C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

70 vs. 71

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-2014, 11:31 PM
  #1  
Cajun_LS3
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Cajun_LS3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Double Oak TX
Posts: 447
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default 70 vs. 71

I know that hp ratings were calculated differently in the early 70's (gross vs net). So, is there a real difference in a 300 hp 1970 Vette and a 270 hp 1971? It seams like torque is also reduced from 70 to 71 (although calc'd. At a lower RPM).

Last edited by Cajun_LS3; 11-12-2014 at 11:34 PM.
Old 11-12-2014, 11:46 PM
  #2  
early shark
Melting Slicks
 
early shark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Nevada City California
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

The compression ratio drop would most likely account for the biggest real world drop in power output. 10:25 to 1 versus 8:5 to 1
Old 11-13-2014, 08:40 AM
  #3  
Alan 71
Team Owner
 
Alan 71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Posts: 30,173
Likes: 0
Received 2,878 Likes on 2,515 Posts

Default

Hi C,
I agree with early shark.
The 70 and 71 engines were rated by the same method
The change in hp rating method occurred for the 1972 cars thus the larger published hp difference was evident then.
Some 71 literature lists the GROSS and S.A.E. NET hp rating too. 210 hp.
This is a chart in the Nov.1970 Corvette News, in an article about the new 71.
Regards,
Alan

Notice this chart would have you believe there was a 115 hp difference between the L48 and the LS6…. I think it was probably a couple more hp than that.






Last edited by Alan 71; 11-14-2014 at 09:26 AM.
Old 11-13-2014, 10:38 PM
  #4  
1974ta
Melting Slicks
 
1974ta's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Damascus MD
Posts: 2,103
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Alan 71
Hi C,
I agree with early shark.
The 70 and 71 engines were rated by the same method
The change in hp rating method occurred for the 1972 cars thus the larger published hp difference was evident then.
Some 71 literature lists the GROSS and S.A.E. NET hp rating too. 210 hp.
This is a chart in the Nov.1970 Corvette News, in an article about the new 71.
Regards,
Alan

Notice this chart would have you believe there was a 125hp difference between the L48 and the LS6…. I think it was probably a couple more hp than that.








Alan,

That difference is pretty laughable. I got a good kick out of the chart.

Bill
Old 11-13-2014, 11:24 PM
  #5  
Cajun_LS3
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Cajun_LS3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Double Oak TX
Posts: 447
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Good info. Thanks. I did some more research and it looks like a good rule of thumb is about a 20% decrease from gross to net.
Old 11-15-2014, 08:18 AM
  #6  
Hammerhead Fred
Melting Slicks
 
Hammerhead Fred's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Midlothian VA
Posts: 2,011
Received 264 Likes on 225 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Cajun_LS3
Good info. Thanks. I did some more research and it looks like a good rule of thumb is about a 20% decrease from gross to net.
The real answer is "it depends".
Try this for some depth of information on the topic.
Old 11-16-2014, 09:47 PM
  #7  
Cajun_LS3
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Cajun_LS3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Double Oak TX
Posts: 447
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hammerhead Fred
That was a great read. Thanks for sharing.

Get notified of new replies

To 70 vs. 71




Quick Reply: 70 vs. 71



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 PM.