C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

1967 L89s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2015, 10:47 PM
  #1  
65 fi
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
65 fi's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Santa Barbara California
Posts: 1,842
Received 139 Likes on 83 Posts

Default 1967 L89s

When was the first 1967 L89 produced? What,other than the build sheet and aluminum heads, may be specific to a L89?
Old 01-29-2015, 11:24 PM
  #2  
67's
Le Mans Master
 
67's's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: POTSDAM NY/Punta Gorda FL
Posts: 7,294
Received 381 Likes on 267 Posts

Default

The vin stamp
Old 01-29-2015, 11:55 PM
  #3  
TCracingCA
Team Owner

 
TCracingCA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 36,652
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,005 Posts

Default I was still playing with L88, but am finding my buried L89 stuff also.

I think I have stuff on 11 of 16 of these cars! I was surprised in the other thread where I posted up a note I had written 20 years ago about the first being built January, because I thought they were out/released earlier. I am seeing problems with the porousity of the aluminum heads during this time frame that seemed to affect the sister L88's.
I am curious as to replies myself! And as to whether 40 of the original 16 have been found! there is far less distinctive parts on these factory builds, so a whole lot easier than an L88 to fake! Because I have been less attentive to articles on these, my stuff is mostly 20+ years old, is why i never started down the L89 road.

Last edited by TCracingCA; 01-30-2015 at 12:00 AM.
Old 01-30-2015, 11:08 AM
  #4  
midstyle
Pro
 
midstyle's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary Alberta
Posts: 675
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65 fi
When was the first 1967 L89 produced? What,other than the build sheet and aluminum heads, may be specific to a L89?
Per Denver zone newsletter, dated March 17th, to all zone Chevrolet dealers, orders for new option L89 engine (includes aluminum cylinder heads and chrome plated rocker covers) may now be submitted.

Also, a Chevrolet Mailgram sent to all Denver Zone Chevrolet dealers, dated March 16th, Attn: P&A Sales Managers; we are advised part # 3904387 (67-427 HD & SPEC H/PER - ALUMINUM HEAD) is now being serviced. Please forward order ........ we will, in turn, place with GMPD for shipment from Otterburn ASAP.

Reprinted in Oct '92 issue of Vette Vues.
Old 01-30-2015, 11:59 AM
  #5  
63Corvette
Le Mans Master
 
63Corvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Granbury Texas
Posts: 9,556
Received 283 Likes on 199 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TCracingCA
I think I have stuff on 11 of 16 of these cars! I was surprised in the other thread where I posted up a note I had written 20 years ago about the first being built January, because I thought they were out/released earlier. I am seeing problems with the porousity of the aluminum heads during this time frame that seemed to affect the sister L88's.
I am curious as to replies myself! And as to whether 40 of the original 16 have been found! there is far less distinctive parts on these factory builds, so a whole lot easier than an L88 to fake! Because I have been less attentive to articles on these, my stuff is mostly 20+ years old, is why i never started down the L89 road.
Which one (VIN) is the car featured in the Car and Driver road test?
Old 01-30-2015, 12:15 PM
  #6  
Dr L-88
Le Mans Master
 
Dr L-88's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Richmond Kentucky
Posts: 5,719
Received 1,240 Likes on 457 Posts
2022 Corvette of the Year Finalist -- Modified
2021 C2 of the Year Winner - Modified
2021 C1 of the Year Winner - Modified
2020 Corvette of the Year (stock)
C2 of Year Winner (stock) 2019
2017 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

Back in the late 70s I had a complete L-89 setup......................tri-power and heads. Heads were casting number 3904392 and were dated mid February 67. It was all the real stuff, came off a car here in KY, engine blown up. Don't know any details about the car. The 67 aluminum heads purportedly had a problem with valve guides. I bought the heads, and complete tri-power for $500 and sold it for $1000 to someone in Nebraska. I have a picture I'll try to post later.
Old 01-30-2015, 12:41 PM
  #7  
PAmotorman
Melting Slicks
 
PAmotorman's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 0
Received 150 Likes on 131 Posts

Default

a co worker harwood dorman had one sold at yenkos. it still had the the old single spring with a flat wound damper that would break. my 65 396 I picked at the st louis factory april 16 1965 broke a spring on the way home back to Pa. I changed all the springs to the new dual spring replacement on the L-89 for harwood before he broke any. I believe that L-89 just changed hands last year.
Old 01-30-2015, 02:41 PM
  #8  
gbvette62
Race Director
 
gbvette62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Shamong, NJ
Posts: 11,109
Received 2,029 Likes on 1,315 Posts

Default

There use to be a guy in Bristol PA, who claimed to own an original 67 L-89 car.

He bought the car new. It was originally Silver Pearl with a black interior, and black convertible top. Around 71-72, he repainted it red and added large (ZL-1/L-88 type) flairs and 15x8 AZ rally wheels to it. We were in a south Jersey Corvette club together, but when the club folded in the mid 80's, I lost track of him and the car. He was a union worker at the US Steel Fairless Works, in Fairless Hills PA, but the last time I saw him, he'd been laid off for a couple years.

I don't know if the car was a legitimate L-89 or not, but he was friends with MF Dobbins, and Dobbins isn't someone you could have BS-ed about a 427 car.
Old 01-30-2015, 03:56 PM
  #9  
TCracingCA
Team Owner

 
TCracingCA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 36,652
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,005 Posts

Default Cool so what I researched, looks to be proving out by this source!

Originally Posted by midstyle
Per Denver zone newsletter, dated March 17th, to all zone Chevrolet dealers, orders for new option L89 engine (includes aluminum cylinder heads and chrome plated rocker covers) may now be submitted.

Also, a Chevrolet Mailgram sent to all Denver Zone Chevrolet dealers, dated March 16th, Attn: P&A Sales Managers; we are advised part # 3904387 (67-427 HD & SPEC H/PER - ALUMINUM HEAD) is now being serviced. Please forward order ........ we will, in turn, place with GMPD for shipment from Otterburn ASAP.

Reprinted in Oct '92 issue of Vette Vues.
I guess 20+ years ago, I was taking good notes! So the first being built in January and not being delivered till March, is looking to be accurate.

Last edited by TCracingCA; 01-30-2015 at 04:09 PM.
Old 01-30-2015, 04:01 PM
  #10  
TCracingCA
Team Owner

 
TCracingCA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 36,652
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,005 Posts

Default I believe

Originally Posted by 63Corvette
Which one (VIN) is the car featured in the Car and Driver road test?
This I would say is an early IP coded car that was only stamped IP, but contained a HD engine based on just the performance! Because no other stock IP car has ever come close to touching that time of 12.8 (stock). It might be one of the few that never saw the track or maybe it did, and it would be nice to have a VIN on that car. Because many former Magazine cars (tested cars) have been found and this one hasn't, it causes me to believe more in the "out-the-back-door car delivery program/network! It was a ringer for the Magazine, and maybe one day we will figure out the whereabouts! CD magazine generally was alright on actually testing, but then sometimes that would hiccup and just post claimed times from the Manufacturers or let a real ringer into the mix. Maybe why GM picked Car and Driver. Whereas Car Life, Road & Track were far more procedural and precise about publishing actual road test data. Then you had Hot Rod, that generally base line ET'd the car, sometimes after some tweaks and then continued with the tweaks until they figured out how fast it could be made to run. Car Craft just generally tested Hot Rod cars. Then there were others that I have an opinion on. I am never short of those!!!!!!

Last edited by TCracingCA; 01-30-2015 at 04:07 PM.
Old 01-30-2015, 07:39 PM
  #11  
lawdawg
Instructor
 
lawdawg's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: alabama
Posts: 217
Received 54 Likes on 32 Posts

Default Porosity

I've had two sets of early , very early l89 heads. Both had very bad porosity problems, and they showed up in the guides.

Just saying. They are only good for show. Not for running at all. Both sets failed within a couple hundred miles. Not 900 , a couple of hundred or two. Too strange for a coincidence.
Old 01-30-2015, 08:56 PM
  #12  
PAmotorman
Melting Slicks
 
PAmotorman's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Posts: 2,415
Likes: 0
Received 150 Likes on 131 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dr L-88
Back in the late 70s I had a complete L-89 setup......................tri-power and heads. Heads were casting number 3904392 and were dated mid February 67. It was all the real stuff, came off a car here in KY, engine blown up. Don't know any details about the car. The 67 aluminum heads purportedly had a problem with valve guides. I bought the heads, and complete tri-power for $500 and sold it for $1000 to someone in Nebraska. I have a picture I'll try to post later.
the valve guide would slip down in the heads. we set screwed them so the could not move. the porosity problem was solved by putting water glass (sodium silicate) in the water jackets, pressurizing the water jacket with air and then baked them in a oven
Old 01-30-2015, 09:31 PM
  #13  
Dr L-88
Le Mans Master
 
Dr L-88's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Richmond Kentucky
Posts: 5,719
Received 1,240 Likes on 457 Posts
2022 Corvette of the Year Finalist -- Modified
2021 C2 of the Year Winner - Modified
2021 C1 of the Year Winner - Modified
2020 Corvette of the Year (stock)
C2 of Year Winner (stock) 2019
2017 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

Originally Posted by PAmotorman
the porosity problem was solved by putting water glass (sodium silicate) in the water jackets, pressurizing the water jacket with air and then baked them in a oven
Maybe I need to do that to my old Can Am 495 block that came from Smokey's garage sale in 1989.
Old 01-30-2015, 10:28 PM
  #14  
TCracingCA
Team Owner

 
TCracingCA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 36,652
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,005 Posts

Default No! Before you do that, give it to me!

Originally Posted by Dr L-88
Maybe I need to do that to my old Can Am 495 block that came from Smokey's garage sale in 1989.


But it appears by March/April they were releasing good aluminum heads with I am sure some rejects. By 1968/69 they had it worked out! The Can Am blocks started to develop cylinder wear problems when they tried to go sleeveless. Porsche in about 1972 late switched to the Nickies coatings. I wonder if this would work on a set up porous cylinder heads. Or some modern 356-t whatever treatment or something. But porousity is porousity! And I definitely think I spelled that wrong twice!!!!!!

PS I figure by the end of February, we will have all of these big block mysteries solved and we can go back to insulting each other!
Old 01-30-2015, 10:30 PM
  #15  
TCracingCA
Team Owner

 
TCracingCA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 36,652
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,005 Posts

Default The year is 2015 and you as per the great post just below yours by PAmotorman

Originally Posted by lawdawg
I've had two sets of early , very early l89 heads. Both had very bad porosity problems, and they showed up in the guides.

Just saying. They are only good for show. Not for running at all. Both sets failed within a couple hundred miles. Not 900 , a couple of hundred or two. Too strange for a coincidence.
Just made them worth something again, and now we can see those maybe on a car after baking! PS because of the great tip-- while baking, send us some cookies also!!!!!! And I am serious!!!!!!!
Old 01-31-2015, 04:29 PM
  #16  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TCracingCA
Porsche in about 1972 late switched to the Nickies coatings.
I think you meant "Nikasil".
Attached Images   
Old 01-31-2015, 05:18 PM
  #17  
Dr L-88
Le Mans Master
 
Dr L-88's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Richmond Kentucky
Posts: 5,719
Received 1,240 Likes on 457 Posts
2022 Corvette of the Year Finalist -- Modified
2021 C2 of the Year Winner - Modified
2021 C1 of the Year Winner - Modified
2020 Corvette of the Year (stock)
C2 of Year Winner (stock) 2019
2017 C1 of the Year Finalist

Default

John,

Is that the same coating used on the pistons and cylinders of the Reynolds "linerless" Can Am blocks?

Thanks,
Rex

Get notified of new replies

To 1967 L89s

Old 01-31-2015, 06:09 PM
  #18  
W Guy
Drifting
 
W Guy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Hightstown NJ
Posts: 1,711
Received 178 Likes on 133 Posts

Default

Derek,
Could you please clear out your private messages?
Thanks
Verne
Old 01-31-2015, 08:28 PM
  #19  
TCracingCA
Team Owner

 
TCracingCA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 36,652
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,005 Posts

Default In the Porsche world, we do call them "Nickies", but you are correct

Originally Posted by JohnZ
I think you meant "Nikasil".
This process was very durable and led to weight savings, based on the restrictions of the mag case to enlarge the spigots (barrel openings), this process allowed them to go from a displacement of 2.4 up to 2.7-2.9. By 1973 the aluminum cased cars began to be produced and the 3 liters were created and there was a designed in larger spigot to fit still larger bores. The process continued to be used by Porsche and a set of those even in the modern is expensive! We have a number of sets of Nickies and have a 2.9 set up, but the last Porsche engine my brother (our families #1 Porsche expert) built was a 300+ hp twin plug coil pack crank triggered 2.8 liter! The engine is run on the street with technology from the aircraft industry were he works using A/R probes, thermocouples to each cylinder. It could go head to head with Peter Gregg and what Al Holbert ran and can be better tuned than those professionals in build hp because of the aircraft tuning aids, and it is essentially an IMSA level with full ported heads build!

The Porsche guys are way more sensitive than Corvette guys and when I was in one of my moods, i removed over 2500 history and tech posts from their Pelican when a moderator got into with me! Deja Vu, didn't I do something like that here on Corvette forum also!

Guy---- Whats up? Give me a hint here and when I get back into work I will try to put you in contact with me, I stopped completely trying to use the forum email because it immediately gets filled up every time i clear it- frustrating! And I gave up finally on the home one. My work can take more, if you can get past my spam block, but I like to watch how much personal I do their at work.

Last edited by TCracingCA; 01-31-2015 at 08:53 PM.
Old 01-31-2015, 08:47 PM
  #20  
TCracingCA
Team Owner

 
TCracingCA's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 36,652
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,005 Posts

Default No

Originally Posted by Dr L-88
John,

Is that the same coating used on the pistons and cylinders of the Reynolds "linerless" Can Am blocks?

Thanks,
Rex
But they were heading in the same direction with what they were trying. I think the Chevrolet engined process eventually if I remember right ended up being tried on the failure Vega and then with coatings on the latter Cosworth Vega! But Nickies on a piston barrel formed block would probably be way to expensive to try! Porsche barrels can be taken out and essentially coated. But in the modern there are some friction coatings now for our V-8 engines!

Last edited by TCracingCA; 02-01-2015 at 10:33 PM.


Quick Reply: 1967 L89s



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 PM.