C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Authenticate Matching Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2012, 05:53 AM
  #1  
NightAl
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
 
NightAl's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Authenticate Matching Numbers

Having recently bought a 1968 convertible, I was wondering about matching numbers. The stamp pad on the engine block has the VIN and engine ID for a 327/350 hp engine. The transmission is stamped with the VIN and Muncie date code. The rear axle is stamped as a 3.36 Posi with a date code. The VIN sequence for the car is late Feb 68, and all the before mentioned items are dated within a few weeks of this. The question is. Is there an organization or individuals who can validate or dismiss these numbers?
Old 02-14-2012, 06:37 AM
  #2  
63split63
Burning Brakes
 
63split63's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,231
Received 34 Likes on 28 Posts

Default Ccas

Contact Al Grenning, if you google his name you will get him. He has a couple of different plan's . If you just want to know what you have he is verry reasonable price wise. If you want it certified by him in writing it costs more of course .
I used him for my 66 L36 and was satisfied,
His business name is CCAS .
Again JMO Bill
Old 02-14-2012, 09:01 AM
  #3  
Lupigiato
Melting Slicks
 
Lupigiato's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Location: Ocean County NJ
Posts: 2,207
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

Congrats on the 68. Mine is a rest-mod but I would think the NCRS would have documentation that can help answer your questions. Look forward to seeing pictures of your vert!
Old 02-14-2012, 09:19 AM
  #4  
Faster Rat
Melting Slicks

 
Faster Rat's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2009
Posts: 2,961
Received 204 Likes on 145 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Lupigiato73
I would think the NCRS would have documentation that can help answer your questions
First of all, "matching numbers" is a terribly mis-used phrase. Please, do not let this thread go over it again and again.

NCRS will not certify that any car has it's original drivetrain, or any other original component. For a fee, their volunteer (or minimally compensated) judges will briefly examine a member's car to see how correctly it appears to conform to known original factory production. Period. If a restamp (undisclosed or unknown) and re-broached pad look like they should (as in well-done)...no problemo. If most everything else on the car looks correct, a counterfeit car could even win a Top Flight award.

Last edited by Faster Rat; 02-14-2012 at 10:10 AM.
Old 02-14-2012, 09:34 AM
  #5  
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Easy Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,468 Likes on 1,247 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default

Originally Posted by NightAl
...The stamp pad on the engine block has the VIN and engine ID for a 327/350 hp engine. The transmission is stamped with the VIN and Muncie date code. The rear axle is stamped as a 3.36 Posi with a date code. The VIN sequence for the car is late Feb 68, and all the before mentioned items are dated within a few weeks of this. The question is. Is there an organization or individuals who can validate or dismiss these numbers?
Sounds like you have verified most of your own numbers. Any real reason to pay someone to come along behind you?

Any reason for you to believe the numbers you have found are not authentic?

http://www.ncrs.org/

Congratulations on the 68. Cruise and enjoy.

Old 02-14-2012, 10:09 AM
  #6  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

The key words are 'authenticate' and 'validate'. No group or club that I know of will come anywhere close to doing that, certainly not NCRS. Al Grenning is your best bet if you feel the need.

'Matching numbers' is a hackneyed phase that's now meaningless.

If you're just curious to see if the components on the car might be the originals, post some pictures here.
Old 02-14-2012, 10:19 AM
  #7  
Alan 71
Team Owner
 
Alan 71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Posts: 30,173
Likes: 0
Received 2,878 Likes on 2,515 Posts

Default

Hi na,
I guess one thing to be gained by having someone else look at you car and it's stamps/dates is that that person would have more experience than you do.
So his opinion would be more highly regarded.
Regards,
Alan
Old 02-14-2012, 10:54 AM
  #8  
NightAl
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
 
NightAl's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't buy the car thinking of matching numbers. It wasn't sold as such. I'm just wanting some support if or when I sell the car. I self verified the numbers for the fun and excitement of having a classic car. Another set of eyes and/or opinion would be greatly appreciated.
Old 02-14-2012, 11:14 AM
  #9  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NightAl
I'm just wanting some support if or when I sell the car.
Let the buyer pay for an inspection then. If it was me, I'd have very little faith in what the seller provided, especially if it was an older document.
Old 02-14-2012, 12:35 PM
  #10  
Mashman
Melting Slicks
 
Mashman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

One thing that might help if you want to be convinced that your engine, and trans are the same ones that the car was born with, is to compare the stamps. I believe the transmission, and engine block were stamped with the same gang stamp, like the one below, and therefore should look identical - so one can in essence verify the other. If they are identical in appearance, and match your VIN, I think it's pretty safe that those are the ones that the car was born with.

Old 02-14-2012, 02:51 PM
  #11  
20mercury
Melting Slicks
 
20mercury's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Lafayette Louisiana
Posts: 3,418
Received 568 Likes on 445 Posts

Default good to know and thanks!

Originally Posted by Mashman
One thing that might help if you want to be convinced that your engine, and trans are the same ones that the car was born with, is to compare the stamps. I believe the transmission, and engine block were stamped with the same gang stamp, like the one below, and therefore should look identical - so one can in essence verify the other. If they are identical in appearance, and match your VIN, I think it's pretty safe that those are the ones that the car was born with.


good to know and interesting!
Old 02-15-2012, 08:57 AM
  #12  
Uncle Maddog
Advanced
 
Uncle Maddog's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Coshocton Ohio
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

"Matching numbers" aren't meaningless to us who can actually verify their validity. For example, mine has MN, and from interviewing the only previous owners, I have determined that, aside from minor repair replacement parts (GM when available), the car is in original, stock condition. The numbered units have never been exchanged for something else, much less taken apart. We all know that there are unscrupulous people who will tell you anything for a sale, so "caveat emptor" is the key. However, to insinuate that there are no reasons to believe that many (if not most) "matching numbers" claims are not fraudulent is somewhat insulting to those owners who are trying very hard to keep the breed pure and respectable. I don't expect anyone who isn't committed to doing that to understand, but please don't dismiss anything that might help another 'Vette enthusiast increase his/her personal knowledge and enjoyment of this hobby. Thanks, everybody!
Old 02-15-2012, 09:30 AM
  #13  
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
 
BBCorv70's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Tolland CT
Posts: 3,177
Received 107 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Maddog
However, to insinuate that there are no reasons to believe that many (if not most) "matching numbers" claims are not fraudulent is somewhat insulting to those owners who are trying very hard to keep the breed pure and respectable.
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by "keep the breed pure and respectable". Are you suggesting any Corvette which does not have matching numbers isn't respectable? Or are you referring to the subset of Corvettes with matching numbers, pure and respectible being the real ones vs the restamps?

So far as the vast majority of matching numbers Corvettes being authentic, could be, don't know. I will say the higher the value the more motivation to generate fakes. This is especially true of the big block Corvettes or LT1s. In this case, best to have someone who really knows the game validate the stamp pad. You'll never be 100% sure unless you can talk to all owners down the line.

Last edited by BBCorv70; 02-15-2012 at 09:42 AM. Reason: clarify
Old 02-15-2012, 09:53 AM
  #14  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Maddog
"Matching numbers" aren't meaningless to us who can actually verify their validity. For example, mine has MN, and from interviewing the only previous owners, I have determined that, aside from minor repair replacement parts (GM when available), the car is in original, stock condition. The numbered units have never been exchanged for something else, much less taken apart. We all know that there are unscrupulous people who will tell you anything for a sale, so "caveat emptor" is the key. However, to insinuate that there are no reasons to believe that many (if not most) "matching numbers" claims are not fraudulent is somewhat insulting to those owners who are trying very hard to keep the breed pure and respectable. I don't expect anyone who isn't committed to doing that to understand, but please don't dismiss anything that might help another 'Vette enthusiast increase his/her personal knowledge and enjoyment of this hobby. Thanks, everybody!
I'm going to guess that you've done an Emily Litella and misunderstood what was said above. It's the PHRASE 'matching numbers' that's meaningless because there's no agreed, universal, hard definition of the term. Ask 10 people and you'll get 12 definitions, no two the same.

I think you may be a little on the naive side also by underestimating just how many counterfeit and fraudulently misrepresented cars there are out there, whether the owners know it or not. Yours might be a genuine original engine car- that's great. Now try convincing 100% of the people that might want to buy it.
Old 02-15-2012, 10:43 AM
  #15  
NightAl
3rd Gear
Thread Starter
 
NightAl's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mashman,
Thank-You for this info. I've cleaned the paint from the block and transmission stamps. The letters and numbers are of the same font, size and length. The stamp on the transmission is harder to read, but is of a bolder imprint. I believe this is due to the rough texture of the case and softer it is made of.
Old 02-15-2012, 11:37 AM
  #16  
Uncle Maddog
Advanced
 
Uncle Maddog's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2011
Location: Coshocton Ohio
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Certainly, I really didn't intend to demean anyone's efforts to do their own cars the way they want. After all, many numbered components get destroyed and stolen over time and have to be replaced with available pieces. This by no means makes the cars "step-children"! All I'm trying to say is that if you come across one that you KNOW is genuine, don't let anyone tell you that it isn't or that it doesn't matter anyway just because he has been told so often that there is no such thing. Sorry if I offended anyone, I come to the forum to be informed and, when I'm able, to encourage others, definitely not to start arguments and to be insultingly compared to an SNL character and be called naive. Thanks, everybody!

Last edited by Uncle Maddog; 02-15-2012 at 11:42 AM. Reason: grammar
Old 02-15-2012, 11:47 AM
  #17  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Maddog
All I'm trying to say is that if you come across one that you KNOW is genuine, don't let anyone tell you that it isn't or that it doesn't matter anyway just because he has been told so often that there is no such thing.
But nobody suggested such a thing in the first place........
Old 02-15-2012, 11:58 AM
  #18  
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
 
BBCorv70's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Tolland CT
Posts: 3,177
Received 107 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Uncle Maddog
Certainly, I really didn't intend to demean anyone's efforts to do their own cars the way they want. After all, many numbered components get destroyed and stolen over time and have to be replaced with available pieces. This by no means makes the cars "step-children"! All I'm trying to say is that if you come across one that you KNOW is genuine, don't let anyone tell you that it isn't or that it doesn't matter anyway just because he has been told so often that there is no such thing. Sorry if I offended anyone, I come to the forum to be informed and, when I'm able, to encourage others, definitely not to start arguments and to be insultingly compared to an SNL character and be called naive. Thanks, everybody!
OK..
If you know it's genuine, cool. Think all that was said is we can't always be 100% sure unless you're the original owner or have interviewed the past owners down to the original. Does it matter? Certainly does to some people!

Get notified of new replies

To Authenticate Matching Numbers




Quick Reply: Authenticate Matching Numbers



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.