C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

How about this valve trane noise? Would you call it normal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2010, 11:38 PM
  #41  
GREGGPENN
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
GREGGPENN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Overland Park Kansas
Posts: 12,012
Received 394 Likes on 323 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by korvette4u
ok. .040" cold? the spec on #155 binding occcurs at .520, that makes .024" too much lift: Nominal Open Pressure & Height should not be exceded.. spec i found are here: check spring specs here,,,BTW just trying to help up to you now..
You must not know what quench is. To be honest, I shouldn't have entered that (irrelevant) spec here.

IIRC, the AFR spring upgrade package is "good" to .600" lift.

Last edited by GREGGPENN; 12-09-2010 at 11:41 PM.
Old 12-10-2010, 04:43 AM
  #42  
korvette4u
Drifting
 
korvette4u's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: CALGARY ab
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GREGGPENN
You must not know what quench is. To be honest, I shouldn't have entered that (irrelevant) spec here.

IIRC, the AFR spring upgrade package is "good" to .600" lift.
ooohhh ahhhhh gigle,,wow---greeg you should have bought the patriot 220's no upgrade needed.. but of course, you knew that!!


so tell us why do you have valve train noise problem? good luck

irrelevant spec are as :they have c-5 and c-6 now no retro fits needed.. these work right out the show room

Last edited by korvette4u; 12-10-2010 at 04:46 AM. Reason: the end
Old 12-10-2010, 08:16 AM
  #43  
GREGGPENN
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
GREGGPENN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Overland Park Kansas
Posts: 12,012
Received 394 Likes on 323 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019

Default

Patriot's and C5's....interesting attempt at a reply.

Isn't this where I should say: "Well there's another country heard from!"




BTW: In case you THINK you figured out something I don't know, look at AFR's spring page here. I'm running their 8019 set that's good to .650" lift.

Last edited by GREGGPENN; 12-10-2010 at 08:33 AM. Reason: Added BTW with link
Old 12-10-2010, 11:40 PM
  #44  
korvette4u
Drifting
 
korvette4u's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2003
Location: CALGARY ab
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GREGGPENN
Patriot's and C5's....interesting attempt at a reply.

Isn't this where I should say: "Well there's another country heard from!"




BTW: In case you THINK you figured out something I don't know, look at AFR's spring page here. I'm running their 8019 set that's good to .650" lift.

thats nice ..i'm so impressed..truly YOU see that i CARE!!!

Last edited by korvette4u; 12-11-2010 at 12:21 AM.
Old 12-11-2010, 12:14 AM
  #45  
coupeguy2001
Le Mans Master
 
coupeguy2001's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 6,043
Received 144 Likes on 106 Posts
2021 C4 of the Year - Modified Finalist

Default

Is it possible that your retainers are hitting the underside of the rockers on the OD of the retainers?
Old 12-12-2010, 12:49 PM
  #46  
DarkBlue88
Pro
 
DarkBlue88's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC, behind someone going 10 under the speed limit
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Greg here's a vid of my homebuilt EFI setup and top end changes, before tune. It has AFR/TPiS heads and a 228/228 flat tappet cam with Comp Ultra Pro Magnums with .528 lift(1.6). It's quiet cold, but gets like this hot. Hasn't gotten any worse, adjusted them 3/4 turn down. They're also stock 305 valve covers, and very thin steel.


Last edited by DarkBlue88; 12-12-2010 at 12:53 PM.
Old 12-12-2010, 02:46 PM
  #47  
JAKE
Le Mans Master
 
JAKE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Kempner Texas
Posts: 9,715
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mtwoolford
Is there a consensus of opinion here? Is it 1/4 turn ? 3/8 turn ? 1/2 turn ? 3/4 turn?

Lets hear from an expert who thinks WAY outside the box.

Tuned Port Induction Specialties (TPIS) "The Shape Of Things To Come" in their publication LT-1 HINTS & L-98 UPDATE, at page 9:

"Effect of valve lash on hydraulic camshafts"

" One of the lessons learned (competing in the 1994 and 1995 World Challenge Series) is that to achieve elevated RPM's out of these camshafts (all hydraulic camshafts - flat or roller tappet) is that you need to preload the lash at least two turns below zero and sometimes more....

....Three turns below zero is extreme for the street but two turns is not out of the question. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SET THEM AT ONE TURN OR LESS" (emphasis added). "

Any thoughts ?
Many months ago I called TPiS about that setting recommendation. I called right after I read it and was told it's only to be used for racing.

If you'd like you can call them too, to see if anything's changed on that. As I wrote, it as many months ago (although it was this year) that I called.

Jake
Old 12-12-2010, 02:51 PM
  #48  
JAKE
Le Mans Master
 
JAKE's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: Kempner Texas
Posts: 9,715
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WW7
I have never heard of or known anyone to set the preload at more then one full turn past 0 lash.. The FSM for my 89 says 1 full turn. I don't know if this above statement would be something to try without a little more investigation.. You could do some serious damage if wrong...Also if 1 turn is suppose to put the plunger half way down, wouldn't 2 full turns bottom the plunger out??..God only knows what 3 turns would do...WW
The FSM for the 96 LT1 specifies one full turn +/- 1/4 turn, which would mean One and One Quarter Turns would still be within spec.

GM loves to change things.

Jake
Old 12-12-2010, 02:58 PM
  #49  
STL94LT1
Race Director
 
STL94LT1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2002
Location: O'Fallon Missouri
Posts: 12,258
Received 81 Likes on 71 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mtwoolford
Is there a consensus of opinion here? Is it 1/4 turn ? 3/8 turn ? 1/2 turn ? 3/4 turn?

Lets hear from an expert who thinks WAY outside the box.

Tuned Port Induction Specialties (TPIS) "The Shape Of Things To Come" in their publication LT-1 HINTS & L-98 UPDATE, at page 9:

"Effect of valve lash on hydraulic camshafts"

" One of the lessons learned (competing in the 1994 and 1995 World Challenge Series) is that to achieve elevated RPM's out of these camshafts (all hydraulic camshafts - flat or roller tappet) is that you need to preload the lash at least two turns below zero and sometimes more....

....Three turns below zero is extreme for the street but two turns is not out of the question. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SET THEM AT ONE TURN OR LESS" (emphasis added). "

Any thoughts ?
You know it's funny, for years I have read on the 'net that very little preload after zero lash will extend the rpm range.
Old 12-14-2010, 10:31 AM
  #50  
BadSS
Instructor
 
BadSS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Posts: 186
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by korvette4u
seems the 155#@ 1.800 is closed installed lbs/ hieght, and the compressed open height 352#@ 1.280 a difference of .520 " is your problem.. not by much ! only .068" too much to function without binding.. may need to change springs! maybe use 185#, these are good to .650"

hope this helps
Yep that helps more than you know. The installed height and coil bind height is the same for both the 155# and 185# springs you linked.
Old 12-14-2010, 03:33 PM
  #51  
THE 383 admiral
Melting Slicks
 
THE 383 admiral's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,422
Received 199 Likes on 183 Posts

Default

if he has the Comp Cam pro true roller rockers as mentioned!! that should not be a ISSUE...
I was thinking of them hitting.. but I have the same type rockers and larger springs.. they would on most aluminum rockers
But you should Always Know or check!!!!
Old 12-14-2010, 10:05 PM
  #52  
GREGGPENN
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
GREGGPENN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Overland Park Kansas
Posts: 12,012
Received 394 Likes on 323 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by THE 383 admiral
if he has the Comp Cam pro true roller rockers as mentioned!! that should not be a ISSUE...
I was thinking of them hitting.. but I have the same type rockers and larger springs.. they would on most aluminum rockers
But you should Always Know or check!!!!
You're right, that's not the problem. I'll try adding more preload when it gets warmer. I'll also replace the DS header gasket to eliminate my pin-hole leak. Then, we'll see where it's at. If it's still similar, I'll go with STL94LT1 and assume the CC ProMags are just noisy. Of course, I'll consider that Cam profile could be a factor as well. (It's certainly alot more aggressive than stock!)

But then again...so is the car when I mash on the go pedal!
Old 12-15-2010, 03:58 PM
  #53  
GREGGPENN
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
GREGGPENN's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Overland Park Kansas
Posts: 12,012
Received 394 Likes on 323 Posts
2020 Corvette of the Year Finalist (appearance mods)
C4 of Year Winner (appearance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by STL94LT1
You know it's funny, for years I have read on the 'net that very little preload after zero lash will extend the rpm range.
I posted feedback from TPiS on page 2 of this thread. Because I also had been pondering over the crank-it-down vs leave it loose paradox, I emailed Clay again. Here is his response....
------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Clay to Gregg....
We dont actually recommend that, it was a observation that we learned on the dyno, it is merely information. We did it when we ran World Challenge in the mid 90s. It is NOT something that I do on engines that I build. And as far as pumping up if you take up the space in the lifter by cranking it down nealry bottoming it out there is very little space for oil.. it cant pump up.


On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Gregg to Clay.....
Clay, why does TPiS recommending cranking lifters down vs the “conventional” ¼ turn to avoid float? Is your goal to maximize lift, flow, and power – while hoping the valves don’t float? Does the extra-tight adjustment somehow prohibit lifters from pumping up where they’d cause valve float?
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Hope this clears it up for everyone. Bottom line: Don't do the 2-3 turn modification unless you're looking to convert your hydraulic to a psuedo-solid lifter cam setup -- under race conditions, with a white elephant charging toward you...during a solar eclipse.



Quick Reply: How about this valve trane noise? Would you call it normal?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 PM.