C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

1992 LT1 E85 w/ProCharger P600B Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2016, 02:47 PM
  #1  
STEVEN13
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
STEVEN13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: N. Babylon NY
Posts: 2,244
Received 112 Likes on 92 Posts

Default 1992 LT1 E85 w/ProCharger P600B Questions

Hello,

I have purchased a used but new P600B and would like to run it with E85 with no intercooler or meth inj. I see in the other forums (C5 C6) that they are running large injectors over 60lbs. My question is how large of an injector can I run with the stock batch system and still have it idle okay. I understand that I will need new pump(s) also. Just wondering if this is even possible to do.


Please-For this thread I would like to stay away with how bad it is to run E85.


No need to talk about belt slip-Have purchased Greg@BlowerWorks ATI damper with the 8 and 6 rib provisions. Will try to make my own bracket to have the SC have a dedicated belt.

The car is stock with LT headers, 1.6 rockers, 6 speed, and 9" solid axle. Street driven and taken to the drag strip. Not looking for anything crazy in regard to power. Was hoping to make 8 pounds of boost.

Any information is greatly appreciated!

Thank you,
Steve
Old 07-28-2016, 03:45 PM
  #2  
Kevova
Le Mans Master
 
Kevova's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: near the thumb in the mitten
Posts: 6,138
Received 732 Likes on 683 Posts

Default

There are some who believe in E85 over running race gas do fuel cost. To run E85 you will need to upgrade fuel system to use it. E85 is not compatible with most of it. You will need to burn at least 30% more E85 vs gasoline. If it takes 45 lb injectors for engine to run with Procharger on gasoline you would looking at 60lbs. IMO I would not do procharging and E85 with a "chip" type PCM. I would go toward a stand alone or later reflashable GM system. I would not want to trial and error with "Chips"

Last edited by Kevova; 07-28-2016 at 03:46 PM.
The following users liked this post:
STEVEN13 (07-29-2016)
Old 07-28-2016, 04:42 PM
  #3  
BrianCunningham
Team Owner
 
BrianCunningham's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Boston, Dallas, Detroit, SoCal, back to Boston MA
Posts: 30,606
Received 239 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

Greg@BlowerWorks should be able to set you up with a system.

Need to get the larger injectors, then have it tuned.

Mine is a MAF car, so I'm getting away w/o having a 2 bar MAP
You may need one on yours.
The following users liked this post:
STEVEN13 (07-29-2016)
Old 07-28-2016, 11:13 PM
  #4  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,990
Received 465 Likes on 368 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by STEVEN13
Hello,

I have purchased a used but new P600B and would like to run it with E85 with no intercooler or meth inj. I see in the other forums (C5 C6) that they are running large injectors over 60lbs. My question is how large of an injector can I run with the stock batch system and still have it idle okay. I understand that I will need new pump(s) also. Just wondering if this is even possible to do.


Please-For this thread I would like to stay away with how bad it is to run E85.


No need to talk about belt slip-Have purchased Greg@BlowerWorks ATI damper with the 8 and 6 rib provisions. Will try to make my own bracket to have the SC have a dedicated belt.

The car is stock with LT headers, 1.6 rockers, 6 speed, and 9" solid axle. Street driven and taken to the drag strip. Not looking for anything crazy in regard to power. Was hoping to make 8 pounds of boost.

Any information is greatly appreciated!

Thank you,
Steve
It is possible possible to run E85 and get it to run fine with the stock 1993 computer. My estimate is you will be around 450 HP with 8 lbs of boost on a stock engine, ,maybe slightly more. A 48 lb injector should be fine. I was running E85 in my 406 making 480 RWHP and the the 48 lb injectors worked well. I was also running the Walbro 485 fuel pump and stock lines and never had a problem. Tuning will take some time but is possible to get done well. You should use a 2 bar map sensor and use half the actual injector rating in the tune and then adjust your VE table to make it work. 50 KPA will actually be 100 KPA and that will allow you to tune the car for boost, since you will not be able to go over 100% VE with this computer.
The following users liked this post:
STEVEN13 (07-29-2016)
Old 07-29-2016, 10:31 AM
  #5  
STEVEN13
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
STEVEN13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: N. Babylon NY
Posts: 2,244
Received 112 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

Greatly appreciate all the responses!!


Originally Posted by Kevova
There are some who believe in E85 over running race gas do fuel cost. To run E85 you will need to upgrade fuel system to use it. E85 is not compatible with most of it. You will need to burn at least 30% more E85 vs gasoline. If it takes 45 lb injectors for engine to run with Procharger on gasoline you would looking at 60lbs. IMO I would not do procharging and E85 with a "chip" type PCM. I would go toward a stand alone or later reflashable GM system. I would not want to trial and error with "Chips"
Thank you-Great information.



Originally Posted by BrianCunningham
Greg@BlowerWorks should be able to set you up with a system.

Need to get the larger injectors, then have it tuned.

Mine is a MAF car, so I'm getting away w/o having a 2 bar MAP
You may need one on yours.
Yes. I have been in contact with Greg (he has been very helpful). Great information. Thank you.

Originally Posted by bjankuski
It is possible possible to run E85 and get it to run fine with the stock 1993 computer. My estimate is you will be around 450 HP with 8 lbs of boost on a stock engine, ,maybe slightly more. A 48 lb injector should be fine. I was running E85 in my 406 making 480 RWHP and the the 48 lb injectors worked well. I was also running the Walbro 485 fuel pump and stock lines and never had a problem. Tuning will take some time but is possible to get done well. You should use a 2 bar map sensor and use half the actual injector rating in the tune and then adjust your VE table to make it work. 50 KPA will actually be 100 KPA and that will allow you to tune the car for boost, since you will not be able to go over 100% VE with this computer.
This is very helpful. Looks like it may be possible for me to do this without a I/C or Meth.

This is the information I was hoping to get. Thanks again. If I am able to get this to work I will post my results. For more info on my car. It made 289 RWHP with 1.6 rockers, LT Tri-Y headers, and tune. Best ET 12.96 I will be taking again to the track with my Alum Flywheel (if nothing breaks). Will start on SC install this winter (have most parts)

Steve

Last edited by STEVEN13; 07-29-2016 at 10:32 AM.
The following users liked this post:
PAINTER MAN (01-14-2017)
Old 08-03-2016, 10:27 AM
  #6  
STEVEN13
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
STEVEN13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: N. Babylon NY
Posts: 2,244
Received 112 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

Would it make sense for someone like me who does not know anything about tuning to consider getting a (self learning) stand alone system.

Thanks again!
Steve
Old 08-03-2016, 02:39 PM
  #7  
Kevova
Le Mans Master
 
Kevova's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2013
Location: near the thumb in the mitten
Posts: 6,138
Received 732 Likes on 683 Posts

Default

It depends on the person. If you like to tinker on cars why not? There is a lot of information out there along with opinions of the different systems. IMO I would do research on it, search other forums for other car running similar engine package. Go to drag strip, cruise nights, or car shows, try to find other people running non oem efi and see what they say and recommend.
Old 08-04-2016, 09:05 AM
  #8  
STEVEN13
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
STEVEN13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: N. Babylon NY
Posts: 2,244
Received 112 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Kevova
It depends on the person. If you like to tinker on cars why not? There is a lot of information out there along with opinions of the different systems. IMO I would do research on it, search other forums for other car running similar engine package. Go to drag strip, cruise nights, or car shows, try to find other people running non oem efi and see what they say and recommend.
Thank you!
Old 08-04-2016, 03:03 PM
  #9  
qwiketz
Melting Slicks
 
qwiketz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Mission Viejo California
Posts: 3,275
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

you should likely be okay with 60's but if it were me, I'd buy the 80's and be done with it permanently. I am also running the walbro 465 and I had issues with it being too much with the stock regulator, so be ready to buy an aeromotive unit.

I'd like to do the whole e85 thing someday down the road. I'm going the chip route currently and hope to tune my car using real time data through Greg at some point.
Old 08-05-2016, 07:04 PM
  #10  
SELLC
Instructor
 
SELLC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2016
Location: Plymouth MI
Posts: 222
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STEVEN13

Please-For this thread I would like to stay away with how bad it is to run E85.


Thank you,
Steve
I understand, but could you please help me to understand why, after going thru the trouble of installing a Pro-Charger; would you use E85?

I'd also suggest inner-cooling. I just had to re-align an ProCharger P1-SC kit on a Mustang last month. Someone messed up the spacing on the bracket which caused it to eat belts every few months. After properly aligning the unit, installing a new tensioner and idler pulleys, everything has been fine for him. I suggested him to use Premium fuel to avoid any possibility of pre-ignition, which with the high heat of a supercharger and the load it puts on the engine, is a very good idea.

I guess you got your reasons, I'm just curious what they are.
Old 08-06-2016, 12:44 AM
  #11  
qwiketz
Melting Slicks
 
qwiketz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Mission Viejo California
Posts: 3,275
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SELLC
I understand, but could you please help me to understand why, after going thru the trouble of installing a Pro-Charger; would you use E85?

I'd also suggest inner-cooling. I just had to re-align an ProCharger P1-SC kit on a Mustang last month. Someone messed up the spacing on the bracket which caused it to eat belts every few months. After properly aligning the unit, installing a new tensioner and idler pulleys, everything has been fine for him. I suggested him to use Premium fuel to avoid any possibility of pre-ignition, which with the high heat of a supercharger and the load it puts on the engine, is a very good idea.

I guess you got your reasons, I'm just curious what they are.
Do your research. There is a very good reason we don't do air to airs and that is because they become nightmares more than they work on c4's. Most people run into cooling issues.
Old 08-06-2016, 10:05 AM
  #12  
STEVEN13
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
STEVEN13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: N. Babylon NY
Posts: 2,244
Received 112 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by qwiketz
you should likely be okay with 60's but if it were me, I'd buy the 80's and be done with it permanently. I am also running the walbro 465 and I had issues with it being too much with the stock regulator, so be ready to buy an aeromotive unit.

I'd like to do the whole e85 thing someday down the road. I'm going the chip route currently and hope to tune my car using real time data through Greg at some point.
Thank you for your response.

From what I understand the 60's may be the max with the 1992 computer in regard to idle quality. I am okay with upgrading the fuel system. This will never be a high HP goal (max 450-500 crank HP)

I will data logging with the help from Greg too.

Thanks again!
Steve
Old 08-06-2016, 10:13 AM
  #13  
STEVEN13
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
STEVEN13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: N. Babylon NY
Posts: 2,244
Received 112 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SELLC
I understand, but could you please help me to understand why, after going thru the trouble of installing a Pro-Charger; would you use E85?

I'd also suggest inner-cooling. I just had to re-align an ProCharger P1-SC kit on a Mustang last month. Someone messed up the spacing on the bracket which caused it to eat belts every few months. After properly aligning the unit, installing a new tensioner and idler pulleys, everything has been fine for him. I suggested him to use Premium fuel to avoid any possibility of pre-ignition, which with the high heat of a supercharger and the load it puts on the engine, is a very good idea.

I guess you got your reasons, I'm just curious what they are.
Originally Posted by qwiketz
Do your research. There is a very good reason we don't do air to airs and that is because they become nightmares more than they work on c4's. Most people run into cooling issues.
As qwiketz stated.

Also the piping is many hoses and clamps which IMHO does not look good. I was wondering if I was to use the air to air intercooler-Would pieces from a C5 kit work (with some modification) or just modify the C4 parts (ie: fab up complete pipes to eliminate the hoses).

Thanks,
Steve
Old 08-06-2016, 01:59 PM
  #14  
qwiketz
Melting Slicks
 
qwiketz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Mission Viejo California
Posts: 3,275
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Using E85really helps you add timing and is very detonation resistant dute to the octane level. If you're not going to be leaning on the car too hard then he probably should be able to get to that part level even without the e85 . I have seen a stock displacement for vortech t trim set up make 412 at the wheels on pump. That car was daily driven and didn't self destruct. There are a few things that you can do in the tune to add safety margin.

Last edited by qwiketz; 08-06-2016 at 01:59 PM.
Old 08-06-2016, 02:05 PM
  #15  
SELLC
Instructor
 
SELLC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2016
Location: Plymouth MI
Posts: 222
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by qwiketz
Using E85really helps you add timing and is very detonation resistant dute to the octane level. If you're not going to be leaning on the car too hard then he probably should be able to get to that part level even without the e85 . I have seen a stock displacement for vortech t trim set up make 412 at the wheels on pump. That car was daily driven and didn't self destruct. There are a few things that you can do in the tune to add safety margin.
Wow! E85 is actually 100-105 octane! Did not know that! Learn something new every day! That's pretty neat!

But the E85 is still much less powerful than gasoline drop for drop, isn't that right?
Old 08-06-2016, 02:12 PM
  #16  
SELLC
Instructor
 
SELLC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2016
Location: Plymouth MI
Posts: 222
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STEVEN13
As qwiketz stated.

Also the piping is many hoses and clamps which IMHO does not look good. I was wondering if I was to use the air to air intercooler-Would pieces from a C5 kit work (with some modification) or just modify the C4 parts (ie: fab up complete pipes to eliminate the hoses).

Thanks,
Steve
Yeah, I can see why the piping could be problematic on these cars. Still I find that SuperChargers in general pretty much hog up a lot of under-hood real estate in just about every car that I see them in.

I guess the octane factor on E85 is a bonus, but the fact the fuel is less powerful is probably the reason it's more stable and resistant to pre-ignition.

In the Mercedes forums there were the WVO guys (Waste vegetable oil), these guys were IMO, a little crazy. They would stalk most all restaurants for the oil, then they would have to strain it and go thru this big process to get it prepared for use... Then in the winter they would have to mix it with Diesel and other stuff to keep it from turning into Crisco! LOL, I just could not see the fascination in it!

At least with E85 you can get it at the pump, and now I understand the Octane benefit! Pretty cool, much cooler than straining cooking oil!

I myself like Nitrous, for all my force fed performance desires. But I work on most all of them, so I never feel like I'm missing out.
Old 08-06-2016, 11:42 PM
  #17  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,990
Received 465 Likes on 368 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SELLC
Wow! E85 is actually 100-105 octane! Did not know that! Learn something new every day! That's pretty neat!

But the E85 is still much less powerful than gasoline drop for drop, isn't that right?
It is less powerful drop for drop but you use 33% more of it when the engine is running at stoick or WOT so when you factor in the additional fuel burned it actually produces more power then gasoline. The power difference with all items being the same (other then the amount of fuel being burned) is about 3% on the plus side for E85. If you build the engine to take advantage of E85 then you can get more then 3% additional for E85 fuel over gasoline.

Get notified of new replies

To 1992 LT1 E85 w/ProCharger P600B Questions

Old 08-07-2016, 12:04 AM
  #18  
qwiketz
Melting Slicks
 
qwiketz's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Mission Viejo California
Posts: 3,275
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts

Default

Sounds like you have some fun learning to do . I'm definitely not trying to be a jerk or anything but the C4's are very unique in their needs as far as forced induction . I came from the world of mustangs with the Vortec s trim to t trim and pro charger D1r. I found that the Corvettes are a bit more of a challenge because of the limited front area for the inner cooler. Methanol injection will get you quite a ways at these Limited horsepower levels . If you really want to make a big numbers and you have to notch a frame, use a huge harmonic balance and use a huge fuel pump and fuel injectors. LT one engine's are not efficient. Yes, you could go bottom nine's with the LT four head and a Y SI but it's got take a huge amount of fuel . In this case for someone trying to make about 450 hp, I think that can be done pretty simply.

Sorry to go off on a rant but I'm working on my car trying to make this heap of **** work ! I'm also a little grumpy because I've been on this form for 11 years and I still haven't gotten nine 's!

Last edited by qwiketz; 08-07-2016 at 12:04 AM.
Old 08-25-2016, 01:30 PM
  #19  
STEVEN13
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
STEVEN13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: N. Babylon NY
Posts: 2,244
Received 112 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by qwiketz
Sounds like you have some fun learning to do . I'm definitely not trying to be a jerk or anything but the C4's are very unique in their needs as far as forced induction . I came from the world of mustangs with the Vortec s trim to t trim and pro charger D1r. I found that the Corvettes are a bit more of a challenge because of the limited front area for the inner cooler. Methanol injection will get you quite a ways at these Limited horsepower levels . If you really want to make a big numbers and you have to notch a frame, use a huge harmonic balance and use a huge fuel pump and fuel injectors. LT one engine's are not efficient. Yes, you could go bottom nine's with the LT four head and a Y SI but it's got take a huge amount of fuel . In this case for someone trying to make about 450 hp, I think that can be done pretty simply.

Sorry to go off on a rant but I'm working on my car trying to make this heap of **** work ! I'm also a little grumpy because I've been on this form for 11 years and I still haven't gotten nine 's!
All good-Thanks! I think for my goals this will work. I have also been in contact with Greg@BlowerWorks. He has been encouraging!

Old 08-25-2016, 01:48 PM
  #20  
SELLC
Instructor
 
SELLC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2016
Location: Plymouth MI
Posts: 222
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by qwiketz
Sorry to go off on a rant but I'm working on my car trying to make this heap of **** work ! I'm also a little grumpy because I've been on this form for 11 years and I still haven't gotten nine 's!
Hang in there brother! If it's 9's you want, it's 9's you'll get!


Quick Reply: 1992 LT1 E85 w/ProCharger P600B Questions



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:56 AM.