MPH per gear?
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
MPH per gear?
I have searched and not found what I am asking. What should be approximate top speed in each first second third and fourth gear respectively with stock gearing?
Thanks
Thanks
#2
2 = 80
3 = 118
4 = 148
5 = 210 if it pulled 7000 ram
I have the Rev limiter set higher so expect a little more from each if you put 7500 rpm
#3
Instructor
Thread Starter
#4
Pick your RPM's, use axle ratio of your choice (3.45) and these 1st (2.68), 2nd (2.80), 3rd (1.29), 4th (1.0), 5th (.75) and 6th (.50) - you can choose your tire as a 315/35/17 or use the actual rolling dimension if you would like to measure it. This will also show you RPM drop @ shift and the resultant RPM. I've done the math a few times and this is quite accurate "when you feed it correct information"!!
http://www.cargister.com/calculator-gear-ratio
You need to understand that if your car is a '90 that you can't rely on the tachometer for accuracy. Actually you need to confirm tachometer accuracy vs. a scanner for all years before relying on it's display.
http://www.cargister.com/calculator-gear-ratio
You need to understand that if your car is a '90 that you can't rely on the tachometer for accuracy. Actually you need to confirm tachometer accuracy vs. a scanner for all years before relying on it's display.
Last edited by WVZR-1; 05-12-2015 at 08:51 PM.
#5
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: South-central Missouri
Posts: 6,314
Received 500 Likes
on
395 Posts
FYI: This chart is available from Marc Haibeck's web site with the understanding the tires are 315x35x17s:
And WVZR-1 is right (as usual!), far as using the analog tach goes. Even if it has been calibrated (not difficult DIY job) it is still subject to some lagging, especially when the rpm rate of change is greatest (i.e., lower gears especially). A digital scanner is one way to avoid mechanical tach lagging (or calibration) errors.
And WVZR-1 is right (as usual!), far as using the analog tach goes. Even if it has been calibrated (not difficult DIY job) it is still subject to some lagging, especially when the rpm rate of change is greatest (i.e., lower gears especially). A digital scanner is one way to avoid mechanical tach lagging (or calibration) errors.