C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Engine runs better on 87 vs 93 any ideas why?

Old 07-27-2015, 01:23 PM
  #21  
65tripleblack
Safety Car
 
65tripleblack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Ocean Township NJ
Posts: 4,797
Received 235 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BD104X
On an un-related note... 65tripleblack, was that you I saw on Squankum Rd & Atlantic Ave near RT 34 on Thursday evening while I was out cruising???
It could very well have been. I might have been returning from the beach, or one of the beachfront "watering holes".
Weather permitting, I'll be at Brick Township Summer Fest this Thursday from 5PM to 9PM at Windward Beach. Hosted by Time Capsule Cruisers.
Hope to see you there. I'll be looking for you. If you see me, please introduce yourself.

http://www.twp.brick.nj.us/summerfest-2015

To those who are misinformed and not necessarily BD104X: Lower octane fuel doesn't burn slower, but it ignites later, producing the same net effect and therefore the confusion and myth. It burns at the same rate as higher octane fuel, and it has the same energy density (specific energy) as higher octane fuel. As stated previously, alcohol content WILL lower gasoline's energy density.

Last edited by 65tripleblack; 07-27-2015 at 01:37 PM.
Old 07-27-2015, 01:32 PM
  #22  
ElHombre
Navigator
 
ElHombre's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Elizabethtown Kentucky
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Does the 93 octane in your area have a high methanol content?
That could cause some pre ignition issues, as well as attracting water in the tank if the car is not driven often.
Old 07-27-2015, 02:12 PM
  #23  
BD104X
Burning Brakes
 
BD104X's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: Freehold NJ
Posts: 794
Received 202 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=65tripleblack;1590140408]It could very well have been. I might have been returning from the beach, or one of the beachfront "watering holes".
Weather permitting, I'll be at Brick Township Summer Fest this Thursday from 5PM to 9PM at Windward Beach. Hosted by Time Capsule Cruisers.
Hope to see you there. I'll be looking for you. If you see me, please introduce yourself.

http://www.twp.brick.nj.us/summerfest-2015
LOL, you don't remember? How many silver C2 convertibles waved to you at intersections that day??? Just kidding - maybe I'll see you in Brick if I can talk my wife out of going to see Pt. Pleasant fireworks on Thursday.
Old 07-27-2015, 03:33 PM
  #24  
Westlotorn
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Westlotorn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 5,676
Received 1,271 Likes on 812 Posts

Default

Was 93 in the car when purchased? It may have been a year old or more.
Fuel Degrades when parked for more than 3 months.
Old 07-27-2015, 04:03 PM
  #25  
phil2302
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
phil2302's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,906
Received 1,008 Likes on 573 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Westlotorn
Was 93 in the car when purchased? It may have been a year old or more.
Fuel Degrades when parked for more than 3 months.
You make a good point however we arent sure what was in the tank when we test drove it but within days of getting the car into his shop the tank was drained, cleaned and filled with 93. Plus all the obvious things you would want to do to optimize performance were done. 3-4 tanks of 93 were used up before he switched to 87.
It is weird. I run my car on the same Mobil 93 all the time and it runs terrific.
Old 07-27-2015, 04:32 PM
  #26  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by phil2302


It is weird. I run my car on the same Mobil 93 all the time and it runs terrific.
Put some 87 in that plug of yours and see if it'll tear the tires off with that stuff in there.
Old 07-27-2015, 06:35 PM
  #27  
427435
Drifting
 
427435's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester Minnesota
Posts: 1,658
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Powershift
Reposting to highlight the attached write-up from Whitfield Oil.

Larry

Thanks.

Here is the write-up.




Flame Speed, Octane Number & Horsepower
Faster Flame Speed Is Always Better For Maximizing Horsepower

There is a lot of misunderstanding about the relationship between flame speed, octane number, and horsepower. There are some connections between these items, but not as many as some people think.

FLAME (burn) SPEED:

THe speed at which the air fuel mixture in a combustion chamber is consumed becomes critical in a racing engine. At 6000 RPM, each spark plug fires 50 times per second. That's a lot of combustion processes happening in a very short time in the same combustion chamber. This is why racing gasoline need to be capable of burning fast. In your daily driver that may not see the top side of 3000 RPM, flame speed is not as critical. In a racing engine, everything is happening much faster, and in a bigger way because the throttle is wide open. The gasoline must burn as completely as possible to make the most possible horsepower. If the gasoline does not get burned in the time allowed, there will be unburned hydrocarbons coming out the exhaust pipe. Besides not making any horsepower for you, the unburned product contributed to air pollution. Flame speed is determined by the hydrocarbon components in the gasoline. It is critical to making max power, but not related to octane quality.

OCTANE NUMBER:

The octane number of a gasoline has little to do with how fast it burns or how much power the engine will make. Octane number is the resistance to detonation. If the octane number is high enough to prevent detonation, there is no need to use a higher octane gasoline since the engine will not make any additional power. Octane number is not related to flame (burn) speed either. Variations in octane quality are independent of flame speed. There are some high octane gasolines in the marketplace with fast flame speeds and some with slow flame speeds. It depends on how they are put together. We prefer fast flame speeds because we know that a properly tuned engine will make more power on this type of gasoline than one that has a slower flame speed.

POWER:

The ultimate goal in the racing gasoline business is to convert chemical energy from the gasoline hydrocarbons into mechanical energy or horsepower. The most efficient way to convert the gasoline into horsepower is to have the correct air-fuel ratio and the correct spark timing. A mixture that is too rich or too lean will not make maximum horsepower. The same is true of spark timing: to much or too little will compromise engine output.

OVERVIEW:

As indicated above, flame speed and octane number both impact the amount of power that an engine will develop, but they are independent of each other. To get maximum power from an engine, one must have a gasoline with adequate flame speed (faster is always better), and adequate octane quality to support the combustion process. Tied in with the optimized air-fuel ratio and the spark timing, we have a winner.
Old 07-27-2015, 07:00 PM
  #28  
Powershift
Race Director
 
Powershift's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Luling Louisiana
Posts: 10,462
Received 1,681 Likes on 1,307 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Westlotorn
Was 93 in the car when purchased? It may have been a year old or more.
Fuel Degrades when parked for more than 3 months.
I have experienced this with Shell 93 octane V-Tech (with ethanol) and Exxon Extra 93 octane (with ethanol).

However I have recently been using Exxon 91 octane non-ethanol gas mixed with VP 110 octane leaded racing gas. Fuel looks/appears and runs beautiful after 6-9 months sitting in the tank. No hint of degradation.

I know my 1967 car needs more road-time, but not everything goes as planned all the time. However, it still leads a pretty good life.

Larry
Old 07-27-2015, 07:10 PM
  #29  
LouieM
Race Director
 
LouieM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: NorCal
Posts: 13,346
Received 3,026 Likes on 1,249 Posts

Default

There is obviously an unknown factor at work here.
Old 07-27-2015, 10:21 PM
  #30  
Nicola
Pro
 
Nicola's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Posts: 655
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

I have been running regular 87 fuel in my 66 300 hp car for years now.
Flat top Pistons, built to stock specs.
No problem, no pinging more money in my wallet too.
Old 07-27-2015, 11:16 PM
  #31  
427435
Drifting
 
427435's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester Minnesota
Posts: 1,658
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Are you using fuel from the same station?

Are both the regular and premium fuels E10 fuels?
Old 07-28-2015, 07:20 AM
  #32  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Originally Posted by LouieM
There is obviously an unknown factor at work here.
Hence my post #4 test as a sanity check...but the horse has now left the barn on discussing what hi-test is, is not, and, how it burns....

This fella inadvertently fixed some problem with his car coincidental to changing gasoline grades and now has the cause and effect wrong....very simple...
Old 07-28-2015, 07:37 AM
  #33  
phil2302
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
phil2302's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,906
Received 1,008 Likes on 573 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frankie the Fink
Hence my post #4 test as a sanity check...but the horse has now left the barn on discussing what hi-test is, is not, and, how it burns....

This fella inadvertently fixed some problem with his car coincidental to changing gasoline grades and now has the cause and effect wrong....very simple...


I dont see how anyone could disagree with your assessment. Myself included.The odd part however is that despite all the aforementioned fixes, nothing changed for the better till the fuel selection was changed followed by an immediate and dramatic improvement.
Plan is to run it down to 1/8 tank and put some 93 back in it. (for research purposes ☺) Report to follow.
Old 07-28-2015, 07:55 AM
  #34  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

These are old cars with some finicky parts....trash in the carb, a temporarily bad acting float, a sticky distributor weight all can correct themselves at inauspicious times leading you to think the symptoms were related to something else. Several decades ago there was a big issue with older gas stations in ground tanks going bad and water in the gas (for some pumps) was fairly prevalent in the Tidewater area....now that could cause some weird problems that could be attributed to a dozen other things.

Your report should be interesting...

Last edited by Frankie the Fink; 07-28-2015 at 07:58 AM.
Old 07-28-2015, 08:31 AM
  #35  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,843 Likes on 1,398 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by phil2302

Before purchase it never idled well or ran smoothly below 2000 rpm. It would stall, sputter, occasionally backfire through carb ......


Never saw this before, you?
None of your symptoms have anything to do with octane.

Yes, I have seen it before on several occasions. Once when I accidentally dumped diesel fuel in my garden tractor and more times than I can remember over the years when I had water in the gas. None lately though.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Engine runs better on 87 vs 93 any ideas why?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 AM.