C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

EPA is at it again......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2016, 01:06 PM
  #1  
Plasticman
Race Director

Thread Starter
 
Plasticman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2000
Location: Beverly Hills (Pine Ridge) Florida
Posts: 10,152
Received 525 Likes on 374 Posts

Default EPA is at it again......

The EPA's proposed regs will make it illegal to modify cars & trucks for "racing".

A proposal by the Environmental Protection Agency could mean bad things for racers and car enthusiasts across the United States. According to the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA), the EPA wants to make it illegal to modify your roadgoing car for racing, and could even prohibit the sale of aftermaket parts that mess with emission control devices.

Tucked away in an EPA proposal titled Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles—Phase 2 is a section that indicates this sort of vehicle modification is a violation of the clean air act. Here's the exact wording, found on page 862 of an official EPA document:

EPA is proposing in 40 CFR 1037.601(a)(3) to clarify that the Clean Air Act does not allow any person to disable, remove, or render inoperative (i.e., tamper with) emission controls on a certified motor vehicle for purposes of competition.



Full article here:

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/02/09/e...sema-official/

Plasticman

Last edited by Plasticman; 02-09-2016 at 01:06 PM.
Old 02-09-2016, 01:42 PM
  #2  
Rickenbach
Instructor
 
Rickenbach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 235
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I was just going to post this. This is why bypassing the Constitution is so dangerous. We are now having bureaucrats make the laws for us instead of Congress. Those who would give up freedom for security will get neither.
Old 02-09-2016, 01:45 PM
  #3  
93RubyRedCoupe
Melting Slicks
 
93RubyRedCoupe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,578
Received 641 Likes on 364 Posts

Default

So many bigger problems in the country and the world, glad they're focusing on modified cars. They'll spend millions to do this, and enforce it but let every terrorist into the country, train them, educate them, then defend their "rights".....Unreal....
Old 02-09-2016, 01:54 PM
  #4  
AZDoug
Race Director
 
AZDoug's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Camp Verde AZ
Posts: 12,434
Received 1,478 Likes on 905 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2017 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

The EPA has outlived its usefulness, everything they set out to do originally, has been accomplished so in order to keep all those bureaucrats employed, they must come up with new things to implement and enforce.

Reduce auto emissions from 1500 PPM HC to say10 PPM HC/mile, so now they want 2 PPM HC per mile, then if that is accomplished, they set it to 1 PPM HC per mile, etc.

Lead in water the same, if they achieved 25 PPB, now they want 10 PPB.

Doug
Old 02-09-2016, 02:21 PM
  #5  
tuxnharley
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
tuxnharley's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 13,966
Received 1,939 Likes on 1,185 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by AZDoug
The EPA has outlived its usefulness, everything they set out to do originally, has been accomplished so in order to keep all those bureaucrats employed, they must come up with new things to implement and enforce.

Reduce auto emissions from 1500 PPM HC to say10 PPM HC/mile, so now they want 2 PPM HC per mile, then if that is accomplished, they set it to 1 PPM HC per mile, etc.

Lead in water the same, if they achieved 25 PPB, now they want 10 PPB.

Doug


Some of things the EPA and its subordinate agencies require are ridiculous. When I worked in an area subject to their regulations we saw many examples of increasingly stringent standards that were unrealistic and impracticable. Two of my "favorite" examples are:
- standards in ppb for metals in sewage discharge that are below the threshold of detectability by state of the art mass spec equipment, accompanied by a discharge permit requirement for certification that the standard has been met.
- standards for sediment in creeks that are below the natural background level occurring from upstream erosion.

Both (and many other similar) requirements were accompanied by the threat of $10,000 per DAY fines if the standards were not met.

The bureaucrats involved in setting such ridiculous standards had no concern for the practicability of their proposed standards......

Here's an interesting way to visualize the scale of parts per million and parts per billion standards -

A part per million is one copper bb in a railroad box car

A part per billion is one copper bb somewhere in a train of a thousand railroad box cars.................

Last edited by tuxnharley; 02-09-2016 at 02:49 PM. Reason: typo
Old 02-09-2016, 03:56 PM
  #6  
OC-1
Drifting
 
OC-1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: nj
Posts: 1,678
Received 167 Likes on 106 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tuxnharley


Some of things the EPA and its subordinate agencies require are ridiculous. When I worked in an area subject to their regulations we saw many examples of increasingly stringent standards that were unrealistic and impracticable. Two of my "favorite" examples are:
- standards in ppb for metals in sewage discharge that are below the threshold of detectability by state of the art mass spec equipment, accompanied by a discharge permit requirement for certification that the standard has been met.
- standards for sediment in creeks that are below the natural background level occurring from upstream erosion.

Both (and many other similar) requirements were accompanied by the threat of $10,000 per DAY fines if the standards were not met.

The bureaucrats involved in setting such ridiculous standards had no concern for the practicability of their proposed standards......

Here's an interesting way to visualize the scale of parts per million and parts per billion standards -

A part per million is one copper bb in a railroad box car

A part per billion is one copper bb somewhere in a train of a thousand railroad box cars.................
there is also a standard for rat feces and insect parts
Old 02-09-2016, 05:20 PM
  #7  
Railroadman
Team Owner
 
Railroadman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 31,358
Received 5,010 Likes on 2,529 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-‘19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24


Default

Originally Posted by OC-1
there is also a standard for rat feces and insect parts
Then they should fine the rats, not the humans! We have become our own worst enemy.
The following users liked this post:
ohiovet (02-10-2016)
Old 02-09-2016, 05:40 PM
  #8  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Originally Posted by OC-1
there is also a standard for rat feces and insect parts
I think that may actually be an FDA standard for the amount of those things that can be in foodstuffs - seriously.

I liked the old miner in West Virginia who worked his claim all by himself - nobody else anywhere around. OSHA required him to have a stretcher near the mine's entrance so he could carry himself out if he was injured
Old 02-09-2016, 05:52 PM
  #9  
JackTripper
Turn 12!
Support Corvetteforum!
 
JackTripper's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: The Beach
Posts: 5,974
Received 498 Likes on 217 Posts

Default

Like everything else that's wrong with this country, this is most likely Obama's fault.

:-)
Old 02-09-2016, 06:12 PM
  #10  
DansYellow66
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
DansYellow66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 15,758
Received 2,621 Likes on 1,953 Posts

Default

[QUOTE=tuxnharley;1591515092]

The bureaucrats involved in setting such ridiculous standards had no concern for the practicability of their proposed standards......

QUOTE]

And then there was the incident in Colorado of EPA contractors drilling into a flooded mine shaft and releasing a torrent of heavy metal contaminated water down the Animas River down into New Mexico. Yep - they are a professional organization - here to protect us.

Last edited by DansYellow66; 02-09-2016 at 06:13 PM.
The following users liked this post:
ohiovet (02-10-2016)
Old 02-09-2016, 07:41 PM
  #11  
jdk971
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
jdk971's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2007
Location: columbus ohio
Posts: 1,511
Received 27 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

all rules laws and etc should be voted on by the house, senate. jim
Old 02-09-2016, 11:28 PM
  #12  
AZDoug
Race Director
 
AZDoug's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Camp Verde AZ
Posts: 12,434
Received 1,478 Likes on 905 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
2017 C1 of Year Finalist

Default

This proposed ruling appears to affect ANY vehicle with emissions equipment, not just new cars.

Basically they are saying your cars are their property, not yours.

Doug
Old 02-10-2016, 07:41 AM
  #13  
rfn026
Safety Car
 
rfn026's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 4,469
Received 272 Likes on 214 Posts

Default

Everyone take a deep breath and count to 10.

This is just alarmist crap put out by SEMA. They go to full panic mode every time they get a chance.

This is probably the least of racing's problems.

Richard Newton
Historic Race Cars
The following 2 users liked this post by rfn026:
CF Editor (02-10-2016), Miami Stingray (02-16-2016)
Old 02-10-2016, 07:47 AM
  #14  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,082 Likes on 4,736 Posts
Army

Default

Originally Posted by rfn026
Everyone take a deep breath and count to 10.

This is just alarmist crap put out by SEMA. They go to full panic mode every time they get a chance.

This is probably the least of racing's problems.

Richard Newton
Historic Race Cars
A 'proposed' reg has a long way to go to become a fully vetted regulation.
Old 02-10-2016, 08:37 AM
  #15  
DansYellow66
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
DansYellow66's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 15,758
Received 2,621 Likes on 1,953 Posts

Default

And notice what happened to Obama/EPAs new rules on power plants at the Supreme Court yesterday.
The following users liked this post:
ohiovet (02-10-2016)
Old 02-10-2016, 09:05 AM
  #16  
ohiovet
Melting Slicks
 
ohiovet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Middletown Ohio
Posts: 2,892
Received 167 Likes on 130 Posts
2016 C1 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by DansYellow66
And notice what happened to Obama/EPAs new rules on power plants at the Supreme Court yesterday.
Dan,
A small (actually large) step in the right direction. This new set of rediculous rules could ruin the employment and economy of at least 27 states.
Old 02-10-2016, 09:15 AM
  #17  
66 big block
Racer
 
66 big block's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Ma
Posts: 319
Received 51 Likes on 21 Posts

Default Epa

OTE=Plasticman;1591514435]The EPA's proposed regs will make it illegal to modify cars & trucks for "racing".

A proposal by the Environmental Protection Agency could mean bad things for racers and car enthusiasts across the United States. According to the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA), the EPA wants to make it illegal to modify your roadgoing car for racing, and could even prohibit the sale of aftermaket parts that mess with emission control devices.

Tucked away in an EPA proposal titled Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles—Phase 2 is a section that indicates this sort of vehicle modification is a violation of the clean air act. Here's the exact wording, found on page 862 of an official EPA document:

EPA is proposing in 40 CFR 1037.601(a)(3) to clarify that the Clean Air Act does not allow any person to disable, remove, or render inoperative (i.e., tamper with) emission controls on a certified motor vehicle for purposes of competition.



Full article here:

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/02/09/e...sema-official/

Plasticman[/QUOTE]

ANOTHER REASON TO VOTE FOR A PATRIOT DONALD TRUMP WHO WILL CUT THIS CRAP
The following users liked this post:
ohiovet (02-10-2016)

Get notified of new replies

To EPA is at it again......

Old 02-10-2016, 09:21 AM
  #18  
ohiovet
Melting Slicks
 
ohiovet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Middletown Ohio
Posts: 2,892
Received 167 Likes on 130 Posts
2016 C1 of Year Finalist
Default

amen!
Old 02-10-2016, 09:36 AM
  #19  
hedgehead
Race Director
 
hedgehead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: I'm not doing as well as I expected, but I never expected I would
Posts: 13,156
Received 109 Likes on 96 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JackTripper
Like everything else that's wrong with this country, this is most likely Obama's fault.

:-)
Oh, hell yes.
Old 02-10-2016, 09:39 AM
  #20  
desertpilgrim
Drifting
 
desertpilgrim's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Glendale AZ
Posts: 1,450
Received 117 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

And you don't worry about the mind set and the demonstration of the TOTAL LACK OF COMMON SENSE by bureaucrats who would even PROPOSE such regulations?!? It's okay, take another short nap.



QUOTE=rfn026;1591520449]Everyone take a deep breath and count to 10.

This is just alarmist crap put out by SEMA. They go to full panic mode every time they get a chance.

This is probably the least of racing's problems.

Richard Newton
Historic Race Cars[/QUOTE]


Quick Reply: EPA is at it again......



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 PM.