Gas Pedal on '63
#21
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Not that big a deal I guess....its just a point of curiosity how these small idiosyncrasies occur.
#22
Melting Slicks
OK gas pedal and screws coming from LIC. The seat bolts got changed back to original last year. I was pissed to hear the shop lost all the original hardware (bolts) and then put in hardware store (soft) bolts when new rugs got put in. That's how these cars get all hoomie goomied up.
#23
#24
Melting Slicks
LICS part # 28-41 online catalogue states the pedal spacer is correct for 63-67.
I have previously owned a 65 & 67 and I currently own a 66. I can say with certainty that spacer block did not exist in any of them.
I am at LICS once or twice a month. Next time I am there I will ask Todd what he knows about it.
I have previously owned a 65 & 67 and I currently own a 66. I can say with certainty that spacer block did not exist in any of them.
I am at LICS once or twice a month. Next time I am there I will ask Todd what he knows about it.
#25
Race Director
I am absolutely positively 100% certain that my '67 has never had such a spacer. I am the second owner, since 1971. Interior was all original when I got it, including original carpet.
#26
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
I forwarded this thread to several '63 experts that I trust their knowledge. Three of them said there was a spacer or the remains of the spacer ON TOP of the carpet. Carpet was cut out the same shape as the spacer.
Who is going to correct the judging guide?
Who is going to correct the judging guide?
#27
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes
on
1,100 Posts
If you'll look closely at that sheet (UPC 1, sheet B33.00) and the Revision Record, you'll note that the spacer and glue to the floor was added on 12-3-62 per ECR 48656.
If you'll also look at UPC 6, sheet C2.00, you'll note that the two accelerator pedal-to-floor screws changed on 11-23-62 (to accommodate the spacer thickness). The dates shown in the Revision Record aren't the date the change actually occurred on the line - they're the date the Engineering Drafting Room revised the A.I.M. sheet, but it's a good indicator of that change (screws on 11-23-62 and the spacer and glue ten days later).
If you'll also look at UPC 6, sheet C2.00, you'll note that the two accelerator pedal-to-floor screws changed on 11-23-62 (to accommodate the spacer thickness). The dates shown in the Revision Record aren't the date the change actually occurred on the line - they're the date the Engineering Drafting Room revised the A.I.M. sheet, but it's a good indicator of that change (screws on 11-23-62 and the spacer and glue ten days later).
Last edited by JohnZ; 07-26-2015 at 09:20 PM. Reason: Reference to floor pan "pocket" removed.
#28
Le Mans Master
I was the third owner. The second owner bought the car in 1966. All he did was abuse it. He altered the fenders, adding flares, and drag raced the car from 1967 until I bought the car in 1994. I believe it was original, but not being the original owner means I can not be positive.
#29
Team Owner
Thread Starter
If you'll look closely at that sheet (UPC 1, sheet B33.00) and the Revision Record, you'll note that the spacer and glue to the floor was added on 12-3-62 per ECR 48656. The spacer also required a change in the floor pan to create a "pocket" for it.
If you'll also look at UPC 6, sheet C2.00, you'll note that the two accelerator pedal-to-floor screws changed on 11-23-62 (to accommodate the spacer thickness). The dates shown in the Revision Record aren't the date the change actually occurred on the line - they're the date the Engineering Drafting Room revised the A.I.M. sheet, but it's a good indicator of that change (screws on 11-23-62 and the spacer and glue ten days later).
If you'll also look at UPC 6, sheet C2.00, you'll note that the two accelerator pedal-to-floor screws changed on 11-23-62 (to accommodate the spacer thickness). The dates shown in the Revision Record aren't the date the change actually occurred on the line - they're the date the Engineering Drafting Room revised the A.I.M. sheet, but it's a good indicator of that change (screws on 11-23-62 and the spacer and glue ten days later).
If I interpret your statement correctly my May '63 coupe should have the spacer and longer screws....although I don't know if my picture above represents a "pocket" for the spacer.
Interesting the JG doesn't delve into it this deeply...
#30
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY and Clearwater, FL
Posts: 2,076
Received 196 Likes
on
144 Posts
I will add what I can.....
I have a February '63 Car with Original and Unmolested Carpet.
I looked Very carefully at the accelerator pedal and see NO signs of a spacer.
The pedal is seated firmly against the heel pad. The carpet has a thin foam backing and has minimal compression.
There is NO "pocket" in the floor pan and the screws stick out about 1/2" on the underside.
I have a February '63 Car with Original and Unmolested Carpet.
I looked Very carefully at the accelerator pedal and see NO signs of a spacer.
The pedal is seated firmly against the heel pad. The carpet has a thin foam backing and has minimal compression.
There is NO "pocket" in the floor pan and the screws stick out about 1/2" on the underside.
#31
Safety Car
Frank, Yup, 10 minute job takes hours.....typical.
Our Feb built '63 didn't have one, I saw no remnants of one and no depression in the floor. The pedal was missing and no front carpet.
So following the AIM I added it, and you're right, it was confusing and time consuming. At first I put it above and looked very wrong. I had to use longer screws and put the spacer below the carpet. It seemed to line up to the accelerator rod better.
Our Feb built '63 didn't have one, I saw no remnants of one and no depression in the floor. The pedal was missing and no front carpet.
So following the AIM I added it, and you're right, it was confusing and time consuming. At first I put it above and looked very wrong. I had to use longer screws and put the spacer below the carpet. It seemed to line up to the accelerator rod better.
#32
Team Owner
Thread Starter
Thanks Rich.....
I should prob ask the folks on the NCRS forum but I suspect I'll get a similar mix of answers. So I guess its more or less up to the owner if he/she wants to use the spacer set up or not. I doubt it would even come up in judging if the screws appear correct in the pedal.
I should prob ask the folks on the NCRS forum but I suspect I'll get a similar mix of answers. So I guess its more or less up to the owner if he/she wants to use the spacer set up or not. I doubt it would even come up in judging if the screws appear correct in the pedal.
#33
Pro
On a related note I am still chasing a random sticky throttle issue on my 66 and I removed my spacer to get the pedal rod centered on the anti squeak pad.
Randy
#34
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
3) IF I USE THE SPACER than the end of the metal gas pedal rod will
start out (gas pedal NOT depressed) at the extreme inboard lower edge of the nylon slider on the back of the pedal....it JUST makes it on enough to work smoothly...can anybody check their 63 for this?
..
#35
Race Director
#36
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
#37
Race Director
#38
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
#40
Team Owner
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes
on
1,398 Posts
I could only speculate.
It was suggested to me by someone who knows about these gas pedal shims that the change in gas pedals had to do with the contact point of the gas pedal anti-squeak pad on the throttle bell crank.
Probably the same reason the shim was added under the carpet.
Just guessing.