Is dual carb setup worth the expense?
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is dual carb setup worth the expense?
My dad has a 58 with a base 283. Is the $3000 or so cost of an original Carter dual setup to make it a 245hp worth the expense? I'm speaking in terms of increased overall value of the car. Thanks for any input.
#2
Race Director
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes
on
1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist
Basically, the answer is yes.
But, for absolute correct originality, that is debatable (just ask the NCRS crowd).
First, nothing is cooler than opening the hood and seeing two carburetors on an alum manifold (of course, you GOT to have the finned valve covers for the finishing touch). And, I'm biased, the only thing cooler than dual 4s is FI.
Contrary to MANY, MANY opinions, a properly rebuilt and setup 2x4 WCFBs----------------WITH PROGRESSIVE LINKAGE---------will function perfect. The old WCFB carb was a very good, dependable carb. It is true, if not properly rebuilt, and the floats not properly adjusted (it's mandatory the floats be centered in the bowls and highly advisable that the tube be installed in the choke passage), they can cause lots of frustration.
Now, with all of that said, regardless of correctness, originality, passing NCRS judging standards, or anything else, I'd buy the setup and install it in a heartbeat (welllllllllll, not me, because I'm an FI nut).
But, for absolute correct originality, that is debatable (just ask the NCRS crowd).
First, nothing is cooler than opening the hood and seeing two carburetors on an alum manifold (of course, you GOT to have the finned valve covers for the finishing touch). And, I'm biased, the only thing cooler than dual 4s is FI.
Contrary to MANY, MANY opinions, a properly rebuilt and setup 2x4 WCFBs----------------WITH PROGRESSIVE LINKAGE---------will function perfect. The old WCFB carb was a very good, dependable carb. It is true, if not properly rebuilt, and the floats not properly adjusted (it's mandatory the floats be centered in the bowls and highly advisable that the tube be installed in the choke passage), they can cause lots of frustration.
Now, with all of that said, regardless of correctness, originality, passing NCRS judging standards, or anything else, I'd buy the setup and install it in a heartbeat (welllllllllll, not me, because I'm an FI nut).
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
Power wise, you won't notice much difference with the base cam. You will hear more noise when you open the throttle.
The base engine isn't all that much to look at. The 2X4 engine with the valve covers is a whole 'nother story for eye appeal.
I don't care much for what the ncrs thinks but if you tie the value of the car to how "correct" it is, it won't add value to the car.
If you buy the intake at a decent price, you won't lose money on it if you decide to sell it.
The base engine isn't all that much to look at. The 2X4 engine with the valve covers is a whole 'nother story for eye appeal.
I don't care much for what the ncrs thinks but if you tie the value of the car to how "correct" it is, it won't add value to the car.
If you buy the intake at a decent price, you won't lose money on it if you decide to sell it.
#4
Team Owner
You can usually buy nice running clones for less than $3,000 and yes its a nice aesthetic and performance upgrade. The WCFBs are rock solid carbs once setup. My '61 clones are going on two years of use and I haven't tweaked anything on them since their installation.
Of course, 'real deal' 245hp dual quads will put a hurtin' in your pocketbook and 99% of spectators will not have no clue they are the original item anyway.
As to increasing the overall value of the car for resale ? Keep the original stuff, swap it back on or offer it with the sale and that will preserve the price. You could sell off the dual quads separately and they may have gained value by then...
Of course, 'real deal' 245hp dual quads will put a hurtin' in your pocketbook and 99% of spectators will not have no clue they are the original item anyway.
As to increasing the overall value of the car for resale ? Keep the original stuff, swap it back on or offer it with the sale and that will preserve the price. You could sell off the dual quads separately and they may have gained value by then...
Last edited by Frankie the Fink; 12-20-2014 at 07:22 AM.
#5
Team Owner
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes
on
732 Posts
It will also depend on what is stamped on the engine pad. A engine code for a single four engine will not gain much beyond the actual cost of a two four setup.
Does your car have a correctly dated engine? If so, what is stamped on the engine pad.
Does your car have a correctly dated engine? If so, what is stamped on the engine pad.
#6
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the help. I'll have to check what is stamped on the engine. Where would the date code be? I want to make sure it actually was originally a base engine. I don't think the intake manifold is the correct number, but not sure. Is there a way to tell what cam is really in it?
Last edited by MMJ; 12-20-2014 at 07:31 AM.
#7
Team Owner
Not the date code -- the engine suffix. It should be just forward past the passenger side valve cover on a slightly tilted, flat metal part of the head. A base motor suffix will be either CQ or DG depending on transmission; manual or powerglide respectively.
#8
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll go by Dad's this morning and look and post back. Thanks!
#9
Melting Slicks
Basically, the answer is yes.
But, for absolute correct originality, that is debatable (just ask the NCRS crowd).
First, nothing is cooler than opening the hood and seeing two carburetors on an alum manifold (of course, you GOT to have the finned valve covers for the finishing touch). And, I'm biased, the only thing cooler than dual 4s is FI.
Contrary to MANY, MANY opinions, a properly rebuilt and setup 2x4 WCFBs----------------WITH PROGRESSIVE LINKAGE---------will function perfect. The old WCFB carb was a very good, dependable carb. It is true, if not properly rebuilt, and the floats not properly adjusted (it's mandatory the floats be centered in the bowls and highly advisable that the tube be installed in the choke passage), they can cause lots of frustration.
Now, with all of that said, regardless of correctness, originality, passing NCRS judging standards, or anything else, I'd buy the setup and install it in a heartbeat (welllllllllll, not me, because I'm an FI nut).
But, for absolute correct originality, that is debatable (just ask the NCRS crowd).
First, nothing is cooler than opening the hood and seeing two carburetors on an alum manifold (of course, you GOT to have the finned valve covers for the finishing touch). And, I'm biased, the only thing cooler than dual 4s is FI.
Contrary to MANY, MANY opinions, a properly rebuilt and setup 2x4 WCFBs----------------WITH PROGRESSIVE LINKAGE---------will function perfect. The old WCFB carb was a very good, dependable carb. It is true, if not properly rebuilt, and the floats not properly adjusted (it's mandatory the floats be centered in the bowls and highly advisable that the tube be installed in the choke passage), they can cause lots of frustration.
Now, with all of that said, regardless of correctness, originality, passing NCRS judging standards, or anything else, I'd buy the setup and install it in a heartbeat (welllllllllll, not me, because I'm an FI nut).
Marty
#11
Might as well install a good old 097 Duntov if you do the dual four set up!
#12
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok the number on the block is F1212E. What does that mean? Wrong block? Thanks.
Last edited by MMJ; 12-20-2014 at 02:28 PM.
#13
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
#14
Team Owner
Interesting. One source I use indicates that all 58 Corvette engine suffixes are two letters....another says that "E" by itself is a '57 truck engine with manual transmission. Maybe somebody here can confirm.
#15
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
'58 Corvette engines are stamped with two letters. Some '58 pass car engines aren't. Pass car "E" is a TurboGlide engine. Beware of the O/S crankshaft pilot bore.
Last edited by MikeM; 12-20-2014 at 05:22 PM.
#16
Team Owner
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes
on
732 Posts
What you really have will depend on that year the engine is.
Engine code of "E" could be anything from 1955 to 1961, or possibly 1968.
Get the block casting number and casting date off of the back top of the engine. Let us know what that is.
It is definitely NOT a Corvette engine.
Engine code of "E" could be anything from 1955 to 1961, or possibly 1968.
Get the block casting number and casting date off of the back top of the engine. Let us know what that is.
It is definitely NOT a Corvette engine.
#17
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, major bummer. Info I have says it's either a 58 or 59 185 hp 2 barrel with turboglide. Casting number is 3737739. So knowing that is NOM, what would you guys suggest doing to this motor to bring the most value to the car? The car has had a frame off and looks beautiful. I can't believe they didn't have the original motor when they did all that. It's a shame. Thanks for any help.
#18
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
Yep, major bummer. Info I have says it's either a 58 or 59 185 hp 2 barrel with turboglide. Casting number is 3737739. So knowing that is NOM, what would you guys suggest doing to this motor to bring the most value to the car? The car has had a frame off and looks beautiful. I can't believe they didn't have the original motor when they did all that. It's a shame. Thanks for any help.
#19
Instructor
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
If you put the dual carbs on it, use the 283 PP heads that have the pyramid symbol on the front of the head to bump the compression. Add the 097 cam as previously suggested and you're all set for performance/sound/looks.
You don't have the correct engine so no sense worrying about whether it's correct or not.