how will this cam sound
#1
how will this cam sound
.647 lift int and exh
duration @ .006 tappet lift 303 int 309 exh
duration @ .050 248 int 254 exh
lobe lift .3810 int .3810 exh
lobe separation 114.0
BBC
thanks for your time
duration @ .006 tappet lift 303 int 309 exh
duration @ .050 248 int 254 exh
lobe lift .3810 int .3810 exh
lobe separation 114.0
BBC
thanks for your time
#2
Pro
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
25 Posts
350ci………..77*
383ci………..78.5*
400ci………..80*
454ci………..84*
496ci………..87*
540ci………..90*
572ci………..92*
632ci………..96.5*
Your adv overlap calculates out to 78*. So as you can see, putting that cam in any decent sized BBC will fall well short of having that bad boy idle. It will sound more or less like a stock cam, give or take a little. But if you are looking for that nasty Hotrod idle, then you will need a much narrower LSA (lobe separation angle), and/or more duration, in order to have enough overlap to achieve that. My 540 has 90* of adv overlap and it has just reached the threshold of a nice choppy idle, and I wouldn't want it very much smoother, or it would start to sound like a grocery getter, instead of a Hotrod. Hope this helps.
Last edited by 540 RAT; 12-10-2008 at 07:56 PM.
#4
Pro
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
25 Posts
Here's how to CORRECTLY calculate advertised overlap:
Add your intake and exhaust advertised duration (duration at .050 will NOT give you the correct overlap)
Divide that answer by 4
Subtract the lobe seperation angle (LSA) from that answer
Multiply that answer by 2, and you have the CORRECT answer for advertised overlap
Add your intake and exhaust advertised duration (duration at .050 will NOT give you the correct overlap)
Divide that answer by 4
Subtract the lobe seperation angle (LSA) from that answer
Multiply that answer by 2, and you have the CORRECT answer for advertised overlap
Last edited by 540 RAT; 12-10-2008 at 07:54 PM.
#8
Drifting
540Rat, I think your numbers could use some tweaking.
I have experience with this cam http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft in a 468 inch motor.
It only calculates out to only have 75° of advertised overlap, and I will guarantee you it doesnt sound anything like a grocery getter.
I have experience with this cam http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft in a 468 inch motor.
It only calculates out to only have 75° of advertised overlap, and I will guarantee you it doesnt sound anything like a grocery getter.
#10
Pro
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
25 Posts
540Rat, I think your numbers could use some tweaking.
I have experience with this cam http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft in a 468 inch motor.
It only calculates out to only have 75° of advertised overlap, and I will guarantee you it doesnt sound anything like a grocery getter.
I have experience with this cam http://www.cranecams.com/?show=brows...tType=camshaft in a 468 inch motor.
It only calculates out to only have 75° of advertised overlap, and I will guarantee you it doesnt sound anything like a grocery getter.
If you like, use that "turning heads", as what determines a wicked **** idle from just another grocery getter. Be honest with yourself, and you'll know what I'm talking about..........
Last edited by 540 RAT; 12-10-2008 at 07:25 PM.
#11
Pro
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
25 Posts
If 56* of advertised overlap is correct, and it'll be in a 383, you will not have vacuum issues. That is rather tame to be honest, sorry. And yes it will sound much like stock. It is NOT a wicked cam by any measure, but you had to know that already. ML67 runs a 548 BBC with an adv overlap in the mid 80's, and he runs power brakes with that, so you have no reason for concern with your combo. Whoever told you that you will have vacuum problems, does not know what they are talking about. Get it running and you'll see.
Last edited by 540 RAT; 12-10-2008 at 07:28 PM.
#12
60234
NA
285
293
255
263
.680
.680
110°
This one is similar to mine... but mine has a wider lobe sep with 1.8rockers...
#15
If 56* of advertised overlap is correct, and it'll be in a 383, you will not have vacuum issues. That is rather tame to be honest, sorry. And yes it will sound much like stock. It is NOT a wicked cam by any measure, but you had to know that already. ML67 runs a 548 BBC with an adv overlap in the mid 80's, and he runs power brakes with that, so you have no reason for concern with your combo. Whoever told you that you will have vacuum problems, does not know what they are talking about. Get it running and you'll see.
"Hydraulic Roller-Street Machine with 125+ Nitrous system or small supercharger. 2200 stall with lower gears"
No I dont expect it to have that wicked sound, but I wasnt expecting it to sound anywhere near stock either.
#16
Burning Brakes
Numbers are 276/288, 113 lsa. Its what comp recommended for a supercharged 383.
"Hydraulic Roller-Street Machine with 125+ Nitrous system or small supercharger. 2200 stall with lower gears"
No I dont expect it to have that wicked sound, but I wasnt expecting it to sound anywhere near stock either.
"Hydraulic Roller-Street Machine with 125+ Nitrous system or small supercharger. 2200 stall with lower gears"
No I dont expect it to have that wicked sound, but I wasnt expecting it to sound anywhere near stock either.
I have a 383 with about 85* adv overlap... and I have enough vaccuum for my accessories... and it sounds OK at idle I guess.
Don't know about being "wicked" though.... we have some awesome big block strokers at the local cruises that would rattle the fillings out of your teeth as they pass...
My cam is a HR with 242/240@0.050 (305/314 advertised duration with 0.594 lift) 112* LSA tends to smooth it out a bit...
PS... I have a question though,
How is manifold vaccum created in a blown application???
Last edited by OzzyTom; 12-11-2008 at 06:31 PM. Reason: fixed link to video clip
#17
Wicked idle "sound" is subjective....
I have a 383 with about 85* adv overlap... and I have enough vaccuum for my accessories... and it sounds OK at idle I guess.
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k1...th_383idle.jpg
Don't know about being "wicked" though.... we have some awesome big block strokers at the local cruises that literally rattle the shop windows as they pass...
My cam is a HR with 242/240@0.050 (305/314 advertised duration with 0.594 lift) 112* LSA tends to smooth it out a bit...
PS... I have a question though,
How is manifold vaccum created in a blown application???
I have a 383 with about 85* adv overlap... and I have enough vaccuum for my accessories... and it sounds OK at idle I guess.
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k1...th_383idle.jpg
Don't know about being "wicked" though.... we have some awesome big block strokers at the local cruises that literally rattle the shop windows as they pass...
My cam is a HR with 242/240@0.050 (305/314 advertised duration with 0.594 lift) 112* LSA tends to smooth it out a bit...
PS... I have a question though,
How is manifold vaccum created in a blown application???
This is a roots setup, not a centrifugal blow-through. If you pull your brake booster vacuum from the bottom of the carb, there is always vacuum since its sitting just above the spinning compressor blades of the blower. You can not pull your dist advance from here though, you must get that from the manifold itself, below the blower. In the manifold the vacuum does indeed go away at WOT, which you want, because at that point your mechanical advance is in.
In any event, my selection of cam was performance first, lopey idle second. When I talked with the cam companies I explained this to them that I thought the lopey idle was cool, but did not want to give up performance to obtain it. Also in discussions here on the forum about my overall setup it was determined that my Holly systemax heads were going to be the limiting factor anyway. I cant afford to replace them right now with the cost of building a 4 bolt, 4340 forged roller cam bottom end, and also my need for new headers and sidepipes. (Plus all the while your in there things that pop up when you can actually see the inside of the engine compartment). I am running 1.6 RR too though, so that will bump it up a tad. With 1.6 I am at something like 540/550 lift and from some reading I just did, this also makes the engine see about 2-4* more duration.
It was also advised that I go with a relatively wide LSA to minimize the supercharger blowing the charge out of the exhaust ports, and to not get carried away with the duration lest I lose bottom end torque.
Last edited by Droshki; 12-11-2008 at 03:02 AM.
#18
Safety Car
Was there supposed to be sound? It just looked like a picture to me. Right hand drive at that? Ah....Oz...
This is a roots setup, not a centrifugal blow-through. If you pull your brake booster vacuum from the bottom of the carb, there is always vacuum since its sitting just above the spinning compressor blades of the blower. You can not pull your dist advance from here though, you must get that from the manifold itself, below the blower. In the manifold the vacuum does indeed go away at WOT, which you want, because at that point your mechanical advance is in.
In any event, my selection of cam was performance first, lopey idle second. When I talked with the cam companies I explained this to them that I thought the lopey idle was cool, but did not want to give up performance to obtain it. Also in discussions here on the forum about my overall setup it was determined that my Holly systemax heads were going to be the limiting factor anyway. I cant afford to replace them right now with the cost of building a 4 bolt, 4340 forged roller cam bottom end, and also my need for new headers and sidepipes. (Plus all the while your in there things that pop up when you can actually see the inside of the engine compartment). I am running 1.6 RR too though, so that will bump it up a tad. With 1.6 I am at something like 540/550 lift and from some reading I just did, this also makes the engine see about 2-4* more duration.
It was also advised that I go with a relatively wide LSA to minimize the supercharger blowing the charge out of the exhaust ports, and to not get carried away with the duration lest I lose bottom end torque.
This is a roots setup, not a centrifugal blow-through. If you pull your brake booster vacuum from the bottom of the carb, there is always vacuum since its sitting just above the spinning compressor blades of the blower. You can not pull your dist advance from here though, you must get that from the manifold itself, below the blower. In the manifold the vacuum does indeed go away at WOT, which you want, because at that point your mechanical advance is in.
In any event, my selection of cam was performance first, lopey idle second. When I talked with the cam companies I explained this to them that I thought the lopey idle was cool, but did not want to give up performance to obtain it. Also in discussions here on the forum about my overall setup it was determined that my Holly systemax heads were going to be the limiting factor anyway. I cant afford to replace them right now with the cost of building a 4 bolt, 4340 forged roller cam bottom end, and also my need for new headers and sidepipes. (Plus all the while your in there things that pop up when you can actually see the inside of the engine compartment). I am running 1.6 RR too though, so that will bump it up a tad. With 1.6 I am at something like 540/550 lift and from some reading I just did, this also makes the engine see about 2-4* more duration.
It was also advised that I go with a relatively wide LSA to minimize the supercharger blowing the charge out of the exhaust ports, and to not get carried away with the duration lest I lose bottom end torque.
#19
I'm shooting for about 8.3 static NA CR. This will put me at about 12.7 at 8 PSI and 13.8 static @ 10 PSI. Ceartinly the ragged edge of things, but I think the dynamic CR will be a bit lower. I've been too lazy to calulate it. It remains to be seen how much boost I will actually produce with a small bump up in cam size from my old engine and the larger displacement of the 383. I expect considerably less then the 10 PSI max I saw on my 355 right before a piston let go.
Last edited by Droshki; 12-11-2008 at 11:36 AM.
#20
Pro
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
25 Posts
Wicked idle "sound" is subjective....
I have a 383 with about 85* adv overlap... and I have enough vaccuum for my accessories... and it sounds OK at idle I guess.
Don't know about being "wicked" though.... we have some awesome big block strokers at the local cruises that literally rattle the shop windows as they pass...
My cam is a HR with 242/240@0.050 (305/314 advertised duration with 0.594 lift) 112* LSA tends to smooth it out a bit...
PS... I have a question though,
How is manifold vaccum created in a blown application???
I have a 383 with about 85* adv overlap... and I have enough vaccuum for my accessories... and it sounds OK at idle I guess.
Don't know about being "wicked" though.... we have some awesome big block strokers at the local cruises that literally rattle the shop windows as they pass...
My cam is a HR with 242/240@0.050 (305/314 advertised duration with 0.594 lift) 112* LSA tends to smooth it out a bit...
PS... I have a question though,
How is manifold vaccum created in a blown application???
Droshki, now you see what I was talking about in reference to your 56* adv overlap vs Tom's 85* adv overlap in the same size motor. That huge difference in overlap will make for a huge difference in idle sound. I didn't know earlier that you were doing a blown motor. The charts were developed from naturally aspirated motors, so I guess I should specify that. And yes, you're probably right, it may not sound quite like a stocker. It should sound somewhat stronger, but by how much, is as the say, subjective. Some may think its cool, while some may not. That's life, but all that really matters, is that you're happy with it. I'm sure it will be a lot of fun. Blown motors are pretty cool, I have one of those also, and its a blast to bring in the boost.
Last edited by 540 RAT; 12-11-2008 at 04:34 PM.