camshaft 3815822 on a 58' dual carb. 245hp
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
crank 3815822 and mechanical lifters on a 58' dual carb. 245hp
The engine of my 58 is equipped with a crank with casting number 3815822.
Is this the correct number ?
It also has a camshaft with mechanical instead of hydraulic lifters, which obviously is not correct for a 245HP 4 carb. engine
Is the camshaft on my car corresponding to the SP. cam of a 270HP ?
If yes, i guess i have to tune-up the engine in the same way of a 270HP (7° BTDC instead of 4, R.P.M idle speed 800 instead of 475, ...)
Is this the correct number ?
It also has a camshaft with mechanical instead of hydraulic lifters, which obviously is not correct for a 245HP 4 carb. engine
Is the camshaft on my car corresponding to the SP. cam of a 270HP ?
If yes, i guess i have to tune-up the engine in the same way of a 270HP (7° BTDC instead of 4, R.P.M idle speed 800 instead of 475, ...)
Last edited by facel6; 06-28-2015 at 10:17 PM.
#2
Unless you measure actual lift and duration and compare it to a known cam there is no way of knowing what cam is in the car.
#3
Team Owner
If its running strong then I wouldn't worry too much about the cam...not sure if that GM number is for the Duntov 097 cam, which is what a 270hp car should have.
I do have a 270 car with the Duntov cam and dual quads and I run the timing at about 14*. Stock specs for timing on these cars is conservative. You will be leaving HP on the table if you go with that - besides your engine appears modified. Point begin you may have to play with things to get optimal bang out of it...
I do have a 270 car with the Duntov cam and dual quads and I run the timing at about 14*. Stock specs for timing on these cars is conservative. You will be leaving HP on the table if you go with that - besides your engine appears modified. Point begin you may have to play with things to get optimal bang out of it...
#5
is that 20 with or without the distributor vacuum line connected?
#6
Team Owner
20* is high if that is the initial with the vac advance (if you have one) plugged...you'll want to get that idle down as low as you can so the centrifugal weights aren't kicking in while you are trying to set initial timing. I'd start around 12* and (vac advance still plugged) you would like the centrifugal to be 'all on' at 2500-2900 RPM with 36* total timing. Then you can crank your idle back up to a nice steady speed.
THEN you can plug the vac advance in and see where things fall. Best to take a test drive and make sure you don't have any trailer-hitching at cruise...that means you have too much advance with everything connected. You can't really measure what the vac advance adds because it is load driven...so you have to go by how the car feels and the configuration of the can (e.g. what number is on it).
Lots of good papers on here about setting timing if you search...
THEN you can plug the vac advance in and see where things fall. Best to take a test drive and make sure you don't have any trailer-hitching at cruise...that means you have too much advance with everything connected. You can't really measure what the vac advance adds because it is load driven...so you have to go by how the car feels and the configuration of the can (e.g. what number is on it).
Lots of good papers on here about setting timing if you search...
#7
Instructor
Thread Starter
OK Frankie
will make some tries tomorrow. It's late here in France and i would not wake up the whole neighborhood
My car has it's stock distributor (GM 1110891) which has no vacuum
just for information, what's the idle speed you have on your 270 ?
Also around 800 rpm ?
will make some tries tomorrow. It's late here in France and i would not wake up the whole neighborhood
My car has it's stock distributor (GM 1110891) which has no vacuum
just for information, what's the idle speed you have on your 270 ?
Also around 800 rpm ?
#8
Instructor
Thread Starter
According to the previous owner that had the engine rebuild,
it's a Duntov cam that's in the car (same as on a 57 270 hp)
Hope this is not a problem with the 245 hp carburetors
it's a Duntov cam that's in the car (same as on a 57 270 hp)
Hope this is not a problem with the 245 hp carburetors
#9
Team Owner
No. The cam will do fine with the 245hp carbs....I ran them for a while before finding the 270hp carbs. Dual quad cars with that cam will not have a stable idle below about 750RPM....I run my car between 825 and 850 RPM....
#10
Instructor
Thread Starter
OK
Once again, thanks a lot Frankie
I think i'm on the good way :-)
Last question (for today): What's the advantage of changing the carburetors ? A pair of 270 carburetors will at least cost about 4'000 $ or more
Once again, thanks a lot Frankie
I think i'm on the good way :-)
Last question (for today): What's the advantage of changing the carburetors ? A pair of 270 carburetors will at least cost about 4'000 $ or more
#11
Team Owner
270 hp carbs ?
Well they'll make you poorer -- you might get a little bit of a performance boost but I don't think it would justify the expense....you can get your 245hp carbs set up to perform just like the 270s. The 270s have different counterweights and arms to activate the flappers for the rear barrels and different springs/metering etc. to accommodate the lower vacuum of cars running the Duntov cam..
Well they'll make you poorer -- you might get a little bit of a performance boost but I don't think it would justify the expense....you can get your 245hp carbs set up to perform just like the 270s. The 270s have different counterweights and arms to activate the flappers for the rear barrels and different springs/metering etc. to accommodate the lower vacuum of cars running the Duntov cam..
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
Should idle fine at 750 rpm.
If you do nothing to your present 245 carbs to match the cam, you may lose a little something in performance. Maybe not. There was a reason the carbs were different for the solid lifter cam but I doubt making the change would make more than an insignificant difference.
#14
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
#15
Instructor
Thread Starter
with my current settings, i could measure 14° advance at 620 RPM and about 40° at 3'000 RPM
Are these values correct or do i have a little bit too much advance ?
Are these values correct or do i have a little bit too much advance ?
Last edited by facel6; 06-30-2015 at 04:10 PM.
#16
unless you have really high octane gas, the total should be no more than 36
#17
Instructor
Thread Starter
#18
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
The French pump octane number is based on a completely different system than it is in the U.S. - the U.S. system uses research octane plus motor octane divided by two. The French system uses just one number (don't know which one, but the result is WAY different).
#19
Instructor
Thread Starter
Yes John, you're right.
In France, we only consider the RON (research octane)
In the states, (RON+MON)/2
In France, we have 2 quality of gas:
with RON 95 (MON = 85) => equivalent US = 90
with RON 98 (MON = 88) => equivalent US = 93
Now the next question: what kind of gas do you usually use for your 283 engines ?
In France, we only consider the RON (research octane)
In the states, (RON+MON)/2
In France, we have 2 quality of gas:
with RON 95 (MON = 85) => equivalent US = 90
with RON 98 (MON = 88) => equivalent US = 93
Now the next question: what kind of gas do you usually use for your 283 engines ?
Last edited by facel6; 06-30-2015 at 05:59 PM.
#20
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
Yes John, you're right.
In France, we only consider the RON (research octane)
In the states, (RON+MON)/2
In france, we have 2 quality of gas:
with RON 95 (MON =85) => equivalent US = 90
with RON 98 (MON = 88) => equivalent US = 93
Now the next question: which kind of gas do you usually use for your 283 engines ?
In France, we only consider the RON (research octane)
In the states, (RON+MON)/2
In france, we have 2 quality of gas:
with RON 95 (MON =85) => equivalent US = 90
with RON 98 (MON = 88) => equivalent US = 93
Now the next question: which kind of gas do you usually use for your 283 engines ?
Except for solid-lifter fuelies, most 283's had compression ratios between 9.5:1 and 10:1, and should run fine on Mid-Grade (89 PON); some will run OK on Regular.