1968 tank sticker
#21
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Westminster Maryland
Posts: 30,173
Likes: 0
Received 2,878 Likes
on
2,515 Posts
Hi wb,
You may have spotted something.
The originals on my 71 measure 13/64".
Reproduction 1/8" pop rivets are often 1/4"
Regards,
Alan
New calipers! Still can't spell engeneer, but I can measure like one now!
You may have spotted something.
The originals on my 71 measure 13/64".
Reproduction 1/8" pop rivets are often 1/4"
Regards,
Alan
New calipers! Still can't spell engeneer, but I can measure like one now!
Last edited by Alan 71; 04-20-2015 at 10:55 AM.
#22
this is getting interesting. I sent pics to Mr Berge for his thoughts. I will post his review asap. 😜
#23
#26
Burning Brakes
#28
#29
#30
#32
It looks to me there is a little white paint on the edge of the trim tag in the one picture, hard to tell. If this is true, it has most likely been on the car since at least that repaint.
I would be worried if I'd bought the car for big dollars based on some previous owners talk of rarity and how special it is, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. I can't see a dollar motive to creating a fake tank sticker and matching trim tag for a car to be painted in primer if it wasn't used as a sales tool.
John
#33
Ken
It looks to me there is a little white paint on the edge of the trim tag in the one picture, hard to tell. If this is true, it has most likely been on the car since at least that repaint.
I would be worried if I'd bought the car for big dollars based on some previous owners talk of rarity and how special it is, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. I can't see a dollar motive to creating a fake tank sticker and matching trim tag for a car to be painted in primer if it wasn't used as a sales tool.
John
It looks to me there is a little white paint on the edge of the trim tag in the one picture, hard to tell. If this is true, it has most likely been on the car since at least that repaint.
I would be worried if I'd bought the car for big dollars based on some previous owners talk of rarity and how special it is, but that doesn't seem to be the case here. I can't see a dollar motive to creating a fake tank sticker and matching trim tag for a car to be painted in primer if it wasn't used as a sales tool.
John
#34
Hi Ken,
I really don't know enough about production to understand how/why this car has a 420 interior.
I'm familiar with cars leaving St. Louis in primer, but how the saddle interior was available in January, I don't know, so I really can't help.
Chuck Berge is the 68-69 NCRS Team Leader. Perhaps you can give him a call, explain what you have, and hear what his thoughts are. 703-629-0206
Regards,
Alan
I really don't know enough about production to understand how/why this car has a 420 interior.
I'm familiar with cars leaving St. Louis in primer, but how the saddle interior was available in January, I don't know, so I really can't help.
Chuck Berge is the 68-69 NCRS Team Leader. Perhaps you can give him a call, explain what you have, and hear what his thoughts are. 703-629-0206
Regards,
Alan
#35
Melting Slicks
The rivets really aren't a question... They are much larger in diameter than the original rivets were (so big that you eyeball them and know they are too large). That isn't a great surprise though. In order to paint one of these cars properly, the trim tag is removed during the process and reattached after painting... Although in this case, with the wrong size rivets. I'd love a better look at the tag itself as I really can't get a feel for it from the photograph. As always, you really need to see the car in person in order to make an accurate assessment.
I've seen my fair share of trim tags over the years. Like Mike, I've never seen a primer car marked this way.
What really got my attention though is the build order... Some strange things going on there.
Regards,
Stan Falenski
I've seen my fair share of trim tags over the years. Like Mike, I've never seen a primer car marked this way.
What really got my attention though is the build order... Some strange things going on there.
Regards,
Stan Falenski
#36
The rivets really aren't a question... They are much larger in diameter than the original rivets were (so big that you eyeball them and know they are too large). That isn't a great surprise though. In order to paint one of these cars properly, the trim tag is removed during the process and reattached after painting... Although in this case, with the wrong size rivets. I'd love a better look at the tag itself as I really can't get a feel for it from the photograph. As always, you really need to see the car in person in order to make an accurate assessment.
I've seen my fair share of trim tags over the years. Like Mike, I've never seen a primer car marked this way.
What really got my attention though is the build order... Some strange things going on there.
Regards,
Stan Falenski
I've seen my fair share of trim tags over the years. Like Mike, I've never seen a primer car marked this way.
What really got my attention though is the build order... Some strange things going on there.
Regards,
Stan Falenski
#37
Melting Slicks
The saddle interior was not offered in Jan 68, another oddity.
The trim tag seems ligit though it may have been removed during a repaint, common.
The car was said to be bronze in color before the repaint in early 90's. The trim tag shows color as 001, 00 being bronze.
The real question here is why the trim tag is coded 001. That is not what I would expect to see on a primer car.
So, Mr Berge and I believe this car to be a Copo. The car is a documented two owner Black Plate Calif car, prior to my purchase. I do have the Protect-O-Plate that matches the tank sticker and the trim tag. Looks good to me.
What intrigues me most are your trim tag and build sheet. Each has some formatting that I have never seen before.
Nice looking car by the way!
Regards,
Stan
#38
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,469 Likes
on
1,248 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
#39
It certainly wasn't common (maybe 200 or so cars a year), but it did occur. Even less common were cars painted a non-standard color by the factory. There aren't many instances of this happening, but we know that it was possible.
Yes, it is odd.
It is difficult to tell anything definitive from your photograph. That's simply the nature of photographs... Your eyes can process much more information than the photo can provide which is why I stress looking at trim tags and stamp pads in person (in addition to photos). Yes, it is common to remove the trim tag during painting, but as a result of the oversize rivets, we know for certain that a trim tag has been off the car too.
Assuming for a moment that the car was originally delivered in primer, what it was painted previously really doesn't have an impact. In any case, Corvette bronze was code 992 and was a standard color for 1968. If the car had been painted that way at the factory, you would expect to see that on trim tag and the build order. It is not.
The real question here is why the trim tag is coded 001. That is not what I would expect to see on a primer car.
A COPO? Maybe, but if so it was certainly to confirm that the car was a sold order, in primer. I doubt that GM or a dealer would want to take a chance on selling a car in primer without a buyer already "locked up."
What intrigues me most are your trim tag and build sheet. Each has some formatting that I have never seen before.
Nice looking car by the way!
Regards,
Stan
Yes, it is odd.
It is difficult to tell anything definitive from your photograph. That's simply the nature of photographs... Your eyes can process much more information than the photo can provide which is why I stress looking at trim tags and stamp pads in person (in addition to photos). Yes, it is common to remove the trim tag during painting, but as a result of the oversize rivets, we know for certain that a trim tag has been off the car too.
Assuming for a moment that the car was originally delivered in primer, what it was painted previously really doesn't have an impact. In any case, Corvette bronze was code 992 and was a standard color for 1968. If the car had been painted that way at the factory, you would expect to see that on trim tag and the build order. It is not.
The real question here is why the trim tag is coded 001. That is not what I would expect to see on a primer car.
A COPO? Maybe, but if so it was certainly to confirm that the car was a sold order, in primer. I doubt that GM or a dealer would want to take a chance on selling a car in primer without a buyer already "locked up."
What intrigues me most are your trim tag and build sheet. Each has some formatting that I have never seen before.
Nice looking car by the way!
Regards,
Stan
#40
Hi Stan, my mistake on the 001 being bronze, 992 is correct. The 001 shows as non standard paint, possibly primer as indicated on the tank sticker. I am trying to locate the first owner to clear some of this up but it’s not easy. I read that an insider with knowledge of future options (saddle interior) could order that option before it was available to the general public after a series of sign offs. The rivets on the trim tag seems obvious. The car being shipped in primer is strange but had been done during that era according to Mr Berge. I think this car is a little special because of all these oddities. Anyway it is to me. Thanks all, Ken