C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stroking a LT-1 Motor during Rebuild-YES OR NO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2016, 07:59 AM
  #21  
leadfoot4
Team Owner
 
leadfoot4's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2001
Location: Western NY
Posts: 82,771
Received 1,343 Likes on 1,094 Posts

Default

Take the LT-1, if it's the original engine for the car, out of the car, place it in a couple of plastic trash bags, then store it in a safe, dry place. Go to the GM Performance website, and pick out a 383 crate motor, and install the crate motor in your car.

You'll retain the value of your original engine, and most likely spend less money of the complete engine. It will be 100% ready to drop in the car, have a known horsepower and torque rating, and will have a warranty.

Just my $0.02 worth
Old 09-30-2016, 11:17 AM
  #22  
GOSFAST
Burning Brakes
 
GOSFAST's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 65 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by leadfoot4
Take the LT-1, if it's the original engine for the car, out of the car, place it in a couple of plastic trash bags, then store it in a safe, dry place. Go to the GM Performance website, and pick out a 383 crate motor, and install the crate motor in your car.

You'll retain the value of your original engine, and most likely spend less money of the complete engine. It will be 100% ready to drop in the car, have a known horsepower and torque rating, and will have a warranty.

Just my $0.02 worth
The one issue with this method, and I'm not at all against it, is the fact that many of our own builds (non-strokers/strokers) want to attend judged shows, impossible without the OEM powerplant.

We've done numerous 100% stock-appearing builds including many for some forum members up here, both SB's and BB's. Many are done for local resto shopand all MUST remain 100% stock looking. Right down to the OEM intake gaskets AND single-thick V/C gaskets. Most all of these are fully-rollered builds, lifters (mostly retro-hyd) and rockers. We can mill/square the decks without touching the original stamped pads, this is easy.

Thanks, Gary in N.Y.

P.S. The BB's are somewhat easier with keeping the "look" with the V/C area, SB's slightly more labor involved. All also have decent HP numbers, a recent BB (stroker) hit 525/530 with every OEM component, Q-jet to exh manifolds. Not really chasing numbers on this type build, basically bolt-together. Here's a shot of a recent SB, fully rollered. That original V/C has no gasket in place and clears all roller rockers nicely.
Attached Images  

Last edited by GOSFAST; 09-30-2016 at 11:18 AM.
Old 09-30-2016, 12:24 PM
  #23  
saunderscx
Intermediate
 
saunderscx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2016
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 36
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jebbysan
Wrap up that bad boy.....build a sneaky 406....and you will never think about a 383.
I love 383's.....but.....the 406 has the bore....a good 1/8 inch of it....
When you put real heads on a 406...they run like hell....
Put it to you this way friend....if you were going to stroke it....it would not make any sense to not add heads to support it....then a real cam and manifold....well at that point...the only point is the brag of the stamp number.....
A carefully built 350 LT-1 with modern tech and ported heads is a silky unit.....I had one. Well balanced engine....
But if you want to knock your socks off and look stock....build a 406.
Yes this post is biased

Jebby
If he goes with a 406 can does he need new springs ? How about other stuff like pulleys/belts/alt bracket/etc ? I've been thinking about mothballing my original numbers matching 350SB and upgrading. Until now I was thinking stroked 383 to keep cost of 'other stuff' to a minimum. This 350SB makes for a great cruiser but not much zing when you press the go pedal, especially rolling faster than 40 mph. Another concern for me is keeping the same low profile hood (see member icon to the left).... I don't think I can color match ~30 year old Pb paint (red now....originally white). My trans is a 400TH so assume that will bolt up to any GM block.

Last edited by saunderscx; 09-30-2016 at 12:29 PM.
Old 09-30-2016, 12:38 PM
  #24  
saunderscx
Intermediate
 
saunderscx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2016
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 36
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jb78L-82
Absolutely do NOT stroke an OEM 71 LT-1!!!!

You are 100% on the correct track...increase the compression to 10+:1, port the heads, intake, and a better cam (no one can see the change).

The bottom end of your engine is really good...forged crank, forged rods, forged pistons (lots of good forged pistons out there (I used JE Forged Racing pistons in my OEM L-82 9:1 with 64 CC AFR 180 aluminum heads with Felpro 1094 .015 head gasket))..total compression 10.2:1).

That is one of the iconic SBC engines used in the C3.....forget stroking a 350 into a 383...if you go that route use a different block into a 406 for real power gains over the 350...like jebbysan suggested^^ above. A properly equipped/built 355 with a forged bottom end like the L-82/LT-1 is more than a match for most 383's on the street. I would only stroke a run of the mill base motor 350/L-48 since it is a typical passenger car engine...
If you rebuild a 350SB with a strong bottom end/forged pistons, keep Q-jet, and add performer manifold + heads + rocking assembly, about what type of HP is typical ? I've got an original numbers matching block. At this stage of the game I like the idea of the original look but I'm not opposed to change and I don't really care about NCRS stuff all that much. I do want more zip when I press the go pedal. If I could get something like 400 HP I'd be very happy. I think the base plate says 250 HP in stock config which is probably pretty much where I'm at now. Or maybe in my case an off the shelf crate engine makes more sense (just mothball the original) and save it.
Old 09-30-2016, 12:43 PM
  #25  
Jebbysan
Dr. Detroit
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Jebbysan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,963
Received 3,892 Likes on 2,564 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by saunderscx
If he goes with a 406 can does he need new springs ? How about other stuff like pulleys/belts/alt bracket/etc ? I've been thinking about mothballing my original numbers matching 350SB and upgrading. Until now I was thinking stroked 383 to keep cost of 'other stuff' to a minimum. This 350SB makes for a great cruiser but not much zing when you press the go pedal, especially rolling faster than 40 mph. Another concern for me is keeping the same low profile hood (see member icon to the left).... I don't think I can color match ~30 year old Pb paint (red now....originally white). My trans is a 400TH so assume that will bolt up to any GM block.
No......I used all of my stock 72' accessories......if you use a Dart Iron Eagle head the engine will be very close to weighing the same......
It will want headers for sure but you could run the stock LT-1 manifold as it was a very good piece.....just mill out the divider......
A 406 is most of the time built externally balanced so make sure you have the proper flexplate......and harmonic balancer for that matter.
I even have LT-1 covers on my own engine
In this photo the regulator is necessary for the 130gph pump I installed later......this photo is shortly after startup.....
And FYI the Holley HP series is one of the finest mixers out there........

Jebby
Attached Images  

Last edited by Jebbysan; 09-30-2016 at 12:45 PM.
The following users liked this post:
saunderscx (09-30-2016)
Old 09-30-2016, 01:27 PM
  #26  
jb78L-82
Le Mans Master
 
jb78L-82's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,114
Received 740 Likes on 617 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by saunderscx
If you rebuild a 350SB with a strong bottom end/forged pistons, keep Q-jet, and add performer manifold + heads + rocking assembly, about what type of HP is typical ? I've got an original numbers matching block. At this stage of the game I like the idea of the original look but I'm not opposed to change and I don't really care about NCRS stuff all that much. I do want more zip when I press the go pedal. If I could get something like 400 HP I'd be very happy. I think the base plate says 250 HP in stock config which is probably pretty much where I'm at now. Or maybe in my case an off the shelf crate engine makes more sense (just mothball the original) and save it.
400+gross hp with good aluminum heads, 10+:1 compression and moderate roller cam. Better/Best aluminum heads like AFR's, more extreme roller cam, aftermarket intake, and 1 3/4 inch LTH headers...450+ Gross HP.

If you go the crate engine route, then 383 all the way making 450+ gross HP...with slightly better torque throughout the rpm range..
Old 09-30-2016, 01:32 PM
  #27  
7t9l82
Le Mans Master
 
7t9l82's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2010
Location: melbourne florida
Posts: 6,329
Received 576 Likes on 459 Posts
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified

Default

If your going NCRS put a set of mini dome replacement pistons with the stock heads and that will give you compression a boost with the stock heads. Do some bowl work in your heads and some 1.6 rockers in it the bump in compression allows that cam to work better.
If not bag up the numbers matching motor and build another whatever you wish size. These guys are correct in a 383 making more torque, but built similarly horsepower is very close. If I was drag racing I'd build probably a 377 and gear the heck out of it.if I want torque to tow a boat I'd build a 454 plus engine.
I wouldn't take an LT-1 block and turn it into something else.a friend had a 70 LT-1 top flight car and when he was done showing it and winning every award there was he freshened the stock engine and we built a 396 small block to put in it.
Old 09-30-2016, 03:01 PM
  #28  
saunderscx
Intermediate
 
saunderscx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2016
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 36
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jb78L-82
400+gross hp with good aluminum heads, 10+:1 compression and moderate roller cam. Better/Best aluminum heads like AFR's, more extreme roller cam, aftermarket intake, and 1 3/4 inch LTH headers...450+ Gross HP.

If you go the crate engine route, then 383 all the way making 450+ gross HP...with slightly better torque throughout the rpm range..
JB - thanks much.
Old 09-30-2016, 03:03 PM
  #29  
saunderscx
Intermediate
 
saunderscx's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2016
Location: Frisco TX
Posts: 36
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jebbysan
No......I used all of my stock 72' accessories......if you use a Dart Iron Eagle head the engine will be very close to weighing the same......
It will want headers for sure but you could run the stock LT-1 manifold as it was a very good piece.....just mill out the divider......
A 406 is most of the time built externally balanced so make sure you have the proper flexplate......and harmonic balancer for that matter.
I even have LT-1 covers on my own engine
In this photo the regulator is necessary for the 130gph pump I installed later......this photo is shortly after startup.....
And FYI the Holley HP series is one of the finest mixers out there........

Jebby
Jebby - great info. Thank you. That's a sweet engine man. Nice
The following users liked this post:
Jebbysan (10-03-2016)
Old 09-30-2016, 06:57 PM
  #30  
wallifishrmn
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
wallifishrmn's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,076
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

This is a numbers matching engine. Therefore I have decided not to replace the intake manifold--already has an high performance dual plenium aluminum intake; can't replace the 780 cfm holley carb; can't replace the heads--numbers matching, etc. Only changes on the interior can be made. Some say replace the solid lifters with rollers--do they sound the same??

Left with:
increase compression from 9:1 to 10-10.5:1
porting the cc
porting the exhuast
bore out enough to clean the cylinders so it could be rebuilt again in the future
go with a more aggresive solid lifter cam--already have a NOS cam 3972182 whose specs are 242/254 .459/.485 116 LSA
dyno the engine to maximize carb/timing etc.

Has anyone used any of the new thermal coatings that supposedly decrease thermal transfer, decrease friction and help oil shedding

Engine builders I have talked said should be able to get 400HP from these mods.

I appreciate all your input. It has really helped me decide to keep it original and only made internal changes.
Old 10-02-2016, 04:45 PM
  #31  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

Edit: sounds like yet another was talked into staying stock

Last edited by cv67; 10-02-2016 at 09:02 PM.
Old 10-03-2016, 12:05 PM
  #32  
bashcraft
Le Mans Master
 
bashcraft's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Butler Pa
Posts: 6,391
Received 109 Likes on 83 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wallifishrmn
Left with:
increase compression from 9:1 to 10-10.5:1
porting the cc
porting the exhuast
bore out enough to clean the cylinders so it could be rebuilt again in the future
go with a more aggresive solid lifter cam--already have a NOS cam 3972182 whose specs are 242/254 .459/.485 116 LSA
dyno the engine to maximize carb/timing etc.
Why is it OK to make all of these changes, but not use a 383 crankshaft?

So far I haven't read one logical response as to why not. It's just a bunch of people talking out their ***.
Old 10-03-2016, 01:34 PM
  #33  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

why buy a car in the first place and keep it so you cant enjoy it cause of what some unknown may think
I really worry about what the next guy will think of when he winds up with my woman maybe one day.
Old 10-03-2016, 01:43 PM
  #34  
Dirty Dalton
Drifting
 
Dirty Dalton's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Persona Non Grata
Posts: 1,875
Received 776 Likes on 479 Posts
2022 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified

Default

Originally Posted by bashcraft
...

It's just a bunch of people talking out their ***.


You may not need to bore - Mine, with ~ 100K miles on it, maybe, I don't really know, bores are 4.002/4.003. None have more than .001 taper or more than .002 out of round. Back in the dark ages one could get pistons +.001. I don't know if they are still available.

This time around it just needs a hone and new rings (well along with all the other usual stuff).
Old 10-03-2016, 02:04 PM
  #35  
pauldana
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
pauldana's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 10,679
Received 396 Likes on 306 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
Edit: sounds like yet another was talked into staying stock
Originally Posted by bashcraft
Why is it OK to make all of these changes, but not use a 383 crankshaft?

So far I haven't read one logical response as to why not. It's just a bunch of people talking out their ***.


AGREE... stroke it... no reason other than money not to.
Old 10-04-2016, 06:35 PM
  #36  
Richard Daugird
Melting Slicks
 
Richard Daugird's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: Texas City, TX Texas
Posts: 3,143
Received 717 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

Can the skinny NCRS legal tires even handle a STOCK LT-1? Hell my L-48 blows the 255/60s off...



Quick Reply: Stroking a LT-1 Motor during Rebuild-YES OR NO



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 AM.