C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

What's the difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2016, 05:57 PM
  #1  
65 396
Racer
Thread Starter
 
65 396's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: richmond virginia
Posts: 422
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Default What's the difference?

Can anyone tell me what the differences are between the early 60's
327/340 engine and the mid/late 60's 327/350 engines?
Old 08-21-2016, 06:02 PM
  #2  
wmf62
Race Director
 
wmf62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes on 621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

solid lifters and camshaft....

Bill
Old 08-21-2016, 06:03 PM
  #3  
63Corvette
Le Mans Master
 
63Corvette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Granbury Texas
Posts: 9,556
Received 283 Likes on 199 Posts

Default

Basically......................... the 30-30 cam vs the hydraulic 151 cam

Last edited by 63Corvette; 08-21-2016 at 06:04 PM.
Old 08-21-2016, 06:08 PM
  #4  
wmf62
Race Director
 
wmf62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Inverness FL
Posts: 17,891
Received 727 Likes on 621 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

Originally Posted by 63Corvette
Basically......................... the 30-30 cam vs the hydraulic 151 cam
lol... i think meant 327ci/350hp, not 350ci/350hp,
Bill
Old 08-21-2016, 06:20 PM
  #5  
MidShark
Melting Slicks
 
MidShark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Belmont Michigan
Posts: 2,343
Received 277 Likes on 144 Posts

Default

Also, the 340 horse had 1.94 intake valves; the 350 horse engines had 2.02s. Carter AFB on the 340hp, and Holley on the 350hp.

Rich

Last edited by MidShark; 08-21-2016 at 06:21 PM.
Old 08-21-2016, 09:20 PM
  #6  
ohiovet
Melting Slicks
 
ohiovet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Middletown Ohio
Posts: 2,892
Received 167 Likes on 130 Posts
2016 C1 of Year Finalist
Default

The 340 HP engines were solid lifters, 11.25 CR (roughly) and used a AFB carb, 2 1/2 " exhaust manifolds and a centrifugal advance distributor.
The 327 350 HP engines had hydraulic lifters, ??? CR, Holley Carb and I believe a vacuum advance dist. In my opinion the one in my 67 ran extremely well, as does the 340 HP engines like the one in my 62.
Old 08-21-2016, 10:25 PM
  #7  
65 396
Racer
Thread Starter
 
65 396's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: richmond virginia
Posts: 422
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ohiovet
The 340 HP engines were solid lifters, 11.25 CR (roughly) and used a AFB carb, 2 1/2 " exhaust manifolds and a centrifugal advance distributor.
The 327 350 HP engines had hydraulic lifters, ??? CR, Holley Carb and I believe a vacuum advance dist. In my opinion the one in my 67 ran extremely well, as does the 340 HP engines like the one in my 62.
Thanks for the quick response and have a blessed day.
Old 08-21-2016, 10:46 PM
  #8  
gbvette62
Race Director
 
gbvette62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Shamong, NJ
Posts: 11,109
Received 2,029 Likes on 1,315 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ohiovet
The 340 HP engines were solid lifters, 11.25 CR (roughly) and used a AFB carb, 2 1/2 " exhaust manifolds and a centrifugal advance distributor.
The 62 340 didn't have vacuum advance, but the 63 340 does.

The 327 350 HP engines had hydraulic lifters, ??? CR, Holley Carb and I believe a vacuum advance dist. In my opinion the one in my 67 ran extremely well, as does the 340 HP engines like the one in my 62.
The compression ratio for the 65-67 327/350 was 11.00:1. The 65 350 HP used 2 1/2" exhaust manifolds, like the 62-63 340, while the 66-68 327/350 used 2" manifolds.

Personally I think the 65-68 327/350 was the best all around small block ever made.

Last edited by gbvette62; 08-21-2016 at 10:47 PM.
Old 08-21-2016, 10:49 PM
  #9  
66jack
Team Owner
 
66jack's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 30,349
Received 830 Likes on 574 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65 396
Can anyone tell me what the differences are between the early 60's
327/340 engine and the mid/late 60's 327/350 engines?
10 hp...
Old 08-21-2016, 10:56 PM
  #10  
ohiovet
Melting Slicks
 
ohiovet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Middletown Ohio
Posts: 2,892
Received 167 Likes on 130 Posts
2016 C1 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by gbvette62
The 62 340 didn't have vacuum advance, but the 63 340 does.



The compression ratio for the 65-67 327/350 was 11.00:1. The 65 350 HP used 2 1/2" exhaust manifolds, like the 62-63 340, while the 66-68 327/350 used 2" manifolds.

Personally I think the 65-68 327/350 was the best all around small block ever made.
I agree.
And the hydraulic lifters were a great improvement over the solid lifters but I did miss the mechanical engine sound.
Bruce B
Old 08-22-2016, 01:55 PM
  #11  
65 396
Racer
Thread Starter
 
65 396's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: richmond virginia
Posts: 422
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Could you get a 327/340 in an Impala (62/63)?
If you could, would the valve covers be aluminum finned like the Corvette?
I'm guessing the 327/340 had a Winters aluminum intake....right?
Old 08-22-2016, 03:47 PM
  #12  
gbvette62
Race Director
 
gbvette62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Shamong, NJ
Posts: 11,109
Received 2,029 Likes on 1,315 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65 396
Could you get a 327/340 in an Impala (62/63)?
If you could, would the valve covers be aluminum finned like the Corvette?
I'm guessing the 327/340 had a Winters aluminum intake....right?
Only the 327/250 & 300 where offered in the 62-63 full size Chevys. If you wanted more engine in a full size, you needed to step up to one of the 409's (380 & 409 hp in 62, 340, 400 & 425 in 63). The 327/250 & 300 continued to be offered in full size Chevrolets for 64 & 65, but for 66, the top 327 offered was reduced to 275 HP.

62 & 63 Nova/Chevy II's were only offered with a 6cyl. For 64, a 283 was added to the Nova as an available option, with the 327/250 & 300 joining the Nova line up in 65. The 327/350 was offered in the 66 Nova, and a slightly detuned 325 horse version could be had in 67's.

The new for 64 Chevelle was offered with the 327/250 & 300. There was Chevrolet material from the time listing the 327/365 as an option too, but there doesn't seem to be any proof that any where actually built. For 65, the 327/350 was offered in the Chevelle and El Camino, but after the 396 came out, the top 327 available for 66 was the 275 HP version.

Since no 327/340's were ever installed in anything other than Corvettes, only the Corvettes got the finned aluminum covers. The L-79 in Nova's and Chevelle's, came with chrome plated versions of the stock stamped steel valve covers.

All small blocks with ratings over 300 horse power, came with an aluminum intake. The only exception to this was the 68 327/350 and 69-70 350/350, which used cast iron intakes.
The following users liked this post:
ohiovet (08-22-2016)
Old 08-22-2016, 11:51 PM
  #13  
65 396
Racer
Thread Starter
 
65 396's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Location: richmond virginia
Posts: 422
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

You guys ain't nothing but the truth.............thank you for the information.

Get notified of new replies

To What's the difference?




Quick Reply: What's the difference?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 PM.