L-81 Performance Specs/Compression Ratio?
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
L-81 Performance Specs/Compression Ratio?
I just purchased an 81 and was looking at the L-81 spec plates. All of them I have seen show compression ratio at 9:1, which is the same as the L-82. The plate shows the L-81 horsepower at 190 and the torque at 280. The L-82 is 230 horsepower and torque 275. I was under the impression the L-81 had low compression like the L-48. What is the difference between the L-81 and L-82 to warrant the 40 horsepower increase and loss of 5 ft/lbs of torque?
Thanks, Zak.
Thanks, Zak.
#2
Le Mans Master
My books show an 8.8 compression ratio and 190 hp. Welcome to the world of low power Corvettes. I own an '81 as well. I just pulled the worn out factory engine yesterday. I've got a fresh roller cammed 355 in the garage. It should roughly double the horsepower of the stock motor. It's been a long time coming, believe me.
#3
Race Director
The 81 L-81 has an 8.2:1 compression ratio, the same as the 80 L-48. The 80 L-82 had 9.0:1, like all L-82's. The L-81 actually produced more torque than the L-82 (280 lb-ft vs 275 for the L-82).
The besides the higher compression, the L-82 used different heads and camshaft than the L-81 (and L-48's), which was where the horsepower difference came from.
The besides the higher compression, the L-82 used different heads and camshaft than the L-81 (and L-48's), which was where the horsepower difference came from.
#4
Le Mans Master
L-81 is basically an L-48 with an aluminum intake, magnesium valve covers and CCC.
#5
Team Owner
Rated "torque" for two different engine is NOT comparable, unless those torque readings were taken at the same rpm's for both. To 'step-around' insurance company requirements (for higher HP engines), GM and other car companies stated engine specs at reduced rpm levels...just so those specified figures would be lower than insurance limits for performance engines. The L-88 engine was actually specified with LOWER horsepower (430) than the L-71 engine (435) in 1969. Of course, the spec for the L-71 was at 5800 rpm, while the L-88 was spec'd at 5200 rpm....and we all know the L-88 would easily wind to more than 6500!
At 5800 rpm, the L-88 would likely have been putting out close to 475 hp, with well over 500 hp being made at 6500 rpm.
You have to "read between the lines" to understand what the advertised power figures really mean.
At 5800 rpm, the L-88 would likely have been putting out close to 475 hp, with well over 500 hp being made at 6500 rpm.
You have to "read between the lines" to understand what the advertised power figures really mean.