What inspections/tests would reflect actual mileage?
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What inspections/tests would reflect actual mileage?
What mechanical inspection or tests could you perform to give you the most accurate representation of the true mileage to assure the odometer is showing actual mileage?
#2
#4
For a '95 have the CCM (NOT PCM/ECM) scanned for VIN and mileage. If the VIN matches the door decal/windshield then it should be safe to assume it's likely correct. It's a massive undertaking to alter both of those values in the CCM. Can it be done? Certainly, but it's not something just anyone can accomplish and it wouldn't be inexpensive either.
If the VIN isn't a match the mileage is from the VIN that is displayed from the time it was replaced + the additional miles it was driven. Have a CARFAX or similar check done on the second VIN.
If the VIN isn't a match the mileage is from the VIN that is displayed from the time it was replaced + the additional miles it was driven. Have a CARFAX or similar check done on the second VIN.
Last edited by WVZR-1; 08-03-2015 at 06:09 PM.
#6
Most higher end scanners can do it. Some of the lesser? I really don't know and the '95 I believe requires a unique adapter as it's an OBD1 car but the ALDL I believe is an OBD2 style. It shouldn't be a difficult find.
Is there some reason to suspect it's altered or incorrect? The FEDERAL data base has been subscribed to by nearly all of the states for several years so it seems there should be several mileage trails. Some states do inquiries before issuing a new title, some supply the information only but don't check and I was told that that the states that are shown to be 'in developement' are actually closer to compliance than not.
http://www.vehiclehistory.gov/nmvtis_states.html
Is there some reason to suspect it's altered or incorrect? The FEDERAL data base has been subscribed to by nearly all of the states for several years so it seems there should be several mileage trails. Some states do inquiries before issuing a new title, some supply the information only but don't check and I was told that that the states that are shown to be 'in developement' are actually closer to compliance than not.
http://www.vehiclehistory.gov/nmvtis_states.html
Last edited by WVZR-1; 08-03-2015 at 09:10 PM.
#7
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've run Carfax and the fed. VIN search, all come back "clean."
The first thing that makes me suspicious is the Carfax report. Carfax report shows mileage when first purchased (531), 4 years later (16,875) then 12 years later when 2nd owner purchased the car (35,541). Through the fed. VIN search I found mileage reports that matched Carfax plus mileage reported in the cars 5th year (20,599). Here's the thing that first caught my attention. Carfax lists "Owner 1, 1994-2011 Est. miles/year: 5,019." Friday, I sent a request to Carfax for an explanation on how they determined 5,019 miles per year with 2nd owner mileage listed to negate it and an absence of continuous listing of mileage to support it.
Also, the 2nd owner had repairs done at 36,000 miles that included water pump and intake gasket replacement. The visual appearance of the car doesn't give me definitive clues to the mileage but I would believe it if someone said it was a higher mileage car.
From what I understand if the instrument cluster or CCM was replaced that would change the displayed mileage. There is no record of either of these occurring. Also, there is no key fob for the vehicle. That could be related to a CCM replacement. All this led me to come to the forum to get information on what I could look at on the car to determine actual mileage.
The first thing that makes me suspicious is the Carfax report. Carfax report shows mileage when first purchased (531), 4 years later (16,875) then 12 years later when 2nd owner purchased the car (35,541). Through the fed. VIN search I found mileage reports that matched Carfax plus mileage reported in the cars 5th year (20,599). Here's the thing that first caught my attention. Carfax lists "Owner 1, 1994-2011 Est. miles/year: 5,019." Friday, I sent a request to Carfax for an explanation on how they determined 5,019 miles per year with 2nd owner mileage listed to negate it and an absence of continuous listing of mileage to support it.
Also, the 2nd owner had repairs done at 36,000 miles that included water pump and intake gasket replacement. The visual appearance of the car doesn't give me definitive clues to the mileage but I would believe it if someone said it was a higher mileage car.
From what I understand if the instrument cluster or CCM was replaced that would change the displayed mileage. There is no record of either of these occurring. Also, there is no key fob for the vehicle. That could be related to a CCM replacement. All this led me to come to the forum to get information on what I could look at on the car to determine actual mileage.
#8
How many miles does it show on it?
#9
Race Director
The key fob and cluster have nothing to do with with the mileage. As said above, the CCM (also known as Body Control Module) is the only residence of the mileage. It also controls the vats. The main reason CCM's were changed in the past were to troubleshoot vats problems, and the new CCM may or may have been adjusted to reflect true mileage.Carfax and mileage reports were often very inaccurate up until the past 10 years and still can be. Its impossible to ascertain true mileage by anything but documentation, especially after 10 or so years. I've seen 200k cars that look like 50k mile cars and I've seen 50k mile cars that you would swear had 200k on them. Some states have laws about mileage on their own, but most defer to the Federal 10 year law. That is why some states put exempt for mileage after 10 years. Even if you could prove the mileage had been changed, you would have to prove who did it , and they did it with the intent to deceive YOU. It would be a civil matter. Most people who buy older cars with low mileage find out that further from making the car more reliable, the un-use has caused many more problems. From what you've said, it sounds like you've become unhappy with the car. Since it is more than likely that there is nothing you can do, you probably should resolve to sell the car (you are not required to disclose things you can't prove and that are more than likely untrue from the information you have provided) or just enjoy the car. Good luck.
Last edited by zr1fred; 08-04-2015 at 10:25 AM.
#10
Team Owner
Pro Mechanic
The key fob and cluster have nothing to do with with the mileage. As said above, the CCM (also known as Body Control Module) is the only residence of the mileage. It also controls the vats. The main reason CCM's were changed in the past were to troubleshoot vats problems, and the new CCM may or may have been adjusted to reflect true mileage.
To determine the "actual mileage" you really need to look at ALL the clues and information and see what passes the "gut-check test".
Last edited by Tom400CFI; 08-04-2015 at 11:08 AM.
#13
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got a reply from Carfax.
"...Due to the fact that CARFAX can only report what has been supplied to us by our sources, we do not have any additional information other than what is listed on the report. It does appear that there are many records with missing odometer reading as well as only 2 readings under the 1st owner to average out. This may be why the estimated mileage per year seems off."
I replied..."I guess I'm surprised your organization would report something based on a subjective interpretation/est guess. I would think you'd only list facts. I also pulled a report from "CheckThatVin." It cost me $4 and had more information than the Carfax report."
"...Due to the fact that CARFAX can only report what has been supplied to us by our sources, we do not have any additional information other than what is listed on the report. It does appear that there are many records with missing odometer reading as well as only 2 readings under the 1st owner to average out. This may be why the estimated mileage per year seems off."
I replied..."I guess I'm surprised your organization would report something based on a subjective interpretation/est guess. I would think you'd only list facts. I also pulled a report from "CheckThatVin." It cost me $4 and had more information than the Carfax report."