C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Is dual carb setup worth the expense?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2014, 11:17 PM
  #1  
MMJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
MMJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Is dual carb setup worth the expense?

My dad has a 58 with a base 283. Is the $3000 or so cost of an original Carter dual setup to make it a 245hp worth the expense? I'm speaking in terms of increased overall value of the car. Thanks for any input.
Old 12-19-2014, 11:52 PM
  #2  
DZAUTO
Race Director

 
DZAUTO's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Mustang OK
Posts: 13,852
Received 3,772 Likes on 1,674 Posts
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

Basically, the answer is yes.
But, for absolute correct originality, that is debatable (just ask the NCRS crowd).
First, nothing is cooler than opening the hood and seeing two carburetors on an alum manifold (of course, you GOT to have the finned valve covers for the finishing touch). And, I'm biased, the only thing cooler than dual 4s is FI.
Contrary to MANY, MANY opinions, a properly rebuilt and setup 2x4 WCFBs----------------WITH PROGRESSIVE LINKAGE---------will function perfect. The old WCFB carb was a very good, dependable carb. It is true, if not properly rebuilt, and the floats not properly adjusted (it's mandatory the floats be centered in the bowls and highly advisable that the tube be installed in the choke passage), they can cause lots of frustration.
Now, with all of that said, regardless of correctness, originality, passing NCRS judging standards, or anything else, I'd buy the setup and install it in a heartbeat (welllllllllll, not me, because I'm an FI nut).
Old 12-20-2014, 05:49 AM
  #3  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Power wise, you won't notice much difference with the base cam. You will hear more noise when you open the throttle.

The base engine isn't all that much to look at. The 2X4 engine with the valve covers is a whole 'nother story for eye appeal.

I don't care much for what the ncrs thinks but if you tie the value of the car to how "correct" it is, it won't add value to the car.

If you buy the intake at a decent price, you won't lose money on it if you decide to sell it.
Old 12-20-2014, 07:16 AM
  #4  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

You can usually buy nice running clones for less than $3,000 and yes its a nice aesthetic and performance upgrade. The WCFBs are rock solid carbs once setup. My '61 clones are going on two years of use and I haven't tweaked anything on them since their installation.

Of course, 'real deal' 245hp dual quads will put a hurtin' in your pocketbook and 99% of spectators will not have no clue they are the original item anyway.

As to increasing the overall value of the car for resale ? Keep the original stuff, swap it back on or offer it with the sale and that will preserve the price. You could sell off the dual quads separately and they may have gained value by then...

Last edited by Frankie the Fink; 12-20-2014 at 07:22 AM.
Old 12-20-2014, 07:19 AM
  #5  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

It will also depend on what is stamped on the engine pad. A engine code for a single four engine will not gain much beyond the actual cost of a two four setup.

Does your car have a correctly dated engine? If so, what is stamped on the engine pad.
Old 12-20-2014, 07:28 AM
  #6  
MMJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
MMJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the help. I'll have to check what is stamped on the engine. Where would the date code be? I want to make sure it actually was originally a base engine. I don't think the intake manifold is the correct number, but not sure. Is there a way to tell what cam is really in it?

Last edited by MMJ; 12-20-2014 at 07:31 AM.
Old 12-20-2014, 07:31 AM
  #7  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Not the date code -- the engine suffix. It should be just forward past the passenger side valve cover on a slightly tilted, flat metal part of the head. A base motor suffix will be either CQ or DG depending on transmission; manual or powerglide respectively.
Old 12-20-2014, 07:46 AM
  #8  
MMJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
MMJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frankie the Fink
Not the date code -- the engine suffix. It should be just forward past the passenger side valve cover on a slightly tilted, flat metal part of the head. A base motor suffix will be either CQ or DG depending on transmission; manual or powerglide respectively.
I'll go by Dad's this morning and look and post back. Thanks!
Old 12-20-2014, 09:04 AM
  #9  
DRM500RUBYZR-1
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
DRM500RUBYZR-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Mullica Hill New Jersey
Posts: 2,334
Received 108 Likes on 74 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DZAUTO
Basically, the answer is yes.
But, for absolute correct originality, that is debatable (just ask the NCRS crowd).
First, nothing is cooler than opening the hood and seeing two carburetors on an alum manifold (of course, you GOT to have the finned valve covers for the finishing touch). And, I'm biased, the only thing cooler than dual 4s is FI.
Contrary to MANY, MANY opinions, a properly rebuilt and setup 2x4 WCFBs----------------WITH PROGRESSIVE LINKAGE---------will function perfect. The old WCFB carb was a very good, dependable carb. It is true, if not properly rebuilt, and the floats not properly adjusted (it's mandatory the floats be centered in the bowls and highly advisable that the tube be installed in the choke passage), they can cause lots of frustration.
Now, with all of that said, regardless of correctness, originality, passing NCRS judging standards, or anything else, I'd buy the setup and install it in a heartbeat (welllllllllll, not me, because I'm an FI nut).


Marty
Old 12-20-2014, 09:21 AM
  #10  
427/42566 coup
Racer
 
427/42566 coup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2014
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Nothing looks or sounds cooler than multiple or dual carbs
Old 12-20-2014, 10:31 AM
  #11  
wilcar
Burning Brakes
 
wilcar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,243
Received 181 Likes on 161 Posts

Default

Might as well install a good old 097 Duntov if you do the dual four set up!
Old 12-20-2014, 11:14 AM
  #12  
MMJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
MMJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frankie the Fink
Not the date code -- the engine suffix. It should be just forward past the passenger side valve cover on a slightly tilted, flat metal part of the head. A base motor suffix will be either CQ or DG depending on transmission; manual or powerglide respectively.
Ok the number on the block is F1212E. What does that mean? Wrong block? Thanks.

Last edited by MMJ; 12-20-2014 at 02:28 PM.
Old 12-20-2014, 03:34 PM
  #13  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MMJ
Ok the number on the block is F1212E. What does that mean? Wrong block? Thanks.
That says the engine was originally born in a full-size passenger car - not a "Corvette engine".
Old 12-20-2014, 03:39 PM
  #14  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Interesting. One source I use indicates that all 58 Corvette engine suffixes are two letters....another says that "E" by itself is a '57 truck engine with manual transmission. Maybe somebody here can confirm.
Old 12-20-2014, 03:45 PM
  #15  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

'58 Corvette engines are stamped with two letters. Some '58 pass car engines aren't. Pass car "E" is a TurboGlide engine. Beware of the O/S crankshaft pilot bore.

Last edited by MikeM; 12-20-2014 at 05:22 PM.
Old 12-20-2014, 03:57 PM
  #16  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

What you really have will depend on that year the engine is.

Engine code of "E" could be anything from 1955 to 1961, or possibly 1968.

Get the block casting number and casting date off of the back top of the engine. Let us know what that is.

It is definitely NOT a Corvette engine.
Old 12-20-2014, 06:30 PM
  #17  
MMJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
MMJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, major bummer. Info I have says it's either a 58 or 59 185 hp 2 barrel with turboglide. Casting number is 3737739. So knowing that is NOM, what would you guys suggest doing to this motor to bring the most value to the car? The car has had a frame off and looks beautiful. I can't believe they didn't have the original motor when they did all that. It's a shame. Thanks for any help.

Get notified of new replies

To Is dual carb setup worth the expense?

Old 12-20-2014, 06:53 PM
  #18  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MMJ
Yep, major bummer. Info I have says it's either a 58 or 59 185 hp 2 barrel with turboglide. Casting number is 3737739. So knowing that is NOM, what would you guys suggest doing to this motor to bring the most value to the car? The car has had a frame off and looks beautiful. I can't believe they didn't have the original motor when they did all that. It's a shame. Thanks for any help.
It's not clear to whom you are trying to maximize the value to. You, your Dad or a buyer?
Old 12-20-2014, 07:05 PM
  #19  
MMJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
MMJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2013
Location: Piedmont Missouri
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
It's not clear to whom you are trying to maximize the value to. You, your Dad or a buyer?
My Dad, but eventually a buyer. What could we do to it to appeal to the widest range of potential buyers?
Old 12-20-2014, 07:20 PM
  #20  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MMJ
My Dad, but eventually a buyer. What could we do to it to appeal to the widest range of potential buyers?
See post #3.

If you put the dual carbs on it, use the 283 PP heads that have the pyramid symbol on the front of the head to bump the compression. Add the 097 cam as previously suggested and you're all set for performance/sound/looks.

You don't have the correct engine so no sense worrying about whether it's correct or not.


Quick Reply: Is dual carb setup worth the expense?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 AM.