Go Back   Corvette Forum > C4 Corvettes, 1984 - 1996 > C4 General Discussion
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ Vendor Directory
Search
C4 General Discussion
General C4 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech

Welcome to Corvetteforum.com!
Welcome to Corvetteforum.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Corvetteforum.com today!


Corvette Store
 
 
C7 Parts & Accessories
C6 Parts & Accessories
C5 Parts & Accessories
C4 Parts & Accessories
C3 Parts & Accessories
C2 Parts & Accessories
C1 Parts & Accessories
Wheels & Tires
Sponsored Ads
 
 
Vendor Directory
  
Closed Thread
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-30-2010, 09:10 PM   #21
Sic-Rod
CF Member
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDR View Post
GM can also be contacted by addressing your mail:
President Barack H. Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, D.C.
20050
Sic-Rod is offline  
Old 09-30-2010, 09:21 PM   #22
mike100
CF Senior Member
 
mike100's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: San Marcos CA
Default

The MR2 was so much better than the fiero. Fieros might have sold a little better if they didn't use the same 4 cylinder that USPS uses in their mail trucks (the iron duke).

you could trick people to come out at lunchtime to check their mail if you drove a 4 cyl fiero in front of the house, stopped, and then took off again.
mike100 is offline  
Old 09-30-2010, 09:47 PM   #23
CorvetteMike2004
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
CorvetteMike2004's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Default

And for the winning car.

Click the image to open in full size.
CorvetteMike2004 is offline  
Old 09-30-2010, 10:31 PM   #24
rudolph schenker
CF Senior Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
rudolph schenker's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Provo, Utah
Default

However, the Fiero did have nice seats!!!



Click the image to open in full size.

Click the image to open in full size.
rudolph schenker is offline  
Old 09-30-2010, 10:45 PM   #25
KARR
CF Senior Member
 
KARR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PLRX View Post
WTF is it with some people this week. Is it bring back 80s car week?

The Fiero, the SVO, 83 CFI. You trolls are something else...

If you got a beef with a corporation make a formal complaint. Are you saying that today, the Pontiac G8 is detuned because it is faster than the Z06? GTFOOH

Here is the GM mailing address, make a point letter and mail it to them

GM
P.O. Box 33170
Detroit, MI 48232-5170

Let me guess, by 10:00PM a new thread about 80s BS would come up. You noobs, trolls and others live with it, there is no 83 CFI and the C5 is better than C4s.
Great post PLRX!
KARR is offline  
Old 09-30-2010, 10:49 PM   #26
KARR
CF Senior Member
 
KARR's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dukeallen View Post
I had a 2.8 in an 85 Camaro, and got a turn behind the wheel of a Fiero GT with one. Both nice cars, reasonably quick, but no way in heck would that motor be truly fast in any car that wasn't falling off a cliff. You must have gotten hold of some good chit to buy that story.
I used to have a 1987 Cavalier Z24 with that 2.8L and that was rated 0-60 in 7.8 seconds and with the speed limiter, you were topped out at 116.
KARR is offline  
Old 09-30-2010, 11:10 PM   #27
Robs 1988
Junior Member
 
Robs 1988's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Default

The 2.8 was a wheezer in any form, carb, tbi, or mpfi.
That's all there is to it.
Robs 1988 is offline  
Old 09-30-2010, 11:12 PM   #28
Aurora40
CF Senior Member
 
Aurora40's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: The Old Dominion
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KARR View Post
I used to have a 1987 Cavalier Z24 with that 2.8L and that was rated 0-60 in 7.8 seconds and with the speed limiter, you were topped out at 116.
That was part of the conspiracy. So that you wouldn't know the 2.8L was detuned in the Fiero, they detuned it in every car thereafter as well. So while you think the 2.8L was never rated at more than about 135hp, the reality is made 637hp when not detuned. GM still hasn't come clean about it because it would be faster than the new ZR1.

They also went all "Mission Impossible" and made sure the engines would self-destruct after use, thereby disposing of all the evidence.
Aurora40 is offline  
Old 09-30-2010, 11:35 PM   #29
astepup
CF Senior Member
 
astepup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Schaller Iowa
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by socalman View Post
Mundo is becoming the Corvette Official Conspiracy King of C4 Gen.

oh, and please don't attempt to use the acronym for this.
socal....I laughed so hard at that I damn near passed out. That's got to be one of the best replies to a troll I've ever seen. Keep up the great work

astepup said that
astepup is offline  
Old 09-30-2010, 11:35 PM
 
Go Back   Corvette Forum > C4 Corvettes, 1984 - 1996 > C4 General Discussion
Reload this Page GM detuned the V6 Pontiac Fiero because it was faster than TPI Corvette
 
 
 
Closed Thread

Tags
060, 28l, beats, c5, camaro, conspiracy, corvette, faster, fiero, g8, gm, make, pontiac, sale, v6


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Click for Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Emails & Password Backup