70Yellowbird

Here's another Craigslist find for CF members to critique ...

http://longisland.craigslist.org/cto/4617723296.html

hail to R3

I don't have anything to add, but I like the 3 window

persuader

I like Motion Vettes but, This one is ugly. IMHO

Texas70

It is a cool find. But if this car is ready for paint, I must be spending way more time than needed on my project

Rky Mtn C6

Just the way the write up is presented, makes me think the guy is

3JsVette

Jim78SA

Business upfront party in the back!

The Punisher

I like the hood

Easy Mike

Why is a critique necessary?

70Yellowbird

Mike ... I have no particular interest in Motion cars, but I've seen many threads on the subject, so I thought I'd post it for those interested.

To critique it or not is totally up to you ... of course.

Easy Mike

I can't say the car merits a critique, but the listing is rife with possibilities.

blueray72

If you're going to pretend like you're working on a car...at least get your shirt dirty.

1996Z15

Aside from the heading of the ad, I don't see where the car is listed as a Motion built car. The body of the ad simply states that it was built by a gentleman who used to work with Joel Rosen at Motion performance and that the car was built using many of the parts available from Motion.
While the car is not my cup of tea some people might think it's cool if it ever gets restored but, to call it a Motion car would be very misleading in my opinion.

parkerracing

I'd like to see a copy of the article the seller's referencing.

avalonjohn

I think it's pretty cool actually, and considering the work that appears to have been done not too bad of a deal. I have to say, the later rear taillight section would not have been my choice though.

chstitans42

That is alot of $$ for a car that still needs everything, motion or not. I dont think the motion customization makes it any more valuable, in my opinion less