C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Thinking of Conical Valve Springs, But...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2014, 02:18 PM
  #41  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TCracingCA
Thought you wrote that they were installed at less height which would coil bind, so naturally more height over the recommendation would weaken the install having less tension!

But I think I did read right that you were still unclear as to what springs these were?
Exactly. The work order specifies new Crane springs, retainers, shims, etc. but Steve said they looked like stock GM pieces which would have been for a 300 hp engine and not the 350 hp "151" cam.

We'll get to the bottom of this yet.
Old 11-08-2014, 03:31 PM
  #42  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by toddalin
Exactly. The work order specifies new Crane springs, retainers, shims, etc. but Steve said they looked like stock GM pieces which would have been for a 300 hp engine and not the 350 hp "151" cam.

We'll get to the bottom of this yet.
The 300hp and 350hp engines (plus the 250hp and 375hp fuelie) all used the same grocery-getter valve springs, same as Grandma had in her 307 station wagon (GM #3911068 - 80# closed, 190# @ 1.25" open). Also known as Federal-Mogul #VS-677 and NAPA #2121150.
Old 11-08-2014, 03:44 PM
  #43  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JohnZ
The 300hp and 350hp engines (plus the 250hp and 375hp fuelie) all used the same grocery-getter valve springs, same as Grandma had in her 307 station wagon (GM #3911068 - 80# closed, 190# @ 1.25" open). Also known as Federal-Mogul #VS-677 and NAPA #2121150.
Thanks,

Even so, the Crane #151 cam card calls for 90# at 1.625" installed height, and 265# at 1.203".
Old 11-08-2014, 03:52 PM
  #44  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by toddalin
Thanks,

Even so, the Crane #151 cam card calls for 90# at 1.625" installed height, and 265# at 1.203".
That's for the Crane-modified ("improved") version of the "151" cam, not the original GM "151" cam.
Old 11-08-2014, 05:05 PM
  #45  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Agreed. It's a great cam. Too bad they stopped production on the "vintage muscle" series years ago.
Old 11-08-2014, 05:47 PM
  #46  
65tripleblack
Safety Car
 
65tripleblack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Ocean Township NJ
Posts: 4,797
Received 235 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by toddalin
Agreed. It's a great cam. Too bad they stopped production on the "vintage muscle" series years ago.
Describe your ignition system.
Old 11-08-2014, 05:55 PM
  #47  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65tripleblack
Describe your ignition system.
Mallory Hyfire IV CD ignition box triggered off Accel points
Mallory high voltage chrome coil
Mallory spiral-wound coil wire
Mallory solid copper plug wires, ends soldered to wires
Champion plugs
37 degrees total ignition advance

Distributor and vacuum advance set up by Lars.

Last edited by toddalin; 11-08-2014 at 06:13 PM.
Old 11-11-2014, 01:45 PM
  #48  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Steve checked the springs yesterday. He said the seat pressures were on the order of 76 - 82# (90# spec), open was a bit over 240# (260# spec).

So this may not a problem. But while out, the springs will be replaced with new GM Z-28 springs (~$50/set). Steve said the Z-28 springs spec the same seat pressure (90#), but were a bit lighter (~5#) open as the cam card.

I told him to put them in, but shim up the seat/open pressure by ~5#. These can and will reuse all of the existing other pieces, and if this is not the problem, I haven't laid a ton of money into it.
Old 11-11-2014, 05:00 PM
  #49  
65tripleblack
Safety Car
 
65tripleblack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Ocean Township NJ
Posts: 4,797
Received 235 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by toddalin
Steve checked the springs yesterday. He said the seat pressures were on the order of 76 - 82# (90# spec), open was a bit over 240# (260# spec).

So this may not a problem. But while out, the springs will be replaced with new GM Z-28 springs (~$50/set). Steve said the Z-28 springs spec the same seat pressure (90#), but were a bit lighter (~5#) open as the cam card.

I told him to put them in, but shim up the seat/open pressure by ~5#. These can and will reuse all of the existing other pieces, and if this is not the problem, I haven't laid a ton of money into it.

"Z28" springs (GM 3927142)

110 # @ 1.700"
1.273" OD
271 # @ 1.25"
358 #/" rate
coil bind @ 1.16"
.450" max valve lift (with generous 0.09" margin to bind) *

* my edit

Last edited by 65tripleblack; 11-11-2014 at 05:12 PM.
Old 11-11-2014, 05:05 PM
  #50  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65tripleblack
Z28 springs (GM 3927142)

110 # @ 1.700"
1.273" OD
271 # @ 1.25"
358 #/" rate
.450" max valve lift

Not GM, Federal Mogul/SBI (160-1144HP). His catalog pressure numbers conflict with the on-line catalog, and he called them to check it out and measured one in the shop at 90#@1.7" and ~255# open.

On-line catalog says 118#@1.700 closed, and 318#@1.210 open. This equates to a spring rate of 408#/in. The spring rate on the cam card is 415#/in, so if the open pressure is set to that of the cam card, the closed pressure would be 91.5# (as opposed to 90# on the cam card).

Steve is very diligent and said he would check each one for open and seat pressure prior to installation and he will shoot for the cam card specs. If he can't get them there, he won't install them and we'll go from there.

Last edited by toddalin; 11-11-2014 at 08:05 PM.
Old 11-13-2014, 08:41 PM
  #51  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

The 160-1144HP springs came in and Steve tested them ALL. Without any shims at all, at an installed height of 1.71", seat pressures were all within 1# @ 91-92#. Open pressure was 260# so these are almost right on the money for the cam card and what his specs said.

I was shooting for 265# open so told him to see how much change the thinnest shim would produce and if it stayed in the "90s" on the seats, use it. (Z28s uses 110# on the seat so keeping in the 90s should be fine.) So long as the open pressures do not exceed 280#, the pressed in studs should be fine.
Old 11-13-2014, 08:55 PM
  #52  
TCracingCA
Team Owner

 
TCracingCA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 36,655
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,005 Posts

Default I am still following!

Originally Posted by toddalin
The 160-1144HP springs came in and Steve tested them ALL. Without any shims at all, at an installed height of 1.71", seat pressures were all within 1# @ 91-92#. Open pressure was 260# so these are almost right on the money for the cam card and what his specs said.

I was shooting for 265# open so told him to see how much change the thinnest shim would produce and if it stayed in the "90s" on the seats, use it. (Z28s uses 110# on the seat so keeping in the 90s should be fine.) So long as the open pressures do not exceed 280#, the pressed in studs should be fine.
I want to see what it will rev to!
Old 11-13-2014, 10:36 PM
  #53  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Me too. The next time that someone in the area on the Forum arranges for a dyno day, I'll find out. Typically happens every couple years.
Old 11-14-2014, 11:02 AM
  #54  
65tripleblack
Safety Car
 
65tripleblack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Ocean Township NJ
Posts: 4,797
Received 235 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by toddalin
Me too. The next time that someone in the area on the Forum arranges for a dyno day, I'll find out. Typically happens every couple years.
I've never adjusted hydraulics for high perf, but was thinking you might want to zero lash them without the additional preload on the plungers. I'm not certain, but that seems to hold-off lifter pump-up for some extra revs.
Old 11-14-2014, 01:38 PM
  #55  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Thanks,

Steve know the goal (be all it can be for what it is) and has been building engines long enough to know what will work..., and what he'll guarantee.
Old 11-14-2014, 04:24 PM
  #56  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Car's done. Doesn't take Steve long.

I asked if there was a notable difference and his response was "Runs good and I'm not about to hammer on your car."

Will probably take a dyno to tell if there is a difference. Something to look forward to. I'll pick it up tomorrow or Monday.
Old 11-14-2014, 04:28 PM
  #57  
TCracingCA
Team Owner

 
TCracingCA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 36,655
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,005 Posts

Default I will lay a wager that it will be tomorrow!

Originally Posted by toddalin
Car's done. Doesn't take Steve long.

I asked if there was a notable difference and his response was "Runs good and I'm not about to hammer on your car."

Will probably take a dyno to tell if there is a difference. Something to look forward to. I'll pick it up tomorrow or Monday.
Probably be standing out there, before they even open!

Get notified of new replies

To Thinking of Conical Valve Springs, But...

Old 11-17-2014, 05:25 PM
  #58  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Just got back from picking up the '64. The new 160-1144HP springs have really made a nice, noticeable improvement. He installed them without shims at 92# on the seats and 260# open. The idle is noticeably smoother, (and a smooth idle is attained from cold quicker) and when pulling away from a stop light, there is less tendency to buck as the gas is feathered in. The thing always pulled great on the cam, and maybe even better now. There was also an occasional "hic" at idle that may be gone.

Steve said it was notably better than when he took it over for alignment, and really loves the way it runs. And Steve has driven a lot of Vettes.
Old 11-18-2014, 09:31 AM
  #59  
65tripleblack
Safety Car
 
65tripleblack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Ocean Township NJ
Posts: 4,797
Received 235 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by toddalin
Just got back from picking up the '64. The new 160-1144HP springs have really made a nice, noticeable improvement. He installed them without shims at 92# on the seats and 260# open. The idle is noticeably smoother, (and a smooth idle is attained from cold quicker) and when pulling away from a stop light, there is less tendency to buck as the gas is feathered in. The thing always pulled great on the cam, and maybe even better now. There was also an occasional "hic" at idle that may be gone.

Steve said it was notably better than when he took it over for alignment, and really loves the way it runs. And Steve has driven a lot of Vettes.
Here, take this sugar pill and call me in the morning.
Old 11-18-2014, 01:52 PM
  #60  
toddalin
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
toddalin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Santa Ana CA
Posts: 8,763
Received 1,167 Likes on 486 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65tripleblack
Here, take this sugar pill and call me in the morning.
I've had the car for 29 years. The engine was rebuilt ~25 years ago, has been dynoed several times over these years, and by now I think that I know its noises, vibrations, and feel. And, it would not surprise me at all if the engine now pulls more vacuum at idle.

For all we know, something may have been out of adjustment (e.g., lifter lash) and it was corrected in the R&R. Or, maybe 25 years of heat cycling softened the springs, as they were over 10# light on the seats and over 20# light when open.

Steve also said it is the most cold blooded car he's driven (takes forever to warm up). He said it is even more cold blooded than his L88.

Last edited by toddalin; 11-18-2014 at 01:59 PM.



Quick Reply: Thinking of Conical Valve Springs, But...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 PM.