C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Gas Pedal on '63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2015, 05:04 PM
  #21  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

Thread Starter
 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Originally Posted by BADBIRDCAGE
You get the pedal from a source like LICS.

My 63, serial number under 4000, build date Nov 27, 1962, had the spacer under the pedal assembly.
OK...now it gets interesting...
Not that big a deal I guess....its just a point of curiosity how these small idiosyncrasies occur.
Old 07-22-2015, 05:25 PM
  #22  
morly1963
Melting Slicks
 
morly1963's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2012
Location: EHT NJ
Posts: 2,724
Received 631 Likes on 419 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Frankie the Fink
OK...now it gets interesting...
Not that big a deal I guess....its just a point of curiosity how these small idiosyncrasies occur.
OK gas pedal and screws coming from LIC. The seat bolts got changed back to original last year. I was pissed to hear the shop lost all the original hardware (bolts) and then put in hardware store (soft) bolts when new rugs got put in. That's how these cars get all hoomie goomied up.
Old 07-22-2015, 05:45 PM
  #23  
tbarb
Safety Car
 
tbarb's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2014
Posts: 3,536
Received 562 Likes on 479 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BADBIRDCAGE
You get the pedal from a source like LICS.

My 63, serial number under 4000, build date Nov 27, 1962, had the spacer under the pedal assembly.
My 63 coupe is second week November and I can't remember any spacer under the pedal, are you certain yours is original?
Old 07-22-2015, 05:52 PM
  #24  
phil2302
Melting Slicks
 
phil2302's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,916
Received 1,011 Likes on 576 Posts
Default

LICS part # 28-41 online catalogue states the pedal spacer is correct for 63-67.
I have previously owned a 65 & 67 and I currently own a 66. I can say with certainty that spacer block did not exist in any of them.
I am at LICS once or twice a month. Next time I am there I will ask Todd what he knows about it.
Old 07-22-2015, 05:59 PM
  #25  
tuxnharley
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
tuxnharley's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 13,965
Received 1,939 Likes on 1,185 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by phil2302
LICS part # 28-41 online catalogue states the pedal spacer is correct for 63-67.
I have previously owned a 65 & 67 and I currently own a 66. I can say with certainty that spacer block did not exist in any of them.


I am absolutely positively 100% certain that my '67 has never had such a spacer. I am the second owner, since 1971. Interior was all original when I got it, including original carpet.
Old 07-22-2015, 06:00 PM
  #26  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

I forwarded this thread to several '63 experts that I trust their knowledge. Three of them said there was a spacer or the remains of the spacer ON TOP of the carpet. Carpet was cut out the same shape as the spacer.

Who is going to correct the judging guide?
Old 07-22-2015, 07:13 PM
  #27  
JohnZ
Team Owner

Support Corvetteforum!
 
JohnZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Washington Michigan
Posts: 38,899
Received 1,857 Likes on 1,100 Posts

Default

If you'll look closely at that sheet (UPC 1, sheet B33.00) and the Revision Record, you'll note that the spacer and glue to the floor was added on 12-3-62 per ECR 48656.

If you'll also look at UPC 6, sheet C2.00, you'll note that the two accelerator pedal-to-floor screws changed on 11-23-62 (to accommodate the spacer thickness). The dates shown in the Revision Record aren't the date the change actually occurred on the line - they're the date the Engineering Drafting Room revised the A.I.M. sheet, but it's a good indicator of that change (screws on 11-23-62 and the spacer and glue ten days later).

Last edited by JohnZ; 07-26-2015 at 09:20 PM. Reason: Reference to floor pan "pocket" removed.
Old 07-22-2015, 07:21 PM
  #28  
BADBIRDCAGE
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
BADBIRDCAGE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Del Boca Vista FL
Posts: 9,621
Received 1,974 Likes on 1,057 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tbarb
My 63 coupe is second week November and I can't remember any spacer under the pedal, are you certain yours is original?
I was the third owner. The second owner bought the car in 1966. All he did was abuse it. He altered the fenders, adding flares, and drag raced the car from 1967 until I bought the car in 1994. I believe it was original, but not being the original owner means I can not be positive.
Old 07-22-2015, 08:23 PM
  #29  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

Thread Starter
 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Originally Posted by JohnZ
If you'll look closely at that sheet (UPC 1, sheet B33.00) and the Revision Record, you'll note that the spacer and glue to the floor was added on 12-3-62 per ECR 48656. The spacer also required a change in the floor pan to create a "pocket" for it.

If you'll also look at UPC 6, sheet C2.00, you'll note that the two accelerator pedal-to-floor screws changed on 11-23-62 (to accommodate the spacer thickness). The dates shown in the Revision Record aren't the date the change actually occurred on the line - they're the date the Engineering Drafting Room revised the A.I.M. sheet, but it's a good indicator of that change (screws on 11-23-62 and the spacer and glue ten days later).
OK -- Now I'm definitely having a '63 "hood block" flashback.
If I interpret your statement correctly my May '63 coupe should have the spacer and longer screws....although I don't know if my picture above represents a "pocket" for the spacer.

Interesting the JG doesn't delve into it this deeply...
Old 07-22-2015, 08:51 PM
  #30  
Rich Yanulis
Melting Slicks
 
Rich Yanulis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY and Clearwater, FL
Posts: 2,076
Received 196 Likes on 144 Posts

Default

I will add what I can.....
I have a February '63 Car with Original and Unmolested Carpet.

I looked Very carefully at the accelerator pedal and see NO signs of a spacer.
The pedal is seated firmly against the heel pad. The carpet has a thin foam backing and has minimal compression.
There is NO "pocket" in the floor pan and the screws stick out about 1/2" on the underside.
Old 07-23-2015, 06:33 AM
  #31  
rich5962
Safety Car
 
rich5962's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 4,098
Received 563 Likes on 337 Posts

Default

Frank, Yup, 10 minute job takes hours.....typical.

Our Feb built '63 didn't have one, I saw no remnants of one and no depression in the floor. The pedal was missing and no front carpet.

So following the AIM I added it, and you're right, it was confusing and time consuming. At first I put it above and looked very wrong. I had to use longer screws and put the spacer below the carpet. It seemed to line up to the accelerator rod better.

Old 07-23-2015, 06:40 AM
  #32  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

Thread Starter
 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Thanks Rich.....

I should prob ask the folks on the NCRS forum but I suspect I'll get a similar mix of answers. So I guess its more or less up to the owner if he/she wants to use the spacer set up or not. I doubt it would even come up in judging if the screws appear correct in the pedal.
Old 07-23-2015, 10:40 AM
  #33  
66RBS
Pro
 
66RBS's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2012
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 707
Received 42 Likes on 35 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by phil2302
LICS part # 28-41 online catalogue states the pedal spacer is correct for 63-67.
.
True. It also states 28-44A Accelerator pedal swivel rod is unique to 63. 28-44B is for 64-67. Not a smoking gun but I would guess the pedal rod geometry changed requiring the spacer

On a related note I am still chasing a random sticky throttle issue on my 66 and I removed my spacer to get the pedal rod centered on the anti squeak pad.

Randy
Old 07-23-2015, 12:10 PM
  #34  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Frankie the Fink

3) IF I USE THE SPACER than the end of the metal gas pedal rod will
start out (gas pedal NOT depressed) at the extreme inboard lower edge of the nylon slider on the back of the pedal....it JUST makes it on enough to work smoothly...can anybody check their 63 for this?

..
Somebody tell FTF the reason his gas pedal doesn't fit the throttle lever with the block in place is because there was a gas pedal change during the '63 model year as well.
Old 07-23-2015, 12:16 PM
  #35  
Powershift
Race Director
 
Powershift's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Luling Louisiana
Posts: 10,463
Received 1,681 Likes on 1,307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
Somebody tell FTF the reason his gas pedal doesn't fit the throttle lever with the block in place is because there was a gas pedal change during the '63 model year as well.
I can do this. Will this suffice??



Larry
Old 07-23-2015, 12:26 PM
  #36  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Powershift
I can do this. Will this suffice??



Larry
Yes. I've been advised the '65 AIM shows a spacer for the '65 model as well. Different part number though.
Old 07-23-2015, 12:31 PM
  #37  
tuxnharley
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
tuxnharley's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 13,965
Received 1,939 Likes on 1,185 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Powershift
I can do this. Will this suffice??



Larry



Not unless you highlight what you are quoting - at least on my system the text in quoted responses doesn't show up without the highlighting.

Get notified of new replies

To Gas Pedal on '63

Old 07-23-2015, 01:34 PM
  #38  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tuxnharley




Not unless you highlight what you are quoting - at least on my system the text in quoted responses doesn't show up without the highlighting.
Not a big deal. He'll only lose a couple of points when the merry men find the wrong pedal in his car.
Attached Images  
Old 07-23-2015, 02:46 PM
  #39  
Rich Yanulis
Melting Slicks
 
Rich Yanulis's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY and Clearwater, FL
Posts: 2,076
Received 196 Likes on 144 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
Somebody tell FTF the reason his gas pedal doesn't fit the throttle lever with the block in place is because there was a gas pedal change during the '63 model year as well.
Mike,
If there was a change, what is the difference between the two versions?
Old 07-23-2015, 03:06 PM
  #40  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Rich Yanulis
Mike,
If there was a change, what is the difference between the two versions?
Rich,

I could only speculate.

It was suggested to me by someone who knows about these gas pedal shims that the change in gas pedals had to do with the contact point of the gas pedal anti-squeak pad on the throttle bell crank.

Probably the same reason the shim was added under the carpet.

Just guessing.


Quick Reply: Gas Pedal on '63



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 PM.