C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Head L48 L82, 74 through 77

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2007, 05:31 PM
  #1  
Vet76te
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Vet76te's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: B'ham Alabama
Posts: 1,026
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts

Default Head L48 L82, 74 through 77

According to my book, (Corvette Facts, 73 through 77), it shows ALL of the heads having the same number, 333882, for both the L48 and the L82 engine. I had always heard that the L82's had a better set of heads. However, according to my book, they are the same head. Is this right?
Old 03-18-2007, 05:50 PM
  #2  
Roughrider
Melting Slicks
 
Roughrider's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: Frederick Maryland
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

The Corvette Black Book shows essentially the same thing. A few other numbers, but that may be for California cars since they were different in some respects.

L48 and L82 differences were mainly in the rotating assembly (compression ratio, crank, pistons) and the block, cam, intake and carb.
Old 03-18-2007, 11:21 PM
  #3  
dgruenke
Drifting
 
dgruenke's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2002
Location: New Baden Illinois
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Didn't the L82 have 2.02/1.6 valves?
Old 03-19-2007, 01:38 AM
  #4  
SEVNT6
Le Mans Master
 
SEVNT6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Omaha NE
Posts: 5,012
Received 1,816 Likes on 825 Posts
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2022 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified

Default

My black book shows 333882 for both L-48 & L-82 in '76.

My dealer sales brochure says the the L-82 has "special heads with larger valves"

Old 03-19-2007, 06:39 AM
  #5  
Vet76te
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Vet76te's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: B'ham Alabama
Posts: 1,026
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SEVNT6
My black book shows 333882 for both L-48 & L-82 in '76.

My dealer sales brochure says the the L-82 has "special heads with larger valves"


My "Corvette Black Book" and my "Vette Facts Book" BOTH say the same thing, 333882 for the L48 & L82 engines. However, just like you guys, I had alwayys heard and read that the L82 had "better" heads.

What is correct?
Old 03-19-2007, 08:42 AM
  #6  
jackson
Le Mans Master

 
jackson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
Posts: 7,739
Received 628 Likes on 556 Posts

Default

882 is a CASTING # ... more than one PART # uses same casting #.

It's how the casting is finished that determines part # ... ie valve size.

Other than valve size, There's no significant difference ... even then, L82's slightly larger valves don't amount for much "better". You can machine a L48 seat to accept a larger valve ... done everyday. You can machine a L48 rocker boss to accept screw-in stud & guideplate ... done everyday.

All 882 castings have same runner/port volume & shape and have same combustion chamber volume & shape ... just as do all 487 castings ... regardless of valve size.

Learn what's actually different ... learn if any difference is significant ... and try to understand how & why any such difference might be "better" ... & Don't believe everything you hear.
Old 03-19-2007, 05:19 PM
  #7  
holley505
Drifting
 
holley505's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Longwood Florida
Posts: 1,971
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dgruenke
Didn't the L82 have 2.02/1.6 valves?
YUP !! and smaller chamber to give slightly higher compression.

Over all the factory heads produce in the late 70 are not the best for performance... of course a machine shop can make them flow well... but you have a better starting point with a cheap 'brand new' set of vortec heads...
Old 03-19-2007, 09:23 PM
  #8  
jackson
Le Mans Master

 
jackson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Unreconstructed, South Carolina
Posts: 7,739
Received 628 Likes on 556 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by holley505
YUP !! and smaller chamber to give slightly higher compression.
NOPE! ... L82 & L48 have same volume chamber ... L82's approx half-point higher compression is from L82 flattop piston that has more dome volume than L48's dish piston. Yes, L82 has slightly bigger valves. As before ... don't believe everything you ...
Old 03-20-2007, 12:10 AM
  #9  
63mako
Race Director
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by jackson
NOPE! ... L82 & L48 have same volume chamber ... L82's approx half-point higher compression is from L82 flattop piston that has more dome volume than L48's dish piston. Yes, L82 has slightly bigger valves. As before ... don't believe everything you ...
Bigger valves, Bigger cam, Flat top forged pistons, Forged crank and 4 bolt mains are the only differences in the L82.
Old 03-20-2007, 12:51 AM
  #10  
2000FRCZ19
Melting Slicks
 
2000FRCZ19's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: winter haven florida
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

this is an l-48 head off a 75. i dont think the previous owner ever changed oil . the motor was still running and didnt smoke when i did the rebuild though. no wonder they could only get 165 hp out of the 75 l-48.the heads ended up in the scrap pile at the machine shop. the vortec would be a much better choice for a mild build.

Last edited by 2000FRCZ19; 03-20-2007 at 12:54 AM.
Old 03-20-2007, 02:01 AM
  #11  
63mako
Race Director
 
63mako's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Millington Illinois
Posts: 10,626
Received 92 Likes on 84 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09

Default

Originally Posted by 2000FRCZ19
this is an l-48 head off a 75. i dont think the previous owner ever changed oil . the motor was still running and didnt smoke when i did the rebuild though. no wonder they could only get 165 hp out of the 75 l-48.the heads ended up in the scrap pile at the machine shop. the vortec would be a much better choice for a mild build.
Now that is some GM quality! A little gasket matching on those intake ports would go a long way. You could probably pull another 17 HP out of that head. That is a 10% increase!
Old 03-20-2007, 03:59 AM
  #12  
aussiejohn
Drifting
 
aussiejohn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: The only Corvettes in Highett Victoria
Posts: 1,944
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts

Default ....and wait, there's more........

63MAKO,
Also aluminum inlet manifold and aluminum finned rocker covers. Oh, and those little L82 badges on some models.

Regards from Down Under

aussiejohn
Old 03-20-2007, 08:46 AM
  #13  
stingr69
Le Mans Master
 
stingr69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Little Rock AR
Posts: 6,606
Received 1,041 Likes on 807 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by aussiejohn
63MAKO,
Also aluminum inlet manifold and aluminum finned rocker covers. Oh, and those little L82 badges on some models.

Regards from Down Under

aussiejohn
And a bigger 8" balancer, and deep groove pulleys for better belt control at high RPM, and a windage tray with special main cap studs, screw-in rocker studs, guideplates, steel timing gears with HD chain, etc. There were actualy quite a few "better" parts in there. There weren't many parts that were common to the L-48 that would go into an L-82. Almost everything was upgraded in some way for added durabillity and HP. Some years used the same intake manifold but not all.

-Mark.
Old 03-20-2007, 09:24 AM
  #14  
73Gator
Advanced
 
73Gator's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Hilliard FL
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My '73 L48 had 3998993 heads on it when I rebuilt it. I assumed that they were original heads since the block casting number was correct.
Old 03-21-2007, 02:46 PM
  #15  
holley505
Drifting
 
holley505's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Longwood Florida
Posts: 1,971
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jackson
NOPE! ... L82 & L48 have same volume chamber ... L82's approx half-point higher compression is from L82 flattop piston that has more dome volume than L48's dish piston. Yes, L82 has slightly bigger valves. As before ... don't believe everything you ...
my bad.... I assumed... and made and A$$ of me.... while u saved his A$$

I didnt realize the piston difference... GM did a lot of work to the L82 to get a low 15 maybe high 14 second vette.
Old 03-22-2007, 08:05 AM
  #16  
stingr69
Le Mans Master
 
stingr69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Little Rock AR
Posts: 6,606
Received 1,041 Likes on 807 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by holley505
my bad.... I assumed... and made and A$$ of me.... while u saved his A$$

I didnt realize the piston difference... GM did a lot of work to the L82 to get a low 15 maybe high 14 second vette.
True.

The L-82 engine was realy a pretty good place to start with if you were into mods. The exhaust held it back a lot and the low compression/low performance heads held back a bit as well. All for the sake of clean air. Change a few things, recalibrate and it is 1969 all over again.

-Mark.
Old 03-22-2007, 08:31 AM
  #17  
Maymyvetteliveforevr
Safety Car
 
Maymyvetteliveforevr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Brampton Ont.
Posts: 4,236
Received 44 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 63mako
Now that is some GM quality! A little gasket matching on those intake ports would go a long way. You could probably pull another 17 HP out of that head. That is a 10% increase!

Do you think you'd get that much. I'm just curious since it mainly labour.

Get notified of new replies

To Head L48 L82, 74 through 77

Old 03-22-2007, 05:00 PM
  #18  
holley505
Drifting
 
holley505's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Longwood Florida
Posts: 1,971
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Maymyvetteliveforevr
Do you think you'd get that much. I'm just curious since it mainly labour.
I would shave the heads also for better a better compression ratio...
Old 03-22-2007, 05:03 PM
  #19  
LeMans Pete
Melting Slicks
 
LeMans Pete's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 3,429
Received 38 Likes on 22 Posts
St. Jude Donor '13-'14

Default

Originally Posted by holley505
I would shave the heads also for better a better compression ratio...
I would completely forget trying to salvage those heads if I were you. 17HP is crap compared to what you'll see if you get better flowing heads. Of course, new heads means you got some other work to do...
Old 03-22-2007, 06:56 PM
  #20  
2000FRCZ19
Melting Slicks
 
2000FRCZ19's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: winter haven florida
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts
St. Jude Donor '12

Default

Originally Posted by foxymophandlpapa
I would completely forget trying to salvage those heads if I were you. 17HP is crap compared to what you'll see if you get better flowing heads. Of course, new heads means you got some other work to do...
i would have to agree completly here. i trashed these heads and did a lot more work with a better set of heads and got more than 2.5 times the origninal hp out of the rebuild.


Quick Reply: Head L48 L82, 74 through 77



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.