C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Bellhousing dialin, am I good to go???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2012, 12:20 PM
  #1  
HamadUP
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
HamadUP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,876
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default Bellhousing dialin, am I good to go???

I spent the whole afternoon adjusting the bellhousing using the offset dowel pins, and this is how it measures now :

1- 12 o'clock : 0
2- 3 o'clock : +.008
3- 6 o'clock : +.008
4- 9 o'clock : .0

So based on what I read here in this forum I'm .004 out of round (.008/2=.004) which should be OK for a Tremec TKO, but when I read a PDF document made by Tremec, they are calling for .0025 maximum, so which one of them is correct?

I spent around 6 hours of work just to achieve these numbers, so I hope I'll be good to go!
Old 01-13-2012, 12:42 PM
  #2  
GT's 78
Racer
 
GT's 78's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Mt Airy, NC
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

According to what I understand about it you have .008 vertical run out and .008 horizonal run out. The formula is 12 o'clock - 6 o'clock = run out and 3 o'clock - 9 o'clock = run out. Your tolerance is max .005 run out.

Last edited by GT's 78; 01-13-2012 at 12:44 PM.
Old 01-13-2012, 04:40 PM
  #3  
73, Dark Blue 454
Melting Slicks
 
73, Dark Blue 454's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HamadUP
1- 12 o'clock : 0
2- 3 o'clock : +.008
3- 6 o'clock : +.008
4- 9 o'clock : .0
I assume you're negative at either the 3 or 6 o'clock postion,..right?
Old 01-13-2012, 04:52 PM
  #4  
FKING1
Safety Car
 
FKING1's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: Dearborn Heights Michigan
Posts: 3,814
Received 105 Likes on 78 Posts

Default

My TKO 600 install tolerance was +or - .005.
As I interpret your readings from the center you are + or - .004 and are good.
I was + or - .006 and installed that way. Wasn't going to mess with .001.
Old 01-13-2012, 06:13 PM
  #5  
GT's 78
Racer
 
GT's 78's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Mt Airy, NC
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FKING1
My TKO 600 install tolerance was +or - .005.
As I interpret your readings from the center you are + or - .004 and are good.
I was + or - .006 and installed that way. Wasn't going to mess with .001.
I humbly disagree. If there was a way (which there isn't) to perfectly center the dial indicator to the pilot bushing you could only be .00025 max out on top and .00025 max on bottom which would be a total of .005 run out. You can't perfectly center the dial indicator with the magnetic base to the crank but it doesn't really matter, when you spin the crank (as long as you dont move the base) your just measuring the difference between top and bottom which would give you your total run out (max .005). Also I'm guessing that he may have zero'd his indicator for each measurement when you probably should spin the full 360 when taking the measurements. Lets say you mount your indicator and zero it in with about .002 measurement at the 12 0'clock position. If the bellhousing was perfectly centered you would get a .002 all the way around. The part about dividing by 2 is the amount of correction needed to move toward center. If you are .008 out to the bottom side then you would need to move .004 to the center to be perfect.

Last edited by GT's 78; 01-13-2012 at 06:38 PM.
Old 01-13-2012, 07:08 PM
  #6  
HamadUP
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
HamadUP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,876
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

OK, I did some further adjustments to the offset dowel pins and now I have :

1- 12 o'clock : 0
2- 3 o'clock : 0
3- 6 o'clock : +.005
4- 9 o'clock : +.004

Thats the maximum I can do, thats for a total runout of about .0025 which should be OK according to Tremec's manual, that 5 sp. conversion job is really taking A LOT of my time and effort!
Old 01-13-2012, 07:08 PM
  #7  
HamadUP
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
HamadUP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,876
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

Originally Posted by 73, Dark Blue 454
I assume you're negative at either the 3 or 6 o'clock postion,..right?
No, both positive figures.
Old 01-13-2012, 11:25 PM
  #8  
73, Dark Blue 454
Melting Slicks
 
73, Dark Blue 454's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HamadUP
No, both positive figures.
Ahh,..should have read closer,..I thought yoou were positive at both the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions.
Old 01-14-2012, 02:16 AM
  #9  
gkull
Team Owner
 
gkull's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 21,743
Received 1,327 Likes on 1,057 Posts

Default

So you are at .002 left and .0025 down. Are your offset dowels orientated the same? If they are I would loosen the 4 bell housing bolts and rotate the dowels both less than 45 degrees to lift towards 12 and right towards 3:00. retighten the bolts and re zero the dial and measure again.

Once you understand the relationship of the offset being just another cam lobe and always moving them together it is easy.

I did a post on how I bent the magnetic base arm to easy position the dial when locked onto the flywheel.

Just because something says the max allowable is 2.5 out I would not do it. It loads the tranny input staft to the pilot bearing.
Old 01-14-2012, 02:47 AM
  #10  
Shark Racer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Shark Racer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 12,399
Received 241 Likes on 200 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gkull
So you are at .002 left and .0025 down. Are your offset dowels orientated the same? If they are I would loosen the 4 bell housing bolts and rotate the dowels both less than 45 degrees to lift towards 12 and right towards 3:00. retighten the bolts and re zero the dial and measure again.

Once you understand the relationship of the offset being just another cam lobe and always moving them together it is easy.

I did a post on how I bent the magnetic base arm to easy position the dial when locked onto the flywheel.

Just because something says the max allowable is 2.5 out I would not do it. It loads the tranny input staft to the pilot bearing.
Thinking about swapping the 700R4 in the 78 for a T45 or TKO... maybe I'll have to do it at your place.
Old 01-14-2012, 06:41 AM
  #11  
pws69
Melting Slicks
 
pws69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: Eastern US XX
Posts: 2,668
Received 40 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GT's 78
.... you could only be .00025 max out on top and .00025 max on bottom which would be a total of .005 run out..
Modern math.......
Old 01-14-2012, 06:58 AM
  #12  
HamadUP
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
HamadUP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2003
Location: Doha
Posts: 2,876
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 6 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08

Default

Originally Posted by gkull
So you are at .002 left and .0025 down. Are your offset dowels orientated the same? If they are I would loosen the 4 bell housing bolts and rotate the dowels both less than 45 degrees to lift towards 12 and right towards 3:00. retighten the bolts and re zero the dial and measure again.

Once you understand the relationship of the offset being just another cam lobe and always moving them together it is easy.

I did a post on how I bent the magnetic base arm to easy position the dial when locked onto the flywheel.

Just because something says the max allowable is 2.5 out I would not do it. It loads the tranny input staft to the pilot bearing.
I've been fighting it for few days now and I'm spending 4-5 hours on it almost daily!, doing the whole thing alone is also a pain. I'll just leave it with what it is right now as long as I'm with in the recommended tolerances, I just don't have the talent (nor the physical ability!) to get that thing exactly on the centerline of the crankshaft.
Old 01-14-2012, 07:04 AM
  #13  
TPIShark
Pro
 
TPIShark's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Clarksburg NJ
Posts: 714
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pws69
Modern math.......
Old 01-14-2012, 09:53 AM
  #14  
gkull
Team Owner
 
gkull's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 21,743
Received 1,327 Likes on 1,057 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HamadUP
I've been fighting it for few days now and I'm spending 4-5 hours on it almost daily!, doing the whole thing alone is also a pain. I'll just leave it with what it is right now as long as I'm with in the recommended tolerances, I just don't have the talent (nor the physical ability!) to get that thing exactly on the centerline of the crankshaft.
If you are doing it by yourself I totally understand! For doing it at all and not paying a guy like me $85 per hour

To the jerks that can't see why it is 1/2. You have to set the dial to "Zero" as a reference point. When it actually is .0025 down at the top (12) and down .0025 down from exact center of the crank shaft at (6)

Shark Racer. Come on over I would help you do the swap. I did mine here at home.
Old 01-14-2012, 01:30 PM
  #15  
Shark Racer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Shark Racer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 12,399
Received 241 Likes on 200 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gkull
Shark Racer. Come on over I would help you do the swap. I did mine here at home.
It's probably been a while since you've seen one of these with a full interior.

I'm going to take you up on that. Might be next year. Going to overhaul third member this year.

The only things that really scare me on the job are hanging the pedals and dialing in the bellhousing.
Old 01-14-2012, 03:25 PM
  #16  
GT's 78
Racer
 
GT's 78's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Mt Airy, NC
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by pws69
Modern math.......
If I didn't have the correct understanding of it why do you feel the need to be a ***** about it.
Old 01-15-2012, 11:21 AM
  #17  
pws69
Melting Slicks
 
pws69's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2001
Location: Eastern US XX
Posts: 2,668
Received 40 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GT's 78
If I didn't have the correct understanding of it why do you feel the need to be a ***** about it.
Wasn't being a "*****" - and nothing about the understanding - just questioning the incorrect math....

Get notified of new replies

To Bellhousing dialin, am I good to go???

Old 01-15-2012, 12:04 PM
  #18  
69 Chevy
Melting Slicks
 
69 Chevy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Lehigh county Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The TKO and more modern trannys have a tapered roller bearing front bearing that has no side to side tolerance and therefore is much less forgiving than a Muncie which has a ball bearing front bearing.
Old 01-15-2012, 12:35 PM
  #19  
redvetracr
Race Director
 
redvetracr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: WI
Posts: 18,125
Likes: 0
Received 174 Likes on 160 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HamadUP
I spent the whole afternoon adjusting the bellhousing using the offset dowel pins, and this is how it measures !
are you using a new reproduction #621 bellhousing?
Old 01-15-2012, 03:09 PM
  #20  
GT's 78
Racer
 
GT's 78's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Location: Mt Airy, NC
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by pws69
Wasn't being a "*****" - and nothing about the understanding - just questioning the incorrect math....
I put in to many zero's I see that now. Sorry for pricking you.


Quick Reply: Bellhousing dialin, am I good to go???



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.