Dyno Run Air/Fuel Ratio quesiton?
#1
"Rodstoration &am p;quot; In Progres
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno Run Air/Fuel Ratio quesiton?
Does the air/fuel ratio look right for this dyno run? Should the engine run any leaner or is it optimized? There are currently 96 jets in the secondarys.
Thanks for the input in advance...
Ed
Thanks for the input in advance...
Ed
#2
Race Director
I would have thought it would make more power with the blue A/F line.
It seems to make alot more power running leaner ?
What did they do to the carb in between the blue and red runs ?
It seems to make alot more power running leaner ?
What did they do to the carb in between the blue and red runs ?
#3
"Rodstoration &am p;quot; In Progres
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Combo of timing, distributor spring rate change and primary jet adjustments. I don't think anything changed on the secondarys as the gasket was stuck and came apart when I took the secondary bowl off.
#4
Race Director
Methinks someone knows what they are doing at that dyno shop. Leave it alone. 96 in the secondary does sound pretty big but if it works...
#5
Melting Slicks
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: St. Charles Mo
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
Received 104 Likes
on
49 Posts
CI 5 & 8 Veteran
Ed. Looks to me like the higher power run was with the higher A/F reading. Looks pretty close to what I have read carburetors should be though.
Even though engines will run anywhere between 5 and 25 A/F, the usual target values for an un-supercharged carbureted engine are a fairly narrow range (Figure 1). A/F is about 12.5 for the WOT and 14.0-15.5 at part-throttle cruise. An intermediate value of about 13.5-14.0 is usually used for mid-range power (non-WOT acceleration).
Bullshark
Even though engines will run anywhere between 5 and 25 A/F, the usual target values for an un-supercharged carbureted engine are a fairly narrow range (Figure 1). A/F is about 12.5 for the WOT and 14.0-15.5 at part-throttle cruise. An intermediate value of about 13.5-14.0 is usually used for mid-range power (non-WOT acceleration).
Bullshark
Last edited by Bullshark; 02-18-2007 at 12:20 AM.
#6
Melting Slicks
You should be the richest at peak tourque which your not in fact the opposet. 14.5~14.7 is good for going down the highway but not at wot you shuold look for a 12.5 ~13 at wot and your car still may like that alittle + - of that
#7
Race Director
Here is my dyno run. As you can see the two lines that are very flat made the most power. The blue line at the end you can see jumps up. The gauge fell out of the pipe. It should remain flat throughout the run.
#8
"Rodstoration &am p;quot; In Progres
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I appreciate the input everyone... so would you leave the 96s in the secondarys or go with a 95 or 94 to tweek the A/F down a little.
#9
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Sep 2000
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 9,078
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
4 Posts
Cruise-In VII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '07
Ed, Lets put a Holley FI unit on that beast of yours. Check out Zwedes when you get a chance, he's just down the road from you. You can tune by laptop and the seat of your pants.
#10
Le Mans Master
I would leave it bro....13.5-1 is just a touch lean but nothing thats gonna hurt anything. Ideally 12.8-13.0-1 is what you want but leaner engine will always show more power on a dyno(to a degree, anything leaner then 13.5 or 13.8 will start losing power)
I think you got it tuned pretty well. I mean you could go up a jet size or two on the secondaries but nothing I would do immediately, especially withouth re-dynoing.
What engine and tranny you running? Those are some good numbers.
I think you got it tuned pretty well. I mean you could go up a jet size or two on the secondaries but nothing I would do immediately, especially withouth re-dynoing.
What engine and tranny you running? Those are some good numbers.
#13
"Rodstoration &am p;quot; In Progres
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Budman... long time no talk... Isn't it about time for the AER show?
I have thought about the Holley FI...need to get with Zwede and check it out...he's in Plano..right?
#14
"Rodstoration &am p;quot; In Progres
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would leave it bro....13.5-1 is just a touch lean but nothing thats gonna hurt anything. Ideally 12.8-13.0-1 is what you want but leaner engine will always show more power on a dyno(to a degree, anything leaner then 13.5 or 13.8 will start losing power)
I think you got it tuned pretty well. I mean you could go up a jet size or two on the secondaries but nothing I would do immediately, especially withouth re-dynoing.
What engine and tranny you running? Those are some good numbers.
I think you got it tuned pretty well. I mean you could go up a jet size or two on the secondaries but nothing I would do immediately, especially withouth re-dynoing.
What engine and tranny you running? Those are some good numbers.