C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

1962 distributor differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2014, 11:52 AM
  #1  
sprinter
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
sprinter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: California CA
Posts: 955
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default 1962 distributor differences

I am having a hard time finding a reasonably priced 1110984 (250hp) distributor. What are the differences between the 1110984 and a 1110985 tach drive distributor? It seems like the 0985s are plentiful...

I want it to look correct on the outside, but plan to replace the points with electronics on the inside.
Old 10-26-2014, 12:29 PM
  #2  
sprinter
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
sprinter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: California CA
Posts: 955
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Other questions:
1. Does the 0185 have the oil filler or was this specific to 0184?
2. If it is a single point, tach drive with vacuum advance, can this be anything other than a 0184?

Thanks for helping me understand
Old 10-26-2014, 01:29 PM
  #3  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

ALL 62 distributors were tach drive.
The 250 and 300hp distributors were SINGLE point with a vacuum advance.
The distributor for the 340hp engine (solid lifter with a carb) was dual point and NO vac adv.
The FI dist was also dual point and NO vac adv.

ANY 63 74 distributor with vac adv will work for your engine. ALTHOUGH not totally correct, they can be setup to work just fine. The primary differences between 63-74 vac adv, single point distributors will be the mechanical weight advance setting and the vac adv canister. BOTH of these features can easily be tailored to suit your engine.
Old 10-26-2014, 02:39 PM
  #4  
redvetracr
Race Director
 
redvetracr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: WI
Posts: 18,125
Likes: 0
Received 174 Likes on 160 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sprinter
It seems like the 0985s are

GM sold many thousands of these dual point tach drive distributors over the counter to racers
Old 10-26-2014, 04:07 PM
  #5  
sprinter
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
sprinter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: California CA
Posts: 955
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DZAUTO
ANY 63 74 distributor with vac adv will work for your engine. ALTHOUGH not totally correct, they can be setup to work just fine. The primary differences between 63-74 vac adv, single point distributors will be the mechanical weight advance setting and the vac adv canister. BOTH of these features can easily be tailored to suit your engine.
So is there anything external visually that can identify a true 1962 1110984 vs. a 63-74 distributor? Did any of the 63-74 versions have the external oiler or no?
Old 10-26-2014, 04:15 PM
  #6  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by sprinter
So is there anything external visually that can identify a true 1962 1110984 vs. a 63-74 distributor? Did any of the 63-74 versions have the external oiler or no?
All of them have cast iron housings (NO alum housings were used for tach drive distributors).
Yes, the REALLY, REALLY knowledgeable judges/distributor gurus can spot the difference between the really early tach drive/vac adv distributors and the later versions. But MOST people will not know the difference between a 62 vac adv/tach drive and a 74 version. When installed in the engine, they look virtually identical. The vac adv can is in the same position, the tach drive is in the same position and they all use the same single door dist cap.
I VERY SERIOUSLY doubt that there are 3 people on this forum that can describe the minute differences between a 62 and 74 tach drive dist.
Old 10-26-2014, 07:09 PM
  #7  
GCD1962
Race Director
 
GCD1962's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 14,761
Received 161 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redvetracr
GM sold many thousands of these dual point tach drive distributors over the counter to racers
We had a hard time keeping them in stock. No other points dist could touch it at the time.
Old 10-29-2014, 08:31 PM
  #8  
62corvette
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
62corvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Waterford WI
Posts: 4,966
Received 663 Likes on 472 Posts

Default

62 984 tach drive distributors were the only tach-drive ones to have an oiler on the side of the body, and that oiler was not a tube, it was only a spring-loaded GITS type cap. Nearly impossible to actually oil! It was used on both 250 and 300 hp 62's.

Last edited by 62corvette; 10-29-2014 at 08:33 PM. Reason: Spelling
Old 10-30-2014, 08:45 PM
  #9  
sprinter
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
sprinter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: California CA
Posts: 955
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Can someone confirm this is a 1110984 (from above description it is). To clarify that point, I think the 1110984 is the only one with GITS cap, Tach drive and vacuum advance. The 1110985 has the first two, but not the vacuum advance; also is dual points.




Last edited by sprinter; 10-30-2014 at 09:58 PM.
Old 10-30-2014, 10:08 PM
  #10  
62corvette
Safety Car
Support Corvetteforum!
 
62corvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Waterford WI
Posts: 4,966
Received 663 Likes on 472 Posts

Default

I can't absolutely say that it is, but it looks exactly like the 984s that I have been familiar with for years. The upside down gear on the bottom concerns me, though.
Old 10-30-2014, 10:14 PM
  #11  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by 62corvette
-------------------------------------------------- The upside down gear on the bottom concerns me, though.
A CLEAR indication that Bubba has touched it!
Old 10-30-2014, 10:52 PM
  #12  
sprinter
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
sprinter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: California CA
Posts: 955
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DZAUTO
A CLEAR indication that Bubba has touched it!
I swear... Bubba loves old vettes. He also removed my rear sway bar
The following users liked this post:
benrep (06-10-2019)
Old 10-30-2014, 10:52 PM
  #13  
WKNR
Instructor
 
WKNR's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 169
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sprinter
Can someone confirm this is a 1110984 (from above description it is). To clarify that point, I think the 1110984 is the only one with GITS cap, Tach drive and vacuum advance. The 1110985 has the first two, but not the vacuum advance; also is dual points.



I think the 54W football cam is correct for a 984. What is the vacuum can number? The cross gear casting is old school.....do you have the original al distributor band?
Old 10-31-2014, 12:16 AM
  #14  
sprinter
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
sprinter's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: California CA
Posts: 955
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WKNR
I think the 54W football cam is correct for a 984. What is the vacuum can number? The cross gear casting is old school.....do you have the original al distributor band?
No band. I just bought this one and yet to receive it. I will update this post with the vacuum can number when I get it.

Get notified of new replies

To 1962 distributor differences




Quick Reply: 1962 distributor differences



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 AM.