I not sure what the CFM is, maybe 750. It smells like fuel after shutdown and sometimes hard to restart after engine is warmed up. Is this Carb worth rebuilding or should it be replaced with eddy 600 CFM carb or other aftermarket carb? Any info on this Q-jet would be appreciated.
17054929 1974 350/400 truck service replacement carb 750 CFM
Old 03-24-2014, 10:15 AM
  #20  
PAmotorman
Melting Slicks
 
PAmotorman's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 0
Received 150 Likes on 131 Posts

Default how to tell the difference

between 750 and 800 CFM Q jet carbs. 750 on the left 800 on the right. the difference is only in the primary side
Attached Images  



Quick Reply: Quadrajet 17054929, questions



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 PM.