C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1969 l46 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-2012, 12:02 AM
  #1  
LS4 PILOT
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
LS4 PILOT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,091
Received 39 Likes on 37 Posts

Default 1969 l46 ?

There were no L-46 cars build with Automatic transmission?
Old 05-23-2012, 12:54 AM
  #2  
Yankeededandy
Pro
 
Yankeededandy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Baar Switzerland
Posts: 569
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts

Default

That's correct. Manual only.

Martin
Old 05-25-2012, 10:13 AM
  #3  
loup68
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
loup68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: myrtle beach sc
Posts: 2,844
Received 427 Likes on 322 Posts

Default

I think that they did not have enough vacuum to reliably shift the turbo 400. At least that is what I have always been told. Same for my 68 327 L-79.
Old 05-25-2012, 01:23 PM
  #4  
LS4 PILOT
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
LS4 PILOT's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,091
Received 39 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by loup68
I think that they did not have enough vacuum to reliably shift the turbo 400. At least that is what I have always been told. Same for my 68 327 L-79.
Hi,
that is interesting. Did the L-79 use the same cam as the L-46 ?

Fred
Old 05-25-2012, 02:18 PM
  #5  
Yankeededandy
Pro
 
Yankeededandy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Baar Switzerland
Posts: 569
Received 135 Likes on 64 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by loup68
I think that they did not have enough vacuum to reliably shift the turbo 400. At least that is what I have always been told. Same for my 68 327 L-79.
Sounds a bit like voodoo to me. Not enough vacuum? I prefer to think the L-46 and L-79 were like the later LT-1 performance oriented small blocks and to keep up with their image they were only coupled with the Muncie 4-speed. A pure marketing decision.

Somebody out there knows the truth. I'm of course guessing here.

Martin
Old 05-25-2012, 02:35 PM
  #6  
C3 Stroker
Safety Car
 
C3 Stroker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Youngstown Ohio
Posts: 3,807
Received 608 Likes on 403 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Yankeededandy
Sounds a bit like voodoo to me. Not enough vacuum? I prefer to think the L-46 and L-79 were like the later LT-1 performance oriented small blocks and to keep up with their image they were only coupled with the Muncie 4-speed. A pure marketing decision.

Somebody out there knows the truth. I'm of course guessing here.

Martin
.....even L-88's could be bought with TH400 auto transmissions and 3.08 gears. They didn't have much vacuum, either, but everything worked OK.
Old 08-18-2012, 07:43 PM
  #7  
loup68
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
loup68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: myrtle beach sc
Posts: 2,844
Received 427 Likes on 322 Posts

Default

You guy's are right about the vacuum. I just read an article in SuperChevy on L -79's and it said that because of the cam overlap, they could not idle properly with the stock automatic transmission torque converter. That is why the L-79 and L-46 could not be hooked up to an automatic transmision.
Old 08-18-2012, 07:47 PM
  #8  
loup68
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
loup68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: myrtle beach sc
Posts: 2,844
Received 427 Likes on 322 Posts

Default

LS4 pilot, I know that I have read that the L-46 cam was toned down for the 69 Vette. The 68 L-79 cam is more radical. I have been looking, but cannot find the specs. for you. Maybe someone else can give you that information.
Old 08-19-2012, 12:19 AM
  #9  
PeteZO6
Drifting

 
PeteZO6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Cameron Park CA
Posts: 1,970
Received 41 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

This is a page from a Hot Rod article from 1987.

The next page states that the 962 cam was the used in the L-46 and L-82 engines. It looks to me that the L-46/L-82 cam is NOT a toned down L-79 cam at all. You decide!

Pete
Old 08-19-2012, 06:34 PM
  #10  
loup68
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
loup68's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2012
Location: myrtle beach sc
Posts: 2,844
Received 427 Likes on 322 Posts

Default

Pete, thank you for the information. This clarifies what I read in the past. GM changed the cam to eliminate the extreme lope at idle on the L79, but slightly improved the Max. lift and .050-inch lift degree. I have never seen the numbers compared before.
I would like to know why the article forgets the 68 corvette L79. It only lists 65-67.
Old 02-28-2015, 07:26 AM
  #11  
4vettesandcounting
Heel & Toe
 
4vettesandcounting's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2015
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yankeededandy
Sounds a bit like voodoo to me. Not enough vacuum? I prefer to think the L-46 and L-79 were like the later LT-1 performance oriented small blocks and to keep up with their image they were only coupled with the Muncie 4-speed. A pure marketing decision.

Somebody out there knows the truth. I'm of course guessing here.

Martin
I agree they wanted these cars for "purists" the L-46 was the early LT-1 without solid lifters

Get notified of new replies

To 1969 l46 ?




Quick Reply: 1969 l46 ?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM.