DART Iron Eagle 180 vs Prof Ported '186' Casting
#1
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
DART Iron Eagle 180 vs Prof Ported '186' Casting
I am studying Dave Vizard's book on SBC Cylinder Head buid & modify.
From what I can see, the DART Iron Eagle appears to flow better, out of the box (as cast), than a thoroughly professionally ported 186 casting (starting with a 165cc intake runner prior to porting). However, as others have noted, that still is shy of the performance of the 180-195cc heads from TFS & AFR (also as-cast).
Is this an accurate statement?
I know this is a "dead-horse" line of discussion but it helps me to relate the DART head performance vs. a fully ported set of 186 close-chamber heads from Chevy. It appears to be a 'step in improvement' between a thoroughly ported (professionally) of Chevy 186 heads and the next-better products from AFR and TFS featuring 180-195-cc intake runners.
One thing I noted, AFR offers the heads in 65 and 75cc chambers. With 75cc chambers, they flow better but drop compression. Too bad the 75's aren't more line 72cc.
From what I can see, the DART Iron Eagle appears to flow better, out of the box (as cast), than a thoroughly professionally ported 186 casting (starting with a 165cc intake runner prior to porting). However, as others have noted, that still is shy of the performance of the 180-195cc heads from TFS & AFR (also as-cast).
Is this an accurate statement?
I know this is a "dead-horse" line of discussion but it helps me to relate the DART head performance vs. a fully ported set of 186 close-chamber heads from Chevy. It appears to be a 'step in improvement' between a thoroughly ported (professionally) of Chevy 186 heads and the next-better products from AFR and TFS featuring 180-195-cc intake runners.
One thing I noted, AFR offers the heads in 65 and 75cc chambers. With 75cc chambers, they flow better but drop compression. Too bad the 75's aren't more line 72cc.
Last edited by TedH; 02-09-2015 at 06:51 PM.
#3
Race Director
Here's a good video on YouTube comparing 882s to a set of Iron Eagles. The Iron Eagles would actually come out cheaper and just dominate the worked 882s in performance.
Of course, the video was uploaded by "DartHeads", so take it as you will. Looked like a LOT of work went into those 882s, though.
Of course, the video was uploaded by "DartHeads", so take it as you will. Looked like a LOT of work went into those 882s, though.
#4
Race Director
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Corsicana, Tx
Posts: 12,607
Received 1,875 Likes
on
913 Posts
2020 C2 of the Year - Modified Winner
2020 Corvette of the Year (performance mods)
C2 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
2017 C2 of Year Finalist
I wouldn't spend any real time or $$$ on a set of 186's/882's. Way too many options out there these days.
JIM
JIM
#5
Le Mans Master
Thread Starter
For the prices and options, it is good to know the aftermarket has delivered.
Unless original equipment is the goal, I don't see the benefit of reviving OEM castings. They are a disadvantage even professionally ported compared to name-brand aftermarket heads.
#7
Race Director
I am studying Dave Vizard's book on SBC Cylinder Head buid & modify.
From what I can see, the DART Iron Eagle appears to flow better, out of the box (as cast), than a thoroughly professionally ported 186 casting (starting with a 165cc intake runner prior to porting). However, as others have noted, that still is shy of the performance of the 180-195cc heads from TFS & AFR (also as-cast).
Is this an accurate statement?
I know this is a "dead-horse" line of discussion but it helps me to relate the DART head performance vs. a fully ported set of 186 close-chamber heads from Chevy. It appears to be a 'step in improvement' between a thoroughly ported (professionally) of Chevy 186 heads and the next-better products from AFR and TFS featuring 180-195-cc intake runners.
One thing I noted, AFR offers the heads in 65 and 75cc chambers. With 75cc chambers, they flow better but drop compression. Too bad the 75's aren't more line 72cc.
From what I can see, the DART Iron Eagle appears to flow better, out of the box (as cast), than a thoroughly professionally ported 186 casting (starting with a 165cc intake runner prior to porting). However, as others have noted, that still is shy of the performance of the 180-195cc heads from TFS & AFR (also as-cast).
Is this an accurate statement?
I know this is a "dead-horse" line of discussion but it helps me to relate the DART head performance vs. a fully ported set of 186 close-chamber heads from Chevy. It appears to be a 'step in improvement' between a thoroughly ported (professionally) of Chevy 186 heads and the next-better products from AFR and TFS featuring 180-195-cc intake runners.
One thing I noted, AFR offers the heads in 65 and 75cc chambers. With 75cc chambers, they flow better but drop compression. Too bad the 75's aren't more line 72cc.