C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Stroker Build... opinions so far?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2015, 09:29 PM
  #41  
DucatiDon
Melting Slicks
 
DucatiDon's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,742
Received 88 Likes on 70 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2018 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

My flat windage tray had to be clearanced to avoid having my rods hit it.
The oil pan too...too close to the 7/8 counterweights at the pan rail....
Old 01-30-2015, 04:58 AM
  #42  
Tom454
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Tom454's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Raleigh North Carolina
Posts: 6,129
Received 39 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DucatiDon
My flat windage tray had to be clearanced to avoid having my rods hit it.
The oil pan too...too close to the 7/8 counterweights at the pan rail....
I'll try to check this (pan) today. I have to play musical chairs with several engines to get to my OEM pan.
Old 01-30-2015, 05:32 AM
  #43  
Tom454
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Tom454's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Raleigh North Carolina
Posts: 6,129
Received 39 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

I tried a dozen online calculators and kept getting conflicting numbers so I did this myself in Excel. One caveat is that I don't know which gasket I will be using so I don't know the actual gasket diameter... I used the bore diameter instead.

Static Compression Ratio:
Volume at BDC over Volume at TDC
Volume at BDC:
Volume of flat top piston sweep: PI * 4.021/2 * 4.021/2 * 3.75 47.6199895
Volume of valve relief's: 7cc=ci 7cc*0.0610237441 0.427166209
Volume, ring to top of piston: ((PI()*4.021/2*4.021/2)-(PI()*4.018/2*4.018/2))*3/16 0.003551521
Volume of gasket assuming .038 and cyl bore PI * 4.021/2 * 4.021/2 * .038 0.482549227
Volume of valve chamber (head cc's): 70*0.0610237441 4.271662087
Volume piston to deck: PI * 4.021/2 * 4.021/2 * .015 0.190479958
Total Volume at BDC: 52.9953985

Volume at TDC:
Volume of valve relief's: 7cc=ci 7cc*0.0610237441 0.427166209
Volume, ring to top of piston: ((PI()*4.021/2*4.021/2)-(PI()*4.018/2*4.018/2))*3/16 0.003551521
Volume of gasket assuming .038 and cyl bore PI * 4.021/2 * 4.021/2 * .038 0.482549227
Volume of valve chamber (head cc's): 70*0.0610237441 4.271662087
Volume piston to deck: PI * 4.021/2 * 4.021/2 * .015 0.190479958
Total Volume at TDC: 5.375409002
Recalculated Static Compression Ratio: 9.858858829

If I change the heads to 64 cc it's 10.50637966

Any flaws in this math?

Last edited by Tom454; 01-30-2015 at 05:58 AM.
Old 02-11-2015, 02:01 PM
  #44  
Tom454
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
 
Tom454's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Raleigh North Carolina
Posts: 6,129
Received 39 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Some more data:
The OEM 1966 327 oil pan clears the Eagle 3.75 crank... but it is close.
The Scat rods cleared the block no problem, but I did relieve the block a hair at rod #3 and 5 JIC.
I purchased the Summit 226008 and Edelbrock 2101 Intakes.
The ports are not uniform, but I measured the same port on each manifold.
The Summit 226008 Intake ports are approximately 1.889 x 1.158. (2.19sq inch).
The Edelbrock 2101 Intake ports are approximately 1.861 x 1.179. (2.19sq inch).
The Z28 3932472 Intake ports are approximately 2.036 x 1.213. (2.47sq inch).
The Z28 runners are visibly larger internally and externally than the other manifolds.
I measured the height from the china rail up to the spot centered between the square port carb stud holes.
Summit: 4-1/8"
Edelbrock: 4-1/8"
Z28: 4-3/4"

The Z28 seems the better choice for my 383 (381) so I am sending the other manifolds back. I'll lose about $35 in shipping but at least I made an informed decision.

The GM Z28 manifold and Holley List 3667 (Chrysler app) fit under the 327 OEM hood with a GM drop base air cleaner. This was the configuration before I started this project.

The Z28 is a square bore manifold so now I have to get a carb. I have a 570cfm (List 3667) but that may be too small. The intent was to use a jetted down 800cfm List 6211 spread bore that I have on my 454 (replacing with TriPower) but the game plan has changed.

Last edited by Tom454; 02-11-2015 at 02:18 PM. Reason: errors
Old 11-23-2016, 05:27 PM
  #45  
lt1z
Melting Slicks
 
lt1z's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,569
Received 170 Likes on 143 Posts

Default

...

Last edited by lt1z; 11-23-2016 at 07:15 PM.



Quick Reply: Stroker Build... opinions so far?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 PM.