C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ZZ4 Crate 350/355... old vs. new specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2008, 09:50 PM
  #1  
thrilher
Racer
Thread Starter
 
thrilher's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: McComb Ms.
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ZZ4 Crate 350/355... old vs. new specs

I have a ZZ4 350cu./355hp bought in 1999.Went to GM Performance Parts website and compared my older engine with the new engine same part # and found a difference in 1 internal components material. I am interested in knowing the difference in quality of parts in Older vs. Newer parts and why the change in materials?
There was only 1 that had a different part number and i will list part number & material difference of the two below...

1.New ZZ4 has....

-- crankshaft...part #12556307 made of forged steel

2.Older ZZ4 has....

-- crankshaft... part#12551485 has Nodular cast iron with undercut and rolled fillets.

What are the good and bad points and reason for change?
Old 03-06-2008, 10:21 PM
  #2  
OzzyTom
Burning Brakes
 
OzzyTom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Posts: 1,004
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by thrilher

1.New ZZ4 has....

-- crankshaft...part #12556307 made of forged steel

2.Older ZZ4 has....

-- crankshaft... part#12551485 has Nodular cast iron with undercut and rolled fillets.

What are the good and bad points and reason for change?
components are generally changed for a reason....
Here's two reasons:

either they can source something which will cope with the job for a cheaper price,
or
they need to upgrade a component as it becomes known to fail.

Forged parts are dearer than cast, so what do you think the reason is?
Old 03-07-2008, 01:39 PM
  #3  
thrilher
Racer
Thread Starter
 
thrilher's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: McComb Ms.
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes i would agree it should be an upgrade, but our country has been cutting quality last decade not improving it and i'm not familliar with different metals except i know cast iron is very strong but when it breaks its pretty much over with in any application except maybe dirt dobbing an exhaust manifold to slow an exhaust leak, where forged steel is "i think" heated longer than normal steel getting more impurities out making it stronger than average.
I tried to contact GM Performance Parts yesterday at their site on this particular subject but they don't have a Contact Us tab.That is why i thought maybe this was a good place for input.I'll find out somewhere because i want to know if they've had issues of crank breaking or just changed to save a few bucks.
Old 03-07-2008, 02:10 PM
  #4  
OzzyTom
Burning Brakes
 
OzzyTom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Posts: 1,004
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

The original cast crank should be fine with all the original specs.

The ZZ4 motor is bought by a lot of hot rodders who modify the base unit. Start to add N2O, or put bigger cams for more rpm, and then the limitations of the cast iron crank become an issue.

A forged steel crank IS capable of withstanding higher fatigue strenghs.

Do a google search and you'll find lots of info on the topic..

http://www.forgingmagazine.com/featu...d_crankshafts_
Old 03-07-2008, 02:21 PM
  #5  
OzzyTom
Burning Brakes
 
OzzyTom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Posts: 1,004
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default Cast? Forged? Billet? What do they mean?

straight from google....

All materials start out at some point as a cast chunk. There is a big difference though in a cast part and a billet chunk of steel or aluminum. The actual naming convention is that a square or rectangular chunk is called a billet, and a round chunk is called a round, but the name billet in aftermarket circles has come to mean “strong because it is made from a block of metal”. This is not always true.
A cast part is made from material being forced or poured into a mold. The part will have thicker and thinner areas, and takes shape from this molten state. Therefore the material must have good castability. One of the main properties of a material that has good castability is that it does not form internal voids on cooling. As a material cools, it shrinks. If there are thick and thin areas, the thick areas will cool slower than the thin ones, and the thick areas can form voids, and the part can warp out of shape or crack, or worse, form internal stresses that come out when the part is used, then crack later. That’s why when you look at an engine block for example, they often have scalloped out areas to make the wall thickness more even. These materials are typically more brittle. A cast crankshaft is “weaker” because it is made from cast or nodular cast iron, not really because it is cast. It is cast because the material is very castable, but is impossible to forge. A billet may start out cast, but the shape is very very even and symmetrical, so the above concerns do not come into play as in a cast part of some odd shape.

A forged part is made from a chunk of metal. It is then usually heated, and it is pounded into shape in a forging die. The extra metal oozes out from between the forging dies and must be ground off. This is why there is a wide parting line on forged parts. A forged crank is stronger because of the steel it is made from. It could be an alloyed 4340 steel with .40% carbon, or a weaker 1020 steel that is not alloyed and has less (.20%) carbon. The early Chevrolet forged steel cranks crack so regularly mostly because of the weak material they were forged from. It was something like a 1020 (I’m not positive, but you get the idea). A forged piston is strong because of the material it is made from The steel used to make a forged part must have good forgability. It is forged because the material is not very castable. The forging process DOES add grain flow and add strength to the part as above, but it is primarily the higher material Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) and Yield Strength (YS) that make it strong. The yield point is the point at which a part first starts to plastically deform. Take a paper-clip, and straighten it. You can flex it to some degree without bending it. Once you permanently bend it, you have hit the yield point. The UTS is where the part actually breaks. The more brittle a material is, the closer together the UTS and the YS are. Also remember, steel can have a yield strength of as little as 40,000 psi, and as great as 300,000 psi. Now a forged part generally is more ductile than a cast part. 4340 steel is probably the most common material for connecting rod and crank forgings. One of the reasons is its balance of high tensile strength, ductility, and cost. It also responds positively to heat treating, so the surface hardness and the overall material tensile strength can be increased after machining. It is cheaper to machine the part when soft, then heat treat it hard.

Now the cost of a forged part would seem to be higher because of needing a set of forging dies and a bajillion ton forging press, but the cost or a forged part is generally much lower than a billet part because once the forging tooling is set up, you just go to town and pump out thousands of parts. Forged parts are always made in high quantity to justify the cost of the tooling. The cost of tooling amortized over 100,000 parts is small. If you had a half million dollars tooling costs, in this case the per part cost would be $5 per part. The parts are also close to finished shape, and do not need much machining. Machining generally must be done by workers with more skill and take more time than forging.

Now here is the key with billet parts... billet parts have the capability of being of higher strength than a forged part. It depends on what kind of steel the part is made from. A billet part is cut from a solid chunk of steel, so the material does NOT have to be forgeable. You can make parts out of superior strength materials to forging, because you do not have to pick a material that is forgable. Again, this does not stop the designers from picking a weak cheap material, knowing gearheads will buy the parts because the box says “billet”. The biggest drawback to a billet part is they must be fully machined. If producing 100,000 or 250,000 parts, the cost of the machining of all the parts will be much higher than the cost of forging and then finish machining an equal number of parts. The advantage is in low numbers of parts. You can set up a CNC program to mill out 10 sets of billet rods and make money on them. The tooling cost to forge something I’m sure is over $100,000. I do not know what it would cost, but I am just throwing out a number to give an idea of costs.

When shopping for parts in the future, remember what the terms "billet" and "forged" really mean. When shopping for the best of any product, the better you understand the terminoligy and the science behind the product, the better your decision making will be. When someone advertises a product as being "billet steel" or "billet aluminum", or "forged steel" you should be asking "what kind of steel?" or "what grade of aluminum?" or "what are the material properties?"
Old 03-07-2008, 05:28 PM
  #6  
thrilher
Racer
Thread Starter
 
thrilher's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: McComb Ms.
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks Tom, very informative
Old 03-07-2008, 05:44 PM
  #7  
redson
Melting Slicks
 
redson's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Fidalgo Island Wa
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Good info to remember!

Get notified of new replies

To ZZ4 Crate 350/355... old vs. new specs




Quick Reply: ZZ4 Crate 350/355... old vs. new specs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 AM.