C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

DCR: fatally flawed KB-Silvolite-UEM calculator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2007, 02:18 PM
  #1  
jackson
Le Mans Master

Thread Starter
 
jackson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
Posts: 7,739
Received 628 Likes on 556 Posts

Default DCR: fatally flawed KB-Silvolite-UEM calculator

KB Silvolite UEM DCR calculator is bullsheet!

There’s a box labeled “Intake Closing Point (Degrees)
ABDC @ 0.050 lift +15 degrees” where you enter your intake valve closing angle in degrees. The box label instructs you to add 15 degrees to your closing angle at 0.050” lift. That “approximated” ICA is dead wrong! … because 15 is FAR less than reality … and will result in erroneously HIGH DCR.

For example I setup a 9.5:1 SCR w/ 3.48” stroke and 5.7” rod with a clevite aftermarket clone of an L82 cam … clevite P/N 229-1990 (adv dur 291*/287*, v lift .450/.461, 0.050” dur 224*/224*, LSA 114*, ICL 114*, AND SAE ICA 79.5* AND 0.050” ICA 47*).

When I ran the DCR w/ the “approximated” 0.050” ICA of 62* (47* + 15*) … it returned a 7.760 DCR. However, when I ran same combo but with the actual SAE ICA of 79.5* it returned a 6.666 DCR. That 17.5* discrepancy’s one helluva difference boys!

I also took at look at several other cams’ specs … they ALL had a difference between 0.050” ICA and SAE ICA of 27* to 32* … NOT 15* !

So … if you enter 0.050” ICA + 15* into the KB Silvolite UEM DCR calculator … it’s probably gonna return a DCR that’s about 1 whole number TOO HIGH … build/cam it based on that and it’ll be about as sporty as a slug rodeoin’ a turd!

I cross-checked this against another DCR calculator. Other than KB's "approximate" ICA issue, KB's DCR calculator seems reasonably accurate. Regardless, I've never thought much of KB pistons ... SpeedPro/SealedPower as good or better & usually less $.
Old 02-14-2007, 02:24 PM
  #2  
dgruenke
Drifting
 
dgruenke's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: New Baden Illinois
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Thanks for the info. Is there another site that you recommend using to determine DCR?
Old 02-14-2007, 02:43 PM
  #3  
jimvette999
Melting Slicks
 
jimvette999's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,431
Received 50 Likes on 48 Posts

Default

At the bottom of this page
http://cochise.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html
you can download a file that resides on your computer.

Also, here's an online one that calculates DCR w/Boost
http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/comprAdvHD.htm

Jim
Old 02-14-2007, 02:58 PM
  #4  
Edzred72
Le Mans Master
 
Edzred72's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2001
Location: Wildwood IL
Posts: 5,943
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The major differences between calcutators drove me nuts a month back when I was figuring for my 406 build.
Never did get two calculators that matched values.
Thanks for the heads up Jack....
Eddie
Old 02-14-2007, 07:18 PM
  #5  
2000FRCZ19
Melting Slicks
 
2000FRCZ19's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: winter haven florida
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

here is another dcr calc. i found while looking a few weeks back. all dcr calcs. seem to give dif. numbers. i could not get the other one to download and run on my comp. maybe jackson could use this one and compair it with the other ones that have been mentioned to see how close it is.

http://www.hotroddersauctions.com/Dy...Calculator.php
Old 02-14-2007, 07:30 PM
  #6  
MotorHead
Race Director
 
MotorHead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Posts: 17,569
Received 156 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

I've been saying that since day one, most cam companies will give you a .006" or .016" duration use that and add a couple of degrees or download the one above, I use that one
Old 02-14-2007, 08:55 PM
  #7  
Guru_4_hire
Team Owner
 
Guru_4_hire's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Posts: 62,198
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran

Default

Originally Posted by 2000FRCZ19
here is another dcr calc. i found while looking a few weeks back. all dcr calcs. seem to give dif. numbers. i could not get the other one to download and run on my comp. maybe jackson could use this one and compair it with the other ones that have been mentioned to see how close it is.

http://www.hotroddersauctions.com/Dy...Calculator.php
This one says a stock grand national needs 106 octane.
Old 02-15-2007, 11:44 PM
  #8  
King Lear
Veteran
Support Corvetteforum!
 
King Lear's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,284
Received 81 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jackson
KB Silvolite UEM DCR calculator is bullsheet!

There’s a box labeled “Intake Closing Point (Degrees)
ABDC @ 0.050 lift +15 degrees” where you enter your intake valve closing angle in degrees. The box label instructs you to add 15 degrees to your closing angle at 0.050” lift. That “approximated” ICA is dead wrong! … because 15 is FAR less than reality … and will result in erroneously HIGH DCR.

For example I setup a 9.5:1 SCR w/ 3.48” stroke and 5.7” rod with a clevite aftermarket clone of an L82 cam … clevite P/N 229-1990 (adv dur 291*/287*, v lift .450/.461, 0.050” dur 224*/224*, LSA 114*, ICL 114*, AND SAE ICA 79.5* AND 0.050” ICA 47*).

When I ran the DCR w/ the “approximated” 0.050” ICA of 62* (47* + 15*) … it returned a 7.760 DCR. However, when I ran same combo but with the actual SAE ICA of 79.5* it returned a 6.666 DCR. That 17.5* discrepancy’s one helluva difference boys!

I also took at look at several other cams’ specs … they ALL had a difference between 0.050” ICA and SAE ICA of 27* to 32* … NOT 15* !

So … if you enter 0.050” ICA + 15* into the KB Silvolite UEM DCR calculator … it’s probably gonna return a DCR that’s about 1 whole number TOO HIGH … build/cam it based on that and it’ll be about as sporty as a slug rodeoin’ a turd!

I cross-checked this against another DCR calculator. Other than KB's "approximate" ICA issue, KB's DCR calculator seems reasonably accurate. Regardless, I've never thought much of KB pistons ... SpeedPro/SealedPower as good or better & usually less $.

Your right, I have been doing this for the last four hours and my supposed KB close to detonation machine is actually at 10.01 static & 7.78 dynamic when you figure in the actual seat to seat cam timing. Its around a full point lower then the KB crap.
If I put in some 7cc FT's I will be at 10.8:1 static and 8.37 dynamic. This will leave me at .042 quench. This site and reading David Vizard's book has convinced me the next engine build is taking place in my house. I think I am going to put this SBC in my Jeep next year to replace the inline 4.0L and build me a killer SBC off of the Dart or Motown block base.

Get notified of new replies

To DCR: fatally flawed KB-Silvolite-UEM calculator




Quick Reply: DCR: fatally flawed KB-Silvolite-UEM calculator



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 PM.