C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Is this too rich?

Old 10-18-2014, 05:27 PM
  #1  
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DanielRicany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default Is this too rich?

Hi guys I have a question. During warm to hot engine temps, in open loop if I drive the car it will run at 11.0:1-11.5:1 Air/fuel ratio. Is this safe to drive on or is it too rich?

I have another tune that corrects this problem but brings up another problem that's even worse.

Thanks for any help.
Old 10-18-2014, 05:38 PM
  #2  
383vett
Race Director
 
383vett's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Location: moraga ca
Posts: 17,570
Received 1,541 Likes on 1,042 Posts

Default

Safe but too rich. You're losing power and wasting fuel
Old 10-18-2014, 05:41 PM
  #3  
leesvet
Safety Car
 
leesvet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,660
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

That's too rich for my liking.
Hot operation when lubrication needs to be at its best, running that rich washes the thin lube off the rings and cyl walls.
knowing that 14.7 is optimal, and that you DO gain a little more power with slightly richer ratios, ask yourself, is having that little bit of more power necessary to drive to work? or to the store? Because the truth is, its NOT.
IIWM,
I'd be saving the engine for times when that little bump in power would utilize it and NOT waste the engine life on everyday BS driving. A good tune should be able to get everything that engine has to offer without sacrificing the longevity of the engine. To run at more than (best guess) 12:1 is slow suicide for the motor.
JMO...
Old 10-18-2014, 05:44 PM
  #4  
WW7
Le Mans Master
 
WW7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 8,731
Received 398 Likes on 318 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DanielRicany
Hi guys I have a question. During warm to hot engine temps, in open loop if I drive the car it will run at 11.0:1-11.5:1 Air/fuel ratio. Is this safe to drive on or is it too rich?

I have another tune that corrects this problem but brings up another problem that's even worse.

Thanks for any help.
Daniel, your car should be going into closed loop around 135- 140 degrees, I saw where you said you had open loop at hot tempertures and it didn't sound right so I thought I would comment......WW

Last edited by WW7; 10-18-2014 at 05:46 PM.
Old 10-18-2014, 06:14 PM
  #5  
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DanielRicany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

I'd only be driving it like this for however long it takes to go into closed loop. Just not practical for me to wait 100 seconds before pulling away after filling up at the gas station...
Old 10-18-2014, 06:25 PM
  #6  
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DanielRicany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Guys this is not at WOT by the way. This is just normal driving in open loop.
Old 10-18-2014, 06:28 PM
  #7  
cumbercr
Melting Slicks
 
cumbercr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Posts: 2,141
Received 66 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WW7
Daniel, your car should be going into closed loop around 135- 140 degrees, I saw where you said you had open loop at hot tempertures and it didn't sound right so I thought I would comment......WW
On an 85, closed loop is on a timer. So it is common to start with a hot engine and drive in open loop.
Old 10-18-2014, 06:35 PM
  #8  
cumbercr
Melting Slicks
 
cumbercr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Posts: 2,141
Received 66 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Daniel,

Post a copy of you table for % Change to Fuel/Air Ratio vs. Coolant (Open Loop)
Old 10-18-2014, 07:03 PM
  #9  
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DanielRicany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Okay this might be a little complicated to follow, but this is how I came up with my tables.

I figured out that GM bases their tables off of 14.7:1

This is the AFR's that it comes out to.

9.59:1 -40*F - -18.4*F
10.8:1 -18.4*F - 3.2*F
11.03:1 3.2*F - 24.8*F
11.66:1 24.8*F - 46.4*F
11.89:1 46.4*F - 68*F
12.75:1 68*F - 89.6*F
13.8:1 89.6*F - 240.8*F

In the later models at 89.6*F - 240.8*F they changed the AFR from 13.8:1 to 13.25:1, so that's what I have targeted.

Judging on how mine were displayed with the values I had before the current table, I was able to figure out that mine has to be based on 22.5:1 AFR to achieve the target AFRs that GM has.

So, for example to get 13.25:1, the formula is:

22.5 - 13.25 = *9.25*
22.5 / 100 = *.225*
9.25 / .225 = 41.11% Change

So to confirm that formula, 22.5 / 100 = .225 x 41.11 = 9.25; 22.5 - 9.25 = 13.25

Now keep in mind, Tuner Pro changes whatever I type in to the closest number it has available.

So here are my CURRENT tables.

57.42
51.95
50.78
48.05
47.27
43.36
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
Old 10-18-2014, 07:13 PM
  #10  
cumbercr
Melting Slicks
 
cumbercr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Posts: 2,141
Received 66 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DanielRicany
Okay this might be a little complicated to follow, but this is how I came up with my tables.

I figured out that GM bases their tables off of 14.7:1

This is the AFR's that it comes out to.

9.59:1 -40*F - -18.4*F
10.8:1 -18.4*F - 3.2*F
11.03:1 3.2*F - 24.8*F
11.66:1 24.8*F - 46.4*F
11.89:1 46.4*F - 68*F
12.75:1 68*F - 89.6*F
13.8:1 89.6*F - 240.8*F

In the later models at 89.6*F - 240.8*F they changed the AFR from 13.8:1 to 13.25:1, so that's what I have targeted.

Judging on how mine were displayed with the values I had before the current table, I was able to figure out that mine has to be based on 22.5:1 AFR to achieve the target AFRs that GM has.

So, for example to get 13.25:1, the formula is:

22.5 - 13.25 = *9.25*
22.5 / 100 = *.225*
9.25 / .225 = 41.11% Change

So to confirm that formula, 22.5 / 100 = .225 x 41.11 = 9.25; 22.5 - 9.25 = 13.25

Now keep in mind, Tuner Pro changes whatever I type in to the closest number it has available.

So here are my CURRENT tables.

57.42
51.95
50.78
48.05
47.27
43.36
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
41.02
That table looks waaaay rich. Here's the table from my 85 tune. Forget all the math. Just try decreasing those numbers and see what happens.

21.1
12.9
11.3
7.0
5.5
-0.4
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
Old 10-18-2014, 07:26 PM
  #11  
tequilaboy
Melting Slicks
 
tequilaboy's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2003
Location: Lakeville MI
Posts: 3,010
Received 252 Likes on 211 Posts

Default



41% enrichment will result in an AFR target of approx. 10.4:1. Stock settings are about 6%. What are you doing?
Old 10-18-2014, 07:30 PM
  #12  
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DanielRicany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cumbercr
That table looks waaaay rich. Here's the table from my 85 tune. Forget all the math. Just try decreasing those numbers and see what happens.

21.1
12.9
11.3
7.0
5.5
-0.4
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
-7.8
I set the table to these values. Tuner Pro changed the -7.8 to 0.00.

Anyway, the AFR while hot with these numbers at idle was 19:1.
Old 10-18-2014, 07:30 PM
  #13  
cumbercr
Melting Slicks
 
cumbercr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Posts: 2,141
Received 66 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tequilaboy


41% enrichment will result in an AFR target of approx. 10.4:1. Stock settings are about 6%. What are you doing?
The numbers I posted are from a stock 85 tune. Enriching a little is fine, but 41% is insane.
Old 10-18-2014, 07:30 PM
  #14  
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DanielRicany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Also it burns my eyes bad at 19:1
Old 10-18-2014, 07:34 PM
  #15  
cumbercr
Melting Slicks
 
cumbercr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Posts: 2,141
Received 66 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DanielRicany
I set the table to these values. Tuner Pro changed the -7.8 to 0.00.

Anyway, the AFR while hot with these numbers at idle was 19:1.
Are you sure your AFR gauge is calibrated?
Old 10-18-2014, 07:38 PM
  #16  
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DanielRicany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Yes. As soon as it hits closed loop the AFR goes to 14.7:1
Old 10-18-2014, 07:46 PM
  #17  
cumbercr
Melting Slicks
 
cumbercr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Posts: 2,141
Received 66 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

I opened the stock BIN in Tuner Pro and got these numbers. The 5.86 is basically 6% as tequilaboy pointed out. If you run that lean with these numbers then something is very wrong.

34.77
26.56
25.00
20.70
19.14
13.28
5.86
5.86
5.86
5.86
5.86
5.86
5.86
5.86

Get notified of new replies

To Is this too rich?

Old 10-18-2014, 07:48 PM
  #18  
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DanielRicany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cumbercr
something is very wrong
That's exactly what my tuner said! And that's also exactly what my OTHER tuner said!

He must have messed something up.

I'm ready to purchase a carburetor and be done with it. Here I am over a year later still tuning...
Old 10-18-2014, 08:02 PM
  #19  
cumbercr
Melting Slicks
 
cumbercr's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Maria, CA
Posts: 2,141
Received 66 Likes on 45 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DanielRicany
That's exactly what my tuner said! And that's also exactly what my OTHER tuner said!

He must have messed something up.

I'm ready to purchase a carburetor and be done with it. Here I am over a year later still tuning...
Have you tried starting with a stock tune? It would likely run lean. Your injectors are basically stock, so you should be able to adjust MAF tables, tweak timing and make some PE table adjustments. If you don't have a stock BIN I'll send you one.
Old 10-18-2014, 08:07 PM
  #20  
DanielRicany
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
DanielRicany's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,065
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

I have a stock tune. How do I know what to set the MAF tables to? My tuner does all this. I only know the small stuff.

Thanks

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Is this too rich?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 PM.