C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

DART Iron Eagle 180 vs Prof Ported '186' Casting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2015, 03:36 PM
  #1  
TedH
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
TedH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Tampa Bay FL
Posts: 8,344
Received 66 Likes on 53 Posts

Default DART Iron Eagle 180 vs Prof Ported '186' Casting

I am studying Dave Vizard's book on SBC Cylinder Head buid & modify.

From what I can see, the DART Iron Eagle appears to flow better, out of the box (as cast), than a thoroughly professionally ported 186 casting (starting with a 165cc intake runner prior to porting). However, as others have noted, that still is shy of the performance of the 180-195cc heads from TFS & AFR (also as-cast).

Is this an accurate statement?

I know this is a "dead-horse" line of discussion but it helps me to relate the DART head performance vs. a fully ported set of 186 close-chamber heads from Chevy. It appears to be a 'step in improvement' between a thoroughly ported (professionally) of Chevy 186 heads and the next-better products from AFR and TFS featuring 180-195-cc intake runners.

One thing I noted, AFR offers the heads in 65 and 75cc chambers. With 75cc chambers, they flow better but drop compression. Too bad the 75's aren't more line 72cc.

Last edited by TedH; 02-09-2015 at 06:51 PM.
Old 02-09-2015, 03:40 PM
  #2  
beckzach05
Cruising
 
beckzach05's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2015
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sub'd.
Old 02-09-2015, 03:54 PM
  #3  
Shark Racer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Shark Racer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 12,399
Received 241 Likes on 200 Posts

Default

Here's a good video on YouTube comparing 882s to a set of Iron Eagles. The Iron Eagles would actually come out cheaper and just dominate the worked 882s in performance.



Of course, the video was uploaded by "DartHeads", so take it as you will. Looked like a LOT of work went into those 882s, though.
Old 02-09-2015, 05:32 PM
  #4  
427Hotrod
Race Director
 
427Hotrod's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Corsicana, Tx
Posts: 12,607
Received 1,875 Likes on 913 Posts
2020 C2 of the Year - Modified Winner
2020 Corvette of the Year (performance mods)
C2 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
2017 C2 of Year Finalist

Default

I wouldn't spend any real time or $$$ on a set of 186's/882's. Way too many options out there these days.

JIM
Old 02-09-2015, 05:50 PM
  #5  
TedH
Le Mans Master
Support Corvetteforum!
Thread Starter
 
TedH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Tampa Bay FL
Posts: 8,344
Received 66 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 427Hotrod
I wouldn't spend any real time or $$$ on a set of 186's/882's. Way too many options out there these days.

JIM
I agree. Mr Vizard goes as far as to say the 882's and pretty much any of the OEM open chamber 76cc heads, while offering some flow potential, have a severe disadvantage to a closed-chamber, better flowing 186 head. And, as you stated, the cost to bring the OEM 186 head to still short of an DART Iron Eagle will still not be as good and cost more.

For the prices and options, it is good to know the aftermarket has delivered.

Unless original equipment is the goal, I don't see the benefit of reviving OEM castings. They are a disadvantage even professionally ported compared to name-brand aftermarket heads.
Old 02-09-2015, 10:25 PM
  #6  
68post
Burning Brakes
 
68post's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2012
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 752
Received 88 Likes on 76 Posts

Default

Don't forget the much better chamber design of most modern heads.
Of course the modern heads have much more porting potential, but cyl head porters do not want to port iron heads anymore !
Old 02-09-2015, 11:14 PM
  #7  
Les
Race Director
 
Les's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Sierra Foothills CA
Posts: 10,831
Received 961 Likes on 571 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TedH
I am studying Dave Vizard's book on SBC Cylinder Head buid & modify.

From what I can see, the DART Iron Eagle appears to flow better, out of the box (as cast), than a thoroughly professionally ported 186 casting (starting with a 165cc intake runner prior to porting). However, as others have noted, that still is shy of the performance of the 180-195cc heads from TFS & AFR (also as-cast).

Is this an accurate statement?

I know this is a "dead-horse" line of discussion but it helps me to relate the DART head performance vs. a fully ported set of 186 close-chamber heads from Chevy. It appears to be a 'step in improvement' between a thoroughly ported (professionally) of Chevy 186 heads and the next-better products from AFR and TFS featuring 180-195-cc intake runners.

One thing I noted, AFR offers the heads in 65 and 75cc chambers. With 75cc chambers, they flow better but drop compression. Too bad the 75's aren't more line 72cc.
When I got my AFR 195s I remember talking to somebody there- I can't remember who after several years, but they were well versed on their product. At their recommendation I got the larger chambered heads due to the better flow but had them milled down to hit the comp. ratio that I wanted. You may want to call them to discuss that option.

Get notified of new replies

To DART Iron Eagle 180 vs Prof Ported '186' Casting




Quick Reply: DART Iron Eagle 180 vs Prof Ported '186' Casting



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 PM.