1961 Corvette engine date code and stamp pad
#1
Race Director
Thread Starter
1961 Corvette engine date code and stamp pad
These numbers are from a powerglide car. The heads, manifold, transmission all have the right date codes and numbers. It's an October 1960 built car. The date code looks like Sept 16, 1960? The VIN is stamped a little strange on the pad. I can't confirm anything about the engine identification numbers. I know the "DG" means 283 CI, 230 HP which would be right. The pad looks like it has broach marks. The car was parked we believe in the early 1980's due to a wiring harness short and left in a hanger in Torrance, CA, all these years. Any thoughts?
Last edited by Randy G.; 08-12-2015 at 08:51 PM.
#3
Beginning in mid-1960, the VIN derivative was stamped using a gang. The VIN derivative in your photo appears to have been stamped without a gang. The broach marks should be running parallel from front to back and I don't see that, but could be a function of the photo. The marks appear to be left to right.
The camera flash washed out most of the chassis date code. What is the date code?
The camera flash washed out most of the chassis date code. What is the date code?
#4
Safety Car
Looks like vin #1082 to me, and like 1960 cars I have seen with similar stamps. This was new to the factory, so the person doing the stamping was learning something new every day. Vin 1052 was the last September car made, so this car was built on Monday October 3, 1960. I think it is the original engine. POWERGLIDE 230hp is a nice ride. I bet it cleans up nicely.
Last edited by jimgessner; 08-13-2015 at 12:31 AM.
#6
Race Director
Thread Starter
Beginning in mid-1960, the VIN derivative was stamped using a gang. The VIN derivative in your photo appears to have been stamped without a gang. The broach marks should be running parallel from front to back and I don't see that, but could be a function of the photo. The marks appear to be left to right.
The camera flash washed out most of the chassis date code. What is the date code?
The camera flash washed out most of the chassis date code. What is the date code?
The broach marks definitely run front to back. I used some thinner and a scotchbrite pad to clean the paint off, so there may be some streaking from rubbing it up and down the pad.
The stamp pad on the block reads F09I9DG which is Sept 19th. That's 3 days after the 09/16/60 cast date if I'm reading everything correctly. I pulled the right side valve cover and found the date of the head to be 06/09/1960.
Last edited by Randy G.; 08-13-2015 at 04:31 AM.
#7
Race Director
Thread Starter
Looks like vin #1082 to me, and like 1960 cars I have seen with similar stamps. This was new to the factory, so the person doing the stamping was learning something new every day. Vin 1052 was the last September car made, so this car was built on Monday October 3, 1960. I think it is the original engine. POWERGLIDE 230hp is a nice ride. I bet it cleans up nicely.
Here's the VIN tag.
Maybe it's goofy enough to be legit.
Last edited by Randy G.; 08-13-2015 at 04:36 AM.
#8
Safety Car
The extra "1" is legitimate in the engine vin derivative. The vin derivative in 1961 included a "1" to designate the model year. This was also a feature for subsequent years. The 1960 MY did not.
The Flint assembly stamp looks normal to me. I see some broaching in there too. Oh, just a FYI, best not to use any type of abrasive, including Scotch-Brite on the pad. Stick with the thinner and brushes, like the small acid brushes. Just cut the bristles down shorter for a better stiffness.
My gut feel is that the stamp pad is legitimate, however uncommon. It should have been gang stamped. But who knows what happened then. It's very possible the gang stamp fixture was not available at the time, being repaired, who knows. The line would have to continue so individual stamps may have been used for a period of time.
Ideally it would be consistent with others built around the same time if you found other examples stamped in a similar fashion. That car appears very original and my bet says it's all real, however of course not typical of expected factory production.
It is also possible that the block was replaced under warranty, or even at final test in St Louis. If so, then the individual stamps would possibly used to "get it out the door". The cast date of the block to assembly stamp is only 3 days apart. Very typical. My 1961 block is cast J200,(Oct 20) assembled I026(Oct 26), 6 days later.
Nice find!
Rich
The Flint assembly stamp looks normal to me. I see some broaching in there too. Oh, just a FYI, best not to use any type of abrasive, including Scotch-Brite on the pad. Stick with the thinner and brushes, like the small acid brushes. Just cut the bristles down shorter for a better stiffness.
My gut feel is that the stamp pad is legitimate, however uncommon. It should have been gang stamped. But who knows what happened then. It's very possible the gang stamp fixture was not available at the time, being repaired, who knows. The line would have to continue so individual stamps may have been used for a period of time.
Ideally it would be consistent with others built around the same time if you found other examples stamped in a similar fashion. That car appears very original and my bet says it's all real, however of course not typical of expected factory production.
It is also possible that the block was replaced under warranty, or even at final test in St Louis. If so, then the individual stamps would possibly used to "get it out the door". The cast date of the block to assembly stamp is only 3 days apart. Very typical. My 1961 block is cast J200,(Oct 20) assembled I026(Oct 26), 6 days later.
Nice find!
Rich
#9
Race Director
Thread Starter
The extra "1" is legitimate in the engine vin derivative. The vin derivative in 1961 included a "1" to designate the model year. This was also a feature for subsequent years. The 1960 MY did not.
The Flint assembly stamp looks normal to me. I see some broaching in there too. Oh, just a FYI, best not to use any type of abrasive, including Scotch-Brite on the pad. Stick with the thinner and brushes, like the small acid brushes. Just cut the bristles down shorter for a better stiffness.
My gut feel is that the stamp pad is legitimate, however uncommon. It should have been gang stamped. But who knows what happened then. It's very possible the gang stamp fixture was not available at the time, being repaired, who knows. The line would have to continue so individual stamps may have been used for a period of time.
Ideally it would be consistent with others built around the same time if you found other examples stamped in a similar fashion. That car appears very original and my bet says it's all real, however of course not typical of expected factory production.
It is also possible that the block was replaced under warranty, or even at final test in St Louis. If so, then the individual stamps would possibly used to "get it out the door". The cast date of the block to assembly stamp is only 3 days apart. Very typical. My 1961 block is cast J200,(Oct 20) assembled I026(Oct 26), 6 days later.
Nice find!
Rich
The Flint assembly stamp looks normal to me. I see some broaching in there too. Oh, just a FYI, best not to use any type of abrasive, including Scotch-Brite on the pad. Stick with the thinner and brushes, like the small acid brushes. Just cut the bristles down shorter for a better stiffness.
My gut feel is that the stamp pad is legitimate, however uncommon. It should have been gang stamped. But who knows what happened then. It's very possible the gang stamp fixture was not available at the time, being repaired, who knows. The line would have to continue so individual stamps may have been used for a period of time.
Ideally it would be consistent with others built around the same time if you found other examples stamped in a similar fashion. That car appears very original and my bet says it's all real, however of course not typical of expected factory production.
It is also possible that the block was replaced under warranty, or even at final test in St Louis. If so, then the individual stamps would possibly used to "get it out the door". The cast date of the block to assembly stamp is only 3 days apart. Very typical. My 1961 block is cast J200,(Oct 20) assembled I026(Oct 26), 6 days later.
Nice find!
Rich
Just looking at it from every direction it looks like it's never been apart. It also looks like they weren't into oil changes. I had to work at it to get the sludge off the head casting numbers just to read them.
#10
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,602
Received 6,509 Likes
on
2,998 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019
Randy,
FWIW: I've got a MY61 block out of a Corvette which, like yours, has a goofy pad stamping. Also, like yours, it's early in the model year. May just be a coincidence.
Jim
FWIW: I've got a MY61 block out of a Corvette which, like yours, has a goofy pad stamping. Also, like yours, it's early in the model year. May just be a coincidence.
Jim
#11
Race Director
Thread Starter
Is there any way you can post a picture of the pad? It would be interesting to compare.
#13
Race Director
Member Since: Apr 2015
Location: Fresno California
Posts: 17,503
Received 3,443 Likes
on
2,113 Posts
Randy, I'd bet a month's pay that the stamp (and the rest of the car) is legitimate. Nobody was faking 230 horse powerglide cars 35 years ago. It looks like a totally honest, un-messed with ride, and you got great deal on it. Some mechanical shining up, and you've got a killer grocery-getter. I'll bet it was the guy's wife's car, and driven pretty gently. Funny how I thought my December 1960 '61 was 'early', but yours, 1,970 cars ahead of mine has a complete different radiator, etc.
#14
Team Owner
I'm not seeing anything to dissuade me from believing the engine numbers/VIN are legit on the car... I'm thinking the rarity of this engine setup elevates it above 'grocery getter' status. You have to decide whether or not to make it a fun driver or 'go for it' and restore it to its former glory (possibly judged) -- you may have a 6 digit car there under the right circumstances...
First thing you want to do is put a couple of black plastic tie wraps around that VIN tag. Its important documentation and it wouldn't be the first one to get knocked off -- or just plain fall off...
First thing you want to do is put a couple of black plastic tie wraps around that VIN tag. Its important documentation and it wouldn't be the first one to get knocked off -- or just plain fall off...
#15
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,602
Received 6,509 Likes
on
2,998 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019
The block is accessible but not conveniently. Still, I'm curious, too. Give me a few days and remind me if it appears that my CRS has kicked in again.
Jim
#17
Race Director
Thread Starter
It has a strange radio in it, and there were no antenna wires in the trunk. Once I figure out how to reopen the trunk (no keys came with the car) I'll know more by looking on the left side for evidence of a filled hole. Everyone wanted the 76 Union antenna ball, but I kept it.
#19
Race Director
Or, if you can't pick the lock, just sacrifice the deck lid emblem,a s it is probably all cracked anyway.
Doug
#20
Race Director
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: northern california
Posts: 13,602
Received 6,509 Likes
on
2,998 Posts
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019