C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

L-81 Performance Specs/Compression Ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2015, 04:30 AM
  #1  
zakbradshaw
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
zakbradshaw's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2010
Location: Fort Worth Texas
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default L-81 Performance Specs/Compression Ratio?

I just purchased an 81 and was looking at the L-81 spec plates. All of them I have seen show compression ratio at 9:1, which is the same as the L-82. The plate shows the L-81 horsepower at 190 and the torque at 280. The L-82 is 230 horsepower and torque 275. I was under the impression the L-81 had low compression like the L-48. What is the difference between the L-81 and L-82 to warrant the 40 horsepower increase and loss of 5 ft/lbs of torque?

Thanks, Zak.
Old 02-15-2015, 08:55 AM
  #2  
Street Rat
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Street Rat's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2010
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 5,311
Received 529 Likes on 396 Posts

Default

My books show an 8.8 compression ratio and 190 hp. Welcome to the world of low power Corvettes. I own an '81 as well. I just pulled the worn out factory engine yesterday. I've got a fresh roller cammed 355 in the garage. It should roughly double the horsepower of the stock motor. It's been a long time coming, believe me.

Old 02-15-2015, 10:20 AM
  #3  
gbvette62
Race Director
 
gbvette62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Shamong, NJ
Posts: 11,104
Received 2,022 Likes on 1,312 Posts

Default

The 81 L-81 has an 8.2:1 compression ratio, the same as the 80 L-48. The 80 L-82 had 9.0:1, like all L-82's. The L-81 actually produced more torque than the L-82 (280 lb-ft vs 275 for the L-82).

The besides the higher compression, the L-82 used different heads and camshaft than the L-81 (and L-48's), which was where the horsepower difference came from.
Old 02-15-2015, 11:13 PM
  #4  
qwank
Le Mans Master
 
qwank's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2011
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 5,943
Received 57 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

L-81 is basically an L-48 with an aluminum intake, magnesium valve covers and CCC.
Old 02-16-2015, 11:18 AM
  #5  
7T1vette
Team Owner
 
7T1vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Crossville TN
Posts: 36,599
Received 2,713 Likes on 2,271 Posts

Default

Rated "torque" for two different engine is NOT comparable, unless those torque readings were taken at the same rpm's for both. To 'step-around' insurance company requirements (for higher HP engines), GM and other car companies stated engine specs at reduced rpm levels...just so those specified figures would be lower than insurance limits for performance engines. The L-88 engine was actually specified with LOWER horsepower (430) than the L-71 engine (435) in 1969. Of course, the spec for the L-71 was at 5800 rpm, while the L-88 was spec'd at 5200 rpm....and we all know the L-88 would easily wind to more than 6500!

At 5800 rpm, the L-88 would likely have been putting out close to 475 hp, with well over 500 hp being made at 6500 rpm.

You have to "read between the lines" to understand what the advertised power figures really mean.

Get notified of new replies

To L-81 Performance Specs/Compression Ratio?




Quick Reply: L-81 Performance Specs/Compression Ratio?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 AM.