C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

carte afb 3269 vs. 3310

Old 02-26-2015, 07:28 PM
  #1  
4953mark
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
4953mark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 46
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default carte afb 3269 vs. 3310

does anyone know the difference between these two carbs

thanks,

Mark
Old 02-26-2015, 10:39 PM
  #2  
Avispa
Safety Car
 
Avispa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Oldsmar, FL
Posts: 4,062
Received 884 Likes on 633 Posts

Default

They are completely different designs. The AFB has no gaskets below the fuel level, has air valves above the secondary Venturi, a single fuel inlet and an aluminum body. The 3310 is a basic Holley 4bbl with vacuum secondary throttles. It has two fuel inlets, is made from cast zinc, has replaceable metering plates that disassemble from the main Venturi housing and has a few gaskets below fuel level, like fuel bowl and metering block gaskets and mounting screw washers. Having gaskets below fuel level means you gotta keep an eye on the carb for fuel leaks.

A feature on the AFB I really like is vacuum operated mixture needles. These are pulled into the main jets by manifold vacuum and lean out the fuel mixture at light part throttle. None of the Holley 4150/4160 series carbs, which the 3310 is an example, has anything like that.

Hope that helps.
Old 02-26-2015, 11:41 PM
  #3  
SI67
Melting Slicks
 
SI67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Sunnyvale CA
Posts: 2,324
Received 60 Likes on 52 Posts

Default I think OP was asking about CARTER 3310 vs Carter 3229

I don't know the differences, but what I suspect Mark was asking about was the difference between two different AFB carbs used in 1962:

3269 as used on 300 HP and 340 HP engines with manual transmissions

and

3310 as used on the 300 HP with Powerglide

I don't know the answer, but I hope I've clarified the question.

Steve
Old 02-27-2015, 08:00 AM
  #4  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

The ST-12 does not list a 3310 AFB for '62.
The differences can be amazingly subtle.

In the Specification section of the ST-12 manual the specs for the internals of the 3269 are given; if you can find the equivalent manual for whatever the 3310 fits on you can get those specs and compare the two. It may not even be enough difference to "feel" on a small block...
Old 02-27-2015, 09:30 AM
  #5  
tbarb
Safety Car
 
tbarb's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2014
Posts: 3,536
Received 562 Likes on 479 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Avispa
They are completely different designs. The AFB has no gaskets below the fuel level, has air valves above the secondary Venturi, a single fuel inlet and an aluminum body. The 3310 is a basic Holley 4bbl with vacuum secondary throttles. It has two fuel inlets, is made from cast zinc, has replaceable metering plates that disassemble from the main Venturi housing and has a few gaskets below fuel level, like fuel bowl and metering block gaskets and mounting screw washers. Having gaskets below fuel level means you gotta keep an eye on the carb for fuel leaks.

A feature on the AFB I really like is vacuum operated mixture needles. These are pulled into the main jets by manifold vacuum and lean out the fuel mixture at light part throttle. None of the Holley 4150/4160 series carbs, which the 3310 is an example, has anything like that.

Hope that helps.
The power enrichment you are referring to is accomplished on a Holley by the main jets and power valve. The goal is to lean the main jets so the car drives good with a lean A/F mixture and the vacuum operated power valve enriches the mixture under load. Good thing with the Holley's is that some say they are easier to tune and jets/air bleeds are easier to access.

The metering rods on a AFB do the same thing and when the spring overcomes the engine vacuum the rod lifts out of the jet allowing more fuel to the nozzle. Good thing with the AFB is that you don't need to take the carburetor apart to tune the power enrichment. The venturi clusters usually need to be replaced to change IFR/air bleed.

I forgot the original question though so sorry if I got started..
Old 02-27-2015, 10:32 AM
  #6  
W Guy
Drifting
 
W Guy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Hightstown NJ
Posts: 1,711
Received 178 Likes on 133 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 4953mark
does anyone know the difference between these two carbs

thanks,

Mark
The 3310 is set to run leaner than the 3269. The primary and secondary jets are smaller and the step up rods are larger diameter at the cruise step. Also the primary air bleed circuit is .002" smaller on the 3310. Using a 3310 on a manual trans car will cause a stumble when the throttle is initially opened. Changing the parts mentioned as well as the primary venturi clusters will duplicate the 3269's performance.

Verne
Old 02-27-2015, 11:00 AM
  #7  
Avispa
Safety Car
 
Avispa's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Oldsmar, FL
Posts: 4,062
Received 884 Likes on 633 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SI67
I don't know the differences, but what I suspect Mark was asking about was the difference between two different AFB carbs used in 1962:

3269 as used on 300 HP and 340 HP engines with manual transmissions

and

3310 as used on the 300 HP with Powerglide

I don't know the answer, but I hope I've clarified the question.

Steve
Oops! The joke's on me. I see "3310" and only one carburetor comes to mind.
Old 02-27-2015, 11:59 AM
  #8  
4953mark
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
4953mark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 46
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by W Guy
The 3310 is set to run leaner than the 3269. The primary and secondary jets are smaller and the step up rods are larger diameter at the cruise step. Also the primary air bleed circuit is .002" smaller on the 3310. Using a 3310 on a manual trans car will cause a stumble when the throttle is initially opened. Changing the parts mentioned as well as the primary venturi clusters will duplicate the 3269's performance.

Verne
I bought a 3310 for a good price the secondaries are .063 and one primary is .101 and the other is .106. I haven't measured the rods as yet. the secondary jets don't want to come out. Any suggestions on their removal?
Old 02-27-2015, 01:13 PM
  #9  
W Guy
Drifting
 
W Guy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: Hightstown NJ
Posts: 1,711
Received 178 Likes on 133 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 4953mark
I bought a 3310 for a good price the secondaries are .063 and one primary is .101 and the other is .106. I haven't measured the rods as yet. the secondary jets don't want to come out. Any suggestions on their removal?
Obviously some penetrating oil would be a good idea. Take a screwdriver and file the tip so it fits perfectly into the slot in the jet. Same width and no wiggle room. Nice snug fit and flat against the bottom of the slot. Then just lean on it. They should pop loose.

Verne

Get notified of new replies

To carte afb 3269 vs. 3310



Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: carte afb 3269 vs. 3310



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.