C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

QA1's vs Koni Sport - who will win? (revisited)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2005, 09:36 PM
  #1  
tempest
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
tempest's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: walled lake MI
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default QA1's vs Koni Sport - who will win? (revisited)

yes, there have been a few threads on this before.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=768918
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=348230

i think a few people have installed them in the past year, and i'm looking to get a set (probably the QA1), so i figured i'd see if i can hear some "long term reports" from you all.

to summarize what i've learned from the past posts:

QA1
pros: lighter, adjustments are easily accessible, looks better (to some)
cons: dual-tube config more prone to foam/fade

Koni sport:
pros: monotube design, Koni knows shocks, period
cons: need to remove rear shock to adjust, heavier

the Koni's softest setting is harder than stock shocks, which could be a pro/con depending on who you ask.

since the only races i participate in are parking lot autocrosses, plus one that is a one-lapper around a road course, i figure the QA1's are the way to go. my car is also a daily, so the QA1's will also be able to be set to a stock-ish damping characteristic.

i guess if i could hear some input on the following i'd appreciate it:
- any QA1 failures or durability issues? (Koni failures???)
- fitment issues? (excluding the adjusters for the Koni's at rear)
- best vendors to get either of them?

i also have a more general adjustable damper question - do these two adjust damping for bounce, rebound, or both?

(DISCLAIMER: any resemblance of this thread title to any other thread, living or dead, is purely coincidental. )
Old 02-02-2005, 11:44 PM
  #2  
mothersworry
Pro
 
mothersworry's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: Lake Lure NC
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Old 02-02-2005, 11:53 PM
  #3  
65Z01
Team Owner
 
65Z01's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2000
Location: SE NY
Posts: 90,675
Likes: 0
Received 300 Likes on 274 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default

I have Koni on the rear of my IROC and would not do it again, as I have to remove the shock to adjust firmness...what a PITA.
Old 02-02-2005, 11:55 PM
  #4  
USAsOnlyWay
Le Mans Master
 
USAsOnlyWay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area WA
Posts: 5,270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by tempest
QA1
pros: lighter, adjustments are easily accessible, looks better (to some)
cons: dual-tube config more prone to foam/fade
I have a question for you, what do you mean, "more pront to foam/fade"?

Let's hear it guys I want to know the same info he does!
Old 02-03-2005, 02:40 AM
  #5  
JrRifleCoach
Team Owner

 
JrRifleCoach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
Posts: 20,161
Received 640 Likes on 444 Posts
St. Jude '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-‘19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24


Default

I spent a day in the shop at Koni when they were located in Virginia. Got the grand tour and lots of good info on shocks and of course why Konis are the best. Of specific note is the method of applying the "gas" to the oil resevoir. Some mfgrs put a plastic bag of nitrogen into the oil chamber to keep the oil from foaming. Others like Koni put a gas charge into the chamber to act directly on the top of the oil. So the piston rod seal becomes the weak link in the longevity of the shocks life. A Koni seal holds back oil and gas. Throw a bag of gas in there and a cheaper seal can be used.

Which is the better shock? Both have their good points; QA's are externally adjustable, if your racing and need the convienience.

Which is less or more likely to foam? The Koni's based on the design will be less likely. If your racing you can build up enough heat to fade shocks.

The question you need to ask yourself is what kind of driving are you going to be doing?
Spirited street? Not likely to overheat a shock.
AutoCrossing? Need the adjustability.

-JRC-
Old 02-03-2005, 03:44 AM
  #6  
USAsOnlyWay
Le Mans Master
 
USAsOnlyWay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area WA
Posts: 5,270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thanks for the clarification JRC.
From what I had read quickly, it seemed that the foam/fade was a product of heat/continual use...aka road racing. I wasn't sure though.

So it seems, if you want to auto-x/street/drag. With an emphasis on street, QA1s are up your alley.
If you are going to do road racing, its a hard slant towards Koni's.

So now it is back to the original questions:
- any QA1 failures or durability issues? (Koni failures???)
- fitment issues? (excluding the adjusters for the Koni's at rear)
- best vendors to get either of them?

i also have a more general adjustable damper question - do these two adjust damping for bounce, rebound, or both?
As for the vendor one, the best price I have seen post shipping is Summit.
I am EXTREMELY interested in hearing the durability/rebuild rates for QA1s. I don't want to drop ~700 on shocks only to have to do it again 2 years later!!!
Old 02-03-2005, 09:12 AM
  #7  
RAFTRACER
Melting Slicks
 
RAFTRACER's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: cincinnati ohio
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Koni sports, rebound adjustable only. QA1's rebound and compression adjustable , but not independantly(one turn of the **** does both). Don't know much about QA1's , But I have Koni's and they ROCK !!! I believe you can get independantly adjustable "doubles" from each company though, for added cost. At least from Koni you can.
Old 02-03-2005, 09:41 AM
  #8  
VR'92
Team Owner
 
VR'92's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: I'm the walkin dude I can see all of the world...
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
St. Jude Donor '03

Default

Which one is cheaper?
Old 02-03-2005, 09:53 AM
  #9  
Solofast
Melting Slicks
 
Solofast's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Indy IN
Posts: 3,003
Received 85 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

The Koni's were developed specifically for autocrossing on a C4. I did the development driving for the ones on the 17 inch cars and we tested three different sets of shocks until we got it right. Roger Johnson developed the 16 inch wheel size. On a C4 you will end up near full soft on the rears and in the middle of the range in the fronts. You will be able to dial in the car using just the fronts. If you are getting push, soften them a bit or if you are loose tighten them up. I takes only a few seconds and is regularly done between runs. If you run out of rope on the fronts you can make rear adjustments but obvioulsy that takes longer. I have heard of some folks drilling a hole in the body above the rear shock hole and then they are able to adjust the rears quickly. I never did that but some people have and it seems to work for them.....

I drove the Koni's on the street for years, just run the fronts to full soft and they will be very comfortable. These shocks were developed around the z51, z07 suspension package for the 89-95 cars. Mark Presley and (as far as I know Matt Braun) are all using these shocks. I tested with Mark in April of last year and the car worked just fine on the Koni's (witness his second place finish in Topeka).

Koni's have low internal friction, that makes it less harsh, and actually improves the handling. Some other shocks (notably Bilsteins) use cast iron piston rings, which last well, but have a lot of "stiction" which makes them very harsh over small impacts and makes them uncomfortable on the street.

The Koni's will last for years and years. The set that I sold to Mark Presley were over 10 years old and had a couple of hundred thousand of street miles on them and they dyno'd about the same as new after all that abuse...
Old 02-03-2005, 10:20 AM
  #10  
BrianCunningham
Team Owner
 
BrianCunningham's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Posts: 30,607
Received 239 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

I've got the QA1's and I love them.

I do a variety of racing, autocross, road, drag, and it's also my daily driver, w/o thier adjustability it would be a lot harder.

They are both easy to adjust, and the range is large. 0 is basically OFF, where 12 is buckboard stiff.
Old 02-03-2005, 10:26 AM
  #11  
loiq
Team Owner
 
loiq's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: On a Wisconsin Death Trip
Posts: 21,510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by USAsOnlyWay
I have a question for you, what do you mean, "more pront to foam/fade"?

Let's hear it guys I want to know the same info he does!
With a twin tube shock design the oil and gas are separated usually by a bag - the gas is held in the outer tube of the shock and the main tube is filled with oil. The damping takes place when the shock piston travels through the oil and how the piston is set up determines the rates, but the gas bag in the outer tube also absorbs some shock. These shocks are not pressurized.

There are two types of monotube designs, emulsion and internal floating piston (I don't know which one the Koni's are) also called a deCarbon shock (named after it's designer). With an emulsion shock the gas and oil mix together in the shock body and "foaming" is actually a part of the design - these shocks don't work until the piston gets worked and the gas/oil combo mixes together. These shocks used to be the standard on most dirt bikes.

In the IFP shock the gas and oil are separated by an internal floating piston. These are perhaps the "best" shocks and are what high-end race cars rely on (off-road trucks, indy cars, etc.). The gas inside them is pressurized (nitrogen).

As for how fast each fade - the twin-tube will almost always fade faster. If you tried to ride a dirt bike with twin tube shocks it wouldn't last long. The rear shocks on most dirt bikes are IFP reservoir designs.

I'm no expert on shocks, but I know a little (just enough to be dangerous). Do an internet seach for shock designs and you will learn a lot.
Old 02-03-2005, 04:13 PM
  #12  
JrRifleCoach
Team Owner

 
JrRifleCoach's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
Posts: 20,161
Received 640 Likes on 444 Posts
St. Jude '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15-'16-'17-'18-‘19-'20-'21-'22-'23-'24


Default

Originally Posted by BrianCunningham
I've got the QA1's and I love them. I do a variety of racing, autocross, road, drag, and it's also my daily driver, w/o thier adjustability it would be a lot harder.They are both easy to adjust, and the range is large. 0 is basically OFF, where 12 is buckboard stiff.
This is where the "best shock" conversation takes on a more subjective direction. What does the driver like? QA-1's are fabulous shocks. LOTS of valving combinations to choose from and rebuildable. There is a dealer in the Sacramento area (factory I think) that does this work. However, QA-1's cost more than Koni's. Roughly 150 per corner. Koni red's are 100 and the yellow sports are 130 give or take some.

So generally speaking, what do you want to do with your Vette? Race? Auto-X? Cruise? Daily driver? Park it? How much do you want to spend? (Actually this is a soft topic for me since many people will spend $2000 on tires and wheels and get all cheapo and buy kyb's )

I bought Koni Red's because I want the best street/spirited driving performance and not go broke doing so. When the time comes to get serious on the track, then I'll spring for QA-1's. No question in my mind......

Last edited by JrRifleCoach; 02-03-2005 at 04:15 PM.
Old 02-03-2005, 05:29 PM
  #13  
LD85
Race Director
 
LD85's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 12,771
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

What addittional cost is there besides the shocks?

Do they both or either or neither require welding to clear the frame, (I read that somewhere) or do neither? I have an 85 and would love to do this mod.

TIA
Old 02-03-2005, 06:07 PM
  #14  
tempest
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
tempest's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2001
Location: walled lake MI
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks for all the input.

i'm along JRC's line of thought regarding the "what is the best shock" question. after worrying this thread will just become a "mine's better" thread, i'm very happy to see all of the objective comments.

i'm leaning toward saving my pennies for the QA1's since i have two very different main uses for the Corvette (autox & daily driving).

off on a slight tangent, i will be getting poly bushings before i get the shocks. no sense in investing in suspension components unless the pivot points are any good....

LD85, shock swaps are quite simple for the two i am looking at - just swap em. i read one of the mounts on the QA1's is narrower than stock so a washer or spacer needs to be used - no biggie.
Old 02-03-2005, 06:13 PM
  #15  
rocco16
Race Director

 
rocco16's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: SCMR Rat Pack'r Charter Member..Great Bend KS
Posts: 13,243
Received 176 Likes on 129 Posts

Default

No experience with QA's but the KONI Sports (yellow) on my '96 have given me no problems whatsoever and the installation was a breeze.
I've heard that installing the QA's can be problematic.

Larry
code5coupe
Old 02-03-2005, 06:37 PM
  #16  
USAsOnlyWay
Le Mans Master
 
USAsOnlyWay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area WA
Posts: 5,270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The adjustability is what I really want. Which is why I personally am leaning towards QA1s, mind you if Koni Yellows are actually 130$ (can you list a source), QA1s are only 5$ more through summit. So that is a wash.

My big questions personally are.

How long do they last?
How much to rebuild?
Old 02-03-2005, 06:40 PM
  #17  
froggy47
Race Director
 
froggy47's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 10,851
Received 194 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

I've had QA's for about a year & love 'em. Lighter, ez adjust, soft (well not that soft) for street & hard as you want for autox. No failures, you can (supposedly) rebuilt yourself. I paid about $125 per corner so IMHO price is not really a factor.

I had a new set of Koni's & QA's on my garage floor & could have gone with either. I just could not deal with having to REMOVE the rears if I wanted to try an adjustment.

They are double adjust with one **** so you do not adjust bump & rebound separate.

My only gripe is that the Koni's have a Vette specific package, with the QA's I had to fab the front bump stop (Koni's are built in) but it was easy to do. Also I did not like the fit of the grommets so I used new stock ones from Superior for a better fit. You could use your stock ones over & also use the Bilstein (if that's what you have) bump stop on the QA. It slips over the rod & just floats.

I would do QA's again if I got a new C4.

Get notified of new replies

To QA1's vs Koni Sport - who will win? (revisited)

Old 02-03-2005, 06:50 PM
  #18  
USAsOnlyWay
Le Mans Master
 
USAsOnlyWay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area WA
Posts: 5,270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by froggy47
I paid about $125 per corner so IMHO price is not really a factor.
May I inquire where at?
Old 02-03-2005, 06:55 PM
  #19  
LD85
Race Director
 
LD85's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 12,771
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by USAsOnlyWay
May I inquire where at?
Part numbers Please
Old 02-03-2005, 07:16 PM
  #20  
USAsOnlyWay
Le Mans Master
 
USAsOnlyWay's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle Area WA
Posts: 5,270
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

These are from summit,
front: HAL-TC3014P
rear: HAL-TC3024P

140$ apiece


Quick Reply: QA1's vs Koni Sport - who will win? (revisited)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:33 AM.