Hotcam + 1.7 rockers + LT4 springs
#1
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Member Since: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hotcam + 1.7 rockers + LT4 springs
Can the Lt4 springs handle the hotcam and 1.7 rockers?
Or should I just pony up the $$ and get the comp 918 springs?
If there isn't a need to spend the $$ I will go with the Lt4 spring if it has been shown to hold up. My car will be a non ported head, cam, header and 4.10 gear weekend driver so I won't be abusing the springs on a drag strip or banging it off the limiter ever.
Thoughts?
Or should I just pony up the $$ and get the comp 918 springs?
If there isn't a need to spend the $$ I will go with the Lt4 spring if it has been shown to hold up. My car will be a non ported head, cam, header and 4.10 gear weekend driver so I won't be abusing the springs on a drag strip or banging it off the limiter ever.
Thoughts?
#3
Can the Lt4 springs handle the hotcam and 1.7 rockers?
Or should I just pony up the $$ and get the comp 918 springs?
If there isn't a need to spend the $$ I will go with the Lt4 spring if it has been shown to hold up. My car will be a non ported head, cam, header and 4.10 gear weekend driver so I won't be abusing the springs on a drag strip or banging it off the limiter ever.
Thoughts?
Or should I just pony up the $$ and get the comp 918 springs?
If there isn't a need to spend the $$ I will go with the Lt4 spring if it has been shown to hold up. My car will be a non ported head, cam, header and 4.10 gear weekend driver so I won't be abusing the springs on a drag strip or banging it off the limiter ever.
Thoughts?
My thoughts are 1.7 rockers aren't going to yield one more horsepower without doing the heads and exhaust. I have the 1.6 roller rockers that came with the hotcam and the power curve moved up about 800rpms. The LT4 springs are tight(.060)! Don't do it.
Now I am finding out that guys with bigger cams and 1.7 rockers are slower than my hotcammed car. Why, because once you exceed the flow of your heads, any additional valve lift or cam gonna hurt your torque like crazy. Go to the track and talk to the talking heads...
#4
Burning Brakes
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Warren Ohio
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
How many people on this forum know that head flow at certain lifts DIRECTLY correspond to the cam lift you choose.
Here's an example: If you have a head that flows 465 cfm at .500 lift and then flows 300 cfm at .550 lift try to figure out what would be your optimum cam lift would be after the rocker arm ratio is figured out.
Can you figure it out? Can you see the daylight at the end of the chunnel?
Here's an example: If you have a head that flows 465 cfm at .500 lift and then flows 300 cfm at .550 lift try to figure out what would be your optimum cam lift would be after the rocker arm ratio is figured out.
Can you figure it out? Can you see the daylight at the end of the chunnel?
#6
Melting Slicks
How many people on this forum know that head flow at certain lifts DIRECTLY correspond to the cam lift you choose.
Here's an example: If you have a head that flows 465 cfm at .500 lift and then flows 300 cfm at .550 lift try to figure out what would be your optimum cam lift would be after the rocker arm ratio is figured out.
Can you figure it out? Can you see the daylight at the end of the chunnel?
Here's an example: If you have a head that flows 465 cfm at .500 lift and then flows 300 cfm at .550 lift try to figure out what would be your optimum cam lift would be after the rocker arm ratio is figured out.
Can you figure it out? Can you see the daylight at the end of the chunnel?
And you have to consider that the max lift is achieved only ONE time during the valve opening and for only 1/1000..0 of second.
ALL the time (In crankshaft degree) before the max lift and after the max lift should be considered .
I think that a head that flows better at .550" lift should be feef with a cam with at least .570" max lift even if the head has a little decrease in flow at .600" figure.
-Beppe-
#8
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
Member Since: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.
My thoughts are 1.7 rockers aren't going to yield one more horsepower without doing the heads and exhaust. I have the 1.6 roller rockers that came with the hotcam and the power curve moved up about 800rpms. The LT4 springs are tight(.060)! Don't do it.
Now I am finding out that guys with bigger cams and 1.7 rockers are slower than my hotcammed car. Why, because once you exceed the flow of your heads, any additional valve lift or cam gonna hurt your torque like crazy. Go to the track and talk to the talking heads...
My thoughts are 1.7 rockers aren't going to yield one more horsepower without doing the heads and exhaust. I have the 1.6 roller rockers that came with the hotcam and the power curve moved up about 800rpms. The LT4 springs are tight(.060)! Don't do it.
Now I am finding out that guys with bigger cams and 1.7 rockers are slower than my hotcammed car. Why, because once you exceed the flow of your heads, any additional valve lift or cam gonna hurt your torque like crazy. Go to the track and talk to the talking heads...
I agree on your points for the 1.7 vs. 1.6 when it comes to power with the stock heads. This mod is kind of a stop gap for the summer as I already have the 1.7 rockers. Long term plan is to do the cam now before the summer and then do the heads next winter. Just built a house and have been putting major $$ into patio, fencing, etc and I wanted to defray the cost some. The car already has TPIS long tubes, no cats,corsa exhaust and 4.10 gears along with a tune that will have to be redone when the cam is swapped
I do have "some" knowledge of engine building as I did all of my own work on my 01 z06 that was a 430rwhp car. Just wasn't sure what the LT4 spring was rated on the lift side.
Thansk for the responses