2016 Camaro SS vs C4 / C4 ZR-1
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
2016 Camaro SS vs C4 / C4 ZR-1
The new 2016 Camaro SS ... What you guys think? Comparing this new Camaro to the C4 or C4 ZR-1?
Last edited by C4.Ray; 01-11-2016 at 03:09 AM.
#3
I wonder what the power to weight ratio is for the C4 ZR1 vs 2016 SS Camaro.
The ZR1 gives up 45 hp (405hp) to the SS (450hp) but the SS although it lost 175 lbs is still around 3700lbs!
The ZR1 is about 3400 to 3500?
It would be a close race.
The ZR1 gives up 45 hp (405hp) to the SS (450hp) but the SS although it lost 175 lbs is still around 3700lbs!
The ZR1 is about 3400 to 3500?
It would be a close race.
#4
Melting Slicks
SS weighs 3600lb, and quite a few are running 11s at the drag strip. I'm not sure it'd be much of a race.
#5
Race Director
All things being equal, it would be a drivers race. Of course, they wouldn't be. Like most of these races between new and classic cars, the classic cars have older parts (tires, etc) and its nearly impossible to find an owner who will subject his car to the strain of an all out launch and race. That said, there are still a few ZR-1 owners who do race them.
#6
Pro
in a drag race, it sure will, but add corning into the mix and the C4 can hold it's own verse a new Camaro. Here's me in my '92 LT1/auto trans Vette racing a 2010 Camaro with a LS3 and 6-speed manual. The LS3 had a hot cam, cat-back exhaust, and a matching tune. Owner/driver, who has 15 years professional driving experience, says the Camaro has around 400 hp. I am completely stock. He ate me up in the straightaways, but I was faster in the corners(keep in mind, I just started racing and just bought my first Vette in Oct 2014). This is the Camaro's owner/driver- http://www.luvracin.com/03_z_Va/Virg...43_harris.html
Me being in the outside lane, I should have gotten a 1 length stagger, which would have put us side by side at the finish.
Me being in the outside lane, I should have gotten a 1 length stagger, which would have put us side by side at the finish.
Last edited by 1stVetteFinally; 01-11-2016 at 10:24 AM.
The following users liked this post:
ch@0s (01-15-2016)
#7
Le Mans Master
That looked like a cool race..a draqg race with two corners. Never saw that b4. As to the posting..I am sure the new car will outrun out c-4 4s. But, But, ride in one for a year or two, and they will look like any other camero and thee are lots and lots of them on the road now. Like mustangs, I call the "me too" cars. Someone says " hey I had a camero like that and someone else always says, yes me too .
#8
Pro
Member Since: Aug 2015
Location: Jackson Wisconsin
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes
on
70 Posts
It drives me nuts when folks compare sedans or coupes to sports cars. Sure the right mustang is faster than a similar Corvette, but its not a Corvette. I love how the last issue of Car and Driver (no affiliation) compares a Stang Gt with a C7 and gives the trophy to the Stang based on "better shifter". Gimme a break. I'm surprised they didni't factor in the cup slots. One thing Corvettes have in common is that they are all true sports cars. There are no compromises. A mustang can be a economy grocery getter or a race track fugitive, but it is still a Stang. No comparison. I'm going to say the same thing for the Camaro. No comparison.
The following users liked this post:
ch@0s (01-15-2016)
#9
Pro
#10
Burning Brakes
I seen many new SSs run low 12s stock. They will murder any stock C4 in a drag race. Much improved over the undergeared over weight 5th gen for sure
#11
Team Owner
Member Since: Aug 2005
Location: Riverside County Southern California
Posts: 34,988
Received 501 Likes
on
342 Posts
Co-winner 2020 C4 of the Year - Modified
2018 Corvette of Year Finalist
2017 C4 of Year
2016 C7 of Year Finalist
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-'19-'20
Some nOObs in here want to believe there is a slightly chance for a 30-20 year old underpowered Corvette to beat a brand new Camaro with the new LT1 engine.
Let me go back to 1998 when the Camaro came out with the LS1, and that Camaro 18 years ago was faster. I got beaten three times back-to-back by one on my 1992 LT1 Vert.
The new Camaro is a great looking car, it's comfortable, easy to work on, and great body lines. Few days ago I saw one at the dealer, and I gave it a throughout inspection. The interiors are comfortable, the instrumentation is user friendly and the powerplant is above all else. I consider this Camaro to be a great evolution on the Camaro line, and it would make a great daily driver.
Now... It has Corvette tail lights.
Let me go back to 1998 when the Camaro came out with the LS1, and that Camaro 18 years ago was faster. I got beaten three times back-to-back by one on my 1992 LT1 Vert.
The new Camaro is a great looking car, it's comfortable, easy to work on, and great body lines. Few days ago I saw one at the dealer, and I gave it a throughout inspection. The interiors are comfortable, the instrumentation is user friendly and the powerplant is above all else. I consider this Camaro to be a great evolution on the Camaro line, and it would make a great daily driver.
Now... It has Corvette tail lights.
Last edited by PLRX; 01-11-2016 at 01:27 PM.
#12
Instructor
Yep, the new camaro is a nice looking and high performance coupe, and may be faster and better in every way to a 30-20 (?) year old C4.
At 4 to 6 times the cost. And if you're under 25 and lucky enough to own one, insurance ain't gonna be cheap.
The numbers aren't the be all end all of car ownership. I, among other C4 owners I imagine, aren't C4 owners because it's the fastest or the newest. I own it because I wanted that one. For someone to boast about a brand new car being better in every way to a 25 year old car is kind of asinine.
This nOOb prefers his Vette. Why? Because, well, ...it's a Vette!
At 4 to 6 times the cost. And if you're under 25 and lucky enough to own one, insurance ain't gonna be cheap.
The numbers aren't the be all end all of car ownership. I, among other C4 owners I imagine, aren't C4 owners because it's the fastest or the newest. I own it because I wanted that one. For someone to boast about a brand new car being better in every way to a 25 year old car is kind of asinine.
This nOOb prefers his Vette. Why? Because, well, ...it's a Vette!
#13
None of the new cars are my thing. EXCEPT Viper.
Plenty of c4's here will tromp on that Camaro, and blow it away in personality too. There is no connection with new cars.
Stock for stock Camaro. ZR1 with gears would be a great race.
Plenty of c4's here will tromp on that Camaro, and blow it away in personality too. There is no connection with new cars.
Stock for stock Camaro. ZR1 with gears would be a great race.
Last edited by pologreen1; 01-11-2016 at 06:46 PM.
#14
Melting Slicks
Yes the 2016 Camaro LT1 will beat the C4 ZR1/LT5, assuming both are stock.
If I could afford a 2016 Camaro I would start making plans to get one this spring. With the LT1 and a manual transmission. In white, of course. They are very nice.
Your point about comparing muscle cars/sports coupes to sports cars is certainly valid. Nobody would argue that there aren't any differences between these cars. However, there are some obvious similarities. SBC, rear-wheel drive performance car, made in America by the same American manufacturer. And plenty more similarities I just can't think of right now. I also believe that the adjusted prices for a well-optioned C4 and a new Camaro SS are in the same ballpark, not counting the C4 ZR-1 of course. And keeping with the theme "it's not a Corvette," comparing a C4 to a C7 or even a c6, stock-for-stock, would be pointless. So we would have to compare the C4 to other 90's sports cars, which has already been done a thousand times.
Every new hot rod (2016 SS) provides a new opportunity to compare performance. These opportunities are quickly snatched up by enthusiast crowds (such as corvetteforum.com).
If I could afford a 2016 Camaro I would start making plans to get one this spring. With the LT1 and a manual transmission. In white, of course. They are very nice.
It drives me nuts when folks compare sedans or coupes to sports cars. Sure the right mustang is faster than a similar Corvette, but its not a Corvette. I love how the last issue of Car and Driver (no affiliation) compares a Stang GT with a C7 and gives the trophy to the Stang based on "better shifter". Gimme a break. I'm surprised they didn't factor in the cup slots. One thing Corvettes have in common is that they are all true sports cars. There are no compromises. A mustang can be a economy grocery getter or a race track fugitive, but it is still a Stang. No comparison. I'm going to say the same thing for the Camaro. No comparison.
Every new hot rod (2016 SS) provides a new opportunity to compare performance. These opportunities are quickly snatched up by enthusiast crowds (such as corvetteforum.com).
Last edited by DGXR; 01-12-2016 at 10:56 AM.
#15
2016 Camaro SS vs C4 / C4 ZR-1
I don't think I am a noob PLRX considering I used to race a third generation Camaro Z28 at the dragstrip in the late 80s and oh yeah I am 53 years of age. My Camaro use to beat most Grand Nationals, Mustangs and Eat IROC Z28s. With me and a cage my third gen was 3640 lbs. very heavy, but it had high HP. So power to weight rules in a drag race. The ZR1s were 405hp and 3400 or so lbs no driver so against an SS it might be a close race if the ZR1 is in great shape with new tires.
I also don't believe a STOCK 2016 SS Camaro will get in the 11s. 450hp and 3600 to 3700 lbs no driver does not add up to 11s.
By the way I do like the new Camaro SS very much (not a hater).
I also don't believe a STOCK 2016 SS Camaro will get in the 11s. 450hp and 3600 to 3700 lbs no driver does not add up to 11s.
By the way I do like the new Camaro SS very much (not a hater).
Last edited by grandspt; 01-11-2016 at 08:11 PM.
#16
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
This thread is not just about which Car is faster, it's more about comfort and driving and every day issues. Why is every comment about "My Vette is faster than yours". We all know the C4 is very comfortable to sit in and drive, but what about this new 6th gen SS? The 5th gen had Recaro seat options, I never sat in those, but I did test drive a 5th gen with stock seats and I was NOT impressed. Hard to see out the back, blind spots and seats were not very comfortable.
Has anyone sat in or test drove this new 2016 SS? Comments?
Has anyone sat in or test drove this new 2016 SS? Comments?
Last edited by C4.Ray; 01-11-2016 at 08:57 PM.
#17
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: munising MI USA
Posts: 5,761
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
45 Posts
I would say for a day to day driver the new Camaro blows the c4 away more then in a drag race. Its not only fast but it get better gas milage rides better is much more reliable and has many more creature comforts that were not around in the 90s and is ALOT more easy to get in and out of and has an actual trunk. I don't have to drive a 2016 ive drove a 2014 and all of this applys and the 2016 is just more of all of it. A c4 is a good car for what it is and what it costs. In its day it was king but cars have come A LONG WAYS since them and its kind of silly to try to compare a c4 to an new camero. Its about like trying to compare a F-15 to the new raptor. Bottom line is most of us here if honest will say we drive c4s because its tough to afford to spend more on a newer play toy. If I won that 1 billion plus lotto I really doubt if I would keep the old 92 vette around. Sure its got a raw feeling that's kind of cool but so does a ls6 chevelle or a L88 vette if I want something old to drive.
Last edited by Lloyd Smale; 01-12-2016 at 05:54 AM.
#19
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes
on
395 Posts
Some nOObs in here want to believe there is a slightly chance for a 30-20 year old underpowered Corvette to beat a brand new Camaro with the new LT1 engine.
Let me go back to 1998 when the Camaro came out with the LS1, and that Camaro 18 years ago was faster. I got beaten three times back-to-back by one on my 1992 LT1 Vert.
The new Camaro is a great looking car, it's comfortable, easy to work on, and great body lines. Few days ago I saw one at the dealer, and I gave it a throughout inspection. The interiors are comfortable, the instrumentation is user friendly and the powerplant is above all else. I consider this Camaro to be a great evolution on the Camaro line, and it would make a great daily driver.
Now... It has Corvette tail lights.
Let me go back to 1998 when the Camaro came out with the LS1, and that Camaro 18 years ago was faster. I got beaten three times back-to-back by one on my 1992 LT1 Vert.
The new Camaro is a great looking car, it's comfortable, easy to work on, and great body lines. Few days ago I saw one at the dealer, and I gave it a throughout inspection. The interiors are comfortable, the instrumentation is user friendly and the powerplant is above all else. I consider this Camaro to be a great evolution on the Camaro line, and it would make a great daily driver.
Now... It has Corvette tail lights.
#20
Pro
Some nOObs in here want to believe there is a slightly chance for a 30-20 year old underpowered Corvette to beat a brand new Camaro with the new LT1 engine.
Let me go back to 1998 when the Camaro came out with the LS1, and that Camaro 18 years ago was faster. I got beaten three times back-to-back by one on my 1992 LT1 Vert.
Let me go back to 1998 when the Camaro came out with the LS1, and that Camaro 18 years ago was faster. I got beaten three times back-to-back by one on my 1992 LT1 Vert.