C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

68 corvette L68 w CE Block questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-2014, 11:16 AM
  #1  
blakkmaxx
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
blakkmaxx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 68 corvette L68 w CE Block questions

Hello gang. I have a few questions. I am to probably sell my corvette due to health problems. An get a c6 this winter. My car is a 68 with a CE motor with a single carb. The motor was replaced under warranty in 69, some where over the last 40 years somebody replaced the tri power with a 4 barrel. I have the tank sticker when we replaced the fuel tank. Should I buy a correct tri power set up to and would it be worth it in selling it. The block is 3963512 I have the other numbers off the pad next to the water pump. Thanks
Old 11-27-2014, 11:35 AM
  #2  
Alan 71
Team Owner
 
Alan 71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Posts: 30,173
Likes: 0
Received 2,878 Likes on 2,515 Posts

Default

Hi bmax,
I guess the first thing to ask is how much of the original engine's parts were moved to the CE block.
The more that came along for the ride the better. I'm asking about parts with part numbers and dates that would be suitable for your car's build dates.
Things like heads, exhaust manifolds, water and fuel pump, starter, distributor, etc..
So is this a car with a non original BLOCK, or a non original ENGINE.
Regards,
Alan

Last edited by Alan 71; 11-27-2014 at 12:25 PM.
Old 11-27-2014, 12:34 PM
  #3  
vettebuyer6369
Administrator
 
vettebuyer6369's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,366
Received 5,321 Likes on 2,770 Posts

Default

I think spending pile of money to replace a tri power just to sell it is a mistake. The car is an NOM and will be an NOM when you are done spending money. I seriously doubt you will get the additional investment back.
Old 11-27-2014, 12:42 PM
  #4  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blakkmaxx
The block is 3963512 I have the other numbers off the pad next to the water pump. Thanks
Could you post those numbers please?
Old 11-27-2014, 07:20 PM
  #5  
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
 
BBCorv70's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Tolland CT
Posts: 3,176
Received 107 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vettebuyer6369
I think spending pile of money to replace a tri power just to sell it is a mistake. The car is an NOM and will be an NOM when you are done spending money. I seriously doubt you will get the additional investment back.
I don't believe all NOMs sell for the same price regardless of how they're equipped. Question is whether a tri-power would fetch enough premium to justify the expense of locating and installing. Anyone who would actually consider buying a NOM have an opinion on this? Opinions from those who would never consider buying the car are irrelevant be it a rare numbers matching car or base model NOM. I would never pay the premiums asked for on many of the more rare numbers matching, big block or LT1 originals. This doesn't mean someone else won't.
Old 11-27-2014, 07:23 PM
  #6  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

A NOM car that is known to have been born with a rare high-HP usually sells for more than one known to have been born with a base engine. Just look at the L-88s.
Old 11-27-2014, 08:03 PM
  #7  
blakkmaxx
Heel & Toe
Thread Starter
 
blakkmaxx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 68 427 l68

Some one wanted to the serial numbers on my block. The best that I can tell are . Block casting 3965312- stamping are 195736605- t101lm. the tank sticker L68AA. I hope this well tell I something. steve
Old 11-27-2014, 09:06 PM
  #8  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blakkmaxx
Some one wanted to the serial numbers on my block. The best that I can tell are . Block casting 3965312- stamping are 195736605- t101lm. the tank sticker L68AA. I hope this well tell I something. steve
That sounds more like the factory stampings on a late '69 L36 Corvette engine and not a CE replacement at all.

Can you post a picture?
Old 11-27-2014, 09:23 PM
  #9  
blue427
Burning Brakes
 
blue427's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,100
Received 128 Likes on 102 Posts

Default

A 400h.p. is rarer than my L-71{435h.p.).I just spent $5,000 putting mine on.You can expect to spend at least that much.I have no intention of ever selling mine I just love multi carbs,maybe just buy the unit if you can catch a deal on it and let the new owner rebuild it and buy all the misc. crap then let him install it.My #'s don't match either but I really don't care what the "experts say". It just make it easier to sell with less of a loss.
Old 11-28-2014, 04:23 AM
  #10  
pltmgr
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
pltmgr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,345
Received 360 Likes on 216 Posts

Default

I bought a 68 NOM BB tripower 2 years ago. Wanted a tripower BB but didn't want to pay matching number pricing. I dont think the cost of adding the tripower on a NOM would be recouped on the sale.
Old 11-28-2014, 08:06 AM
  #11  
emccomas
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
emccomas's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Madison - just west of Huntsville AL
Posts: 31,361
Received 1,283 Likes on 732 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by blakkmaxx
Some one wanted to the serial numbers on my block. The best that I can tell are . Block casting 3965312- stamping are 195736605- t101lm. the tank sticker L68AA. I hope this well tell I something. steve
I am thinking that this block is stamped

19S736605 TI0ILM - there is a digit missing from the engine assembly date code.

If so, this is a 427, 390 hp engine, manual transmission from 1969 Corvette #36605.

A picture of the engine pad would really help at this point.
Old 11-28-2014, 09:45 AM
  #12  
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Easy Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,468 Likes on 1,247 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default

Originally Posted by blakkmaxx
...Block casting 3965312- stamping are 195736605- t101lm....
Originally Posted by Mike Ward
...That sounds more like the factory stampings on a late '69 L36 Corvette engine and not a CE replacement at all...
I agree. It's not a CE block. 195736605 is probably 19S736605 which would be the VIN derivative for 1969 #36605. LM is the code for and L-36 with standard transmission.

Old 11-28-2014, 10:46 AM
  #13  
Mike Ward
Race Director
 
Mike Ward's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Easy Mike
I agree. It's not a CE block. 195736605 is probably 19S736605 which would be the VIN derivative for 1969 #36605. LM is the code for and L-36 with standard transmission.

I wonder if this car is actually a '69 with it's born with engine that came with the paperwork from a '68?
Old 11-28-2014, 12:08 PM
  #14  
vettebuyer6369
Administrator
 
vettebuyer6369's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: About 1100 miles from where I call home. Blue lives matter.
Posts: 51,366
Received 5,321 Likes on 2,770 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BBCorv70
I don't believe all NOMs sell for the same price regardless of how they're equipped. .
I agree with you, I didnt say all NOM deductions are the same. All Im saying is, buying the tri power stuff is expensive and spending the money and then hoping you get it back on a car that is an NOM isnt a move Id make. I prefer to spend less money on cars that are actively for sale unless I'm really comfortable that the extra expense will enhance the return or break even while the car sells quicker. IMO I'm not sure thats the case here.
Old 11-28-2014, 02:11 PM
  #15  
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
 
BBCorv70's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Tolland CT
Posts: 3,176
Received 107 Likes on 90 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Vettebuyer6369
I agree with you, I didnt say all NOM deductions are the same. All Im saying is, buying the tri power stuff is expensive and spending the money and then hoping you get it back on a car that is an NOM isnt a move Id make. I prefer to spend less money on cars that are actively for sale unless I'm really comfortable that the extra expense will enhance the return or break even while the car sells quicker. IMO I'm not sure thats the case here.
OK
Old 11-29-2014, 09:35 AM
  #16  
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Easy Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,468 Likes on 1,247 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default

Originally Posted by Mike Ward
...I wonder if this car is actually a '69 with it's born with engine that came with the paperwork from a '68?...
To quote Sherlock Holmes: "The game is afoot."

Get notified of new replies

To 68 corvette L68 w CE Block questions




Quick Reply: 68 corvette L68 w CE Block questions



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.